Skip to main content
Log in

Method for determination of chemoattraction in Tetrahymena pyriformis

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earlier works presented a variety of techniques for detection of chemoattractants in ciliates. The present agar layer model and the used double-P cutter give an easy, reproducible way of quantitative evaluation of positive chemotaxis. Beside the two-channel chamber, the multichannel one seems to be also useful in characterization of different taxons or different chemoattractants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Almagor M, Ron A, Bar-Tana J (1981) Chemotaxis in Tetrahymena thermophila. Cell Motil 1:261–268

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bonner JT, Kelso AP, Gillmor RG (1966) A new approach to the problem of aggregation in the cellular slime molds. Biol Bull 130:28–42

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gerisch G (1982) Chemotaxis in Dictyostelium. Annu Rev Physiol 44:535–552

    Google Scholar 

  4. Köhidai L, Karsa J, Csaba G (1994) Effects of hormones on the chemotaxis in Tetrahymena-investigations on receptor memory. Microbios 77:75–85

    Google Scholar 

  5. Köhidai L, Karsa J, Csaba G (1994) Effects of atrial natriuretic factor on the unicellular model Tetrahymena pyriformis. Microbios, in press

  6. Kovács P, Csaba G (1990) Effect of insulin on Blepharisma undulans (Stein) at primary exposure and reexposure. Acta Protozool 29:131–139

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kovács P, Csaba G (1994) Study on pheromone on insulin induced chemotaxis in Tetrahymena. Microbios, in press

  8. Leick V (1988) Gliding Tetrahymena thermophila: oriented chemochinesis in a ciliate. Eur J Protistol 23:354–360

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leick V, Helle J (1983) A quantitative assay for ciliate chemotaxis. Anal Biochem 135:466–469

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leick V, Hellung-Larsen P (1992) Chemosensory behaviour of Tetrahymena. Bioassays 14:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  11. O Neill JB, Pert CB, Ruff MR, Smith CC, Higgins WJ, Zipser B (1988) Identification and characterization of the opiate receptor in the ciliated protozoan, Tetrahymena. Brain Res 450:303–315

    Google Scholar 

  12. Taneda K (1988) Geotactic behavior in Paramecium caudatum I. Geotaxis assay of individual specimen. Zool Sci 5:781–788

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ueda T, Kobatake Y (1977) Hydrophobicity of biosurfaces as shown by chemoreceptive thresholds in Tetrahymena, Physarum and Nitella. J Membrane Biol 34:351–368

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Houten J, Preston RR (1987) Chemoreception: paramecium as a receptor cell. Adv Exp Med Biol 221:375–384

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van Houten J, Hansma H, Kung C (1975) Two quantitative assays for chemotaxis in Paramecium. J Comp Physiol 104:211–223

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Houten J, Hauser DCR, Levandowsky M (1981) Chemosensory behaviour in protozoa. In: Levandowsky M, Hutner SH (eds), Biochemistry and physiology of protozoa. New York: Academic Press, Vol. 4, pp 67–124

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van Houten J, Martel E, Kasch T (1982) Kinetic analysis of chemotaxis of Paramecium. J Protozool 29:226–230

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Köhidai, L. Method for determination of chemoattraction in Tetrahymena pyriformis . Current Microbiology 30, 251–253 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293642

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293642

Keywords

Navigation