Skip to main content
Log in

A touchstone for the bard

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We introduce an authorship identification test, called modal analysis, based on a new statistic derived from the Karhunen-Loeve transform. Application to the poems of the Shakespearean canon and to other contemporary poetry strongly supports the case for disqualification of most major claimants. Results also cast doubt that the recently discovered poems, Shall I Die and Elegy, were written by William Shakespeare, but do suggest that eight unascribed poems of The Passionate Pilgrim may have been his work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, Warren. A Computer-Aided Technique for Stylistic Discrimination: The Authorship of Greene's Groatsworth of Wit. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Bureau of Research Project No. 7-G-036, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Oscar James and Edward G. Quinn, eds. The Reader's Encyclopedia of Shakespeare. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Reginald Charles. Shakespeare and his Betters: A History and a Criticism of the Attempts Which Have been Made to Prove that Shakespeare's Works Were Written by Others. London: Max Reinhardt, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. J. Transform Coding of Images. New York: Academic Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, Alfred. Francis Bacon's Personal Life Story. London: Rider & Co., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, Brad, and Ronald Thisted. “Estimating the Number of Unseen Species: How Many Words Did Shakespeare Know?” Biometrika, 63, 435 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, Ward, and Robert Valenza. “Computers and the Oxford Candidacy.” Claremont McKenna College, October 31, 1990.

  • Evans, Gwynne, and Harry Levin. “Shakespeare as Shakespeare.” Harvard Alumni Magazine, February 1975, p. 39.

  • Fisher, R. A., et al. “The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population.” Journal of Animal Ecology, 12 (1943), 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Donald, “Elegy” by W. S.: A Study in Attribution. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, H. N. The Shakespeare Claimants: A Critical Survey of the Principal Theories Concerning the Authorship of the Shakespearean Plays. London: Methuen, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Calvin. The Murder of the Man who was Shakespeare. New York: Grosset and Dunlap, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, David I. “The Analysis of Literary Style.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A(General) 148 (1985), 328 (reprinted for private circulation, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. “Analysis of a Complex of Statistical Variables into Principal Components.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 24 (1933), 417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolata, Gina. “Shakespeare's New Poem: An Ode to Statistics.” Science, 231 (1986, 24 January), 335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelyfeld, Joseph. “A Scholar's Find: Shakespearean Lyric.” New York Times, November 24, 1985, 1, 12, with correctiops of “Editor's Note,” November 25, 1985, 2.

  • Mendenhall, Thomas C. “The Characteristic Curves of Composition.” Science, 9 (1887), 237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, Frederick and David L. Wallace. Applied Bayesian and Classical Inference: The Case of the Federalist Papers. Springer Verlag, 1984.

  • Ogburn, Charlton Jr. The Mysterious Shakespeare: The Myth and the Reality. New York: Dodd, Mead, & Co., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. “On Lines and Planes of Closest Fit to Systems of Prints in Space” Philosophical Magazine, 2 (1901), 599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenbaum, Stanley. Internal Evidence and Elizabethan Dramatic Authorship. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenbaum, Stanley. Shakespeare's Lives. New York: Oxford University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare Clinic. Matching Shakespeare, 1989. Claremont, CA: Claremont McKenna College, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare Clinic. Matching Shakespeare, 1990. Claremont, CA: Claremont McKenna College, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Gary. “Shakespeare's New Poem: A Scholar's Clues and Conclusions.” New York Times Book Review, p. 11, December 15, 1985.

  • Thisted, Ronald, and Brad Efron. “Did Shakespeare Write a Newly-Discovered Poem?” Biometrika, 74 (1986), 445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, David, ed. Shakespeare in the Public Records. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenza, Robert J. “Are the Thisted-Efron Authorship Tests Valid?” Computers and the Humanities, 25, 1 (1991), 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Trees, H. L. Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Stanley, and Gray Taylor, William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elliott, W.E.Y., Valenza, R.J. A touchstone for the bard. Comput Hum 25, 199–209 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116075

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116075

Key Words

Navigation