Skip to main content

Is Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer Really Not Justifiable?

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 163))

Abstract

The consensus that breast screening is effective for women aged 50–59 years was shattered when Gotzsche and Olsen suggested that there are no reliable data to support screening by mammography. In practice, their concerns have been difficult to address because for many studies purporting to show effectiveness, adequate data have not been published to confirm that they were valid. Further, the trials in Canada for which such data are available did not show effectiveness of screening mammography. Since the 1990s, there has been an unprecedented reduction in breast cancer mortality in many countries. However, the reductions have no clear link to screening, but are probably due to the implementation of adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and tamoxifen. Whether screening will have an additional impact in the future is unclear. After reviewing the published evidence, I conclude that the additional contribution of mammography over screening by good breast physical examinations and breast self examination is to detect good prognosis breast cancers, as the benefit of screening derives from the earlier detection of relatively advanced breast cancers, providing good therapy is given. If women choose mammography screening, they should understand that their risk of dying in the next few years may not be reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Brown HK, Forrest APM, Hepburn W, Kirkpatrick AE, et al (1999) 14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening. Lancet 353:1903–1908

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander F, Roberts MM, Lutz W, Hepburn W (1989) Randomisation by cluster and the problem of social class bias. J Epidemiol Community Health 43:29–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson I, Aspergren K, Janzon L, Lindholm K, Linell F, et al (1988) Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial. Br Med J 297:943–948

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson I, Janzon L (1997) Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmö mammographic screening program. NCI Monogr 22:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW (1999) Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical examination: Should it be done? How? JAMA 282:1270–1280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett AA (1985) Physical examination of the breast and breast self-examination. In: Miller AB (ed) Screening for cancer. Academic Press Inc. Orlando, pp 271–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Black WC, Haggstrom DA, Welch HG (2002) All-cause mortality in randomised trials of cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:167–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanks RG, Moss SM, McGahan CE, Quinn MJ, Babb PJ (2000) Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990–8: comparison of observed with expected mortality. Br Med J 321:665–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bjurstam N, Björneld L, Duffy SW, Prevost TC (1998) Author reply. Cancer 83:188–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjurstam N, Björneld L, Duffy SW, Smith TC, Cahlin E, Eriksson O, et al (1997) The Gothenberg breast screening trial. First results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39–49 years at randomization. Cancer 80:2091–2099

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day NE, Baines CJ, Chamberlain J, et al (1986) UICC project on screening for cancer: Report of the workshop on screening for breast cancer. Int J Cancer 38:303–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy SW, Tabar L, Smith RA (2001) Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 358:2166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer BK, Shapiro S (1993) Report on the International Workshop on Screening for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:1644–1656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frisell J, Glas U, Hellstrom L, Rutqvist LE (1997) Follow-up after 11 years — update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 45:263–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gotzsche PC (2001) Author’s reply. Lancet 358:2167–2168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotzsche PC, Olsen O (2000) Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 355:129–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg LH, Tabar L, Adami HO, Bergstrom R (1986) Survival in breast cancer diagnosed between mammographic screening examinations. Lancet 2: 27–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horton R (2001) Screening mammography-an overview revisited. Lancet 358:1284–1285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenner P (1990) The excess mortality rate. A useful concept in cancer epidemiology. Acta Oncol 29: 573–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr M (1991) A case-control study of treatment adequacy and mortality from breast cancer for women age 40–49 years at entry into the National Breast Screening Study. Masters Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen OS, Henschke CI, Pasmantier MW, Smith JP, Libby OM, Yankelevitz DF (2002) Mammography screening: no supporting evidence? Lancet 359:404–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB (1994) May we agree to disagree, or how do we develop guidelines for breast cancer screening in women? J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1729–1731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB (2000a) Organized breast cancer screening programs in Canada. Can Med Ass J 163:1150–1151

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB (2000b) Effect of screening programme on mortality from breast cancer. Benefit of 30% may be substantial overestimate. Br Med J 321:1527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB (2001) Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 358:2164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T (1998) The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial. First results on mortality, incidence and mode of detection for women ages 39–49 years at randomization. Cancer 83:186–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB, Baines CJ, Turnbull C (1991) The role of the nurse-examiner in the National Breast Screening Study. Can J Pub Health 82:162–167

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB, Chamberlain J, Day NE, Hakama M, Prorok PC (1990) Report on a workshop of the UICC project on evaluation of screening for cancer. Int J Cancer 46:761–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB, To T, Baines CJ, Wall C (2000b) Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13year results of a randomized trial in women age 50–59 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1490–1499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB, To T, Baines CJ, Wall C (2002) The Canadian National Breast Screening Study — 1. A randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40–49: Breast cancer mortality after 11–16 years of follow-up. Ann Int Med 137:305–320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB, Yurgalevitch S, Weissfeld JL (2000a) Death review process in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trials. Control Clin Trials 21:400S–406S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel (1997) Consensus statement. NCI Monogr 22:vii–xii

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon RM, Prevost TC, Duffy SW, Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH (2000) Some random-effects models for the analysis of matched-cluster randomised trials: application to the Swedish Two-County trial of breast-cancer screening. J Epidemiol Biostat 5:349–358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjold B, Rutqvist L-E (2002) Longterm effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomized trials. Lancet 359:909–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nyström L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, Lindgren A, Lindqvist M, Ryden S, et al (1993) Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomized trials. Lancet 341:973–978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen O, Gotzsche P (2001a) Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 358:1340–1342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen O, Gotzsche PC (2001b) Screening for breast cancer with mammography (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, Oxford: Update software

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquette D, Snider J, Bouchard F, Olivotto I, Bryant H, Decker K, et al (2000) Performance of screening mammography in organized programs in Canada in 1996. Can Med Ass J 163:1133–1138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabar L, Chen H-H T, Duffy SW, Kruesmo UB (1999) Primary and adjuvant therapy, prognostic factors and survival in 1,053 breast cancers diagnosed in a trial of mammography screening. Jpn J Clin Oncol 29:608–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US Preventive Services Task Force (1996) Guide to clinical preventive services, 2nd edn. Washington DC. US Department of Health and Human Services

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Miller, A.B. (2003). Is Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer Really Not Justifiable?. In: Senn, HJ., Morant, R. (eds) Tumor Prevention and Genetics. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 163. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55647-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55647-0_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62892-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55647-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics