Skip to main content

What Recommenders Recommend – An Analysis of Accuracy, Popularity, and Sales Diversity Effects

  • Conference paper
User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7899))

Abstract

In academic studies, the evaluation of recommender system (RS) algorithms is often limited to offline experimental designs based on historical data sets and metrics from the fields of Machine Learning or Information Retrieval. In real-world settings, however, other business-oriented metrics such as click-through-rates, customer retention or effects on the sales spectrum might be the true evaluation criteria for RS effectiveness. In this paper, we compare different RS algorithms with respect to their tendency of focusing on certain parts of the product spectrum. Our first analysis on different data sets shows that some algorithms – while able to generate highly accurate predictions – concentrate their top 10 recommendations on a very small fraction of the product catalog or have a strong bias to recommending only relatively popular items than others. We see our work as a further step toward multiple-metric offline evaluation and to help service providers make better-informed decisions when looking for a recommendation strategy that is in line with the overall goals of the recommendation service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jannach, D., Zanker, M., Ge, M., Gröning, M.: Recommender systems in computer science and information systems - a landscape of research. In: Huemer, C., Lops, P. (eds.) EC-Web 2012. LNBIP, vol. 123, pp. 76–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. McNee, S.M., Riedl, J., Konstan, J.A.: Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2006), pp. 1097–1101 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adomavicius, G., Kwon, Y.: Improving aggregate recommendation diversity using ranking-based techniques. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 24(5), 896–911 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Steck, H.: Item popularity and recommendation accuracy. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp. 125–132 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cremonesi, P., Garzotto, F., Negro, S., Papadopoulos, A.V., Turrin, R.: Looking for “good” recommendations: A comparative evaluation of recommender systems. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011, Part III. LNCS, vol. 6948, pp. 152–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Jannach, D., Hegelich, K.: A case study on the effectiveness of recommendations in the mobile internet. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, New York, pp. 41–50 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kirshenbaum, E., Forman, G., Dugan, M.: A live comparison of methods for personalized article recommendation at Forbes.com. In: Flach, P.A., De Bie, T., Cristianini, N. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7524, pp. 51–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Cremonesi, P., Koren, Y., Turrin, R.: Algorithms on top-n recommendation tasks. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Barcelona, pp. 39–46 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fleder, D., Hosanagar, K.: Blockbuster culture’s next rise or fall: The impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. Management Science 55(5), 205–208 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Prawesh, S., Padmanabhan, B.: The “top N” news recommender: count distortion and manipulation resistance. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Chicago, USA, pp. 237–244 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, M.: Enhancing the diversity of collaborative filtering recommender systems. PhD Thesis. Univ. College Dublin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Said, A., Tikk, D., Shi, Y.: Recommender Systems Evaluation: A 3D Benchmark. In: ACM RecSys 2012 Workshop on Recommendation Utility Evaluation: Beyond RMSE, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 21–23 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ekstrand, M.D., Ludwig, M., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.T.: Rethinking the recommender research ecosystem: reproducibility, openness, and LensKit. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp. 133–140 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer, F., Fessant, F., Clérot, F., Gaussier, E.: Toward a new protocol to evaluate recommender systems. In: ACM RecSys 2012 Workshop on Recommendation Utility Evaluation: Beyond RMSE, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 9–14 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koren, Y.: Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Las Vegas, USA, pp. 426–434 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gedikli, F., Bagdat, F., Ge, M., Jannach, D.: RF-REC: Fast and accurate computation of recommendations based on rating frequencies. In: 13th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing, CEC 2011, Luxembourg, pp. 50–57 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lemire, D., Maclachlan, A.: Slope one predictors for online rating-based collaborative filtering. In: SIAM Conference on Data Mining, Newport Beach, pp. 471–480 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. (2006), http://sifter.org/~simon/journal/20061211.html (last accessed March 2013)

  19. Rendle, S., Freudenthaler, C., Gantner, Z., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: BPR: Bayesian Personalized Ranking from Implicit Feedback. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Canada, pp. 452–461 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G., Riedl, J.T.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 22(1), 5–53 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Castagnos, S., Jones, N., Pu, P.: Eye-Tracking Product Recommenders’ Usage. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 29–36 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dias, M.B., Locher, D., Li, M., El-Deredy, W., Lisboa, P.J.: The value of personalised recommender systems to e-business: A case study. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 291–294 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zanker, M., Bricman, M., Gordea, S., Jannach, D., Jessenitschnig, M.: Persuasive online-selling in quality & taste domains. In: Bauknecht, K., Pröll, B., Werthner, H. (eds.) EC-Web 2006. LNCS, vol. 4082, pp. 51–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Jannach, D., Karakaya, Z., Gedikli, F.: Accuracy improvements for multi-criteria recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC 2012, Valencia, Spain, pp. 674–689 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jannach, D., Lerche, L., Gedikli, F., Bonnin, G. (2013). What Recommenders Recommend – An Analysis of Accuracy, Popularity, and Sales Diversity Effects. In: Carberry, S., Weibelzahl, S., Micarelli, A., Semeraro, G. (eds) User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. UMAP 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7899. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38844-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38844-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38843-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38844-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics