Skip to main content

Specifying a Wikipedia-Centric Explanatory Model for Online Group Evolution and Structural Differentiation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Structural Differentiation in Social Media

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Social Networks ((LNSN))

Abstract

In the previous chapter, we set up the broader sociological underpinnings of our argument. This chapter will focus on the more immediate and tangible mechanisms that shape the emergence and evolution of social media groups, such as those that build Wikipedia. Our theoretical argument will devote particular attention to the role played by contributing elites in organizing and sustaining collaborative activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Chap. 5 and Appendix A for a definition and measurement of effort in this context.

  2. 2.

    On Wikipedia, each article is accompanied by a “talk” page, a space where the authors or readers can discuss the editorial process.

  3. 3.

    We borrow the idea of phased development mostly from Wegner, as indicated above. Yet, there are other views, such as those of Tushman and Romanelli (2008), which can also be taken into account. Our view, in distinction to Tushman and Romanelli, who proposed a punctuated equilibrium perspective, takes a more incremental approach to phase transitions.

  4. 4.

    The cited paper refers to informal scientific groups, which is highly relevant for this context.

References

  • Arazy O, Nov O (2010) Determinants of Wikipedia quality: the roles of global and local contribution inequality. In: Inkpen K, Gutwin C, Tang J (eds) Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Arazy O, Ortega F, Nov O, Yeo L, Balila A (2015) Functional roles and career paths in Wikipedia. In: Cosley D, Forte A, Ciolfi L, McDonald D (eds) Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Backstrom L, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Lan X (2006) Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In: Eliassi-Rad T, Ungar L, Craven M, Gunopulos D (eds) Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey KD (1990) Social entropy theory. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales RF, Slater PE (1956) Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. In: Parsons T, Bales RF (eds) Family, socialization and interaction process. Routledge, London, pp 259–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabási A-L (2014) Linked: how everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler Y, Shaw A, Hill BM (2015) Peer production: a modality of collective intelligence. In: Malone TW, Bernstein MS (eds) The collective intelligence handbook. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau PM (1970) A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. Am Sociol Rev 35:201–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau PM (1977) A macrosociological theory of social structure. Am J Sociol 83:26–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2016) American Time Use Survey. http://stats.bls.gov/news.release/atus.toc.htm. Accessed 13 Oct 2016

  • Cummings TG, Worley CG (2014) Organization development and change. Cengage Learning, Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellarocas C, Sutanto J, Grigore M, Tarigan B (2014) Understanding the “few that matter” in online social production communities: The case of Wikipedia. Paper presented at the 2014 winter conference on business intelligence, Snowbird, 27 Feb-1 Mar 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen N (1971) The entropy law and the economic problem. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Halfaker A, Kittur A, Kraut R, Riedl J (2009) A jury of your peers: quality, experience and ownership in Wikipedia. In: Riehle D, Bruckman A (eds) WikiSym 2009: proceedings of the 5th annual symposium on wikis and open collaboration. ACM Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfaker A, Geiger RS, Morgan JT, Riedl J (2012) The rise and decline of an open collaboration system: how Wikipedia’s reaction to popularity is causing its decline. Am Behav Sci 57(5):664–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ince D (2009) Adhocracy. In: Ince D (ed) Dictionary of the Internet. Oxford Reference. http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199571444.001.0001/acref-9780199571444-e-50?rskey=v6jNsn&result=61. Accessed 31 Jan 2017

  • Javanmardi S, McDonald DW, Lopes CV (2011) Vandalism detection in Wikipedia: a high-performing, feature-rich model and its reduction through lasso. In: Ortega F, Forte A (eds) Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on wikis and open collaboration. ACM Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jullien N (2012) What we know about Wikipedia. A review of the literature analyzing the project(s). Available via SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2308346_code728676.pdf?abstractid=2053597&mirid=1. Accessed 31 Jan 2017

  • Kriplean T, Beschastnikh I, McDonald DW (2008) Articulations of wikiwork: uncovering valued work in Wikipedia through barnstars. In: Begole B, McDonald DW (eds) Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K (1947) Quasi-stationary social equilibria and the problem of permanent change. In: Burke WW, Lake DG, Paine JW (eds) Organization change: a comprehensive reader. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff L (2002) Indicators of structural change in the dynamics of science: entropy statistics of the SCI journal citation reports. Scientometrics 53(1):131–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matei SA, Bertino E, Zhu M, Liu C, Si L, Britt BC (2015) A research agenda for the study of entropic social structural evolution, functional roles, adhocratic leadership styles, and credibility in online organizations and knowledge markets. In: Bertino E, Matei SA (eds) Roles, trust, and reputation in social media knowledge markets: theory and methods. Springer, New York, pp 3–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1979) The structuring of organizations: a synthesis of the research. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchnik L, Pei S, Parra LC, Reis SDS, Andrade JS Jr, Havlin S, Makse HA (2013) Origins of power-law degree distribution in the heterogeneity of human activity in social networks. Sci Rep 3:1783. doi:10.1038/srep01783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ (2005) Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp Phys 46(5):323–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J (2006) The 90-9-1 rule for participation inequality in social media and online communities. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality. Accessed 31 Jan 2017

  • Nov O (2007) What motivates Wikipedians? Commun ACM 50(11):60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor M (1991) Entropy, structure, and organisational change. Ecol Econ 3(2):95–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood CE, Wilson KV (1961) Some terms and associated measures for talking about human communication. Institute of Communications Research, University of Illinois, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Panciera K, Halfaker A, Terveen L (2009) Wikipedians are born, not made: a study of power editors on Wikipedia. In: Teasley S, Havn E, Prinz W, Lutters W (eds) Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on supporting group work. ACM Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto V (1906) Manuale di economia politica. Piccola Biblioteca Scientifica, Milan. English edition: Pareto V (1971) Manual of political economy (trans: Schweir AS). MacMillan: London

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowman DA, Solansky S, Beck TE, Baker L, Kulkarni M (2007) The role of leadership in emergent, self-organization. Leadership Quart 18(4):341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preece J, Shneiderman B (2009) The reader-to-leader framework: motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Trans Hum-Comput Interact 1(1):13–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauermann H, Franzoni C (2015) Crowd science user contribution patterns and their implications. P Natl Acad Sci USA 112(3):679–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schramm W (1955) Information theory and mass communication. J Mass Comm 32(2):131–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Seife C (2007) Decoding the universe: how the new science of information is explaining everything in the cosmos, from our brains to black holes, reprint. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafiq MZ, Ilyas MU, Liu AX, Radha H (2013) Identifying leaders and followers in online social networks. IEEE J Sel Area Comm 31(9):618–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1948) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Toffler A (1970) Future shock. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman ML, Romanelli E (2008) Organizational evolution: a metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In: Burke WW, Lake DG, Paine JW (eds) Organization change: a comprehensive reader. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 174–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 20:510–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman RH Jr (1993) Adhocracy: the power to change. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Welser HT, Cosley D, Kossinets G, Lin A, Dokshin F, Gay G, Smith M (2011) Finding social roles in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, Seattle, 8–11 Feb 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matei, S.A., Britt, B.C. (2017). Specifying a Wikipedia-Centric Explanatory Model for Online Group Evolution and Structural Differentiation. In: Structural Differentiation in Social Media. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64425-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64425-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64424-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64425-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics