Abstract
Modern governments formulate and execute policies with consequences for society (Hupe & Edwards, 2012). Yet, governance takes place within and through bureaucratic structures. These structures provide the resource basis for governments to govern, broadly speaking, and also the foundation of modern political order and civilized political life (Fukuyama, 2014; Kristof, 2016). This chapter applies an organizational approach to account for how bureaucratic structures shape governance of the administrative state. It is argued that bureaucratic structures intervene in governance processes, thereby creating a systematic bias that makes some process characteristics and outputs more likely than others. An emphasis on bureaucratic structure presupposes a theory of organizations that assumes that ways of organizing may affect how organizations and their members think and act (Hammond, 1986; March & Olsen, 1983a, 1983b). Structural factors include bureaucratic structure, demography, culture, and location. In this chapter, however, the role of organizational structure is central to the argument. There are at least two important reasons for this choice: First, some of the most promising research findings are related to this variable. Second, contemporary scholarship lacks a comprehensive analysis of how organizational structures affect governance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ansell, C., & Trondal, J. (2018). Governing turbulence. An organizational-institutional agenda. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 43–57.
Bach, T. (2010). Policy and management autonomy of federal agencies in Germany. In P. Lægreid & K. Verhoest (Eds.), Governance of public sector organizations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bach, T., & Ruffing, E. (2013). Networking for autonomy? National agencies in European networks. Public Administration, 91(3), 712–726.
Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world. Cornell University Press.
Bartolini, S. (2005). Re-structuring Europe. Oxford University Press.
Boin, A., ’t Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2005). The politics of crisis management. Cambridge University Press.
Checkel, J. T. (2007). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. In J. T. Checkel (Ed.), International institutions and socialization in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can approach to organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.
Danielsen, O. A., & Yesilkagit, K. (2014). The effects of European regulatory networks on the bureaucratic autonomy of national regulatory authorities. Public Organization Review, 14, 353–371.
Dehousse, R. (1997). Regulation by networks in the European Community: The role of European agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 246–261.
Döhler, M. (2020). The architecture of organizations as missed opportunity in political research. Public Administration, 98(4), 891–904.
Eberlein, B., & Grande, E. (2005). Beyond delegation: Transnational regulatory regimes and the EU regulatory state. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(1), 89–112.
Ebinger, F., Sylvia, V. & Fromm, N. (2018). The partisan-professional dichotomy revisited: Politicization and decision-making of senor civil servants. Public Administration, 97(4), 861–876.
Egeberg, M. (Ed.). (2006). Multilevel Union administration. Palgrave Macmillan.
Egeberg, M. (2012). How bureaucratic structure matters: An organizational perspective. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public administration. SAGE.
Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2009a). Political leadership and bureaucratic autonomy. Effects of agencification. Governance, 22(4), 673–688.
Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2009b). National agencies in the European administrative space: Government driven, commission driven, or networked? Public Administration, 87(4), 779–790.
Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2018). An organizational approach to public governance. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, D. C. (2011). The organizational turn in international organization theory. Theorizing International Organizations (http://www.journal-iostudies.org/sites/journal-iostudies.org/files/JIOS1012.pdf).
Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political order and political decay. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gulick, L. (1937). Notes on the theory of organizations. With special references to government in the United States. In L. Gulick & L. Urwick (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration. Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University.
Hammond, T. H. (1986). Agenda control, organizational structure, and bureaucratic politics’. American Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 379–420.
Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Schakel, A. H., Niedzwiecki, S., Osterkatz, S. C., & Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2016). Measuring regional authority. Oxford University Press.
Hupe, P., & Edwards, A. (2012). The accountability of power: Democracy and governance in modern times. European Political Science Review, 4(2), 177–194.
Joaquin, M. E., & Greitens, T. J. (2022). American administrative capacity. Springer.
Kassim, H., Peterson, J., Bauer, M. W., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R., Hooghe, L., & Thompson, A. (2013). The European Commission of the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press.
Kettl, D. F. (2002). The transformation of governance. The John Hopkins University Press.
King, G. (2014). Restructuring the Social Sciences: Reflections from Harvard’s Institute for Quantitative Social Science. PS: Political Science and Politics, 47(1), 165–172.
Krause, G. A., & Jin, R. Q. (2020). Organizational design and its consequences for administrative reform: Historical lessons from the U.S. Budget and Accounting Act of 1921. Governance, 33(2), 365–384.
Kristof, N. (2016). ‘Big government’ looks great from here. International New York Times, Friday, March 18.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy. Russel Sage Foundation.
Maggetti, M. (2014). The rewards of cooperation: The effects of membership in European regulatory networks. European Journal of Political Research, 53(3), 480–499.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Scandinavian University Press.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983a). Organizing political life: What administrative reorganization tells us about government. American Political Science Review, 77(2), 281–296.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983b). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.
March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1992). Behavioral decision making theory and organizational decision theory. In M. Zey (Ed.), Decision Making. SAGE.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2006). Elaborating the ‘new institutionalism’. In R. A. W. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford University Press.
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Wiley.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. The Free Press.
Matthews, F. (2012). Governance and state capacity. In D. L. Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Governance. Oxford University Press.
Mawson, J., & Spencer, K. (1997). The origin and operation of the government offices for the English regions. In J. Bradbury & J. Mawson (Eds.), British regionalism and devolution. Jessica Kingsley.
Meier, K. J. (2010). Governance, structure, and democracy: Luther Gulick and the future of public administration. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 284–291.
Naurin, D., & Wallace, H. (Eds.). (2008). Unveiling the Council of the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan.
Olsen, J. P. (2010). Governing through institution building. Oxford University Press.
Olsen, J. P. (2017). Democratic accountability, political order, and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (2017). The policy state. Harvard University Press.
Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15, 203–223.
Page, E. C. (1992). Political authority and bureaucratic power. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Radin, B. A. (2012). Federal management reform. Georgetown University Press.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2000). The governance narrative: Key findings and lessons from the ESRC’s Whitehall programme. Public Administration, 78, 345–363.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1975). The Semisovereign People. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Scott, W. R. (1981). Organizations. Rational, natural, and open systems. Prentice Hall.
Simon, H. A. (1965). Administrative behavior. Free Press.
Simon, S. A. (1997). Administrative behavior. New York: The Free Press.
Treib, O. (2008). Implementing and complying with EU governance outputs. Living Reviews in European Governance, 3(5) http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2008-5
Trein, P., Biesbroek, R., Bolognesi, T., Cejudo, G. M., Duffy, R., Hustedt, T., & Meyer, I. (2020). Policy coordination and integration. A research agenda. Public Administration Review, https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13180
Trist, E. (1983). Referent Organizations and the Development of Inter-Organizational Domains. Human Relations, 36(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678303600
Trondal, J. (2014). Agencification. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 545–549.
Trondal, J., Marcussen, M., Larsson, T., & Veggeland, F. (2010). Unpacking international organizations. Manchester University Press.
Trondal, J., Murdoch, Z., & Geys, B. (2017). How pre- and post-recruitment factors shape role perceptions of European Commission officials. Governance, 31(1), 85–101.
Trondal, J., Suvarierol, S., & van den Berg, C. (2008). The compound machinery of government. The case of seconded officials in the European Commission. Governance, 21(2), 253–274.
Trondal, J., & Peters, B. G. (2013). The rise of European administrative space. Lessons learned. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(2), 295–307.
Verhoest, K., Roness, P. G., Verschuere, B., Rubecksen, K., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2010). Autonomy and control of state agencies. Palgrave Macmillan.
Vestlund, N. M. (2015). Changing policy focus through organizational reform? The case of the pharmaceutical unit in the European Commission. Public Policy and Administration, 30(1), 92–112.
Vibert, F. (2007). The rise of the unelected. Cambridge University Press.
Waldo, D. (1952). Development of a theory of the administrative state. American Political Science Review, 46(1), 81–103.
Weber, M. (1924/2007). Legitimate Authority and Bureaucracy. In D. S. Pugh (Ed.). Organization theory. Selected readings. 3rd edition. Penguin Books.
Weber, M. (1983). On capitalism, bureaucracy and religion. Harper Collins Publishers.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, M. K., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trondal, J. (2023). Theorizing the Administrative State. In: Governing the Contemporary Administrative State. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28008-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28008-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28007-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28008-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)