Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Energy Community Preferences of Solar Prosumers and Electricity Consumers in the Digital Energy Ecosystem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trading in Local Energy Markets and Energy Communities

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Energy ((LNEN,volume 93))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdelkafi N, Raasch C, Roth AE (2019) Multi-sided platforms. Electr Mark 29:553–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00385-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adu-Kankam K, Camarinha-Matos L (2019) Emerging community ecosystems: analysis of organizational and governance structures of selected representative cases. In: Technological innovation for industry and service systems, DoCEIS 2019, vol 553, pp 24–40. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Baidya S, Potdar V, Ray P, Nandi C (2021) Reviewing the opportunities, challenges, and future directions for the digitalization of energy. Energy Res Soc Sci 81:102243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtadze N, Pavlov B, Pyatetsky V, Suleykin A (2019) Digital energy ecosystems. IFAC PapersOnLine 52(13):30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauwens T, Gotchev B, Holstenkamp L (2016) What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives. Energy Res Soc Sci 13:136–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasch J, Hansen P, Kamin T, Golob U, Andor M, Sommer S, Mlinarič M et al (2021). New clean energy communities in polycentric settings: four avenues for future research. Energy Res Soc Sci 82:102276

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooklyn Microgrid (2021) Retrieved from https://www.brooklyn.energy/

  • Brown D, Hall S, Davis ME (2020) What is prosumerism for? Exploring the normative dimensions of decentralised energy transitions. Energy Res Soc Sci 66:101475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brummer V (2018) Community energy—benefits and barriers: a comparative literature review of Community Energy in the UK, Germany and the USA, the benefits it provides for society and the barriers it faces. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 94:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caramizaru A, Uihlein A (2020) Energy communities: an overview of energy and social innovation. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/180576,JRC1194

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CE Delft (2016) The potential of energy citizens in the European Union. CE Delft. Retrieved from https://friendsoftheearth.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/ce-delft-the-potential-of-energycitizens-eu.pdf

  • Chen V, Duh H (2009) Investigating user experience of online communities: the influence of community type. In: 2009 International conference on computational science and engineering. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Doci G, Vasileiadou E (2014) “Let’s do it ourselves”: individual motivations for investing in renewables at renewables at community level. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven

    Google Scholar 

  • Dóci G, Vasileiadou E, Petersen AC (2015) Exploring the transition potential of renewable energy. Futures 66:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong H, Hussain F, Chang E (2007) An Integrative view of the concept of digital ecosystem. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on networking and services, pp 42–44. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2006) Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Bus Rev 84(10)

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerging Microgrid Business Models (2016) Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Espe E, Potdar V, Chang E (2018) Prosumer communities and relationships in smart grids: a literature review, evolution and future directions. Energies 11(2528). https://doi.org/10.3390/en11102528

  • European Commission (2015) Towards an integrated strategic energy technology (SET) plan: accelerating the European energy system transformation. EC, Bryssels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2018) Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/2001/oj

  • European Union (2019) Clean energy for all Europeans. Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahad Zia M, Elbouchikhi E, Benbouzid M (2018) Microgrids energy management systems: a critical review on methods, solutions, and prospects. Appl Energy 222:1033–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira JC, Martins A (2018) Building a community of users for open market energy. Energies 11(2330). https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092330

  • Frieden D, Tuerk A, Roberts J, d'Herbemont S, Gubina A (2019) Collective self-consumption and energy communities: overview of emerging regulatory approaches in Europe. Compile Research Consortium

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbani A, Nascimento L, Filatova T (2020) Growing community energy initiatives from the bottom up: simulating the role of behavioural attitudes and leadership in the Netherlands. Energy Res Soc Sci 70:101782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorroño-Albizu L, Sperling K, Djørup S (2019) The past, present and uncertain future of community energy in Denmark: critically reviewing and conceptualising citizen ownership. Energy Res Soc Sci 57:101231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulden M, Bedwell B, Rennick-Egglestone S, Rodden T, Spence A (2014) Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management. Energy Res Soc Sci 2:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gržanić M, Capuder T, Zhang N, Huang W (2022) Prosumers as active market participants: a systematic review of evolution of opportunities, models and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 154:111859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagiu A (2013) Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. MIT Sloan Manage Rev

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison J (2021) How local energy systems provide resilience. Delta Energy & Environment Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen E, Matschoss K (2017) Understanding the uneven diffusion of building-scale renewable energy systems: a review of household, local and country level factors in diverse European countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:580–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen E, Johnson M, Robinson S, Vadovics E, Saastamoinen M (2010) Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change. Energy Policy 38(12):7586–7595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbes C, Brummer V, Rognli J, Blazejewski S, Gericke N (2017) Responding to policy change: new business models for renewable energy cooperatives—barriers perceived by cooperatives’ members. Energy Policy 109:82–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuninckx S, te Boveldt G, Macharis C, Coosemans T (2022) Stakeholder objectives for joining an energy community: Flemish case studies. Energy Policy 162:112808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hienerth C, Lettl C, Keinz P (2014) Synergies among producer firms, lead users, and user communities: the case of the LEGO producer-user ecosystem. J Prod Innov Manage 31(4):848–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch A, Parag Y, Guerrero J (2018) Microgrids: a review of technologies, key drivers, and outstanding issues. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 90:402–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunkin S, Krell K (2018) Renewable energy communities: a policy brief from the policy learning platform on low-carbon economy. European Union. Interreg Europe. Retrieved Aug 20, 2020, from https://www.interregeurope.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/plp_uploads/policy_briefs/2018-08-30_Policy_brief_Renewable_Energy_Communities_PB_TO4_final.pdf

  • Huuki H, Svento R (2021) Unobserved preferences and dynamic platform pricing under positive network externality. NETNOMICS Econ Res Electr Netw. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-020-09140-w

  • Huuki H, Karhinen S, Böök H, Lindfors AV, Kopsakangas-Savolainen M, Svento R (2020) Utilizing the flexibility of distributed thermal storage in solar power forecast error cost minimization. J Energy Storage 28:101202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyysalo S (2021) Broadening the inquiry: new Internet-based energy communities. In: Hyysalo S (eds) Citizen activities in energy transition, pp 62–95. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003133919

  • IEA (2017) Digitalization & energy. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2020) Energy technology perspectives 2020. International Energy Agency, Paris. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-technology-perspectives-2020

  • Ingeborgrud L, Heidenreich S, Ryghaug M, Moe Skjølsvold T, Foulds C, Robison R, Mourik R et al (2020) Expanding the scope and implications of energy research: a guide to key themes and concepts from the social sciences and humanities. Energy Res Soc Sci 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101398

  • Ioannis K, Raimondo G, Dimitrios G, Rosanna DG, Georgios K, Gary S, Igor NF et al (2017) Blockchain in energy communities: a proof of concept. European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalkbrenner BJ, Roosen J (2016) Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: the role of community and trust in Germany. Energy Res Soc Sci 13:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio L, Heiskanen E, Apajalahti E-L, Marschoss K (2020) Farm power: how a new business model impacts the energy transition in Finland. Energy Res Soc Sci 65

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampman B, Blommerde J, Afman M (2016) The potential of energy citizens in the European Union. CE Delft, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Khavul S, Bruton G (2013) Harnessing innovation for change: sustainability and poverty in developing countries. J Manage Stud 50(2):285–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein SJ, Coffey S (2016) Building a sustainable energy future, one community at a time. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 867–880

    Google Scholar 

  • Koirala PB, Araghi Y, Kroesen M, Ghorbani A, Hakvoort RA, Herder PM (2018) Trust, awareness, and independence: insights from a socio-psychological factor analysis of citizen knowledge and participation in community energy systems. Energy Res Soc Sci 38:33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotilainen K, Sommarberg M, Järventausta P, Aalto P (2016) Prosumer centric digital energy ecosystem framework. In: MEDES proceedings of the 8th international conference on management of digital ecosystems, pp 47–51. ACM, Biarriz. https://doi.org/10.1145/3012071.3012080

  • Lennon B, Dunphy N, Gaffney C, Revez A, Mullally G, O’Connor P (2019) Citizen or consumer? Reconsidering energy citizenship. J Environ Plan Policy Manage 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1680277

  • Lund PD, Lindgren J, Mikkola J, Salpakari J (2015) Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:785–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matschoss K, Repo P, Timonen P (2019). Embedding European citizen visions in sustainability transition: comparative analysis across 30 European countries. Futures 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102437

  • Meelen T, Truffer B, Schwanen T (2019) Virtual user communities contributing to upscaling innovations in transitions: the case of electric vehicles. Environ Innov Soc Trans 31:96–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mengelkamp E, Gärttner J, Rock K, Kessler S, Orsini L, Weinhardt C (2018) Designing microgrid energy markets: a case study: The Brooklyn Microgrid. Appl Energy 210:870–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morstyn T, Farrell N, Darby SJ, McCulloch MD (2018) Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants. Nat Energy 3:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourik R, Breukers S, Summeren L, Wieczorek A (2019) Community-based virtual power plants: against all odds? Proceedings 20(1):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019020025

  • Mundaca L, Samahita M (2020) What drives home solar PV uptake? Subsidies, peer effects and visibility in Sweden. Energy Res Soc Sci 60:101319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachira F, Dini P, Nicolai AA (2007) Network of digital business ecosystems for Europe: roots, processes and perspectives. In: Digital business ecosystems. European Commission, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Nidhin Mahesh A, Sai Shibu NB, Balamurugan S (2019) Conceptualizing blockchain based energy market for self sustainable community. In: Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on blockchain-enabled networked sensor (BlockSys'19), pp 1–7. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362744.3363345

  • Nolden C, Barnes J, Nicholls J (2020) Community energy business model evolution: a review of solar photovoltaic developments in England. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 122:109722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olkkonen L, Korjonen-Kuusipuro K, Grönberg I (2017) Redefining a stakeholder relation: Finnish energy “prosumers” as co-producers. Environ Innov Soc Trans 24:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterakis NG, Erdinç O, Catalão JP (2017) An overview of demand response: key-elements and international experience. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69:871–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peñaloza D, Mata É, Fransson N, Fridén H, Samperio Á, Quijano A, Cuneo A (2022). Social and market acceptance of photovoltaic panels and heat pumps in Europe: a literature review and survey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 111867

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlaviciute G, Steg L, Contzen N, Roeser S, Huijts N (2018) Emotional responses to energy projects: insights for responsible decision making in a sustainable energy transition. Sustainability 2526

    Google Scholar 

  • Powells G, Fell MJ (2019) Flexibility capital and flexibility justice in smart energy systems. Energy Res Soc Sci 54:56–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pumphrey K, Walker SL, Andoni M, Robu V (2020) Green hope or red herring? Examining consumer perceptions of peer-to-peer energy trading in the United Kingdom. Energy Res Soc Sci 68:101603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathnayaka A, Potdar V, Dillon T, Hussain O, Chang E (2014) A methodology to find influential prosumers in prosumer community groups. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 10:706–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis I, Goncalves I, Lopes M, Henggeler Antunes C (2021) Ari istuu tuossa vieressä ja tuumasi että näinkin voi tehdä. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 144:111013

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J, Frieden D, d'Herbemont S (2019) Energy community definitions. compile consortium. Retrieved from https://www.compile-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/Explanatory-note-on-energycommunity-definitions.pdf

  • Roth L, Lowitzsch J, Yildiz Ö, Hashani A (2018) Does (Co-)ownership in renewables matter for an electricity consumer’s demand flexibility? Empirical evidence from Germany. Energy Res Soc Sci 46:169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schick L, Gad C (2015) Flexible and inflexible energy engagements—A study of the Danish smart grid strategy. Energy Res Soc Sci 9:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schot JK (2016) The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems. Nat Energy 1(5):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang G, Hielscher S, Hargreaves T, Martiskainen M, Smith A (2014) A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK. Environ Innov Soc Trans 13:21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soeiro S, Ferreira Dias M (2020a) Renewable energy community and the European energy market: main motivations. Heliyon 6(7):e04511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soeiro S, Ferreira Dias M (2020b) Community renewable energy: benefits and drivers. Energy Rep 6(8):134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summeren LF, Wieczorek AJ, Bombaerts GJ, Verbong GP (2020) Community energy meets smart grids: reviewing goals, structure, and roles in virtual power plants in Ireland, Belgium and the Netherlands. Energy Res Soc Sci 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101415

  • Teotia F, Bhakar R (2016) Local energy markets: concept, design and operation. In: 2016 national power systems conference (NPSC), pp 1–6. IEEE, Bhubaneswar. https://doi.org/10.1109/NPSC.2016.7858975

  • Toffler A (1980) The third wave. William Collins Sons, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsujimoto M, Kajikawa Y, Tomita J, Matsumoto Y (2018) A review of the ecosystem concept—Towards coherent ecosystem design. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 136:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A, Emmert S, Charter M, Vezzoli C, Sto E, Munch Andersen M, Lahlou S et al (2008) Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production: an evidence-based review. J Clean Prod 16:1218–1225

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela S, Iivari N, Svento R (2021) Drivers and barriers to the adoption of smart home energy management systems—users’ perspective. In: ACIS 2021 proceedings. ACIS

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanadzina GM (2019) Business models for community microgrids. In: 16th international conference on the European energy market (EEM), pp 1–7. IEEE, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Schoor T, Scholtens B (2015) Power to the people: local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:666–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernay A-L, Sebi C (2020) Energy communities and their ecosystems: a comparison of France and the Netherlands. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 158:120123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Werff E, Steg L (2016) The psychology of participation and interest in smart energy systems: comparing the value-belief-norm theory and the value-identity-personal norm model. Energy Res Soc Sci 22:107–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Wu Y, Cimen H, Vasquez JC, Guerrero JM (2022) Towards collective energy community: potential roles of microgrid and blockchain to go beyond P2P energy trading. Appl Energy 119003

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz Ö, Rommel J, Debor S, Holstenkamp L, Mey F, Müller JR, Rognli J et al (2015) Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda. Energy Res Soc Sci 6:59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.001

  • Yin S, Wang S, Yang M, Guo X, Zhang N (2021) Exploration of the construction path of an energy ecosystem adapted to the power Internet of things. In: IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, Bristol, p 631

    Google Scholar 

  • Young W, Middlemiss L (2012) A rethink of how policy and social science approach changing individuals’ actions on greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy 41:742–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Wu J, Zhou Y, Cheng M, Long C (2018) Peer-to-Peer energy trading in a Microgrid. Appl Energy 220:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou BL (2016) Smart home energy management systems: concept, configurations, and scheduling strategies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 61:30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Academy of Finland via research funding on the “Digitally mediated decarbon communities in energy transition (DigiDecarbon)” project (grant 348210), the Academy of Finland Strategic Research Council project BCDC Energy (grant 292854), and Fortum and Neste Foundation (grant numbers 20190098 and 20200099).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Innolab, University of Vaasa, Oulu, Finland

    Sanna Tuomela

  2. Interact Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

    Sanna Tuomela

  3. Centre for Wireless Communications, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

    Tuomo Hänninen

  4. Finnish Environment Institute and Department of Economics, Accounting and Finance, Oulu Business School, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

    Enni Ruokamo

  5. Interact Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

    Netta Iivari

  6. Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland

    Maria Kopsakangas-Savolainen

  7. Oulu Business School, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

    Rauli Svento

Authors
  1. Sanna Tuomela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tuomo Hänninen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Enni Ruokamo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Netta Iivari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maria Kopsakangas-Savolainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rauli Svento
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanna Tuomela .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland

    Miadreza Shafie-khah

  2. Stromdao GmbH, Mauer, Germany

    Amin Shokri Gazafroudi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tuomela, S., Hänninen, T., Ruokamo, E., Iivari, N., Kopsakangas-Savolainen, M., Svento, R. (2023). Energy Community Preferences of Solar Prosumers and Electricity Consumers in the Digital Energy Ecosystem. In: Shafie-khah, M., Gazafroudi, A.S. (eds) Trading in Local Energy Markets and Energy Communities. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 93. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21402-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21402-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21401-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21402-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation