Abstract
This chapter examines the multimodal ways in which teachers gain visual and haptic access to the students’ digital devices to solve problems encountered by them. The setting is a digital skills course aimed at the elderly. Depending on the nature of the problem, and the teacher’s epistemic status, the problems were resolved in two possible ways: (1) through instructional demonstrations (2) through problem-solving. Demonstrations were utilized when the encountered problem was treated as a learnable, while problem-solving was engaged when the problem was treated as a solvable. In cases of learnables, the teachers first sought to resolve the issue via multiple modalities which would allow the student to remain in control of the device. If these modalities proved unsuccessful, the teachers would resolve the issue through an instructional demonstration and accompanied rapport-building turns at talk. Solvables were resolved in a more direct way by the teacher taking immediate control of the device.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahearn, L. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.
Alexopoulou, S. (2020). The portrait of older people as (non) users of digital technologies: A scoping literature review and a typology of digital older (non) users. Gerontechnology, 19(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2020.19.003.11
Broth, M., & Mondada, L. (2013). Walking away. The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 47(1), 41–58.
Cibulka, P. (2015). When the hands do not go home: A micro-study of the role of gesture phases in sequence suspension and closure. Discourse Studies, 17(1), 3–24.
Clark, H., & Gerrig, R. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66(4), 764–805.
Craven, A., & Potter, J. (2010). Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12(4), 419–422.
Cutler, S. J. (2005). Ageism and technology. Generations, 29(3), 67–72.
Czaja, S., & Lee, C. (2002). Designing computer systems for older adults. In J. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 413–427). Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
De Stefani, E., & Gazin, A.-D. (2014). Instructional sequences in driving lessons: Mobile participants and the temporal and sequential organization of actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 63–79.
Dixon, S. (2015). Gimme! Gimme! Gimme!: Object requests, ownership and entitlement in a children’s play session. Journal of Pragmatics, 82, 39–51.
Drew, P., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2014). Requesting—From speech act to recruitment. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 1–34). John Benjamins.
Elleström, L. (2018). A medium-centered model of communication. Semiotica, 224, 269–293.
Evans, B., & Reynolds, E. (2016). The Organization of corrective demonstrations using embodied action in sports coaching feedback. Symbolic Interaction, 39, 525–556.
Enfield, N. (2014). Human agency and the infrastructure for requests. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 35–54). John Benjamins.
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in society, 5(1), 25–66.
Fox, B., & Heinemann, T. (2015). The alignment of manual and verbal displays in requests for the repair of an object. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(3), 342–362.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press.
Greiffenhagen, C. (2012). Making rounds: The routine work of the teacher during collaborative learning with computers. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(1), 11–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9134-8
Hall, J. K., & Looney, S. D. (2021). The role of self-talk in downgrading a teacher’s certainty about grammar matters. TESOL Quarterly, 55(1), 185–218.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.
Heath, C., Luff, P., Sanchez-Svensson, M., & Nicholls, M. (2018). Exchanging implements: The micro-materialities of multidisciplinary work in the operating theatre. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(2), 297–313.
Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29.
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103
Horlacher, A.-S. (2019). Workplace asymmetries and object-passing in hair salons. In D. Day & J. Wagner (Eds.), Objects, bodies and work practice (pp. 33–60). Multilingual Matters.
Jakonen, T. (2020). Professional embodiment: Walking, reengagement of desk interactions, and provision of instruction during classroom rounds. Applied Linguistics, 41(2), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy034
Kendrick, K., & Drew, P. (2016). Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436
Leung, R., Findlater, L., McGrenere, J., Graf, P., & Yang, J. (2010). Multi-layered interfaces to improve older adults initial learnability of mobile applications. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 3(1), 1–30.
Lin, C., Hsieh, T., & Shiang, W. (2009). Exploring the interface design of mobile phone for the elderly. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human centered design, HCII 2009, LNCS 5719 (pp. 476–481). Springer-Verlag.
Majlesi, A., & Broth, A. (2012). Emergent learnables in second language classroom interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 14(3–4), 193–207.
Mallenius, S., Rossi, M., & Tuunainen, V. (2007). Factors affecting the adoption and use of mobile devices and services by elderly people–results from a pilot study. Proceedings of 6th Annual Global Mobility Roundtable, Los Angeles.
McLeod, E. (2009). The use (and disuse) of mobile phones by baby boomers. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 7(1), 28–38.
Mondada, L. (2016). Multimodal resources and the organization of social interaction. In A. Rocci & L. Saussure (Eds.), Verbal communication (pp. 329–350). De Gruyter.
Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106.
Nevile, M. (2007). Seeing the point: Attention and participation in the airline cockpit. In L. Mondada & V. Markaki (Eds.), Interacting bodies: Online proceedings of the 2nd international conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies. ENS LSH & ICAR Research, Lyons, France.
Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 121–151.
Oksman, V. (2006). Young people and seniors in Finnish ‘Mobile Information Society’. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.5334/2006-3
Rauniomaa, M., & Keisanen, T. (2012). Two multimodal formats for responding to requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6–7), 829–842.
Rippl, G. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of intermediality: Literature—Image—Sound—Music. de Gruyter.
Rossi, G. (2014). When do people not use language to make requests? In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 303–334). John Benjamins.
Roupa, Z., Νikas, M., Gerasimou, E., Zafeiri, V., Giasyrani, L., Κazitori, E., & Sotiropoulou, P. (2010). The use of technology by the elderly. Health Sciences Journal, 4(2), 118–126.
Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. Heritage & J. Atkinson (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 2–27). Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. (2002). Home position. Gesture, 2(2), 133–146.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Schegloff, E. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216.
Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2012). Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose and decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(3), 297–321.
Takada, A., & Endo, T. (2015). Object transfer in request-accept sequence in Japanese caregiver-child interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 82, 52–66.
Thurlow, C. (2015). Multimodality, materiality and everyday textualities: The sensuous stuff of status. In G. Rippl (Ed.), Handbook of intermediality: Literature—Image—Sound—Music (pp. 619–636). de Gruyter.
Tuncer, S., & Haddington, P. (2019). Object transfers: An embodied resource to progress joint activities and build relative agency. Language in Society, 49(1), 61–87.
Tuncer, S., Licoppe, C., & Haddington, P. (2019). When objects become the focus of human action and activity: Object-centred sequences in social interaction. Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 20, 384–398.
Tutt, D., & Hindmarsh, J. (2011). Reenactments at work: Demonstrating conduct in data sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(3), 211–236.
Weilenmann, A., & Lymer, G. (2014). Incidental and essential objects in interaction: Paper documents in journalistic work. In M. Nevile, M. Rauniomaa, P. Haddington, & T. Heinemann (Eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity (pp. 319–338). John Benjamins.
West, C. (1990). Not just ‘Doctors’ Orders’: Directive-response sequences in patients’ visits to women and men physicians. Discourse & Society, 1, 85–112.
Zinken, J., & Ogiermann, E. (2013). Responsibility and action: Invariants and diversity in requests for objects in British English and Polish interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(3), 256–276.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Transcription Conventions
Appendix: Transcription Conventions
See Table 4.1.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Råman, J. (2022). Multimodal Negotiation for the Right to Access Digital Devices Among Elderly Users and Teachers. In: Alarauhio, JP., Räisänen, T., Toikkanen, J., Tumelius, R. (eds) Shaping the North Through Multimodal and Intermedial Interaction. Arctic Encounters. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99104-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99104-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99103-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99104-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)