Skip to main content

Multimodal Negotiation for the Right to Access Digital Devices Among Elderly Users and Teachers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Shaping the North Through Multimodal and Intermedial Interaction

Part of the book series: Arctic Encounters ((AE))

Abstract

This chapter examines the multimodal ways in which teachers gain visual and haptic access to the students’ digital devices to solve problems encountered by them. The setting is a digital skills course aimed at the elderly. Depending on the nature of the problem, and the teacher’s epistemic status, the problems were resolved in two possible ways: (1) through instructional demonstrations (2) through problem-solving. Demonstrations were utilized when the encountered problem was treated as a learnable, while problem-solving was engaged when the problem was treated as a solvable. In cases of learnables, the teachers first sought to resolve the issue via multiple modalities which would allow the student to remain in control of the device. If these modalities proved unsuccessful, the teachers would resolve the issue through an instructional demonstration and accompanied rapport-building turns at talk. Solvables were resolved in a more direct way by the teacher taking immediate control of the device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahearn, L. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexopoulou, S. (2020). The portrait of older people as (non) users of digital technologies: A scoping literature review and a typology of digital older (non) users. Gerontechnology, 19(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2020.19.003.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broth, M., & Mondada, L. (2013). Walking away. The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 47(1), 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cibulka, P. (2015). When the hands do not go home: A micro-study of the role of gesture phases in sequence suspension and closure. Discourse Studies, 17(1), 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H., & Gerrig, R. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66(4), 764–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craven, A., & Potter, J. (2010). Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12(4), 419–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, S. J. (2005). Ageism and technology. Generations, 29(3), 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaja, S., & Lee, C. (2002). Designing computer systems for older adults. In J. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 413–427). Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Stefani, E., & Gazin, A.-D. (2014). Instructional sequences in driving lessons: Mobile participants and the temporal and sequential organization of actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, S. (2015). Gimme! Gimme! Gimme!: Object requests, ownership and entitlement in a children’s play session. Journal of Pragmatics, 82, 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2014). Requesting—From speech act to recruitment. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 1–34). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elleström, L. (2018). A medium-centered model of communication. Semiotica, 224, 269–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, B., & Reynolds, E. (2016). The Organization of corrective demonstrations using embodied action in sports coaching feedback. Symbolic Interaction, 39, 525–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enfield, N. (2014). Human agency and the infrastructure for requests. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 35–54). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin-Tripp, S. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in society, 5(1), 25–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, B., & Heinemann, T. (2015). The alignment of manual and verbal displays in requests for the repair of an object. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(3), 342–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiffenhagen, C. (2012). Making rounds: The routine work of the teacher during collaborative learning with computers. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(1), 11–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9134-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. K., & Looney, S. D. (2021). The role of self-talk in downgrading a teacher’s certainty about grammar matters. TESOL Quarterly, 55(1), 185–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., Luff, P., Sanchez-Svensson, M., & Nicholls, M. (2018). Exchanging implements: The micro-materialities of multidisciplinary work in the operating theatre. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(2), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horlacher, A.-S. (2019). Workplace asymmetries and object-passing in hair salons. In D. Day & J. Wagner (Eds.), Objects, bodies and work practice (pp. 33–60). Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jakonen, T. (2020). Professional embodiment: Walking, reengagement of desk interactions, and provision of instruction during classroom rounds. Applied Linguistics, 41(2), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, K., & Drew, P. (2016). Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, R., Findlater, L., McGrenere, J., Graf, P., & Yang, J. (2010). Multi-layered interfaces to improve older adults initial learnability of mobile applications. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 3(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C., Hsieh, T., & Shiang, W. (2009). Exploring the interface design of mobile phone for the elderly. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human centered design, HCII 2009, LNCS 5719 (pp. 476–481). Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majlesi, A., & Broth, A. (2012). Emergent learnables in second language classroom interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 14(3–4), 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallenius, S., Rossi, M., & Tuunainen, V. (2007). Factors affecting the adoption and use of mobile devices and services by elderly people–results from a pilot study. Proceedings of 6th Annual Global Mobility Roundtable, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, E. (2009). The use (and disuse) of mobile phones by baby boomers. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 7(1), 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2016). Multimodal resources and the organization of social interaction. In A. Rocci & L. Saussure (Eds.), Verbal communication (pp. 329–350). De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevile, M. (2007). Seeing the point: Attention and participation in the airline cockpit. In L. Mondada & V. Markaki (Eds.), Interacting bodies: Online proceedings of the 2nd international conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies. ENS LSH & ICAR Research, Lyons, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 121–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksman, V. (2006). Young people and seniors in Finnish ‘Mobile Information Society’. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.5334/2006-3

  • Rauniomaa, M., & Keisanen, T. (2012). Two multimodal formats for responding to requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6–7), 829–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rippl, G. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of intermediality: Literature—Image—Sound—Music. de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, G. (2014). When do people not use language to make requests? In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 303–334). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roupa, Z., Νikas, M., Gerasimou, E., Zafeiri, V., Giasyrani, L., Κazitori, E., & Sotiropoulou, P. (2010). The use of technology by the elderly. Health Sciences Journal, 4(2), 118–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. Heritage & J. Atkinson (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 2–27). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. (2002). Home position. Gesture, 2(2), 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2012). Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose and decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(3), 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takada, A., & Endo, T. (2015). Object transfer in request-accept sequence in Japanese caregiver-child interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 82, 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurlow, C. (2015). Multimodality, materiality and everyday textualities: The sensuous stuff of status. In G. Rippl (Ed.), Handbook of intermediality: Literature—Image—Sound—Music (pp. 619–636). de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tuncer, S., & Haddington, P. (2019). Object transfers: An embodied resource to progress joint activities and build relative agency. Language in Society, 49(1), 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuncer, S., Licoppe, C., & Haddington, P. (2019). When objects become the focus of human action and activity: Object-centred sequences in social interaction. Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 20, 384–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutt, D., & Hindmarsh, J. (2011). Reenactments at work: Demonstrating conduct in data sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(3), 211–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weilenmann, A., & Lymer, G. (2014). Incidental and essential objects in interaction: Paper documents in journalistic work. In M. Nevile, M. Rauniomaa, P. Haddington, & T. Heinemann (Eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity (pp. 319–338). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. (1990). Not just ‘Doctors’ Orders’: Directive-response sequences in patients’ visits to women and men physicians. Discourse & Society, 1, 85–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinken, J., & Ogiermann, E. (2013). Responsibility and action: Invariants and diversity in requests for objects in British English and Polish interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(3), 256–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joonas Råman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Transcription Conventions

Appendix: Transcription Conventions

See Table 4.1.

Table 4.1 Transcription conventions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Råman, J. (2022). Multimodal Negotiation for the Right to Access Digital Devices Among Elderly Users and Teachers. In: Alarauhio, JP., Räisänen, T., Toikkanen, J., Tumelius, R. (eds) Shaping the North Through Multimodal and Intermedial Interaction. Arctic Encounters. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99104-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99104-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99103-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99104-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics