Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intermediality and Medium Specificity

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Intermediality

  • 117 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter surveys the historical development of a key concept in intermediality research in the West: medium specificity. From its classical origins, the discussion progresses through the early modern period to the modern period and the present day. The timeline is divided into sections that focus on the key ideas concerning medium specificity, either directly or with crucial relevance, both in the historical period in question and the influence of the ideas on later periods. The sections are constructed around quotations from original and secondary sources interpreted and explained to forge a somewhat logical narrative on the tale of medium specificity through time. In a fundamental fashion, the historical journey has to do with this question: Is “medium” a physical thing fixed with essential qualities that set it apart from all other media and so make it “specific,” or is it a concept to be understood in a more active sense, not as a fixed thing but as a changing set of practices by which we interact with the physical world in specific ways?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnheim, Rudolf. 1974. On the nature of photography. Critical Inquiry 1: 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt, Irving. 1910. The New Laokoon: An essay on the confusion of the arts. London and New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao, Weihong. 2015. The trouble with theater: Cinema and the geopolitics of medium specificity. Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media 56 (2): Article 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image music text. Trans. Stephen Heath. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981. Camera Lucida: Reflections on photography. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill & Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarten, Alexander. 1750. Aesthetica. Traiecti cis Viadrum: J.C. Kleyb. https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_dopKAAAAcAAJ/mode/2up. Accessed 9 September 2022.

  • Benjamin, Walter. 1969 (1936). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction (Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit). In Illuminations, ed. Hannah Arendt, 217–254. Trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books. https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm. Transcript by Andy Blunden. Accessed 9 September 2022.

  • Berg, Dirk J. van den. 2004. What is an image and what is image power? Image & Narrative: Online Magazine of the Visual Narrative. Issue 8 Mélanges/Miscellaneous. http://www.imageandnarrative.be/inarchive/issue08/dirkvandenbergh.htm. Accessed 9 September 2022.

  • Berger, John. 1972. Ways of seeing. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blore, Francis. 2018. The importance of medium specificity in writing and drawing. Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice 3 (1): 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, Jay David, and Richard Grusin. 2000. Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow, Maxine. 2016. Pragmatics of attachment and detachment: medium (un)specificity as material agency in contemporary art. PhD thesis, Norwich University of the Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, Shannon. 2018. Fidelity, medium specificity, (in) determinacy: Identities that matter. In The Routledge companion to adaptation, ed. Dennis Cutchins, Katja Krebs, and Eckart Voigts. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, Jörgen. 2016. The intermediality of narrative literature: Medialities matter. Palgrave Pivot. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, Jörgen, and Beate Schirrmacher, eds. 2021. Intermedial studies: An introduction to meaning across media. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, Norman. 1995. Philostratus and the imaginary museum. In Vision & Textuality, ed. Stephen W. Melville and Bill Readings, 174–194. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, Michael, and Marcel Cobussen, eds. 2021. The Bloomsbury handbook of sonic methodologies. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Edmund. 1990 (1757). A philosophical enquiry into the origins of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahir, Linda Costanzo. 2006. Literature into Film. Jefferson: McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Noël. 2003. Engaging the moving image. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Medium specificity. In The Palgrave handbook of the philosophy of film and motion pictures, ed. Noël Carroll, Laura T. Di Summa, and Shawn Loht, 29–47. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, Stanley. 1971. The world viewed: Reflections on the ontology of film. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheeke, Stephen. 2008. Writing for art: The aesthetics of Ekphrasis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clüver, Claus. 1997. Ekphrasis reconsidered: On verbal representations of non-verbal texts. In Interart poetics: Essays on the interrelations of the arts and media, ed. Ulla-Britta Lagerroth, Hans Lund, and Erik Hedling, 19–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Christopher. 1991. Reading the written image: Verbal play, interpretation and the roots of Iconophobia. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, Diarmuid. 2008. On the very idea of a “specific” medium: Michael Fried and Stanley Cavell on painting and photography as arts. Critical Inquiry 34 (2): 274–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, John. 1695. The art of painting. London, Printed by J. Heptinstall for W. Rogers. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A36766.0001.001?view=toc. Accessed 9 September 2022.

  • Elleström, Lars. 2019. Transmedial narration: Narratives and stories in different media. Palgrave Pivot. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, Kamilla. 2012. The adaptation of adaptation: A dialogue between the sciences and humanities. In Adaptation and cultural appropriation, ed. Pascal Nicklas and Oliver Lindner, 145–161. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Rethinking formal-cultural and textual-contextual divides in adaptation studies. Literature/Film Quarterly 42 (4): 576–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. Theorizing adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1973. Seeing and knowing. In The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medial perception, 131–151. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, Michael. 1998. Art and Objecthood. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasché, Rodolphe. 2003. The idea of form: Rethinking Kant’s aesthetics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaut, Berys. 2010. A philosophy of cinematic art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Clement. 1939. Avant-Garde and Kitsch. Partisan Review 6 (5): 34–49. http://archives.bu.edu/collections/partisan-review/search/detail?id=283920. Accessed 9 September 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1940. Towards a Newer Laocoön. Partisan Review 7 (4): 296–310. http://archives.bu.edu/collections/partisan-review/search/detail?id=283925. Accessed 9 September 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1962. After abstract expressionism. Art International 6 (8): 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grennan, Simon, and Hague, Ian. 2018. Medium, knowledge, structure: Capacities for choice and the contradiction of medium-specificity in games and comics. Image & Narrative. Text and Image in Children’s Literature/Texte et image dans la littérature de jeunesse. http://www.imageandnarrative.be/index.php/imagenarrative/article/view/1765. Accessed 9 September 2022.

  • Guillory, John. 2010. Genesis of the media concept. Critical Inquiry 36 (2): 321–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Judith. 2002. ut pictura poesis. The University of Chicago, theories of media, keywords glossary. https://csmt.uchicago.edu/glossary2004/utpicturapoesis.htm. Accessed 9 September 2022.

  • Hayles, N. Katherine. 2004. Print is flat, code is deep: The importance of media-specific analysis. Poetics Today 25 (1): 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, James A.W. 1993. Museum of words: The poetics of ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg. W. F. 1977 (1807). Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horace. Ars poetica. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/articles/69381/ars-poetica. Accessed 9 September 2022.

  • Houwen, Janna. 2017. Film and video intermediality: The question of medium specificity in contemporary moving images. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, Linda. 2006. A theory of adaptation. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, Martin. 2005. Songs of experience: Modern American and European variations on a universal theme. Berkeley: The University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Henry. 2008. Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Klaus Bruhn. 2016. Intermediality. In The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy, ed. Klaus Bruhn Jensen, Robert T. Craig, Jefferson D. Pooley, and Eric W. Rothenbuhler, 3–12. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Caroline A. 2005. Eyesight alone: Clement Greenberg’s modernism and the bureaucratization of the senses. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the power of judgment. ed. Paul Guyer. Trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. New York/London: Cambridge University Press. Original Kritik der Urteilskraft (1790). http://www.archive.org/details/kritikderurteils00kantuoft. Accessed 9 September 2022.

  • Kinder, Marsha, and Tara McPherson, eds. 2014. Transmedia frictions: The digital, the arts, and the humanities. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Király, Hajnal. 2010. The dance of Intermediality: Attempt at a semiotic approach of medium specificity and intermediality in film. In Media borders, multimodality and intermediality, ed. Lars Elleström, 199–210. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, Sibylle. 2015 (2008). Medium, messenger, transmission: An approach to media philosophy. (Medium, Bote, Übertragung. Kleine Metaphysik der Medialität). Trans. Anthony Enns. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Rosalind. 2009. The guarantee of the medium. In Studies across disciplines in the humanities and social sciences 5, ed. Tiina Arppe, Timo Kaitaro, and Kai Mikkonen, 139–145. Helsinki: Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, Murray. 1992. Ekphrasis: The illusion of the natural sign. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Rensselaer W. 1940. Ut Pictura Poesis: The humanistic theory of painting. New York: Norton. The Art Bulletin 22 (4): 197–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Karl. 1941. The imagines of the elder Philostratus. The Art Bulletin 23 (1): 16–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessing, Gotthold E. 2005 (1766). Laocoon: An essay upon the limits of painting and poetry. Trans. Ellen Frothingham. Mineola: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, Dominic McIver. 2014. Beyond art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Louvel, Liliane. 2011. Poetics of the Iconotext. Trans. Laurence Petit. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1984 (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi, Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Man, Paul. 1996. In Aesthetic Ideology, ed. Andrzej Warminski. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann, Jerome. 1991. The textual condition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding media: The extensions of Man. London/New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyrowitz, Joshua. 1999. Understandings of media. et Cetera 56 (1): 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzoeff, Nicholas. 1999. An introduction to visual culture. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W.J.T. 1994. Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noë, Alva. 2015. Strange tools: Art and human nature. New York: Hill & Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, Jerome. 2013. Epistemology not ideology OR why we need new Germans. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 10 (2–3): 295–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parikka, Jussi. 2013. Afterword: Cultural techniques and media studies. Theory, Culture & Society 30 (6): 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, John D. 2015. The marvelous clouds: Toward a philosophy of elemental media. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petersson, Sonya, Christer Johansson, Magdalena Holdar, and Sara Callahan, eds. 2018. The power of the in-between: Intermediality as a tool for aesthetic analysis and critical reflection. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philostratus the Elder. Imagines. https://www.theoi.com/Text/PhilostratusElder1A.html. Accessed 9 September 2022.

  • Pop, Doru. 2020. The gamification of cinema and the cinematization of games. In Transmediations: Communication across media Borders, Routledge studies in multimodality, ed. Niklas Salmose and Lars Elleström, 52–74. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintilian. Institutio oratoria. http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Quintilian/Institutio_Oratoria. Accessed 9 September 2022.

  • Rajewsky, Irina O. 2005. Intermediality, intertextuality, and remediation: A literary perspective on intermediality. Intermédialités 6: 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. 2011. What medium can mean. Trans. Steven Corcoran. Parrhesia 11: 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richon, Oliver. 2011. Introduction: On literary images. Photographies 4 (1): 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rippl, Gabriele, ed. 2015. Handbook of intermediality: Literature – image – sound – music. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Gillian. 2001. (Fourth edition in 2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruskin, John. 1848. Modern Painters, Vol. III. London: Dent. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/59392/59392-h/59392-h.htm. Accessed 9 September 2022.

  • Ryan, Marie-Laure, and Jan-Noël Thon, eds. 2014. Storyworlds across media: Toward a media-conscious narratology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmose, Niklas, and Lars Elleström, eds. 2020. Transmediations: Communication across media borders. Routledge studies in multimodality. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrock, Andrew Richard. 2015. Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication 9: 1229–1246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröter, Jens. 2012. Four models of intermediality. In Travels in intermedia[lity]: ReBlurring the boundaries, ed. Bernd Herzogenrath, 15–36. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Anthony N. 2018. Storytelling industries: Narrative production in the 21st century. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soules, Marshall. 2002. Animating the language machine: Computers and performance. https://web.archive.org/web/20060224032144/http://www.mala.bc.ca/~soules/animate.htm. Accessed 9 September 2022.

  • Stewart, Garrett. 2010. Bookwork as demediation. Critical Inquiry 36 (3): 110–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturken, Marita, and Cartwright, Lisa. 2001. (Second edition in 2009). Practices of looking: An introduction to visual culture. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoben, Jan. 2020. Media parasites, specificity and the unheard. Auditive Perspektiven. https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/21841/5-JThoben_kunsttexte2020AP.pdf. Accessed 9 September 2022.

  • Thon, Jan-Noël. 2016. Transmedial narratology and contemporary media culture. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn, David, and Henry Jenkins, eds. 2003. Rethinking media change: The aesthetics of transition. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toikkanen, Jarkko. 2013. The intermedial experience of horror: Suspended failures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Transcendental puppets: Kant and Kleist. In The poetics of transcendence, Currents of encounter series, ed. Elisa Heinämäki, P.M. Mehtonen, and Antti Salminen, 159–178. Amsterdam: Brill Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Välineen käsite ja välinemääräisyys 2010-luvulla. (The concept of medium and medium-specificity in the 2010s). Media & viestintä 40 (3–4): 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Intermedial experience and ekphrasis in Wordsworth’s “Slumber”. Partial Answers 17 (1): 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. Feeling the unseen: Imagined touch perceptions in paranormal reality television. The Senses and Society 15 (1): 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2021. At the cutting edge: Touch images in Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Pit and the Pendulum”. Connotations – A Journal for Critical Debate 30: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2022. Endless north: Intermedial experience of motion and balance in H. P. Lovecraft’s “The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath”. In Shaping the north through multimodal and intermedial interaction, ed. Juha-Pekka Alarauhio, Tiina Räisänen, Jarkko Toikkanen, and Riikka Tumelius, 233–246. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Torregrossa, Clotilde. 2020. Remember the medium! Film, medium specificity, and response-dependence. PhD thesis. University of St. Andrews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstegen, Ian. 2014. Dispositional realism and the specificity of digital media. Leonardo 47 (2): 159–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen, Ira A., and Jarkko Toikkanen. 2020. Co-creating study of experience in dialogue. Research in Art Education 1: 74–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Peter, ed. 1996. Icons – Texts – Iconotexts: Essays on ekphrasis and intermediality, European cultures: Studies in literature and the arts. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, Ruth. 2009. Ekphrasis, imagination and persuasion in ancient rhetorical theory and practice. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond. 1977. From medium to social practice. In Marxism and literature, 158–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Werner. 2011. (Inter)mediality and the study of literature. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 13: 3. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol13/iss3/2/. Accessed 9 September 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wordsworth, William. 1800. Lyrical ballads, with other poems, volume 1. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/8905. Accessed 9 September 2022.

  • Yacobi, Tamar. 1997. Verbal frames and ekphrastic figuration. In Interart poetics: Essays on the interrelations of the arts and media, ed. Ulla-Britta Lagerroth, Hans Lund, and Erik Hedling, 35–46. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

    Jarkko Toikkanen

Authors
  1. Jarkko Toikkanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jarkko Toikkanen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden

    Jørgen Bruhn

  2. Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    Asunción López-Varela

  3. Federal University of São João del-Rei, São João del Rei, Brazil

    Miriam de Paiva Vieira

Section Editor information

  1. Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden

    Jorgen Bruhn

  2. English Studies, Comparative Literature, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    Asun López-Varela Azcárate

  3. Federal University of São João del-Rei, São João del-Rei, Brazil

    Miriam de Paiva Vieira

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Toikkanen, J. (2023). Intermediality and Medium Specificity. In: Bruhn, J., López-Varela, A., de Paiva Vieira, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Intermediality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91263-5_13-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91263-5_13-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91263-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91263-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation