Skip to main content

Normativity and Polycontextual Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 515 Accesses

Part of the book series: Relational Economics and Organization Governance ((REOG))

Abstract

Global or regional value creation or production networks are the paradigmatic cases of relational networks. This is particularly obvious in the case of corporate social responsibility. Within the framework of conventional economic theory, this can at best be explained as the result of negative external effects and attempts to internalise them, the relational view reveals further and other aspects of this value creation context. In particular, the focus is on the importance of global civil society in economic and social value creation processes. However, for companies, this implies the development of the capacity for trans-sectoral stakeholder management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adloff, F., Birsl, U., & Schwertmann, P. (Eds.). (2005). Wirtschaft und Zivilgesellschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012a). Collaborative value creation: a review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part I: Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(5), 726–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012b). Collaborative value creation: a review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part II: Partnership processes and outcomes. Non Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 929–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, F. S., & Brower, R. S. (2005). Intergovernmental and intersectoral management: Weaving networking, contracting out, and management roles into third party government. Public Performance and Management Review, 29(1), 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bär, S. (2011). Das Krankenhaus zwischen ökonomischer und medizinischer Vernunft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B. (2011). Leveraging corporate responsibility: The stakeholder route to maximizing business and social value. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • BMAS. (2010). Empfehlungsbericht des Nationalen CSR-Forums an die Bundesregierung. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2016). Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Stubblebine, W. C. (1962). Externality. Economia, 29(116), 371–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L. (2011). Standards: Recipes for reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buttkereit, S. (2009). Intersectoral alliances: An institutional economics perspective. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W., & Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open Innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A., & Fuller, M. (2010). Collaborative strategic management: Strategy formulation and implementation by multi-organizational cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L. J., & Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the value of «Creating Shared Value». California Management Review, 56(2), 130–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1992). Managing for the future: The 1990s and beyond. New York, NY: Truman Talley Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (2006). Classic Drucker: Essential wisdom of Peter Drucker from the pages of Harvard business review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberger, M. (2017). Corporate Social Entrepreneurship—Prozess und Form ökonomischer Organisation zur Kreation sozialunternehmerischer Opportunitäten. Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1997). The market and the forum: Three varieties of political theory. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 3–33). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations: Communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, market pricing. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99(4), 689–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P. (2004). Relational models theory 2.0; In N. Haslam (Ed.), Relational models theory: A contemporary overview (pp. 3–25). Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and «The Corporate Objective Revisited». Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 103–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, I., & Hasnaoui, A. (2011). The meaning of corporate social responsibility: The vision of four nations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 419–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the global order. From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jhunjhunwala, S. (2014). Intertwining CSR with strategy—The way ahead. Corporate governance. The International Journal of Business in Society, 14(2), 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalegaonkar, A., & Brown, D. (2000). Intersectoral cooperation: Lessons for practice. IDR Reports, 16(2), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. A. (Eds.). (1999). Global public goods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 51–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. (2011). Business-community partnerships: Understanding the nature of partnership. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 11(1), 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lock, I., & Seele, P. (2016). CSR governance and departmental organization: A typology of best practices. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16(1), 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovegrove, N., & Thomas, M. (2013). Triple-strength leadership. Harvard Business Review, 91(9), 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1998). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. (Vol. 2). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2008). Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micklethwait, J., & Wooldridge, J. (2005). The company: A short history of a revolutionary idea. New York, NY: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162 Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). The fragility of goodness: Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M. (2011). Institutional logics in the study of organizations: The social construction of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(3), 409–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F., Russo, A., Tencati, A., & Vurro, C. (2011). Deconstructing the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare. Carmel, IN: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, S. (2016). Zivilgesellschaft—Überlegungen zu einem interdisziplinären Konzept. Docupedia-Zeitgeschichte. Potsdam: Zentrum für zeithistorische Forschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, S., Groth, H. & Schmitt, R. (2010). The«Stakeholder View» approach: An untapped. Opportunity to manage corporate performance and wealth. Strategic Change, 19(3–4), 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world—A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzeck, H., & Hansen, E. G. (2010). Stakeholder governance: How stakeholders influence corporate decision making. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 10(4), 378–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzeck, H., Hansen, E. G., & Grayson, D. (2011). Joint management stakeholder committees: A new path to stakeholder governance? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 11(5), 560–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzeck, H., & Chapman, S. (2012). Creating shared value as a differentiation strategy—The example of BASF in Brazil. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(4), 499–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprengel, R. (Ed.). (2007). Philanthropie und Zivilgesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Global Compact. (2015). The SDGs Explained for Business. Visited December 13, 2017. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/sdgs/about.

  • Waddell, S. (2005). Societal learning and change. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, S., & Brown, D. L. (1997). Fostering intersectoral partnering: A guide to promotion cooperation among government, business, and civil society actors. IDR Reports, 13(3), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1921). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft [Reprinted: 2002]. (J. Winckelmann, Ed.). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, J. (1996). Ökonomische Organisation, Allokation und Status. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, J. (1998). Kooperationsökonomie. Die Ökonomie der Diversität, Abhängigkeit und Atmosphäre. In G. Wegner & J. Wieland (Eds.), Formelle und informelle Institutionen der Ökonomie. Genese und Evolution (S. 14–43). Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, J. (2005). Corporate governance, values management, and standards: A european perspective. Business and Society, 44(1), 74–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, J. (2014). Governance ethics: Global value creation, economic organization and normativity (Vol. 48). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, J. (2017). Shared value creation—Theoretical concepts, practical challenges. In J. Wieland (Ed.), Creating shared value—Concepts, experience, criticism (pp. 9–26). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, J. (2018). CSR—Shared value creation through Intersectoral Governance. In L. Sacconi & G. Degli Antoni (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of social responsibility: Individuals, corporations and institutions. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, J., & Heck, A. E. (2013). Shared value durch stakeholder governance. Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland J., & Fischer, D. (2020 in press). Transaction cost theory and business legitimacy. In J. Rendtorff (Ed.), Handbook of business legitimacy. Springer, Cham.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josef Wieland .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wieland, J. (2020). Normativity and Polycontextual Governance. In: Relational Economics. Relational Economics and Organization Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45112-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics