Skip to main content

Toward global solution to MAP image estimation: Using Common structure of local solutions

  • Evolutionary Search
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (EMMCVPR 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1223))

Abstract

The maximum a posteriori (MAP) principle is often used in image restoration and segmentation to define the optimal solution when both the prior and likelihood distributions are available. MAP estimation is equivalent to minimizing an energy function. It is desirable to find the global minimum. However, the minimization in the MAP image estimation is non-trivial due to the use of contextual constraints between pixels. Steepest descent methods such as ICM quickly finds a local minimum but the solution quality depends much on the initialization. Some initializations are better than others. In this paper, we present an iterative optimization algorithm, called the Comb algorithm, for approximating the global minmum. The Comb maintains a number of best local minima found so far. It uses the Common structure of Best local minima (hence “Comb”) to derive new initial configurations. Because the derived configurations contain some structure resembling that of the global minimum, they may provide good starting points for local search to approach the global minimum. Experimental comparisons show that the Comb produces solutions of quality much better than ICM and comparable to simulated annealing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Besag. “Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems” (with discussions). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society-Series B, 36:192–236, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Besag. “On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures” (with discussions). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 48:259–302, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Bhanu, S. Lee, and J. Ming. “Adaptive image segmentation using a genetic algorithm”. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 25:1543–1567, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. B. Chou, P. R. Cooper, M. J. Swain, C. M. Brown, and L. E. Wixson. “Probabilistic network inference for cooperative high and low level vision”. In R. Chellappa and A. Jain, editors, Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications, pages 211–243, Boston, 1993. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Geman and D. Geman. “Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution and the Bayesian restoration of images”. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6(6):721–741, November 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. E. Goldberg. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Huang, K. P. Abd X. Zhuang, and J. Cavanaugh. “Optic flow field segmentation and motion estimation using a robust genetic partitioning algorithm”. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17:1177–1190, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gellatt, and M. P. Vecchi. “Optimization by simulated annealing”. Science, 220:671–680, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Z. Li. Markov Random Field Modeling in Computer Vision. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Z. Li. “MAP image restoration and segmentation by constrained optimization”. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, page accepted for publication, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Moscato. “On evolution, search, optimization, genetic algorithms and martial arts: Towards memetic algorithms”. C3P Report 826, Caltech Concurrent Computation Program, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge University Press, 2 edition, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. J. Radcliffe and P. D. Surry. Formal memetic algorithms. In T. Fogarty, editor, Evolutionary Computing: AISB Workshop, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1–14. Springer-Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Roth and M. D. Levine. “Geometric primitive extraction using a genetic algorithm”. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 16:901–905, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Marcello Pelillo Edwin R. Hancock

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, S.Z. (1997). Toward global solution to MAP image estimation: Using Common structure of local solutions. In: Pelillo, M., Hancock, E.R. (eds) Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. EMMCVPR 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1223. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-62909-2_91

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-62909-2_91

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62909-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69042-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics