Evaluation of Arc Evaporated Coatings on Rounded Surfaces and Sharp Edges

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents measurements and cutting tests related to coating features on sharp cutting edges and rounded objects. One typical feature of plasma based deposition processes is the formation of a sheath region around the object to be coated. The formation of the sheath has some implications on the coating of three dimensional objects, since rounded surfaces and edges are subjected to different ion flux density as compared to a flat surface. Solid carbide drills of different diameters were coated with a TiAlCrSiN coating by cathodic arc evaporation. It is noted the deposition rate increases with decreasing drill diameter, and the fraction of elements with high expected mean ionization charge state is higher for a small as compared to a large diameter drill. The observations are explained by Coulomb attraction of ions from the plasma in combination with the sheath to tool radius ratio in combination with resputtering and scattering in the gas/plasma phase. Solid carbide end mills were coated with TiAlN at three different substrate biases; -10, - 40, and - 80 V. It is observed that the coating stresses increase drastically with increasing bias, and the corners of the tools have different stress levels than the flatter areas. In addition, the fraction of Ti in the coating around the corners is increased significantly when the bias increases. The end mills were tested in a machining test, and the best performer was the variant deposited at - 40 V.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

145-150

Citation:

Online since:

March 2011

Export:

Price:

[1] O. Knotek, E. Lugscheider, F. Loeffler, A. Schrey, and B. Bosserhoff, Surface and Coatings Technology, 68-69 (1994) 253.

DOI: 10.1016/0257-8972(94)90170-8

Google Scholar

[2] W. Koenig, R. Fritsch, and D. Kammermeier, Surface and Coatings Technology, 49 (1991) 316.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Kodama, and R.F. Bunshah, Thin Solid Films, 96 (1982) 53.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Ahlgren, and H. Blomqvist, Surface and Coatings Technology, 200 (2005) 157.

Google Scholar

[5] I. Petrov, L. Hultman, U. Helmersson, J. -E. Sundgren, and J.E. Greene, Thin Solid Films, 169 (1989) 299.

DOI: 10.1016/0040-6090(89)90713-x

Google Scholar

[6] K. -D. Bouzakis, G. Skordaris, N. Michailidis, I. Mirisidis, G. Erkens, and R. Cremer, Surface and Coatings Technology, 202 (2007) 826.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.06.025

Google Scholar

[7] W. -D. Münz, D.B. Lewis, P. Eh. Hovsepian, C. Schönjahn, A. Ehiasarian,.I.J. Smith, Surface Engineering, 17 (2001) 15.

DOI: 10.1179/026708401101517557

Google Scholar

[8] Hugh O. Pierson, Handbook of Chemical Vapor Deposition, Principles, Technology and Applications, Noyes Publications, New Jersey, 2nd edition, 1992, p.363.

Google Scholar

[9] W. R. Pfouts, Manufacturing Engineering, 125 (2000) 1.

Google Scholar

[10] F. Chen, Introduction to Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2nd edition, Springer, New York, 2006, p.10.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Anders, Surface and Coatings Technology, 136 (2001) 85.

Google Scholar

[12] E. B. Macak, W. -D. Münz, J.M. Rodenburg, Surface Engineering, 19 (2003) 310.

Google Scholar

[13] E. B. Macak, W. -D. Münz, J.M. Rodenburg, Surface and Coatings Technology, 151-152 (2002) 349.

Google Scholar

[14] I.C. Noyan, J.B. Cohen, Residual Stress Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987 pp.117-130.

Google Scholar

[15] I. G. Brown, and X. Godechot, IEEE Transcations on plasma science, 19 (1991) 713.

Google Scholar

[16] A. Anders, Cathodic Arcs, From Fractals Spots to Energetic Condensation, 1st edition, Springer, New York, 2008, p.182.

Google Scholar

[17] A. Zalar, J. Kovac, B. Pracek, P. Panjan, and M. Ceh, Applied Surface Science, 254 (2008) p.6611.

Google Scholar