The Contribution of Dynamic Simulation Model of Depiction of Knowledge, in the Leading Process of High Technology Companies

Nasiopoulos K. Dimitrios; Damianos P. Sakas; Dimitrios S. Vlachos

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.543.406

Paper Titles

Novel Approach for Lysozyme Detection Employing Block Copolymer Overlayers on Plastic Optical Fibers
p.385

Control, Regulation and Command System of Hydronic Radiant Floors Heating by Wireless and Energy Harvesting Sensors and Actuators
p.389

Developing a Transducer Based on Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR) of Gold Nanostructures for Nanobiosensor Applications
p.393

The Role of Open Source Leadership in Developing High Technology Companies
p.402

The Contribution of Dynamic Simulation Model of Depiction of Knowledge, in the Leading Process of High Technology Companies
p.406

Plasma Treatment as a Way of Increasing the Selectivity of Carbon Nanotube Networks for Organic Vapor Sensing Elements
p.410

Optimal Group Configurations of Fibre Materials Based on Inclusion Modelling
p.414

An Ultra Low-Power MR*1) Sensor for a Smart Water Meter or a Smart Gas Meter
p.418

Aerosol-Assisted CVD of SnO₂ Thin Films for the Room-Temperature Detection of Hydrogen Sulfide
p.422

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 543The Contribution of Dynamic Simulation Model of...

The Contribution of Dynamic Simulation Model of Depiction of Knowledge, in the Leading Process of High Technology Companies

Abstract:

The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of knowledge [ creation mode (e.g. goal-driven and goal-free) and organizational culture on knowledge creation and sharing performance in the context of high technology (high-tech) companies [ with the contribution of Dynamic Simulation Model. Both goal-free and goal-framed creation modes are more likely to support knowledge creation, while the goal-driven mode is not likely to be favorable for knowledge creation. The paper has leveraged the systems dynamic paradigm to conduct sustainable enterprise modelling and iThink system to implement the models. High-tech companies who are frequently looking for new ideas for product design [ and manufacturing technologies [ are more likely to adopt the goal-free creation mode. High-tech companies who would like to emphasize goal achievement with respect to creation in manufacturing should form an organizational culture with a characteristic of market competition [. Also, a company with both goal-free and/or goal-framed creation modes is more likely to be willing to frame its strategic decisions (or goals) and then freely look for creative ways to reach the goals.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Materials and Applications for Sensors and Transducers II

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 543)

Pages:

406-409

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.543.406

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2013

Authors:

Nasiopoulos K. Dimitrios, Damianos P. Sakas, Dimitrios S. Vlachos

Keywords:

Dynamic Simulation Models, High-Tech Companies, Knowledge, Leadership

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

References

[1] Yong CAO, Yang XIANG, (2012) The Impact of Knowledge Governance on Knowledge Sharing, Management Decision, Vol. 50 Iss: 4.

Google Scholar

[2] Hung-Wen Lee, Ching-Fang Yu, (2011) Effect of organizational relationship style on the level of knowledge sharing, International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 32 Iss: 5/6, pp.677-686.

DOI: 10.1108/01437721111158260

Google Scholar

[3] Lars Witell, Martin Löfgren, Anders Gustafsson, (2011) Identifying ideas of attractive quality in the innovation process, The TQM Journal, Vol. 23 Iss: 1, pp.87-99.

DOI: 10.1108/17542731111097515

Google Scholar

[4] Isabel Diéguez Castrillón, Ana I. Sinde Cantorna, (2005) The effect of the implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies on training in the manufacturing sector, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 29 Iss: 4, p.268 – 280.

DOI: 10.1108/03090590510597124

Google Scholar

[5] Carl L. Saxby, Kevin R. Parker, Philip S. Nitse, Paul L. Dishman, (2002) Environmental scanning and organizational culture, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 20 Iss: 1, pp.28-34.

DOI: 10.1108/02634500210414747

Google Scholar

[6] Bo Xu, Zhangxi Lin, Bingjia Shao, (2010) Factors affecting consumer behaviors in online buy-it-now auctions, Internet Research, Vol. 20 Iss: 5, pp.509-526.

DOI: 10.1108/10662241011084086

Google Scholar

[7] Barbara Kaufman, (2011) Leadership strategies: build your sphere of influence, Business Strategy Series, Vol. 12 Iss: 6, pp.315-320.

DOI: 10.1108/17515631111185950

Google Scholar

[8] Charles F. Webber, (2003) New technologies and educative leadership, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 41 Iss: 2, p.119 – 123.

DOI: 10.1108/09578230310477013

Google Scholar

[9] Daniel Burrus, (2010) Social networks in the workplace: the risk and opportunity of Business 2. 0, Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 38 Iss: 4, pp.50-53.

DOI: 10.1108/10878571011059674

Google Scholar

[10] Kimberly Buch, David K. Wetzel, (2001) Analyzing and realigning organizational culture, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 22 Iss: 1, p.40 – 44.

DOI: 10.1108/01437730110380219

Google Scholar

[11] Barbara Bigliardi, Alberto Ivo Dormio, Francesco Galati, Giovanni Schiuma, (2012) The impact of organizational culture on the job satisfaction of knowledge workers, VINE, Vol. 42 Iss: 1, pp.36-51.

DOI: 10.1108/03055721211207752

Google Scholar