Effect of Cyanoacrylate-Based β-TCP Adhesive on Pullout Strength of Orthodontic Mini-Screw

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, the effect of cyanoacrylate-based β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) on pullout strength of orthodontic mini-screw was evaluated. New cements were prepared by mixing Histoacryl® (n-butyl cyanoacrylate) and acid-treated β-tricalcium phosphate. The ratios of β-TCP to Histoacryl® were 0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0. Artificial bone blocks were used as a substrate for the miniscrew implantation. The test groups were divided into three groups (one solid bone block [group 1] and a bone block with a 0.9 mm hole [group 2], and a bone block with a 2.5 mm hole [group 3]). And each group was divided into subgroups according to cement usage and non-usage. The used artificial bone density was 0.64g/cm2. Pullout strengths were determined using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 9.0 for Windows program. Paired samples t-tests and ANOVA were used with p<0.05. The maximum pullout strengths were 295.9 ± 3.8 N for group 1, 261.1±15.0 N for group 2, and 273.2±20.0 N for group 3. In group 1 and 2, the pullout strength in the subgroup using cement was higher than that of the subgroup of not using cement (p<0.05). In group 3, the pullout strength in the subgroups using cyanoacrylate-based β- TCP cement was higher than that of the subgroup using conventional glass ionomer cement (GC Fuji-I, GC Co., Tokyo, Japan) (p<0.05). These results indicate that our β-TCP/Histoacryl® cements have the potential to enhance pullout strength of the orthodontic mini-screw.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 330-332)

Pages:

1361-1364

Citation:

Online since:

February 2007

Export:

Price:

[1] S.H. Sarandeep, S.L. Alan: Amer. J. Orthod. and Dento. Orthop. Vol. 127(2005), p.307.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Costa, M. Raffainl: Int. Adult. Orthod. Orthog. Surg. Vol. 13: (1998), p.201.

Google Scholar

[3] B Melsen, C. Verna: Prog. Orthod. Vol. 1(1999), p.10.

Google Scholar

[4] M.K. Al-Munajed, P.H. Gordon, and J.F. Mccabe: J. Orthod. Vol. 27(2000), p.255.

Google Scholar

[5] D.J. Howeels, P. Jones: British J. of Orthod. Vol. 16(1989), p.75.

Google Scholar

[6] S.B. Lee, D.Y. Lee, and K.J. Park et al: Key. Eng. Mater. Vol. 309-311(2006), p.1133.

Google Scholar

[7] K.J. Park, D.Y. Lee, and S.B. Lee et al: Key. Eng. Mater. Vol. 284-286(2005), p.933.

Google Scholar

[8] F.B. Christensen, M Dalstra : Eur. Spine. J. Vol. 9 (2000), p.97.

Google Scholar

[9] LJM Boyle, DE Frost: J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. Vol. 51(1993), p.45.

Google Scholar