Rapid Communication Open Access
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2006; 12(23): 3751-3755
Published online Jun 21, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i23.3751
N-acetylcysteine does not prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography hyperamylasemia and acute pancreatitis
Janusz Milewski, Malgorzata Degowska, Maciej Kierzkiewicz, Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Central Clinical Hospital of Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, Poland
Grazyna Rydzewska, Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Central Clinical Hospital of Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, and Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Andrzej Rydzewski, Department of Internal Medicine & Nephrology, Central Clinical Hospital of Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, and Institute of of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Correspondence to: Professor Grazyna Rydzewska MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Central Clinical Hospital of Ministry of Internal Affairs, Woloska str. 137, 02- 507 Warsaw, Poland. grazyna.rydzewska@cskmswia.pl
Telephone: +48-22-6021240 Fax: +48-22-8451468
Received: November 14, 2005
Revised: November 28, 2005
Accepted: December 12, 2005
Published online: June 21, 2006

Abstract

AIM: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is the most common and often severe complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The early step in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis is probably the capillary endothelial injury mediated by oxygen-derived free radicals. N-acetylcysteine - a free radical scavenger may be potentially effective in preventing post-ERCP acute pancreatitis and it is also known that N-acetylcysteine (ACC) can reduce the severity of disease in experimental model of AP.

METHODS: One hundred and six patients were randomly allocated to two groups. Fifty-five patients were given N-acetylcysteine (two 600 mg doses orally 24 and 12 h before ERCP and 600 mg was given iv, twice a day for two days after the ERCP). The control group consisted of 51 patients who were given iv. isotonic saline twice a day for two days after the ERCP. Serum and urine amylase activities were measured before ERCP and 8 and 24 h after the procedure. The primary outcome parameter was post-ERCP acute pancreatitis and the secondary outcome parameters were differences between groups in serum and urine amylase activity.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis between two groups (10 patients overall, 4 in the ACC group and 6 in the control group). There were also no significant differences in baseline and post-ERCP serum and urine amylase activity between ACC group and control group.

CONCLUSION: N-acetylcysteine fails to demonstrate any significant preventive effect on post-ERCP pancreatitis, as well as on serum and urine amylase activity.

Key Words: N-acetylcysteine, ERCP, Acute pancreatitis, Hyperamylasemia



INTRODUCTION

Since their introduction, endoscopic retrograde cholangi-opancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) have played a very important role in the diagnosis and treatment of biliary and pancreatic diseases. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a very safe procedure and capable of providing diagnostic information similar to ERCP, but ERCP and EST still hold a key therapeutic role[1-3]. Although these procedures are generally considered being safe, they are associated with some complications, like cholangitis, haemorrhage, perforation and acute pancreatitis (AP). Acute pancreatitis is the most frequent major complication of ERCP. It is estimated that it occurs in 1%-15% of patients overall[4,5], with a higher incidence in subjects who have had therapeutic ERCP[6].

Post-ERCP pancreatitis usually is defined as new onset of abdominal pain persisting for more than 24 h after the procedure, and elevation of serum pancreatic enzymes 5 times above the normal limit. Asymptomatic increase in pancreatic enzyme activities may occur in up to 70% of all cases. Although the pathogenesis of post-ERCP pancreatitis is not clearly understood, it seems that the patient’s inflammatory response to pancreatic duct imaging and instrumentation plays a critical role[5]. An early step in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis is capillary endothelial injury manifested as increased capillary permeability[7]. An experimental study suggested that capillary injury might be mediated by oxygen-derived free radicals[8]. The manifestations of pancreatitis in experimental animal model can be ameliorated by blocking the action of oxygen-derived free radical scavengers[9-11]. Acetylcysteine is an excellent source of sulfhydryl groups, and is converted in the body into metabolites capable of stimulating glutathione synthesis and acting directly as free radical scavenger[12]. It has been shown that acetylcysteine can reduce severity of experimental acute pancreatitis[9,13,14]. Anecdotal reports suggest also that NAC could be effective in reducing complication of AP in humans[15]. N-acetylcysteine thus may be potentially effective in the prevention of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis.

Recently Katsinelos et al[16] have found that intravenous N-acetylcysteine does not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. The authors have pointed out that their findings cannot be generalized because larger cohorts may be needed to definitevly elucidate this problem. As combination of data from multiple, small (even underpowered) trials should enhance the precision and accuracy of any meta-analysis[17], we describe here the results of a prospective, randomized open-label study to determine the effect of N-acetylcysteine on the incidence of hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis after ERCP, which was previously reported only in the abstract form[18].

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients

Between January and December 2002, 345 consecutive patients undergoing ERCP in our institution were assessed for eligibility to enter the study. A total of 106 patients who fulfilled the entry criteria and gave their consent, were enrolled into the study. Exclusion criteria were as follows: presence of acute pancreatitis and/or severe chronic pancreatitis and/or hyperamylasemia, pregnancy and breast feeding, age under 18.

Patients were randomized to one of the two groups. In the treated group, 55 subjects received N-acetylcysteine (ACC 600, Hexal-Polska). Two 600 mg doses were given orally 24 h and 12 h before ERCP and 600 mg was given intravenously, twice a day for two days after the ERCP. The control group consisted of 51 patients who were given iv isotonic saline twice a day for two days after the ERCP. The present study was approved by the local ethics committee.

Endoscopic procedure

All endoscopic procedures were performed by the same experienced endoscopist. As a contrast medium 60% dilution of diatrizoate meglumine was used. All patients were fasted overnight and remained fasting for a minimum of 12 h after the ERCP. Patients stayed in the hospital for at least 48 h after the procedure. Biochemical parameters and clinical status were examined. Premedication consisted of pharyngeal anesthesia with xylocaine spray and intravenous administration of midazolam and hyoscine-N-butyl bromide titrated according to age and tolerance. ERCP was performed with the patient under general anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl, without airway intubation. At the end of each procedure, the endoscopist recorded also the details of the maneuvers performed, especially the ease or difficulty of cannulation, number of cannulations, number of pancreatic duct injections, presence of parenchymogram on radiography, or whether a needle-knife sphincterotomy was performed. Biochemical and clinical evaluation, serum and urine amylase activity were measured before ERCP and after 8 and 24 h of the procedure. Before the endoscopic procedure and 24 h after, blood samples were analysed for alanine and asparagine transaminases, bilirubin and white blood cells (leukocytosis was defined as a white cell count greater than 10 000/ mm3). The primary outcome parameter was frequency of AP post-ERCP, defined by clinical features consistent with acute pancreatitis beginning after ERCP and lasting for at least 24 h, associated with increase in serum amylase levels greater than five times above normal.

Secondary outcome parameters were differences between groups in serum and urine amylase activities measured at 8 and 24 h after the ERCP.

Statistical analysis

Univariate statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test for count data or Student’s t-test for comparison of means. Multivariate analysis was performed using forward logistic regression procedure and 0.05 and 0.1 as values to enter or remove the variables. Serum and urine amylase data were subjected to repeated measure analysis of variance with N-acetylcysteine treatment as between subject factor. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The STATA software, version 8.2 for Macintosh (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) was used for statistical computations.

RESULTS

Of the 106 patients included, 55 were randomized to the ACC group and 51 to the control group. The groups were similar with respect to the main indications for ERCP (Table 1) and endoscopic procedures performed (Table 2). There were no significant differences in acute pancreatitis risk factors (female gender, multiple cannulations, pancreatic duct injections, precut papillotomy, common biliary duct diameter; diagnostic ERCP and failed procedure) between the groups (Table 3). Post-ERCP pancreatitis graded as mild or moderate was observed in 10 (9.4%) patients, 4 (7.3%) patients in the ACC group and 6 (11.8%) in the control group (NS). In univariate analysis of differences between two groups according to the presence of acute pancreatitis, only two factors were significantly associated with an increased risk of pancreatitis: precut papillotomy and multiple cannulations. Female sex was on the verge of statistical significance (Table 4).

Table 1 Indications for ERCP in N-acetylcysteine treated group (ACC-group) and control group.
ERCP indicationsACC groupControl groupP
Bile duct stones3532NS
Recurrent pancreatitis24NS
Biliary pain, cholestasis35NS
Chronic pancreatitis83NS
Pancreatic cancer31NS
Other46NS
Table 2 ERCP procedure performed.
ERCP procedure (patients)ACC groupControl group
Diagnostic42
Therapeutic5149
Endoscopic sphincterotomy4447
Table 3 Risk factors for acute pancreatitis.
Risk factors (patients)ACC groupControl groupTotalP
Gender (F/M)33/2233/1866/40NS
Multiple cannulations9716NS
Pancreatic duct injections131225NS
Diagnostic ERCP516NS
Failed procedure235NS
Precut papillotomy12921NS
Small bile duct diameter257NS
Table 4 Unvariate analysis of group differences according to the presence of acute pancreatitis.
VariablesAcutepancreatitis(n = 10)No acutepancreatitis(n = 96)P
N-acetylcysteine / Control4/651/54NS
Sex (F/M)9/157/39NS
Precut (Y/N)6/415/810.004
Small bile duct diameter (Y/N)1/96/90NS
Multiple cannulations (Y/N)5/511/850.006
Pancreatic duct injections (Y/N)4/621/75NS
Diagnostic ERCP (Y/N)1/95/91NS

There were no significant differences in baseline and post-ERCP serum and urine amylase activity between ACC group and control group (Table 5). There were also no differences in total bilirubin, alanine and aspartate aminotransferases and WBC between the two groups (data not shown).

Table 5 Serum and urine amylase activity before ERCP, after 8 and 24 h in control and ACC groups (mean ± SD).
Serum and urine amylaseactivity levelsControl group(%)ACC group(%)P
before ERCP serum62.1 ± 59.779.0 ± 79.4NS
urine272.9 ± 320.5268.1 ± 355.2NS
8 h after ERCP serum324.6 ± 487.1270.1 ± 484.7NS
urine596.3 ± 1108.3775.9 ± 1500.4NS
24 h after ERCP serum268.6 ± 590.9183.56 ± 252.1NS
urine1324.8 ± 2763.91033.7 ± 2499.6NS

Initially the following variables including N-ace-tylcysteine treatment, precut papillotomy, multiple cannulations, common biliary duct diameter, injection of the contrast into pancreatic duct, failed procedure, sex and age, were entered into a logistic regression model.

On multiple logistic regression analysis, only precut papillotomy remained as a predictor of acute pancreatitis (Table 6).

Table 6 Summary of the results of forward selection multiple logistic-regression analysis with development of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis as the outcome variable.
Variable1Odds ratio95% ClP
Precut (no precut vs precut)0.1080.026-0.4560.003
Sex (F vs M)7.4320.841-65.6890.071
DISCUSSION

Although certain risk factors have been identified, the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis remains unpredictable. The knowledge of risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis is often not helpful in avoiding pancreatitis in individual patients. For these reasons it would be beneficial to find prophylactic treatment capable of preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. The present study was conducted to test the hypothesis that N-acetylcysteine might reduce the frequency and intensity of post- ERCP pancreatitis. Our results did not support this hypothesis. Similarly many other therapeutic agents including octreotide, low-molecular weight heparin, nifedipine, have no beneficial effect on the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis[19-26]. On the other hand, there are data suggesting that gabexate mesylate, diclofenac and heparin may reduce the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis[5,27-30]. Data concerning corticosteroids, IL-10 and somatostatin are contradictory[19,31-33].

Oxygen reactive species (ROS) have been implicated in the initiation of acute pancreatitis[34]. Animal models of acute pancreatitis point out to the occurence of early and profound oxidative stress[35,36]. In human studies of acute pancreatitis, increased blood concentrations of the superoxide radical and lipid peroxides, as well as depletion of ascorbic acid and an increased fraction of dehydroascorbic acid have been found[37].

In experimental pancreatitis various forms of scavenger therapy for ROS, have been shown to mitigate the pancreatic tissue damage after induction of acute pancreatitis and to attenuate the extrapancreatic complications, suggesting that superoxide dismutase[35], polyethylene glycol-linked superoxide dismutase[38], allopurinol[11], CV 3611 (a synthetic ascorbic acid derivative)[10] and N-acetylcysteine[9,13], may play their role in attenuating the extrapancreatic complications. N-acetylcysteine is converted to metabolites capable of stimulating glutathione synthesis[12] and is an important antioxidant and essential cofactor for antioxidant enzymes, and is depleted in AP[39].

Nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB), an oxidant-sensitive transcription factor, may regulate the induction of cytokine gene expression, which in turn regulates inflammatory response[13]. NF-κB activation and cytokine production in pancreatic acinar cells are suppressed by N-acetylcysteine[13,40]. It was reported that of ACC use in patients suffering from acute pancreatitis and multiorgan failure can improve their clinical status[15].

The occurrence of pancreatic damage after ERCP may be due to extraductal leakage of the pancreatic juice present in the ducts, rupture of acini or alterations of the acinar cells. Such functional alterations cause leak of pancreatic enzymes into the interstitium and then into the blood, consequently leading to hyperamylasemia and hyperamylasuria. In our study, ACC treatment had no influence on post-ERCP serum and urine amylase activities, suggesting that ACC does not ameliorate pathophysiologic mechanisms operating post-ERCP, leading to leak of pancreatic enzymes.

Our results are consistent with those obtained by Katsinelos et al[16]. There are however some differences between the present study and that of Katsinelos and colleagues[16]. We used a lower dose of N-acetylcysteine, which is similar to that used for the prevention of nephrotoxicity by contrast agents[41]. Although in AP experimetal models doses are used as high as 1000 mg/kg[9], there is evidence that high doses might actually have deleterious effects on the course of AP by inducing apoptosis probably due to inhibiting NF-κB[42,43].

Although our study was underpowered, it should be noted that increasing sample size would probably not yield different results. We initially assumed 10% rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis, it would be 3% in the treatment group. Then the number of patients required for the study with a two-sided 5% significance test and a power of 80% was 194 per group. Interim analysis was performed after inclusion of 106 patients to determine if a larger sample might change findings. An effect size of 0.077 calculated from the power analysis indicated that a statistically significant difference did not occur even if the study was continued and enrolled preplanned number of patients. In fact it would be necessary to recruit at least 669 subjects in each group to demonstrate any statistical significance, a clearly untenable goal. In addition, N-acetylcysteine treatment had no statistically significant influence on serum amylase activity. Therefore a decision to terminate the study was made.

We also attempted to identify conditions predisposing patients to the development of AP post-ERCP. In the present study, precut papillotomy was significantly associated with increased risk of pancreatitis, suggesting that this factor reflects the technical difficulty of the procedure.

In conclusion, N-acetylcysteine fails to demonstrate any significant preventive effect on post-ERCP pancreatitis, as well as on serum and urine amylase activity. Pancreatic injury is related to endoscopic maneuvers performed to obtain biliary access, rather than to the patient-related factors. Hence, a therapeutic agent with significant prophylactic effect on post-ERCP pancreatitis is still needed and it is necessary to perform more studies[44].

Footnotes

S- Editor Wang J L- Editor Wang XL E- Editor Ma WH

References
1.  Fogel EL, Sherman S, Park SH, McHenry L, Lehman GA. Therapeutic biliary endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2003;35:156-163.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Kozarek RA. Therapeutic pancreatic endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2001;33:39-45.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Norton ID, Petersen BT. Interventional treatment of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopic procedures. Surg Clin North Am. 1999;79:895-911, xii.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Sherman S, Lehman GA. ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1991;6:350-367.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 188]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 193]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Murray B, Carter R, Imrie C, Evans S, O'Suilleabhain C. Diclofenac reduces the incidence of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:1786-1791.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 172]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 191]  [Article Influence: 9.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Tanner AR. ERCP: present practice in a single region. Suggested standards for monitoring performance. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;8:145-148.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Braganza JM, Scott P, Bilton D, Schofield D, Chaloner C, Shiel N, Hunt LP, Bottiglieri T. Evidence for early oxidative stress in acute pancreatitis. Clues for correction. Int J Pancreatol. 1995;17:69-81.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Takano S, Kimura T, Kawabuchi M, Yamaguchi H, Kinjo M, Nawata H. Ultrastructural study of the effects of stress on the pancreas in rats. Pancreas. 1994;9:249-257.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Demols A, Van Laethem JL, Quertinmont E, Legros F, Louis H, Le Moine O, Devière J. N-acetylcysteine decreases severity of acute pancreatitis in mice. Pancreas. 2000;20:161-169.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Nonaka A, Manabe T, Tobe T. Effect of a new synthetic ascorbic acid derivative as a free radical scavenger on the development of acute pancreatitis in mice. Gut. 1991;32:528-532.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Wisner JR, Renner IG. Allopurinol attenuates caerulein induced acute pancreatitis in the rat. Gut. 1988;29:926-929.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Kelly GS. Clinical applications of N-acetylcysteine. Altern Med Rev. 1998;3:114-127.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Kim H, Seo JY, Roh KH, Lim JW, Kim KH. Suppression of NF-kappaB activation and cytokine production by N-acetylcysteine in pancreatic acinar cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2000;29:674-683.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 69]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 77]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Yagci G, Gul H, Simsek A, Buyukdogan V, Onguru O, Zeybek N, Aydin A, Balkan M, Yildiz O, Sen D. Beneficial effects of N-acetylcysteine on sodium taurocholate-induced pancreatitis in rats. J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:268-276.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Braganza JM, Holmes AM, Morton AR, Stalley L, Ku R, Kisher R. Acetylcysteine to treat complications of pancreatitis. Lancet. 1986;1:914-915.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Paroutoglou G, Beltsis A, Mimidis K, Zavos C. Intravenous N-acetylcysteine does not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:105-111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 38]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Can we learn anything from small trials. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;703:25-31; discussion 31-2.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Milewski J, Degowska M, Kierzkiewicz M, Rydzewski A, Rydzewska G. N-acetylcysteine for the prevention of post-ERCP hyperamylasemia and acute pancreatitis (AP). 11th United European Gastroenterology Week. Madrid, Spain. Gut. 2003;52:A170.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Manolakopoulos S, Avgerinos A, Vlachogiannakos J, Armonis A, Viazis N, Papadimitriou N, Mathou N, Stefanidis G, Rekoumis G, Vienna E. Octreotide versus hydrocortisone versus placebo in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:470-475.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Testoni PA, Bagnolo F, Andriulli A, Bernasconi G, Crotta S, Lella F, Lomazzi A, Minoli G, Natale C, Prada A. Octreotide 24-h prophylaxis in patients at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:965-972.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Arcidiacono R, Gambitta P, Rossi A, Grosso C, Bini M, Zanasi G. The use of a long-acting somatostatin analogue (octreotide) for prophylaxis of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Endoscopy. 1994;26:715-718.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 55]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Arvanitidis D, Hatzipanayiotis J, Koutsounopoulos G, Frangou E. The effect of octreotide on the prevention of acute pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia after diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45:248-252.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Binmoeller KF, Harris AG, Dumas R, Grimaldi C, Delmont JP. Does the somatostatin analogue octreotide protect against ERCP induced pancreatitis. Gut. 1992;33:1129-1133.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 71]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Rabenstein T, Fischer B, Wiessner V, Schmidt H, Radespiel-Tröger M, Hochberger J, Mühldorfer S, Nusko G, Messmann H, Schölmerich J. Low-molecular-weight heparin does not prevent acute post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:606-613.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Prat F, Amaris J, Ducot B, Bocquentin M, Fritsch J, Choury AD, Pelletier G, Buffet C. Nifedipine for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, double-blind randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:202-208.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 64]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Sand J, Nordback I. Prospective randomized trial of the effect of nifedipine on pancreatic irritation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Digestion. 1993;54:105-111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Rabenstein T, Roggenbuck S, Framke B, Martus P, Fischer B, Nusko G, Muehldorfer S, Hochberger J, Ell C, Hahn EG. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: can heparin prevent acute pancreatitis after ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:476-483.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Andriulli A, Solmi L, Loperfido S, Leo P, Festa V, Belmonte A, Spirito F, Silla M, Forte G, Terruzzi V. Prophylaxis of ERCP-related pancreatitis: a randomized, controlled trial of somatostatin and gabexate mesylate. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:713-718.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 69]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Schneider J, Barkin J. Gabexate for the prevention of pancreatic damage related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;45:447-448.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Cavallini G, Tittobello A, Frulloni L, Masci E, Mariana A, Di Francesco V. Gabexate for the prevention of pancreatic damage related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gabexate in digestive endoscopy--Italian Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:919-923.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 263]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 270]  [Article Influence: 9.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Weiner GR, Geenen JE, Hogan WJ, Catalano MF. Use of corticosteroids in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:579-583.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Dumot JA, Conwell DL, Zuccaro G Jr, Vargo JJ, Shay SS, Easley KA, Ponsky JL. A randomized, double blind study of interleukin 10 for the prevention of ERCP-induced pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2098-2102.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 59]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 65]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Devière J, Le Moine O, Van Laethem JL, Eisendrath P, Ghilain A, Severs N, Cohard M. Interleukin 10 reduces the incidence of pancreatitis after therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:498-505.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 111]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 123]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Schoenberg MH, Birk D, Beger HG. Oxidative stress in acute and chronic pancreatitis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995;62:1306S-1314S.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Gough DB, Boyle B, Joyce WP, Delaney CP, McGeeney KF, Gorey TF, Fitzpatrick JM. Free radical inhibition and serial chemiluminescence in evolving experimental pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1990;77:1256-1259.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Dabrowski A, Gabryelewicz A. Oxidative stress. An early phenomenon characteristic of acute experimental pancreatitis. Int J Pancreatol. 1992;12:193-199.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Tsai K, Wang SS, Chen TS, Kong CW, Chang FY, Lee SD, Lu FJ. Oxidative stress: an important phenomenon with pathogenetic significance in the progression of acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1998;42:850-855.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 116]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 120]  [Article Influence: 4.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Wisner J, Green D, Ferrell L, Renner I. Evidence for a role of oxygen derived free radicals in the pathogenesis of caerulein induced acute pancreatitis in rats. Gut. 1988;29:1516-1523.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 82]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 89]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Lüthen R, Niederau C, Grendell JH. Intrapancreatic zymogen activation and levels of ATP and glutathione during caerulein pancreatitis in rats. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:G592-G604.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Zhao ZC, Zheng SS, Cheng WL, Wang X, Qi Y. Suppressing progress of pancreatitis through selective inhibition of NF-KappaB activation by using NAC. J Zhejiang Univ Sci. 2004;5:477-482.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Tepel M, van der Giet M, Schwarzfeld C, Laufer U, Liermann D, Zidek W. Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent-induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:180-184.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1144]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 946]  [Article Influence: 39.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Steinle AU, Weidenbach H, Wagner M, Adler G, Schmid RM. NF-kappaB/Rel activation in cerulein pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:420-430.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 191]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 202]  [Article Influence: 8.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Tsai JC, Jain M, Hsieh CM, Lee WS, Yoshizumi M, Patterson C, Perrella MA, Cooke C, Wang H, Haber E. Induction of apoptosis by pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate and N-acetylcysteine in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:3667-3670.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 189]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 187]  [Article Influence: 6.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Mariani A. Pharmacological prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: which therapy is best. JOP. 2003;4:68-74.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]