Clinical Research Open Access
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2005; 11(15): 2319-2323
Published online Apr 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i15.2319
Nitroester drug’s effects and their antagonistic effects against morphine on human sphincter of Oddi motility
Shuo-Dong Wu, Zhen-Hai Zhang, Dong-Yan Li, Jun-Zhe Jin, Jing Kong, Zhong Tian, Wei Wang, Min-Fei Wang, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Dr. Shuo-Dong Wu, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China. wushuodong@hotmail.com
Telephone: +86-24-83955062
Received: July 31, 2004
Revised: August 1, 2004
Accepted: September 4, 2004
Published online: April 21, 2005

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the effects of nitroester drugs on human sphincter of Oddi (SO) motility and their antagonistic effects against morphine which shows excitatory effect on Oddi’s sphincter motility.

METHODS: The effects of these drugs on SO were evaluated by means of choledochofiberoscopy manometry. A total of 67 patients having T-tubes after cholecystectomy and choledochotomy were involved in the study, they were randomly divided into glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) group, isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) group, pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PTN) group, morphine associated with GTN group, morphine associated with ISDN group and morphine associated with PTN group. Basal pressure of Oddi’s sphincter (BPOS), amplitude of phasic contractions (SOCA), frequency of phasic contractions (SOF), duration of phasic contractions (SOD), duodenal pressure (DP) and common bile duct pressure (CBDP) were scored and analyzed. Morphine was given intramuscularly while nitroester drugs were applied sublingually.

RESULTS: BPOS and SOCA decreased significantly after administration of ISDN and GTN, BPOS reduced from 10.95±7.49 mmHg to 5.92±4.04 mmHg (P<0.05) evidently after application of PTN. BPOS increased from 7.37±5.58 mmHg to 16.60±13.87 mmHg, SOCA increased from 54.09±38.37 mmHg to 100.70±43.51 mmHg, SOF increased from 7.15±3.20 mmHg to 10.38±2.93 mmHg and CBDP increased 3.75±1.95 mmHg to 10.49±8.21 mmHg (P<0.01) evidently after injection of morphine. After associated application of ISDN and GTN, the four indications above decreased obviously. As for application associated with PTN, SOCA and SOF decreased separately from 100.64±44.99 mmHg to 66.17±35.88 mmHg and from 10.70±2.76 mmHg to 9.04±1.71 mmHg (P<0.05) markedly.

CONCLUSION: The regular dose of GTN, ISDN and PTN showed inhibitory effect on SO motility, morphine showed excitatory effect on SO while GTN, ISDN and PTN could antagonize the effect of morphine. Among the three nitroester drugs, the effect of ISDN on SO was most significant.

Key Words: Sphincter of Oddi, Nitroester drugs, Glyceryl trinitrate, Isosorbide dinitrate, Pentaerythritol tetranitrate, Morphine, Choledochofiberoscopy manometry



INTRODUCTION

The Oddi’s sphincter is the smooth muscle junction connecting the common bile duct and the duodenum which provides regulation of bile flow and hinders duodenobiliary reflux. During phasic contractions the papilla is closed and bile flow stops. Between phasic contractions the papillary muscle is relaxed and the bile flows from the common bile duct to the duodenum. Oddi’s sphincter manometry (OSM) is considered as the gold standard method for evaluating the function of Oddi’s sphincter. OSM can be directly performed during surgery, or indirectly during ERCP, via a T-tube or percutaneously. A basal pressure and phasic contractions of Oddi’s sphincter can be obtained with OSM.

Nitroester drugs are organic nitrates which have been shown to relax the smooth muscle of blood vessels. This effect has been widely accepted for the treatment of angina pectoris. Nitrates also act on a range of smooth muscles and effectively relax muscles of the gallbladder, the bile duct and the SO (SO) not in superscript[1-3]. Morphine can cause excitatory effect on Oddi’s sphincter motility and therefore induces upper abdominal pain with characteristics of biliary colic in some patients. Morphine could increase intrabiliary duct pressure[4-6], and delay bile flow to the duodenum[7] So morphine should not be used during ERCP manometry or choledochoscope examination. Few reports have described if nitroester drugs could antagonize the excitatory effect of morphine on Oddi’s sphincter motility.

The first aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of three nitroester drugs on human Oddi’s sphincter motility by choledochoscope manometry. While the second aim is to assess if nitroester drugs can antagonize morphine’s excitatory effect on SO motor function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients

OSM was performed for 67 patients (30 men, 37 women, and mean age 52.5 years, range 37-75 years) with PENTAX LX-750p choledochofiberoscopy at the Second Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University between October 2003 and July 2004. All the patients had undergone cholecystectomy and biliary exploring, T tube drainage at least 1.5 mo (mean 2.5 mo) ago, they were given nothing and kept fasting for 8 h before manometry.

Methods

A triple lumen polyethylene manometry catheter of 200 cm length and 1.7 mm outer diameter was used for manometry. The side holes in the distal end were located 2 mm apart. Each catheter lumen was infused with sterile water at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min by a minimally compliant hydraulic capillary infusion system. PC polygraph HR (Swedish CTD-Synectics Medical Company) and relevant program were used to record and analyze the tracings. The manometry was performed after removing all the stones in the common bile duct. The catheter was introduced via side-pore of choledochofiberoscopy into duodenum directly, when the tracings of the pressure were stable, duodenal pressure (DP)-curve was recorded. It was then withdrawn in a stepwise fashion, the position of catheter in the sphincter was confirmed by the characteristic pressure changes seen on the screen. It could also be confirmed by direct observation through choledochofiberoscopy. The SO and common bile duct motility tracings were recorded respectively. Drugs were administered sublingually or injected intramuscularly at 10 min intervals. Patients were selected randomly, to receive one of the different schemes of drug administration.

GTN group, ISDN group and PTN group, one of the three nitroester drugs was administered sublingually after the first measurement. GTN was administered in dose of 1 mg while ISDN in doses of 5 mg and PTN in doses of 20 mg. Ten minutes later, the second manometry was performed, and then the third, 20 min after administration.

Morphine associated with GTN group, morphine associated with ISDN group and morphine associated with PTN group. Morphine was administered intramuscularly in doses of 10 mg after the first measurement. Ten minutes later, the second manometry was performed. Then the patient took sublingual administration of 1 mg GTN or 5 mg ISDN or 20 mg PTN. Therefore 10 and 20 min later, the procedure was repeated for the third and the fourth time.

Basal pressure of Oddi’s sphincter (BPOS), amplitude of phasic contractions (SOCA), frequency of phasic contractions (SOF), duration of phasic contractions (SOD), DP and common bile duct pressure (CBDP) were recorded and analyzed with a special computer program. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Student’s t-test. Data were expressed as mean±SD. A single-tailed P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients with T-tube who had no evidence of ampullary abnormality underwent SOM. Clear tracings of pressure and phasic contractions were acquired. Every group had data of three or four times which were compared and contrasted.

Effect of solo nitroester drugs on the SO motility

Ten minutes after sublingual administration of 5 mg ISDN or 1 mg GTN, BPOS and SOCA decreased markedly (P<0.05). Even 20 min later, the effects still persisted (P<0.05) (Tables 1 and Tables 2). As for the PTN group, BPOS reduced significantly 20 min after administration (P<0.05). SOCA and CBD decreased slightly 10 and 20 min after application, but it is not statistically significant (Table 3).

Table 1 Manometric data before and after administration of GTN in 10 patients (mean±SD).
Before GTN administration (control)10 min after GTN administration20 min after GTN administration
Sphincter of Oddi basal pressure (mmHg)9.70±2.545.71±3.95a5.80±3.42a
Amplitude of phasic contractions (mmHg)88.84±68.7752.07±23.59c49.78±32.67c
Frequency of phasic contractions (n/min)6.71±2.217.32±2.695.57±2.05
Common bile duct pressure (mmHg)5.43±4.404.19±4.195.43±4.39
Table 2 Manometric data before and after administration of ISDN in 16 patients (mean±SD).
Before ISDN administration (control)10 min after ISDN administration20 min after ISDN administration
Sphincter of Oddi basal pressure (mmHg)10.78±10.795.56±3.38a5.40±4.78
Amplitude of phasic contractions (mmHg)92.06±43.3660.82±33.64c38.16±18.38d
Frequency of phasic contractions (n/min)7.88±2.586.83±3.637.13±3.47
Common bile duct pressure (mmHg)4.49±5.333.42±1.563.13±2.17
Table 3 Manometric data before and after administration of PTN in 11 patients (mean±SD).
Before PTN administration (control)10 min after PTN administration20 min after PTN administration
Sphincter of Oddi basal pressure (mmHg)10.95±7.498.59±11.905.92±4.04a
Amplitude of phasic contractions (mmHg)86.19±42.0468.08±38.2359.51±27.35
Frequency of phasic contractions (n/min)7.04±1.505.95±2.797.31±2.80
Common bile duct pressure (mmHg)7.26±4.254.83±4.135.57±3.49
Effects of nitroester drugs antagonize morphine on the SO motility

Morphine at a dose of 10 mg produced an immediate and markedly stimulatory effect on the SO and the common bile duct. Levels of BPOS, SOCA, SOF and CBDP significantly increased 10 min after injection (P<0.01) (Table 4). Then 10 min after sublingual application of TPN, the four increased indications decreased markedly to normal levels (P<0.01), but the effects were transient. As for 20 min after administration, all the indications had no difference to that of 10 min after morphine injection (Table 5) BPOS, CBDP and SOCA lowered significantly 10 and 20 min after application of ISDN, SOF decreased obviously 20 min after administration (P<0.05) (Table 6). BPOS decreased evidently 10 and 20 min after the usage of PTN, SOF slowed down slightly 10 min after administration (P<0.05) (Table 7).

Table 4 Manometric data before and after administration of morphine in 30 patients (mean±SD).
Before morphine administration (control)10 min after morphine administration
Sphincter of Oddi basal pressure (mmHg)7.37±5.5816.60±13.87b
Amplitude of phasic contractions (mmHg)54.09±38.37100.70±43.51d
Frequency of phasic contractions (n/min)7.15±3.2010.38±2.93f
Common bile duct pressure (mmHg)3.75±1.9510.49±8.21h
Table 5 Antagonism of GTN against morphine on the SO motility in 10 patients (mean±SD).
10 min after morphine administration (control)10 min after GTN associated administration associated20 min after GTNadministration
Sphincter of Oddi basal pressure (mmHg)12.49±5.406.46±6.88b13.47±7.69
Amplitude of phasic contractions (mmHg)96.56±48.4956.54±27.19d63.89±34.56
Frequency of phasic contractions (n/min)8.98±1.346.96±1.83f7.66±2.50
Common bile duct pressure (mmHg)10.99±4.754.94±3.27h7.87±4.72
Table 6 Antagonism of ISDN against morphine on the SO motility in 10 patients (mean±SD).
10 min after morphine administration (control)10 min after ISDN associated administration associated20 min after ISDNadministration
Sphincter of Oddi basal pressure (mmHg)24.63±19.555.43±4.82a5.98±6.02b
Amplitude of phasic contractions (mmHg)112.89±35.0439.65±21.08d43.45±28.65d
Frequency of phasic contractions (n/min)11.46±3.838.82±2.678.52±2.21c
Common bile duct pressure (mmHg)11.79±8.216.05±4.76e5.75±3.87e
Table 7 Antagonism of PTN against morphine on the SO motility in 10 patients (mean±SD).
10 min after morphine administration (control)10 min after PTN associated administration associated20 min after PTN administration
Sphincter of Oddi basal pressure (mmHg)13.25±9.6310.61±11.0013.12±12.09
Amplitude of phasic contractions (mmHg)100.64±44.9975.86±32.16a66.17±35.88a
Frequency of phasic contractions (n/min)10.70±2.769.95±1.089.04±1.71c
Common bile duct pressure (mmHg)6.99±6.306.49±3.664.48±4.15
DISCUSSION

The advent of OSM in the mid-1970s was the most important development in understanding of the motility of the SO. Prior to that time, the SO motility was evaluated by indirect methods such as cineradiography, contrast media drainage time, and transphincteric flow studies via a T-tube either during or after biliary tract surgery. From then on, OSM has obtained widespread application in the evaluation of patients for SO dysfunction (SOD). OSM could be directly performed during surgery, or indirectly during ERCP, via a T-tube or percutaneously. In this study we studied nitroester drugs’ effects and their antagonistic effects against morphine on human SO motility via choledochofiberoscopy manometry.

Nitroester drugs can relax vascular smooth muscles, including that of gastrointestinal tract. They also can effectively relax the muscle of Oddi’s sphincter. Among these drugs the effect of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) on the SO has been well researched. There are relatively few reports about isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) and no report about pentaerythritol tetranitrate(PTN) on the SO motility. Staritz et al[8] first reported that sublingual administration of 1.2 mg of GTN markedly lowered the SO basal tone and phasic contraction amplitude. Later on, Brandstatter et al[9] also found a remarkable decrease of the BPOS and the phasic SO contraction frequency, which lasted for many minutes after intravenous administration of nitroglycerine. Furthermore, Staritz et al[10] and Uchida et al[11] found that sublingual GTN enables the endoscopic extraction of small (6-12 mm) common bile duct (CBD) stones. Because of its potential side effect, such as severe headache, Luman et al[12] recently demonstrated that topical infusion 5 or 10 mg of GTN significantly decreased the basal SO tone and phasic motor function. They stated that local administration of GTN was not accompanied by adverse effects. Wehrmann et al[13] found that topical application of GTN or ISDN evoked a profound inhibition of SO motor function, and the effect of ISDN was longer than that of GTN. However, locally administered GTN did not facilitate selective bile-duct access during routine ERCP. Yasuyoshi et al[14] described the removal of small common bile duct stones through the combined use of intravenous injection of ISDN and baskets and/or balloons without the use of endoscopic sphincterotomy. Stones were completely removed in 15 of the 18 patients.

We found that both GTN and ISDN could decrease BPOS and SOCA, PTN could reduce SOCA, showed inhibitory effects on SO. Among the three drugs, the effect of ISDN on SO was most significant. Nitroester drugs are nitric oxide (NO) donors, application of NO donors could significantly inhibit SO motor function[15,16] The effect of cholecystokinin, a major hormone with relaxing properties, on the SO was mediated through stimulation of non-adrenergic non-cholinergic (NANC) nerves whose neurotransmitter is NO[17]. Sari et al[18] found that nitroglycerin increased the cyclic GMP concentration. Neither tetrodotoxin (TTX) nor vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIPa) modified this response. It could also increase the cyclic AMP concentration, which was blocked by both TTX and VIPa. This indicated that relaxation of the SO by NO donors involves a glibenclamide-sensitive mechanism which was closely related to increased formation of cyclic AMP but not of cyclic GMP. So we thought the three nitroester drugs which could provide NO inhibited SO motor function via excitation of NANC nerves.

Narcotic drugs (especially morphine) have already been known to cause spasm of the SO. Nonetheless, they were widely used in the perioperative period in patients with biliary tract disease, both for preoperative analgesia and for supplementation of the anesthetic technique. Unfortunately, spasm of the sphincter may yield a “pseudocalculus” artifact during cholangiography that is indistinguishable from impacted common bile duct stone and may result in unnecessary bile duct exploration. Helm et al[19] studied the effect of morphine on SO using OSM during ERCP. In a small cumulative dose of 2.5-5 μg/kg, morphine increased the frequency of phasic contractions to a maximum of 10-12/min, but it did not affect the mean amplitude of phasic contractions and the mean SO basal pressure. As the cumulative dose was increased from 10 to 20 μg/kg, no further increase in the frequency of phasic pressure waves was seen. Instead, the phasic wave amplitude and the mean SO basal pressure increased. Blaut et al[20] found that morphine increased the intraductal biliary pressure (IDP) with OSM via a T-tube, but the high IDP caused by morphine could be counteracted by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. We found that morphine could increase the basal pressure of Oddi’ sphincter, CBDP, frequency and amplitude of phasic contractions. Morphine showed an excitatory effect on the SO, and might be a cause of Oddi’s sphincter dysfunction. Our previous study showed that the effect of morphine on SO lasted more than 20 min[21].

Some reports indicate that the morphine-induced SO spasm, can be reversed by injection of naloxone[22], nalbuphine[23], and glucagon[24]. Nitroglycerin has been used to reverse the spasm induced by narcotic usage[25,26]. But there was no research in manometry evaluated if nitroester drugs can antagonize the excitatory effect of morphine on Oddi’s sphincter motility. We found that all the three nitroester drugs could antagonize the excitation induced by morphine. But the mechanism was not well known, and needs to be researched further.

The risk of pancreatitis induced by ERCP cannot be eliminated presently. The etiology of ERCP-induced pancreatitis is multifactorial. Attempts to prevent this complication by using administration of glucagon[27], nifedipine[28,29], hydrocortisone[30] and octreotide[30] have been disappointing. Somatostatin[31,32] is effective in reducing the incidence of pancreatitis after therapeutic ERCP, but the cost is relatively expensive. Sudhindran et al[33] found prophylactic treatment with GTN reduced the incidence of pancreatitis following ERCP but did not reduce the extent of hyperamylasemia or the severity of pancreatitis.

In summary, our results indicate that all the three nitroester drugs have inhibitory effects on human SO, they also can antagonize the excitation effect of morphine on SO. Among them the effect of ISDN is most obvious. This action is mediated through stimulation of the NANC nerves. These drugs could be used for several purposes: (1) to remove small- and medium-sized common bile duct stones through intact papillae; (2) to facilitate cannulation of the ampulla in diagnostic ERCP; (3) to relieve the pain caused by biliary colic in patients with SO dysfunction; (4) to reverse the spasm of Oddi’s sphincter induced by narcotic usage; and (5) to reduce the incidence of pancreatitis following ERCP.

Footnotes

Science Editor Guo SY Language Editor Elsevier HK

References
1.  Greaves R, Miller J, O'Donnell L, McLean A, Farthing MJ. Effect of the nitric oxide donor, glyceryl trinitrate, on human gall bladder motility. Gut. 1998;42:410-413.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Chelly J, Tannières ML, Tournay D, Franchiset F, Alexandre JH, Passelecq J. Nitroglycerin and amyl nitrite action on common bile duct during operation for vesicular lithiasis (author's transl). Anesth Analg (Paris). 1979;36:557-560.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Staritz M. Pharmacology of the sphincter of Oddi. Endoscopy. 1988;20 Suppl 1:171-174.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Sarles JC, Midejean A, Devaux MA. Electromyography of the sphincter of Oddi. Technic and experimental results in the rabbit: Effect of certain drugs. Am J Gastroenterol. 1975;63:221-231.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Dedrick DF, Tanner WW, Bushkin FL. Common bile duct pressure during enflurane anesthesia. Effects of morphine and subsequent naloxone. Arch Surg. 1980;115:820-822.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Radnay PA, Duncalf D, Novakovic M, Lesser ML. Common bile duct pressure changes after fentanyl, morphine, meperidine, butorphanol, and naloxone. Anesth Analg. 1984;63:441-444.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Joehl RJ, Koch KL, Nahrwold DL. Opioid drugs cause bile duct obstruction during hepatobiliary scans. Am J Surg. 1984;147:134-138.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 55]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Staritz M, Poralla T, Ewe K, Meyer zum Büschenfelde KH. Effect of glyceryl trinitrate on the sphincter of Oddi motility and baseline pressure. Gut. 1985;26:194-197.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 75]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Brandstätter G, Schinzel S, Wurzer H. Influence of spasmolytic analgesics on motility of sphincter of Oddi. Dig Dis Sci. 1996;41:1814-1818.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Staritz M, Poralla T, Dormeyer HH, Meyer zum Büschenfelde KH. Endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones through the intact papilla after medical sphincter dilation. Gastroenterology. 1985;88:1807-1811.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Uchida N, Ezaki T, Hirabayashi S, Minami A, Fukuma H, Matsuoka H, Yachida M, Kurokohchi K, Morshed SA, Nishioka M. Endoscopic lithotomy of common bile duct stones with sublingual nitroglycerin and guidewire. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:1440-1443.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Luman W, Pryde A, Heading RC, Palmer KR. Topical glyceryl trinitrate relaxes the sphincter of Oddi. Gut. 1997;40:541-543.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Wehrmann T, Schmitt T, Stergiou N, Caspary WF, Seifert H. Topical application of nitrates onto the papilla of Vater: manometric and clinical results. Endoscopy. 2001;33:323-328.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Ibuki Y, Kudo M, Todo A. Endoscopic retrograde extraction of common bile duct stones with drip infusion of isosorbide dinitrate. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38:178-180.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Slivka A, Chuttani R, Carr-Locke DL, Kobzik L, Bredt DS, Loscalzo J, Stamler JS. Inhibition of sphincter of Oddi function by the nitric oxide carrier S-nitroso-N-acetylcysteine in rabbits and humans. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:1792-1798.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Kaufman HS, Shermak MA, May CA, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD. Nitric oxide inhibits resting sphincter of Oddi activity. Am J Surg. 1993;165:74-80.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Behar J, Biancani P. Pharmacologic characterization of excitatory and inhibitory cholecystokinin receptors of the cat gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi. Gastroenterology. 1987;92:764-770.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Sari R, Peitl B, Kovacs P, Lonovics J, Palvolgyi A, Hegyi P, Nagy I, Nemeth J, Szilvassy Z, Porszasz R. Cyclic GMP-mediated activation of a glibenclamide-sensitive mechanism in the rabbit sphincter of Oddi. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49:514-520.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Helm JF, Venu RP, Geenen JE, Hogan WJ, Dodds WJ, Toouli J, Arndorfer RC. Effects of morphine on the human sphincter of Oddi. Gut. 1988;29:1402-1407.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 101]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 89]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Błaut U, Marecik J, Hartwich A, Herman RM, Laskiewicz J, Thor PJ. The effect of transcutaneous nerve stimulation on intraductal biliary pressure in post-cholecystectomy patients with T-drainage. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:21-26.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Wu SD, Kong J, Wang W, Zhang Q, Jin JZ. Effect of morphine and M-cholinoceptor blocking drugs on human sphincter of Oddi during choledochofiberscopy manometry. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2003;2:121-125.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Butler KC, Selden B, Pollack CV. Relief by naloxone of morphine-induced spasm of the sphincter of Oddi in a post-cholecystectomy patient. J Emerg Med. 2001;21:129-131.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Humphreys HK, Fleming NW. Opioid-induced spasm of the sphincter of Oddi apparently reversed by nalbuphine. Anesth Analg. 1992;74:308-310.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Jones RM, Detmer M, Hill AB, Bjoraker DG, Pandit U. Incidence of choledochoduodenal sphincter spasm during fentanyl-supplemented anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1981;60:638-640.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Velosy B, Madácsy L, Lonovics J, Csernay L. Effect of glyceryl trinitrate on the sphincter of Oddi spasm evoked by prostigmine-morphine administration. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997;9:1109-1112.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Toyoyama H, Kariya N, Hase I, Toyoda Y. The use of intravenous nitroglycerin in a case of spasm of the sphincter of Oddi during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesiology. 2001;94:708-709.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Chang FY, Guo WS, Liao TM, Lee SD. A randomized study comparing glucagon and hyoscine N-butyl bromide before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995;30:283-286.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Sand J, Nordback I. Prospective randomized trial of the effect of nifedipine on pancreatic irritation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Digestion. 1993;54:105-111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Prat F, Amaris J, Ducot B, Bocquentin M, Fritsch J, Choury AD, Pelletier G, Buffet C. Nifedipine for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, double-blind randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:202-208.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 64]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Manolakopoulos S, Avgerinos A, Vlachogiannakos J, Armonis A, Viazis N, Papadimitriou N, Mathou N, Stefanidis G, Rekoumis G, Vienna E. Octreotide versus hydrocortisone versus placebo in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:470-475.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Arvanitidis D, Anagnostopoulos GK, Giannopoulos D, Pantes A, Agaritsi R, Margantinis G, Tsiakos S, Sakorafas G, Kostopoulos P. Can somatostatin prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? Results of a randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19:278-282.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 46]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Poon RT, Yeung C, Liu CL, Lam CM, Yuen WK, Lo CM, Tang A, Fan ST. Intravenous bolus somatostatin after diagnostic cholangiopancreatography reduces the incidence of pancreatitis associated with therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2003;52:1768-1773.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 57]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Sudhindran S, Bromwich E, Edwards PR. Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of glyceryl trinitrate in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-induced pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1178-1182.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 64]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]