Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:38:24.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Critique of Some Recent North American Mortuary Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

David P. Braun
David P. Braun*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interpretations of prehistoric social organization based on multivariate statistical analyses of burial practices are becoming increasingly common in the North American archaeological literature. Unfortunately, these analyses and interpretations can incorporate weaknesses ranging from faulty data coding and the mis-application of statistical procedures to biases in the statistical and logical procedures employed. These problems are discussed in light of recent analyses (Tainter 1975a, 1975b, 1977a, 1977b, 1978) which use burial data from six Woodland sites in the riverine midwestern United States to develop a model of social change for the period A.D. 200-800. The results of these particular analyses are shown to be, at best, highly ambiguous and, at worst, contradictory to the proposed interpretations. This paper summarizes the weaknesses in these analyses, both to show the absence of support for the particular proposed interpretations and to illustrate how inappropriate methods can negate potentially useful mortuary research.

Type
comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 1981 , pp. 398 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asch, David L. 1976 The Middle Woodland population of the lower Illinois Valley: a study in paleodemographic methods. Northwestern University Archaeological Program Scientific Papers 1.Google Scholar
Baker, Frank C. 1930 The use of animal life by the moundbuilding Indians of Illinois. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 22:41–64.Google Scholar
Beer, Stafford 1972 Brain of the firm. Penguin Press, London.Google Scholar
Berelson, B., and Steiner, G. A. 1964 Human behavior: an inventory of scientific findings. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, Ludwig von, 1968 General system theory. Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1962 Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity 28:217–225.Google Scholar
Berelson, B., and Steiner, G. A. 1971 Mortuary practices: their study and their potential. In Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices, edited by James A. Brown. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology 25:6–29.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M. 1970 A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. American Sociological Review 35(2):201–218.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M., and Schoenherr, Richard A. 1971 The structure of organizations. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Braun, David P. 1977 Middle Woodland—early Late Woodland social change in the prehistoric central midwestern U.S. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan. University Microfilms No. 77-26210.Google Scholar
Braun, David P. 1979 Illinois Hopewell burial practices and social organization: a reexamination of the Klunk-Gibson mound group. In Hopewell archaeology: the Chillicothe conference, edited by Brose, D. and Greber, N., pp. 66–79. Cleveland Museum of Natural History and Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Brillouin, Leon 1962 Science and information theory (second ed.). Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, James A. 1979 Charnel houses and mortuary crypts: disposal of the dead in the Middle Woodland period. In Hopewell archaeology: the Chillicothe conference, edited by Brose, D. and Greber, N., pp. 211–219. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Buikstra, Jane E. 1976 Hopewell in the lower Illinois Valley: a regional study of human biological variability and prehistoric mortuary behavior. Northwestern University Archaeological Program Scientific Papers 2.Google Scholar
Buikstra, Jane E. 1977 Biocultural dimensions of archaeological study: a regional perspective. In Bioculhiral adaptation in prehistoric America, edited by Robert L. Blakely. Southern Anthropological Society Proceedings 11:67–84.Google Scholar
Buikstra, Jane E., and Goldstein, Lynne 1973 The Perrins Ledge crematory. Illinois State Museum Reports of Investigations 8.Google Scholar
Carroll, John B. 1961 The nature of the data, or how to choose a correlation coefficient. Psychometrika 26(4):347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, Colin 1966 On human communication (second ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Christenson, Andrew L., and Read, Dwight W. 1977 Numerical taxonomy, R-mode factor analysis, and archaeological classification. American Antiquity 42:163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, David L. 1968 Analytical archaeology. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Cory, Charles B. 1912 The mammals of Illinois and Wisconsin. Publications of the Field Museum of Natural History, Zoological Series 11.Google Scholar
Doran, J. E., and Hodson, F. R. 1975 Mathematics and computers in archaeology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Durkheim, Emile Google Scholar
Doran, J. E., and Hodson, F. R. 1933 The division of labor in society. Translation of De la Division du Travail Social (1893). Free Press, New York (1964 edition).Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent V. 1972 The cultural evolution of civilizations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3:399–426.Google Scholar
Friedman, Jonathon 1975 Tribes, states, and transformations. In Marxist analyses in social anthropology, edited by Bloch, Maurice. Association of Social Anthropologists Studies No. 3: 161-204. Halstead Press, New York.Google Scholar
Gatlin, Lila L. 1972 Information theory and living systems. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Lynne G. 1976 Spatial structure and social organization: regional manifestations of Mississippian society. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University. University Microfilms No. 77-1257.Google Scholar
Greber, N'omi 1976 Within Ohio Hopewell: analysis of burial patterns from several classic sites. Ph.D. dissertation. Case Western Reserve University. University Microfilms No. 77-11898.Google Scholar
Greber, N'omi 1979 Variations in social structure of Ohio Hopewell peoples. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 4(1):35–78.Google Scholar
Griffin, James, Flanders, Richard E., and Titterington, Paul F. 1970 The burial complexes of the Knight and Norton mounds in Illinois and Michigan. University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology Memoir 2. Hatch, James W.Google Scholar
Griffin, James, Flanders, Richard E., and Titterington, Paul F. 1974 Social dimensions of Dallas mortuary practices. M.A. thesis, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Griffin, James, Flanders, Richard E., and Titterington, Paul F. 1976 Status in death: principles of ranking in Dallas culture mortuary remains. Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Harary, Frank 1959 Status and contrastatus. Sociometry 22:23–43.Google Scholar
Jefferies, Richard W. 1976 The Tunacunnhee site: evidence of Hopewell interaction in northwest Georgia. Anthropological Papers of the University of Georgia 1.Google Scholar
Jefferies, Richard W. 1979 The Tunacunnhee site: Hopewell in northwest Georgia. In Hopewell archaeology: the Chillicothe conference, edited by Brose, D. and Greber, N., pp. 162–170. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
King, Thomas F. 1976 Political differentiation among hunter-gatherers: an archaeological test. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California-Riverside. University Microfilms No. 76-28068.Google Scholar
King, Thomas F. 1978 Don't that beat the band? Nonegalitarian political organization in prehistoric central California. In Social Archaeology, edited by Redman, C. and others, pp. 225–248. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lance, G. N., and Williams, W. T. 1965 Computer programs for monothetic classification (“association analysis“). Computer Journal 8: 246–249.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Homey, A. B., and Libby, W. F. 1967a Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 12: 1–47.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Homey, A. B., and Libby, W. F. 1967b Organization and environment. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Litterer, Joseph A. (editor) 1969 Organizations (second ed.). Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Mainfort, Robert C. 1977 The Fletcher site cemetery (20BY28), Bay County, Michigan: a study in the social dynamics of the contact period. Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University. University Microfilms No. 77-25259.Google Scholar
Matson, R. G., and True, D. L. 1974 Site relationships at Quebrada Tarapaca, Chile: a comparison of clustering and scaling techniques. American Antiquity 39:51–74.Google Scholar
Miller, James G. 1978 Living systems. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Orser, Charles E. 1980 An archaeological and ethnohistorical socioeconomic analysis of Arikara mortuary practices. Ph.D. dissertation, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale.Google Scholar
O'Shea, John M. 1978 Mortuary variability: an archaeological investigation with case studies from the nineteenth century central Plains of North America and the early Bronze Age of southern Hungary. Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Parmalee, Paul W. 1973 Appendix A: Identification of faunal materials from the Koster site mounds, Greene County, Illinois. In The Koster mounds, Greene County, Illinois, by Gregory Perino. Late Woodland site archaeology in Illinois I: investigations in south-central Illinois. Illinois Archaeological Survey Bulletin 9:207–210.Google Scholar
Parmalee, Paul W., Paloumpis, Andreas A., and Wilson, Nancy 1972 Animals utilized by Woodland peoples occupying the Apple Creek site, Illinois. Illinois State Museum Reports of Investigations 23.Google Scholar
Peebles, Christopher S. 1971 Moundville and surrounding sites: some structural considerations of mortuary practices II. In Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices, edited by J. A. Brown. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology 25:68–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peebles, Christopher S. 1972 Monothetic-divisive analysis of the Moundville burials: an initial report. Newsletter of Computer Archaeology 8(2):1–13.Google Scholar
Peebles, Christopher S. 1974 Moundville: the organization of a prehistoric community and culture. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California-Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Peebles, Christopher S., and Kus, Susan M. 1977 Some archaeological correlates of ranked societies. American Antiquity 42:421–448.Google Scholar
Perino, Gregory 1968 The Pete Klunk mound group, Calhoun County, Illinois. In Hopewell and Woodland site archaeology in Illinois. Illinois Archaeological Survey Bulletin 6:9–124.Google Scholar
Perino, Gregory 1970 Certain Hopewell and Late Woodland sites in west-central Illinois. Unpublished ms., Gilcrease Institute, Tulsa, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Homey, A. B., and Libby, W. F. 1973a The Late Woodland component at the Pete Klunk site, Calhoun County, Illinois. In Late Woodland site archaeology in Illinois I: investigations in south-central Illinois. Illinois Archaeological Survey Bulletin 9:58–89.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Homey, A. B., and Libby, W. F. 1973b The Late Woodland component at the Schild sites, Greene County, Illinois. In Late Woodland site archaeology in Illinois I: investigations in south-central Illinois. Illinois Archaeological Survey Bulletin 9:90–140.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Homey, A. B., and Libby, W. F. 1973c The Koster mounds, Greene County, Illinois. In Late Woodland site archaeology in Illinois I: investigations in south-central Illinois. Illinois Archaeological Survey Bulletin 9:141–210. Google Scholar
Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., and Turner, C. 1968 Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly 13:65–105.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Homey, A. B., and Libby, W. F. 1971a Ritual, sanctity, and cybernetics. American Anthropologist 73(1):59–76.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Homey, A. B., and Libby, W. F. 1971b The sacred in human evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2:23–44. Google Scholar
Rothschild, Nan A. 1975 Age and sex, status and role, in prehistoric societies of eastern North America. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Rappaport, Roy A. 1979 Mortuary behavior and social organization at Indian Knoll and Dickson Mounds. American Antiquity 44:658–675.Google Scholar
Rubey, William W. 1952 Geology and mineral resources of the Hardin and Brussels Quadrangles (in Illinois). U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 218.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall D. 1958 Social stratification in Polynesia. American Ethnological Society Monographs 29.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall D. 1961 The segmentary lineage: an organization of predatory expansion. American Anthropologist 63: 322–345.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley C. 1973 Logic (second ed.). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Google Scholar
Saxe, Arthur A. 1970 Social dimensions of mortuary practices. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan. University Microfilms No. 71-04720.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1972 Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity 37:156–165.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1975 Archaeology as behavioral science. American Anthropologist 77:836–848.Google Scholar
Segraves, B. Abbott 1977 The Malthusian proposition and nutritional stress: differing implications for man and society. In Malnutrition, behavior, and social organization, edited by Greene, L. S., pp. 173–218. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude E., and Weaver, Warren 1949 The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Siegel, Sidney 1956 Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral scientist. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Sneath, Peter H., and Sokal, Robert R. 1973 Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Speth, John D., and Johnson, Gregory A. 1976 Problems in the use of correlation for the investigation of tool kits and activity areas. In Cultural change and continuity, essays in honor of James B. Griffin, edited by Cleland, C., pp. 35–57. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Steponaitis, Vincas P. 1978 Location theory and complex chiefdoms: a Mississippian example. In Mississippian settlement patterns, edited by Smith, B., pp. 417–453. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Strathern, Andrew 1969 Descent and alliance in the New Guinea highlands: some problems of comparison. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland for 1969, pp. 37-52.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Homey, A. B., and Libby, W. F. 1975a Social inference and mortuary practices: an experiment in numerical classification. World Archaeology 7:1–15.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Homey, A. B., and Libby, W. F. 1975b The archaeological study of social change: Woodland systems in west-central Illinois. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University. University Microfilms No. 75-29766.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Homey, A. B., and Libby, W. F. 1977a Woodland social change in west-central Illinois. Mid-Continental Journal of Archaeology 2(1): 67–98.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Homey, A. B., and Libby, W. F. 1977b Modeling change in prehistoric social systems. In For theory building in archaeology, edited by Binford, Lewis R., pp. 327–351. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Tainter, Joseph A. 1978 Mortuary practices and the study of prehistoric social systems. In Advances in archaeological method and theory (Vol. 1), edited by Schiffer, Michael B., pp. 105–141. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, David H. 1978 The awful truth about statistics in archaeology. American Antiquity 43:231–244.Google Scholar
Trubowitz, Neal 1977 A statistical examination of the social structure of Frontenac Island. In Current perspectives in northeastern archaeology, edited by Funk, R. and Hayes, C. III. Researches and Transactions of New York State Archaeological Association 17(1):123–147. Van Cennep, Arnold Google Scholar
Trubowitz, Neal 1960 The rites of passage. Translated from the French (1908) by Vizedom, M. B. and Caffee, G. L.. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Weiss, Kenneth M. 1973 Demographic models for anthropology. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology 27.Google Scholar
Whallon, Robert E. 1971 A computer program for monothetic subdivisive classification in archaeology. University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology Technical Papers 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whallon, Robert E. 1972 A new approach to pottery typology. American Antiquity 37:13–33.Google Scholar
Whallon, Robert E., Peebles, Christopher S., and Kus, Susan 1974 Experimenting with the numerical analysis of shape in pottery vessels. Paper presented at the XLIth International Congress of Americanists, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Williams, W. T., and Lambert, J. M. 1959 Multivariate methods in plant ecology I: association analysis in plant communities. Journal of Ecology 47:83–107.Google Scholar
Williams, W. T., and Lambert, J. M. 1960 Multivariate methods in plant ecology II: the use of an electronic digital computer for association analysis. Journal of Ecology 48:698–710.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H. 1870 Geology of Calhoun County. Geological Survey of Illinois 4.Google Scholar