Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of out-of-pocket health expenditure in China

Analysis using China health and nutrition survey data

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Within total health expenditure, the share of out-of-pocket health expenditure by individuals has increased in the past 25 years in China, from 20% in 1980 to 49% in 2006, with a peak of 59% in 2000. Medical issues have become a larger concern than any other issue for households.

Objective

To estimate the determinants of individual out-of-pocket health expenditure in China.

Methods

We used a subsample of 9860 adults aged ≥18 years from the 2004 China Health and Nutrition Survey. To control for potential sample selection bias, the Heckman selection model was used to analyse individuals’ health expenditure decisions, which is based on a sample that excludes individuals who do not report paying for healthcare.

Results

Of the sampled population, 24.6% reported recent illness, 80.6% of whom sought care; 82.3% of those who sought care reported the amount of health spending. The average out-of-pocket health expenditure was Chinese Yuan (Y) 502 (Y100 = $US12.2 in 2004). Illness perceived as ‘quite serious’ and self-reported poor health status had the highest coefficients (2.012 [p < 0.01] and 3.351 [p < 0.01], respectively). People spent more on healthcare with increasing age, especially over the age of 65 years, with a coefficient of 1.171 (p < 0.01). Those who had chronic disease, earned higher incomes, resided in urban areas, lived in the middle or eastern region, or lived in a household with a head having a middle school or higher education paid more for healthcare. In the model examining disaggregated effects of insurance programmes, the coefficients were positive, except for commercial insurance, and the coefficient for labour insurance was significant.

Conclusion

Perceived severity of illness and self-reported health status are the most important factors when determining out-of-pocket health expenditure. The effect of aging is substantial. China should develop appropriate medical relief policies for the elderly to help them gain access to necessary healthcare services. Certain types of insurance programmes tend to increase out-of-pocket health expenditures, which highlights the need to continuously monitor and rigorously evaluate the impact of ongoing health insurance reform in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Bank. Assessing government health expenditure in China: final draft, October 2005. Report no. 34529 [online]. Available from URL: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEAPREGTOPHEANUT/Resources/502734-1129734318233/governmenthealthexpenditureandNHA-final.pdf [Accessed 2010 Nov 10]

  2. Hu S, Tang S, Liu Y, et al. Reform of how health care is paid for in China: challenges and opportunities. Lancet 2008 Nov 22; 372(9652): 1846–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yip W, Hsiao W. The Chinese health system at a crossroads. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008; 27(2): 460–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Watts J. China’s health reforms tilt away from the market. Lancet 2008 Jan 26; 371(9609): 292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang X, Kanbur R. Spatial inequality in education and health care in China. China Econ Rev 2005; 16: 189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagstaff A, Lindelow M. Can insurance increase financial risk? The curious case of health insurance in China. J Health Econ 2008; 27: 990–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagstaff A, Yu S. Do health sector reforms have their intended impacts? The World Bank’s Health VIII project in Gansu province, China. J Health Econ 2007; 26: 505–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. China Health and Nutrition Survey Research Team. Survey design [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/china/design/survey [Accessed 2010 Nov 10]

  9. China Health and Nutrition Survey Research Team. Cross-sectional data (2004 data files) [online]. Available from URL: https://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/china/data/datasets/data_downloads/ [Accessed 2010 Nov 10]

  10. Aday LA, Andersen R. A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Serv Res 1974; 9: 208–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995; 36: 1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin JD, Wu JL, Lee PN. Healthcare needs of people with intellectual disability in institutions in Taiwan: outpatient care utilization and implications. J Intellect Disabil Res 2003; 47: 169–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruy H, Young WB, Kwak H. Differences in health insurance and health service utilization among Asian Americans: method for using the NHIS to identify unique patterns between ethnic groups. Int J Health Plann Manage 2002; 17: 55–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen CM, Lu FC. Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Health. The guidelines for prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci 2004; 17Suppl. 1: 1–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hjortsberg C. Why do the sick not utilize health care? The case of Zambia. Health Econ 2003; 12: 755–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rous JJ, Hotchkiss DR. Estimation of the determinants of household health care expenditures in Nepal with controls for endogenous illness and provider choice. Health Econ 2003; 12: 431–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Su TT, Pokhrel S, Gbangou A, et al. Determinants of household health expenditure on western institutional health care. Eur J Health Econ 2006; 7: 199–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 2002: 49-51, 560–66

    Google Scholar 

  19. Geitona M, Zavras D, Kyriopoulos J. Determinants of healthcare utilization in Greece: implications for decision-making. Eur J Gen Pract 2007; 13: 144–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mulunpalo S, Vuori I, Oja P, et al. Self-rated health status as a health measure: the predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 517–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nelson EC, McHorney CA, Manning WG, et al. A longitudinal study of hospitalisation rates for patients with chronic disease: results from the medical outcomes study. Health Serv Res 1998; 32: 759–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chou KL, Chi I. Factors associated with use of publicly funded services by Hong Kong Chinese older adults. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 1025–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dunlop S, Coyte PC, McIsaac W. Socioeconomic status and the utilization of physicians’ services: results from the Canadian National Population Health Survey. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 123–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fleishman JA, Cohen JW, Manning WG, et al. Using the SF-12 health status measure to improve predictions of medical expenditures. Med Care 2006; 44(5 Suppl.): I54–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lam CLK, Fong DYT, Lauder I, et al. The effect of health related quality of life (HRQOL) on health services utilization of a Chinese population. Soc Sci Med 2002; 55: 1635–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bertakis KD, Azari R, Helms LJ, et al. Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J Fam Pract 2000; 49: 147–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Murphy JF, Hepworth JT. Age and gender differences in health services utilization. Res Nurs Health 1996; 19: 323–9

    Google Scholar 

  28. China’s population aged 65 and above to reach 109.56 mln. People’s Daily Online 2009 May 27 [online]. Available from URL: http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90776/90882/6666930.html [Accessed 2009 May 27]

  29. United Nations. World population prospects: the 2002 revision. Vol I: comprehensive tables; Vol II: sex and age. New York: United Nations, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  30. Roy K, Howard DH. Equity in out-of-pocket payments for hospital care: evidence from India. Health Policy 2007; 80(2): 297–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van Doorslaer E, O’Donnell O, Rannan-Eliya RP, et al. Catastrophic payments for health care in Asia. Health Econ 2007; 16(11): 1159–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schieber G, Maeda A. Health care financing and delivery in developing countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 1999; 18(3): 193–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hornbrook MC, Goodman MJ. Chronic disease, functional health status, and demographics: a multi-dimensional approach to risk adjustment. Health Serv Res 1996; 31(3): 283–307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hulka BS, Wheat JR. Patterns of utilization: the patient perspective. Med Care 1985; 23: 438–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen XY. Clinical bioethics in China: the challenge of entering a market economy. J Med Philos 2006; 31(1): 7–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen XY. Defensive medicine or economically motivated corruption? A confucian reflection on physician care in China today. J Med Philos 2007; 32(6): 635–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hougaard JL, Østerdal LP, Yu Y. The Chinese healthcare system: structure, problems and challenges. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2011; 9(1): 1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were used to conduct this study or prepare this manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

The authors thank the China Health and Nutrition Survey, funded by NIH (R01-HD30880, DK056350, and R01-HD38700), and the Carolina Population Center and the Chinese Centre for Disease Control for providing the survey data. The authors also thank three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuedan You.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

You, X., Kobayashi, Y. Determinants of out-of-pocket health expenditure in China. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 9, 39–49 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2165/11530730-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11530730-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation