Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy and Tolerability of Fluvastatin and Simvastatin in Hypercholesterolaemic Patients

A Double-Blind, Randomised, Parallel-Group Comparison

  • Clinical Use
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin and fluvastatin were compared in a randomised, parallel-group study using marketed formulations of the drugs and identical encapsulation to ensure blindness. 120 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (LDL > 185 mg/dl), who entered a run-in, washout period of 4 weeks (3 months in the case of previous statin treatment), were randomised to fluvastatin 40mg or simvastatin 20mg once daily in the evening. After 4 weeks, the doses were doubled (80 and 40mg once daily in the evening, respectively) in all patients for another 6 weeks. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups at randomisation. Mean LDL-C fell by 24% by the end of the first 4 weeks on fluvastatin 40mg once daily and by 31 % after another 6 weeks on 80mg once daily. The corresponding decreases on simvastatin were 24 and 34%. The difference between the treatment groups in total cholesterol and triglycerides, HDL-C and LDL-C, were not significant. At the end of the study, there was a positive correlation between baseline LDL-C and percentage LDL-C reduction in the fluvastatin group (p < 0.001) but not in the simvastatin group (p = 0.752). From the lowest (< 200 mg/dl) to the middle two (200 to 237 mg/dl) and to the highest (> 237 mg/dl) quartile of baseline LDL-C, fluvastatin reduced LDL-C by 16, 31 and 43%, respectively. The corresponding figures for simvastatin were 37, 33 and 35%.

Adverse events occurred in 18 patients on fluvastatin and in 28 patients on simvastatin treatment. In the simvastatin group, a causal relationship between adverse event and study drug was regarded as likely in 4 cases, but in no case for patients receiving fluvastatin. There were statistically, but not clinically, relevant increases in aminotransferases (ASAT and ALAT) and creatine kinase (CK) in both groups. The mean increases in ASAT and ALAT were about 42 and 55% on simvastatin and 34 and 27% on fluvastatin, respectively. The mean CK levels increased during simvastatin and fluvastatin treatments by about 35 and 18%, respectively.

Fluvastatin and simvastatin induced indistinguishable reductions in LDL-C on their highest and next-highest recommended doses. The potency ratio was 1:2 (fluvastatimsimvastatin). Both drugs were well tolerated, with no significant difference in the incidence of drug-related adverse events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease; the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 1994; 344: 1383–9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1301–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Livine GN, Keaney JF, Vita JA. Cholesterol reduction in cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 1995; 322: 512–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Holme I. Cholesterol reduction and its impact on coronary artery disease and total mortality. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 10C–17C

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Illingworth DR, Erkelens DW, Keller U, et al. Defined daily doses in relation to hypolipidaemic efficacy of lovastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin. Lancet 1994; 343: 1554–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitchel YB. The long-term tolerability profile of lovastatin and simvastatin. Atherosclerosis 1992; 97: S33–S39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacotot B, Benghozi R, Pfister P, et al. Comparison of fluvastatin versus pravastatin treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 54A–56A

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haasis R, Berger J. Fluvastatin versus Lovastatin — eine randomisierte, doppelblinde, multizentrische Parallelgrup-penstudie zur Effektivität und Sicherheit einer Lipidsenkung. Herz Kreisl 1995; 27: 375–80

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haasis R, Berger J, Andersson F, et al. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of fluvastatin and lovastatin in primary hyperchol-esterolaemia. Br J Med Econ 1996; 10: 145–57

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ose L, Scott R and the Simvastatin-Fluvastatin Study Group. Double-blind comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin and fluvastatin in patients with primary hyper-cholesterolaemia. Clin Drug Invest 1995; 10: 127–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Illingworth DR, Stein EA, Knopp RH, et al. A randomized multicenter trial comparing the efficacy of simvastatin and fluvastatin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 1996; 1: 23–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Deslypere JP. Simvastatin-fluvastatin comparative study [correspondence]. Clin Drug Invest 1996; 11: 362–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deslypere JP. Simvastatin-fluvastatin comparative study — continued [correspondence]. Clin Drug Invest 1996; 12: 57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ose L. Simvastatin-fluvastatin comparative study — continued [correspondence]. Clin Drug Invest 1996; 11: 363–4

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ose L. Simvastatin-fluvastatin comparative study — continued [correspondence]. Clin Drug Invest 1996; 12: 57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Friedewald T, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without the use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972; 6: 499–502

    Google Scholar 

  17. European Atherosclerosis Society. Prevention of coronary heart disease — scientific background and new clinical guidelines. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 1992; 2: 113–56

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kjekshus J, Pedersen TR. Reducing the risk of coronary events: evidence from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 64C–68C

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schulte, KL., Beil, S. Efficacy and Tolerability of Fluvastatin and Simvastatin in Hypercholesterolaemic Patients. Clin. Drug Invest. 12, 119–126 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199612030-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199612030-00001

Keywords

Navigation