Skip to main content
Log in

Prevention Strategies for Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Complex (MAC) Infection

A Review of Recent Studies in Patients with AIDS

  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In patients with AIDS, disseminated Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (MAC) infection is a common bacterial infection and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality.

In placebo-controlled studies, rifabutin, clarithromycin and azithromycin (administered as single agents) have been shown to prevent the development of MAC bacteraemia in patients with advanced HIV disease. Clarithromycin also conferred a survival benefit over placebo, but this was not initially observed with either rifabutin or azithromycin.

Subsequently, the efficacy of single agent therapy was compared with that of combination treatment as prophylaxis against the development of disseminated MAC. In the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 196/Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA) 009 study, clarithromycin monotherapy and clarithromycin and rifabutin combination therapy regimens were both more effective than rifabutin monotherapy in reducing the incidence of MAC bacteraemia. However, the combination regimen was generally not well tolerated. In the California Consortium Treatment Group (CCTG)/Multiple Opportunistic Prevention Prophylactic Strategy (MOPPS) study, azithromycin plus rifabutin was significantly more effective than either agent administered alone, and azithromycin was more effective than rifabutin. However, azithromycin (alone or in combination with rifabutin) caused frequent gastrointestinal adverse events. Emergence of resistance in those failing prophylaxis appeared to be higher with clarithromycin than with azithromycin or rifabutin. The use of the combination regimen of clarithromycin plus rifabutin did not reduce the selection of clarithromycin-resistant isolates.

Several issues need to be considered in the choice of MAC prophylaxis for the individual patient. On the basis of efficacy and potential drug interactions with protease inhibitors, clarithromycin or azithromycin is preferred to rifabutin. However, rifabutin is less likely to result in the emergence of resistance than the macrolides, and is likely to prevent tuberculosis, whereas azithromycin and clarithromycin will prevent some bacterial infections. Combination therapy for prophylaxis is not indicated in most situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Horsburgh Jr CR. Mycobacterium avium complex infection in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1332–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barradell LB, Plosker GL, McTavish D. Clarithromycin: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex infection in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Drugs 1993; 46(2): 289–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Benson CA, Ellner JJ. Mycobacterium avium complex infection and AIDS: advances in theory and practice. Clin Infect Dis 1993: 17(1): 7–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nightingale SD, Cameron DW, Gordin FM, et al. Two controlled trials of rifabutin prophylaxis against Mycobacterium avium complex infection in AIDS. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 828–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore RD, Chaisson RE. Survival analysis of two controlled trials of rifabutin prophylaxis against Mycobacterium avium complex. AIDS 1995; 9: 1337–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pierce M, Crampton S, Henry D, et al. A randomised trial of clarithromycin as prophylaxis against disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection in patients with advanced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 384–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oldfield EC, Dickinson G, Chung R, et al. Once weekly azithromycin for the prevention of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection in AIDS patients [abstract no. 203]. 3rd Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections: 1996 Jan 28–Feb 1: Washington: 90

  8. Benson CA, Cohn DL, Williams P, et al. A phase III prospective, randomized, double-blind study of the safety and efficacy of clarithromycin (CLA) vs. rifabutin (RBT) vs. CLA + RBT for prevention of Mycobacterium avium complex disease in HIV+ patients with CD4+ counts ≤ 100 cells/μL [abstract no. 205]. 3rd Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections: 1996 Jan 28–Feb 1: Washington: 91

  9. Cohn DL, Benson CA, Williams P, et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, comparative study of the safety and efficacy of clarithromycin (CLA) vs rifabutin (RBT) vs the combination for the prevention of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) bacteremia or disseminated MAC disease (DMAC) in HIV-infected patients (pts) with CD4 counts ≤ 100 cells/mm3 [abstract no. WEB 421]. Xlth International Conference on AIDS: 1996 Jul 7–12: Vancouver: 27

  10. Havlir DV, Dube MP, Sattler FR, et al. Prophylaxis against disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex with weekly azithromycin, daily rifabutin, or both. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 392–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shafran SD, Singer J, Zarowny DP, et al. A comparison of two regimens for the treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex bacteremia in AIDS: rifabutin, ethambutol, and clarithromycin versus rifampin, ethambutol, clofazimine, and ciprofloxacin. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 377–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. DATRI 001 Study Group. Coadministration of clarithromycin alters the concentration-time profile of rifabutin [abstract A2]. 34th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy: 1994 Oct 4–7: Orlando

  13. Carpenter CC, Fischl MA, Hammer SM, et al. Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1996: recommendations of an international panel. JAMA 1996; 276: 146–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. The Indinavir (MK 639) Pharmacokinetic Study Group. Indinavir (MK 639) drug interaction studies [abstract no. MOB 174]. XI International Conference on AIDS: 1996 Jul 7–12: Vancouver: 18-9

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohn, D.L. Prevention Strategies for Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Complex (MAC) Infection. Drugs 54 (Suppl 2), 8–15 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199700542-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199700542-00004

Keywords

Navigation