ICC 중재법원의 판정사례에 관한 연구 -이집트와유고슬라비아의 철강제수 출입분쟁사건을 중심으로-

@article{ART001245993},
author={ 한재필 },
title={ICC 중재법원의 판정사례에 관한 연구 -이집트와유고슬라비아의 철강제수 출입분쟁사건을 중심으로-},
journal={중재연구},
issn={1226-3699},
year={2008},
volume={18},
number={1},
pages={49-69},
doi={10.16998/jas.2008.18.1.49},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.16998/jas.2008.18.1.49}

TY - JOUR
AU - 한재필
TI - ICC 중재법원의 판정사례에 관한 연구 -이집트와유고슬라비아의 철강제수 출입분쟁사건을 중심으로-
T2 - 중재연구
PY - 2008
VL - 18
IS - 1
PB - 한국중재학회
SP - 49-69
SN - 1226-3699
AB - This study is to analyze the case law on the disputes of the ex-im contract of steel bar from Yugoslav to Egypt, for which awards were made by the ICC Arbitration Court, trying to find out the characteristic approach of the tribunal toward arbitration case dealing with socialistic country, Yugoslav and Islamic Egypt. An Egyptian importer and an Yugoslavian Exporter concluded a contract, with an option to purchase an additional quantity. for the steel bar. The importer exercised this option as provided in the contract. But the exporter refused to honor the option, due to the fact that the world market price for the steel bar has gone up. As a result, the importer had to purchase the steel bar as a replacement from a Rumanian company at the price higher than the original contract. And it has initiated arbitration under the arbitration clause at the ICC Arbitration Court to claim compensation for the loss due to the price difference. CISG and ULIS were closely studied along with the Yugoslav Law to determine whether the exporter could be exempted from the liability to damages. But the tribunal denied to accept the exporter's contention. The tribunal decided that the importer was entitled to damages due to the exporter's failure to deliver the additional quantity of goods at the original price. It was due to the fact that the price increase was not extremely sudden & high enough to exceed a reasonable entrepreneurial risk and also could be taken into account when concluding the contract.
KW - ICC 중재법원, 통례적 기업가위험, CISG 79조, ULIS 85조.
DO - 10.16998/jas.2008.18.1.49
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.16998/jas.2008.18.1.49
ER -

한재필 (2008). ICC 중재법원의 판정사례에 관한 연구 -이집트와유고슬라비아의 철강제수 출입분쟁사건을 중심으로-. 중재연구, 18( 1), 49- 69.

한재필 . 2008, “ICC 중재법원의 판정사례에 관한 연구 -이집트와유고슬라비아의 철강제수 출입분쟁사건을 중심으로-”, 중재연구, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 49-69. Available from: doi:10.16998/jas.2008.18.1.49

한재필 “ICC 중재법원의 판정사례에 관한 연구 -이집트와유고슬라비아의 철강제수 출입분쟁사건을 중심으로-” 중재연구 18.1 pp. 49-69 (2008): 49.

한재필 . ICC 중재법원의 판정사례에 관한 연구 -이집트와유고슬라비아의 철강제수 출입분쟁사건을 중심으로- 중재연구 [Internet]. 2008; 18( 1), : 49-69. Available from: doi:10.16998/jas.2008.18.1.49

한재필 . “ICC 중재법원의 판정사례에 관한 연구 -이집트와유고슬라비아의 철강제수 출입분쟁사건을 중심으로-” 중재연구 18, no.1 (2008): 49-69. doi: 10.16998/jas.2008.18.1.49

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

ICC 중재법원의 판정사례에 관한 연구 -이집트와유고슬라비아의 철강제수 출입분쟁사건을 중심으로-

중재연구

약어 : -

2008, vol.18, no.1, pp.49 - 69

DOI : 10.16998/jas.2008.18.1.49

발행기관 : 한국중재학회

연구분야 : 무역학

한재필¹

¹숭실대학교

인용한 논문 수 : 2 서지 간략 보기

초록

This study is to analyze the case law on the disputes of the ex-im contract of steel bar from Yugoslav to Egypt, for which awards were made by the ICC Arbitration Court, trying to find out the characteristic approach of the tribunal toward arbitration case dealing with socialistic country, Yugoslav and Islamic Egypt. An Egyptian importer and an Yugoslavian Exporter concluded a contract, with an option to purchase an additional quantity. for the steel bar. The importer exercised this option as provided in the contract. But the exporter refused to honor the option, due to the fact that the world market price for the steel bar has gone up. As a result, the importer had to purchase the steel bar as a replacement from a Rumanian company at the price higher than the original contract. And it has initiated arbitration under the arbitration clause at the ICC Arbitration Court to claim compensation for the loss due to the price difference. CISG and ULIS were closely studied along with the Yugoslav Law to determine whether the exporter could be exempted from the liability to damages. But the tribunal denied to accept the exporter's contention. The tribunal decided that the importer was entitled to damages due to the exporter's failure to deliver the additional quantity of goods at the original price. It was due to the fact that the price increase was not extremely sudden & high enough to exceed a reasonable entrepreneurial risk and also could be taken into account when concluding the contract.

키워드

ICC 중재법원, 통례적 기업가위험, CISG 79조, ULIS 85조.

참고문헌(32)

[학술지] 양석완 / 2003 / 중국중재계약의 형식과 내용에 관한 비교법적 고찰 / 비교법학연구 2
[학술지] 오석웅 / 국제상사중재판정에 있어서 중재판정부에 의한 법 선택의 범위 －객관적연결기준으로서 "밀접관련성"의 해석과 중재판정부에 의한 실질법의 적용범위에 관한 독일법의 비교법적 분석－ / 국제거래법연구 15 (1)
[학술지] 오원석 / 2006 / 국제상사중재에서 준거법의 결정 / 무역상무연구 29
[학술지] 유병운 / 2004 / 국제상사중재의 준거법 적용의 원칙과 방향 / 안암법학 18
[학술지] 홍성규 / 2003 / 개정한국중재법의 주요 논점과 과제 / 국제상학 18 (2)
[학술지] 한재필 / 2005 / 중국 중재판정부의 신용장관련 중재판정에 대한 연구 / 중재연구 15 (2)
[학술지] 한재필 / 2006 / 양도가능신용장거래에서 은행의 영업상 비밀유지의무위반에 관한 연구 / 중재연구 16 (1)
[학술지] 한재필 / 2007 / 양도가능신용장의 법리에 관한 고찰 / 무역학회지 32 (3)
[단행본] Beal / 1999 / Chitty on Contract / Sweet & Maxwell
[단행본] Treitel / 1999 / The Law of Contract / Sweet & Maxwell
[기타] / 1996 / BULGARIA Arbitration Award case No. 11/1996 of 12 February 1998
[기타] / 1989 / CISG Case Presentation, ICC Arbitration case No. 6281 of 1989
[기타] / 1980 / CISG {UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980)}
[기타] / 1997 / CISG Case Presentation, GERMANY 4 July 1997 Appellate Court Hamburg (Tomato concentrate case)
[기타] / 1989 / CISG case presentation, ICC Arbitration case No.6281 of 1989
[기타] / 1999 / CLOUT case No. 271 [GERMANY Bundesgerichtshof [Federal Supreme Court] 24 March 1999
[기타] / 1988 / CLOUT case No. 272 [GERMANY Oberlandesgericht [Appellate Court] Zweibrucken 31 March 1988
[기타] / 1999 / CLOUT case No. 331 [SWITZERLAND Handelsgericht [Commercial Court] 10 Feb. 1999
[기타] / 1995 / CLOUT case No. 140 [RUSSIA Arbitration Award case No. 155/1994 of 16 March 1995
[기타] / 1995 / CLOUT case No. 142 [RUSSIA Arbitration Award case No. 123/1992 of 17 October 1995
[기타] / 1996 / BULGARIA Arbitration Award case No. 56/1955 of 24 April 1996
[기타] / 1998 / FRANCE Tribunal de Commerce [District Court] Besancon 19 January 1998
[기타] / 1997 / RUSSIA Arbitration Award case No. 155/1996 of 22 January 1997]
[기타] / 2004 / The UNCITRAL Digest of case law on the United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods, A/CN.9/SER.C/DIGEST.CISG.79[8 June 2004]
[기타] / 1952 / British Movietonews Ltd v. London and District Cinemas Ltd [1952] A.C. 166, 185
[기타] / 1951 / Hangkam Kwingtong Woo v. Lin Lan Fong [1951] AC 707
[기타] / 1982 / Bill on International Private Law of 15 February 1982, Sluzbeni list No. 43/1982
[기타] / Convention relating to a Uniform Law on the International sale of Goods (ULIS)
[기타] / Egyptian International Private Law
[기타] / 1955 / Hague Convention 15 June 1955 on the Law Applicable to International Sales of Goods
[기타] / 1978 / The Yugoslav Law on Obligation of 1978
[기타] / UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration