초록

Purpose – In recent years, many firms have attempted various approaches to cope with the continual increase of aviation transportation. The previous research into freight charge forecasting models has focused on regression analyses using a few influence factors to calculate the future price. However, these approaches have limitations that make them difficult to apply into practice: They cannot respond promptly to small price changes and their predictive power is relatively low. Therefore, the current study proposes a freight charge–forecasting model using time series data instead a regression approach. The main purposes of this study can thus be summarized as follows. First, a proper model for freight charge using the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model, which is mainly used for time series forecast, is presented. Second, a modified ARIMA model for freight charge prediction and the standard process of determining freight charge based on the model is presented. Third, a straightforward freight charge prediction model for practitioners to apply and utilize is presented. Research design, data, and methodology – To develop a new freight charge model, this study proposes the ARIMAC(p,q) model, which applies time difference constantly to address the correlation coefficient (autocorrelation function and partial autocorrelation function) problem as it appears in the ARIMA(p,q) model and materialize an error-adjusted ARIMAC(p,q). Cargo Account Settlement Systems (CASS) data from the International Air Transport Association (IATA) are used to predict the air freight charge. In the modeling, freight charge data for 72 months (from January 2006 to December 2011) are used for the training set, and a prediction interval of 23 months (from January 2012 to November 2013) is used for the validation set. The freight charge from November 2012 to November 2013 is predicted for three routes – Los Angeles, Miami, and Vienna – and the accuracy of the prediction interval is analyzed using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Results – The result of the proposed model shows better accuracy of prediction because the MAPE of the error-adjusted ARIMAC model is 10% and the MAPE of ARIMAC is 11.2% for the L.A. route. For the Miami route, the proposed model also shows slightly better accuracy in that the MAPE of the error-adjusted ARIMAC model is 3.5%, while that of ARIMAC is 3.7%. However, for the Vienna route, the accuracy of ARIMAC is better because the MAPE of ARIMAC is 14.5% and the MAPE of the error-adjusted ARIMAC model is 15.7%. Conclusions – The accuracy of the error-adjusted ARIMAC model appears better when a route’s freight charge variance is large, and the accuracy of ARIMA is better when the freight charge variance is small or has a trend of ascent or descent. From the results, it can be concluded that the ARIMAC model, which uses moving averages, has less predictive power for small price changes, while the error-adjusted ARIMAC model, which uses error correction, has the advantage of being able to respond to price changes quickly.

키워드

Forecasting of Time Series, ARIMA(p, q), ARIMAC, Error Adjusted ARIMAC.

참고문헌(21)open

  1. [단행본] Bowerman, B. / 2005 / Forecasting, Time Series, and Regression / Thomson Brooks

  2. [단행본] Box, G. E. P. / 1976 / Time Series Analysis:Forecasting and Control / Holden-Day

  3. [단행본] Box, G. E. P. / 1994 / Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control / Prentice Hall

  4. [학술지] Burger, C. J. S. C. / 2001 / A practitioners guide to time-series methods for tourism demand forecasting - a case study of Durban, South Africa / Tourism Management 22 (4) : 403 ~ 409

  5. [학술지] Chen, C. / 2009 / Seasonal ARMA forecasting of inbound air travel arrivals to Taiwan / Transportmetrica 5 (2) : 124 ~ 140

  6. [학술지] Chu, F. L. / 2004 / Forecasting tourism demand : a cubic polynomial approach / Tourism Management 25 (2) : 209 ~ 218

  7. [학술지] Coshall, J. / 2006 / Time Series Analyses of UK Outbound Travel by Air / Journal of Travel Research 44 (3) : 335 ~ 347

  8. [학술지] Hibon, M. / 2005 / To combine or not to combine : Selecting among forecasts and their combinations / International Journal of Forecasting 21 (1) : 15 ~ 24

  9. [학위논문] Hur, Nam-kyun / 2010 / A Study on the Air Travel Demand Forecasting using Time-Series Model

  10. [단행본] Jung, Dong-bin / 2009 / Demand Forecasting of time seriesⅠ / Hannarae Academy

  11. [인터넷자료] Korea Chamber of Commerce ＆Industry / SCM CEO REPORT Vol.12

  12. [학술지] Kulendran, N. / 2003 / Forecasting the demand for international business tourism / Journal of Travel Research 41 (3) : 265 ~ 271

  13. [학술지] 이충기 / 2007 / 최적 시계열 수요예측 모델선정에 관한 연구 / 관광학연구 31 (6) : 289 ~ 311

  14. [단행본] Lewis, C. D. / 1982 / Industrial and Business Forecasting Methods / Butterworth Scientific

  15. [학술지] Li, G. / 2005 / Recent developments in econometric modeling and forecasting / Journal of Travel Research 44 (1) : 83 ~ 99

  16. [학술지] Ljung. G. M. / 1978 / On a Measure of Lack of Fit Time Series Models / Biometrika 65 : 297 ~ 303

  17. [학술지] 송근석 / 2009 / 결합기법을 이용한 관광수요예측 / 관광레저연구 21 (1) : 183 ~ 202

  18. [학술대회] Totamane, R. / 2009 / Air Cargo Demand Prediction / Proceedings of 3rd Annual IEEE International Systems Conference : 23 ~ 26

  19. [학술지] Witt, S. F. / 1992 / Forecasting domestic tourism demand : Application to Las Vegas arrivals data / Journal of Travel Research 31 (1) : 36 ~ 41

  20. [학술지] Wong, K. K. F. / 2007 / Tourism forecasting : To combine or not to combine? / Tourism Management 28 (4) : 1068 ~ 1078

  21. [학술대회] Wu, Ming-Cheng / 2007 / China’s Future Market Development and Implications / Proceedings of International Air Transportation Conference : 146 ~ 153