Abstract
Due to their small size, high diffusivity, and chemically active surfaces, nanoparticles share much in common with water-soluble proteins. These similarities have generated great interest in using biofunctional nanoparticles as a route to deliver targeted therapeutics. Already nanoparticles have found applications in the hyperthermia of tumors, personal care lotions, and tissue scaffolding. Our study focuses on the targeting of such nanoparticles to specific biological sites. It therefore seeks to identify the factors that control the migration and capture of nanoparticles within living systems. In particular, we examine the affinity of anti-collagen coated magnetite nanoparticles for collagen IV-coated surfaces under flow stress. The studies are performed within microfluidic devices that are designed to mimic various fluid flow patterns within the body. We find, in this case, a large background signal due to nonspecific binding. Further examination shows a correlation between chemical functionality (e.g., surface charge, hydrophilicity) that suggests that a balanced approach between biological functionality and chemical functionality may reduce the background from nonspecific binding to acceptable levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zambaux, M. F.; Bonneaux, F.; Gref, R.; Maincent, P. J. Controlled Release 1998, 50, 31.
Schievink, W. I. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 336, 28–40.
Hashimoto, T.; Meng, H.; Young, W. L. Neurol. Res. June 2006, 28, 372–380(9).
Kilic, T.; Sohrabifar, M.; Kurtkaya, O.; Yildirim, O.; Elmaci, I.; Gunel, M.; Pamir, M. N. Neurosurgery 2005, 57, 997–1007; discussion 997–1007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benkoski, J.J., Patrone, J.J., Crookston, J. et al. The Effects of Chemical Functionalization vs. Biological Functionalization on Nanoparticle Binding Affinity. MRS Online Proceedings Library 1064, 304 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-1064-PP03-04
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-1064-PP03-04