Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter May 22, 2015

Preparation and characterization of reactive liquid rubbers toughened epoxy-clay hybrid nanocomposites

  • Jowita Szymańska , Mohamed Bakar ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Marcin Kostrzewa and Marino Lavorgna

Abstract

The present work investigates the effect of organomodified nanoclay (ZW1) and butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer terminated with different amine groups (amine-terminated butadiene-acrylonitrile, ATBN) on the properties and morphology of epoxy resin. The morphologies of the nanocomposites were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The nanocomposites structure was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, XRD and TEM. The properties evaluation showed that the polymeric modifier and nanoclays strongly influence the fracture toughness and flexural properties of the nanocomposites. Hybrid epoxy composites containing 1% ZW1 and ATBN rubbers showed improved fracture toughness and flexural properties in comparison with unmodified epoxy resin. FTIR spectra showed an increase in the hydroxyl peak height peak height of 3360 cm-1 due to reactive rubber incorporation. SEM micrographs of hybrid epoxy resin nanocomposites showed significant plastic yielding of the polymer matrix with stratified structures and more cavitations, explaining thus the enhancement of fracture toughness and flexural strength of the nanocomposites.


Corresponding author: Mohamed Bakar, Department of Organic Materials Technology, Radom University of Technology and Humanities, Chrobrego 27, 26-600 Radom, Poland, e-mail: .

References

[1] Fröhlich J, Thomann R, Mülhaupt R. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 7205–7211.10.1021/ma035004dSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Li JB. Polym. Bull. 2006, 56, 377–384.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Lee HB, Kim HG, Yoon KB, Lee DH, Min KE. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 113, 685–692.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Liu W, Hoa SV, Pugh M. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2004, 44, 1178–1186.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Lee KY, Kim KY, Hwang IR, Choi YS, Hong CH. Polym. Test. 2010, 29, 139–146.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Vijayan PP, Puglia D, Kenny JM, Thomas S. Soft Matter. 2013, 9, 2899–2911.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Kelnar I, Rotrekl J, Kaprálková L, Hromádková J, Strachota A. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 125, 3477–3483.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Sithique MA. J. Polym. Eng. 2011, 31, 175–180.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Razak SIA, Wahman WAWA, Yahya MY. J. Polym. Eng. 2013, 33, 565–577.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Zeng M, Sun X, Yao X, Ji G, Chen N, Wang B, Qi C. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 106, 1347–1352.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Liang YL, Pearson RA. Polymer 2010, 51, 4880–4890.10.1016/j.polymer.2010.08.052Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kostrzewa M, Hausnerova B, Bakar M, Sar K. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2010, 29, 237–248.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kostrzewa M, Hausnerova B, Bakar M, Pająk K. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 122, 3237–3247.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Bakar M, Lavorgna M, Szymańska J, Dętkowska A. Polym. -Plast. Technol. Eng. 2012, 51, 675–681.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Chow WS, Yap YP. eXPRESS Polym. Lett. 2008, 2, 2–11.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Bakar M, Szymańska J. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2014, 27, 1239–1255.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Kinloch AJ, Young RJ. Fracture Behaviour of Polymers, Applied Science Publishers: London, 1983.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Lim SR, Chow WS. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2011, 50, 182–189.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Liu W, Hoa SV, Pugh M. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 307–316.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hwang JF, Manson JA, Hertzberg RW, Miller GA, Sperling LH. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1989, 29, 1466–1476.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Ben Saleh AB, Mohd Ishak ZA, Hashim AS, Kamil WA. J. Phys. Sci. 2009, 20, 1–12.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Lazzeri A, Bucknall CB. Polymer 1995, 36, 2895–2902.10.1016/0032-3861(95)94338-TSearch in Google Scholar

[23] Arias ML, Frontini PM, Williams RJJ. Polymer 2003, 44, 1537–1546.10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00829-7Search in Google Scholar

[24] Prado LASA, Cascione M, Wichmann MHG, Gojny FH, Fiedler B, Schulte K, Goerigk G. SAXS Hasylab Ann. Rept. 2005, 945–946.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Piscitelli F, Lavorgna M, Buonocore GG, Verdolotti L, Galy J, Mascia L. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2013, 298, 896–909.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Szustakiewicz K, Gazińska M, Kiersnowski AJ, Piglowski J. Polimery 2011, 56, 397–400.10.14314/polimery.2011.397Search in Google Scholar

[27] Yee AF, Pearson RA. J. Mater. Sci. 1986, 21, 2462–2474.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Wise CW, Cook WD, Goodwin AA. Polymer 2000, 41, 4625–4633.10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00686-2Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-12-29
Accepted: 2015-3-23
Published Online: 2015-5-22
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 8.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2014-0393/html
Scroll to top button