Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 28, 2020

Effect of Swirl on Gasification Characteristics in an Entrained-flow Coal Gasifier

  • Rongbin Li , Mingzhuang Xie , Hui Jin , Liejin Guo EMAIL logo and Fengqin Liu

Abstract

The three-dimensional (3-D) comprehensive mathematical model was developed to simulate the coal gasification process in an entrained flow gasifier with a swirl burner. The models employed or developed includes the coal devolatilization model, the char combustion and gasification model, the gas homogeneous reaction model, the random-trajectory model, gas turbulence model, and the P-1 radiation model. The solution of models was executed based on the computational fluid dynamics (CFD). By qualitatively comparing the results at different swirl number, the significant influences of swirl on characteristics of coal gasification such as flow distributions, gas temperature and product composition including hydrogen (H2), carbon monoxide (CO), etc., and on the performance of coal gasification such as averaged exit product composition, carbon conversion rate and cold gas efficiency, were in detail discussed. Especially, a proper swirl number (S ≤ 0.65) in favor of gasification was found for the investigated gasifier in this paper.

Nomenclature

A, B

Empirical constants in Eddy-Dissipation model

Ai

Proportional coefficient of devolatilization, char heterogeneous reactions and gas homogeneous reactions (1/s)

Ap

Projected area of particle (m2)

ap

Equivalent absorption coefficient of particles in cell (1/m)

ag

Gas absorption coefficient (1/m)

a, b

Global reaction exponents for the species X and Y in gases homogeneous reactions

C1, C2

Turbulent model constants

CD

Drag coefficient

Cp, cp

Specific capacity of gas species and particle (J/(kg⋅K))

D

Averaged diameter of the inlet of gasification agent (m)

Dji

Mass diffusion coefficient of component j in component i (m2/s)

Dj,m

Mass diffusion coefficient for species j in the mixture (m2/s)

di, do

Inner and outer diameters of the inlet of gasification agent (m)

dp

Diameter of particle (m)

Ei

Activation energy of devolatilization, char heterogeneous reactions and gas homogeneous reactions (kJ/mol)

Ep

Equivalent emission of particles in cell (1/m)

Fdi, Fgi

Drag force and gravity (N)

fv,0

Mass fraction of volatiles initially present in the particle

G

Incident radiation in P-1 radiation model (W/m)

gi

Acceleration of gravity (m/s2)

H

Total enthalpy (J/kg)

h

Convective heat transfer coefficient between particle and gas phase (W/(m2⋅K))

k1

Kinetic rate of devolatilization (1/s)

kci

Kinetic rate of char heterogeneous reactions (kg/(m2⋅s⋅Pa0.5))

LHV

Low heating value of coal (J/kg)

Mj, Mw,j

Molecular weight of species j (g/mol)

Mc(s)

Molecular weight of carbon (g/mol)

mp

Mass of coal particle (kg)

mp,0

Mass of initial particle (kg)

N

Total number of chemical species in the system

Nu

Nusselt number

P

Static pressure (Pa)

Pr

Prandtl number

pi

Partial pressure of O2, CO2, and H2O (Pa)

QC

Convective heat transferred between particle and gas phase (J/s)

QG

Gasification heat (J/s)

QR

Radiative heat transferred between particle and gas phase (J/s)

qri

Radiation flux (W/m2)

R

Universal gas constant (J/(K⋅mol))

Red

Reynolds number based on the particle diameter and the relative velocity

S

Swirl number

Sh

Sherwood number

Sp

Surface area of particle, m2

Sϕ

Generalized source term

Sϕp

Source term of interaction between coal particle and gas phase

Sct

Turbulent Schmidt number

Tg

Temperature of gas (K)

Tp

Temperature of particle (K)

ui

Instantaneous gas velocity (m/s)

ui¯

Time-mean velocity of gas phase (m/s)

ui

Fluctuating velocity of gas phase (m/s)

upi

Velocity of particle (m/s)

vR, vj

Stoichiometric coefficients for reactant and any species in the system

Xi

Mole fraction of species i

xi

Coordinate (m)

Yj

Mass fraction of species j

YR, YP

Mass fraction of any product and reactant species

yc

Carbon mass fraction on dry basis of coal

Z

Modulus of the mean rate-of-strain tensor

ΔH

Heat of devolatilization in eq. (3), gasification reactions in eq. (6)-eq. (8) (J/kg)

Δmpi

Mass change for each particle (kg)

Δt

Integration time step between particle and gas phase (s)

ΔfHm,proΘ

Standard formation enthalpy of products (J/kg)

ΔrHm,vol

Reaction heat of volatile (J/kg)

ΔrHm,carbon

Carbon complete combustion heat (J/kg)

ρ

Gas density (kg/m3)

κ

Turbulent kinetic energy (m2/s2)

ε

Dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy (1/(m2⋅s3))

εp

Emissivity of particle

ϕ

Generalized dependent variable

Γ

Generalized diffusion coefficient

Γr

Radiation parameter related to the absorption and scattering coefficients

μ

Molecular viscosity (kg/(m⋅s))

μt

Turbulent viscosity (kg/(m⋅s))

λ

Molecular thermal conductivity (W/(m⋅K))

λt

Turbulent thermal conductivity (W/(m⋅K))

σ

Stefan-Boltzmann constant, 5.67 × 10−8 W/(m2⋅K4)

σκ, σε

Turbulent Prandtl number for κ and ε equations in realizable κ-ε model

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [No. 51506199] and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2302018FRF-TP-18-095A1].

References

Abani, N., and A. F. Ghoniem. 2013. “Large Eddy Simulations of Coal Gasification in an Entrained Flow Gasifier.” Fuel 104: 664–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.006.Search in Google Scholar

Anacleto, P. M., E. C. Fernandes, M. V. Heitor, and S. I. Shtork. 2003. “Swirl Flow Structure and Flame Characteristics in a Model Lean Premixed Combustor.” Combustion Science and Technology 175: 1369–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200302354.Search in Google Scholar

Badzioch, S., and P.G. Hawksley. 1970. “Kinetics of Thermal Decomposition of Pulverized Coal Particles.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 9: 521–30. https://doi.org/10.1021/i260036a005.Search in Google Scholar

Bi, D. P., Q. L. Guan, W. W. Xuan, and J. S. Zhang. 2015. “Numerical Simulation of GSP Gasifier under Different Swirl Angles.” Fuel 155: 155–63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.001.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, C. X., M. Horio, and T. Kojima. 2000a. “Numerical Simulation of Entrained Flow Coal Gasifiers. Part I: Modeling of Coal Gasification in an Entrained Flow Gasifier.” Chemical Engineering Science 55: 3861–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00030-0.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, C. X., M. Horio, and T. Kojima. 2000b. “Numerical Simulation of Entrained Flow Coal Gasifiers. Part II: Effects of Operating Conditions on Gasifier Performance.” Chemical Engineering Science 55: 3875–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00031-2.Search in Google Scholar

Chigier, N. A. 1972. “Gas Dynamics of Swirling Flow in Combustion Systems.” Astronaut Acta 17: 387–95.Search in Google Scholar

Choi, Y. C., X. Y. Li, T. J. Park, J. H. Kim, and J. G. Lee. 2001. “Numerical Study on the Coal Gasification Characteristics in an Entrained Flow Coal Gasifier.” Fuel 80: 2193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00101-6.Search in Google Scholar

Coppalle, A., and P. Vervisch. 1983. “The Total Emissivities of High-Temperature Flames.” Combustion and Flame 49: 101–08. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(83)90154-2.Search in Google Scholar

Crowe, C. T., M. P. Sharma, and D. E. Stock. 1977. “Particle-Source in Cell (Psi-cell) Model for Gas-Droplet Flows.” Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME 99: 325–32. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3448756.Search in Google Scholar

Dai, Z. H., X. Gong, X. L. Guo, H. F. Liu, F. C. Wang, and Z. H. Yu. 2008. “Pilot-trial and Modeling of a New Type of Pressurized Entrained-flow Pulverized Coal Gasification Technology.” Fuel 87: 2304–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.12.005.Search in Google Scholar

Emun, F., M. Gadalla, T. Majozi, and D. Boer. 2010. “Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Process Simulation and Optimization.” Computers & Chemical Engineering 34: 331–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.04.007.Search in Google Scholar

Guruz, G. A., U. Uctepe, and T. Durusoy. 2004. “Mathematical Modeling of Thermal Decomposition of Coal.” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 71: 537–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2003.08.007.Search in Google Scholar

Hjertager, B. F., and B. H. Hjertager. 1976. “On Mathematical Modeling of Turbulent Combustion with Special Emphasis on Soot Formation and Combustion.” Symposium (International) on Combustion 16: 719–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(77)80366-4.Search in Google Scholar

Fan, C., S. M. Guo, and H. Jin. 2019. “Numerical study on coal gasification in supercritical water fluidized bed and exploration of complete gasification under mild temperature conditions.” Chemical Engineering Science 206: 134–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2019.05.041.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, M., I. Ye, and C. Ryu. 2018. “Effect of Slage Viscosity Model on Transient Simulations of Wall Salg Flow in an Entrained Coal Gasifier.” The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 35: 1065–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-018-0008-x.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J. K., C. G. Hu, Y. S. Shin, and H. S. Chun. 1990. “Combustion Characteristics of a 2-Stage Swirl-Flow Fluidized-Bed Combustor.” The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 68: 824–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450680513.Search in Google Scholar

Lilley, D. G. 1977. “Swirl Flows in Combustion - Review.” AIAA Journal 15: 1063–78. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60756.Search in Google Scholar

Litvinenko, V., and B. Meyer. 2018. “Fundamentals of Gasification and Gasifiers.” In Syngas Production: Status and Potential for Implementation in Russian Industry, 7–17. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70963-53.Search in Google Scholar

McGee, H. A. 1991. Molecular Engineering. New York: McGraw-hil.Search in Google Scholar

Minchener, A. 2005. “Coal Gasification for Advanced Power Generation.” Fuel 84: 2222–35. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.08.035.Search in Google Scholar

Morsi, S. A., and A. J. Alexande. 1972. “An Investigation of Particle Trajectories in two-Phase Flow Systems.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics 55: 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112072001806.Search in Google Scholar

Ranz, W. E., and W. R. Marshall. 1952. “Evaporation from Drops.” Chemical Engineering Progress 48: 141–46.Search in Google Scholar

Schingnitz, M. 2002. “Gasification - an Opportunity to Design Environmentally Compatible Processes in the Chemical and Pulp & Paper Industry.” Chemical Engineering & Technology 26: 983–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200302999.Search in Google Scholar

Shih, T. H., W. W. Liou, A. Shabbir, Z. G. Yang, and J. Zhu. 1995. “A New Kappa-Epsilon Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds-Number Turbulent Flows.” Computers & Fluids 24: 227–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T.Search in Google Scholar

Shuen, J. S., L. D. Chen, and G. M. Faeth. 1983. “Evaluation of a Stochastic-Model of Particle Dispersion in a Turbulent Round Jet.” Aiche Journal 29: 167–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690290127.Search in Google Scholar

Siegel, R., and J.R. Howell. 1992. Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer. Washington D.C.: Hemisphere publishing corporation.Search in Google Scholar

Singer, S. L., and A. F. Ghoniem. 2011. “An Adaptive Random Pore Model for Multimodal Pore Structure Evolution with Application to Char Gasification.” Energy & Fuels : an American Chemical Society Journal 25: 1423–37. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef101532u.Search in Google Scholar

Slezak, A., J. M. Kuhlman, L. J. Shadle, J. Spenik, and S. P. Shi. 2010. “CFD Simulation of Entrained-flow Coal Gasification: Coal Particle Density/sizefraction Effects.” Powder Technology 203: 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2010.03.029.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, I. W. 1982. “The Combustion Rate of Coal Chars: A Review.” Pittsburgh: Symposium (International) on Combustion 19: 1045–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(82)80281-6.Search in Google Scholar

Smoot, L. D., and P. J. Smith. 1985. Coal Combustion and Gasification. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4757-9721-3Search in Google Scholar

Vanierschot, M., and E.V.D. Bulck. 2008. “Influence of Swirl on the Initial Merging Zone of a Turbulent Annular Jet.” Physics of Fluids 20: 645. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2992191.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, L. J., Y. J. Jia, S. K. Kumar, R. D. Li, R. B. Mahar, M. Ali, I. N. Unar, U. Sultan, and K. Memon. 2016. “Numerical Analysis on the Influential Factors of Coal Gasification Performance in Two-stage Entrained Flow Gasifier.” Applied Thermal Energy 115: 1601–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.122.Search in Google Scholar

Watanabe, H., and M. Otaka. 2006. “Numerical Simulation of Coal Gasification in Entrained Flow Coal Gasifier.” Fuel 85: 1935–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.02.002.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, J. L., Q. F. Liang, Z. H. Dai, and H. F. Liu. 2018. “The Influence of Swirling Flows on Pulverized Coal Gasifiers Using the Comprehensive Gasification Model.” Fuel Processing Technology 172: 142–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.12.012.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, F., Z. J. Zhou, F. C. Wang, H. F. Liu, X. Gong, and Z. H. Yu. 2007. “Characteristic of the Shenfu Coal Char Gasification with Steam and Carbon Dioxide.” The Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology 71: 436–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2950.2405.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-11-10
Revised: 2020-01-04
Accepted: 2020-02-02
Published Online: 2020-02-28

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 3.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2019-0203/html
Scroll to top button