Chest
Volume 135, Issue 4, April 2009, Pages 999-1001
Journal home page for Chest

Original Research
Malignant Disease
A Prospective Study of the Volume of Pleural Fluid Required for Accurate Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Effusion

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-2002Get rights and content

Background

This is a prospective study to define the volume of pleural fluid adequate for maximal yield of cytologic analysis of pleural fluid.

Methods

Patients undergoing diagnostic thoracentesis with malignancy in the differential diagnosis were enrolled in the study. The first 50 mL of pleural fluid were put in a specimen cup, and subsequent fluid was collected in a drainage bag. Both samples were sent for cytologic evaluation. The cytologist was blinded as to which specimen was being evaluated.

Results

Forty-four patients (21 men, 23 women; mean [± SD] age, 46 ± 11.1 years) were enrolled in the study. The average volume of the “large-volume” specimen was 890 ± 375 mL (range, 250 to 1,800). Although malignant pleural involvement had never been documented for any patients, 31 patients had received a diagnosis of malignancy prior to undergoing thoracentesis. Cytologic tests were positive for malignancy in 23 of the 44 patients (55%). In the group of patients with an established history of cancer, pleural fluid was positive for malignant cells in 19 of 33 samples (58%). In all 23 patients with malignant pleural effusion, both the 50-mL specimen and the large-volume specimen were cytologically identical. In all 21 patients with negative pleural cytology findings, there was again 100% concordance between the 50-mL samples and the larger samples. The minimum adequate pleural fluid volume for cytologic diagnosis has been a matter of debate. The strongest data to date came from a retrospective study in 2002.

Conclusion

Our prospective study now unequivocally supports the concept that the submission of > 50 mL of pleural fluid for cytologic analysis does not increase diagnostic yield.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the institutional review board of our institution. Due to logistical reasons, subjects were accrued during the following two separate intervals: March 4, 2003, to June 3, 2004; and August 7, 2007, to December 1, 2007. During these intervals, patients with suspected malignant pleural effusion undergoing a diagnostic thoracentesis were enrolled prospectively. The skin was sterilized and draped in standard fashion. After injecting the skin with 1% lidocaine, a small 8F

Results

Forty-four patients were included in our study (21 men and 23 women). The mean age was 46 ± 11.1 years. The mean volume of the large-volume specimen was 890 ± 375 mL (range, 250 to 1,800 mL). Thirteen patients had no history of cancer. Thirty-one patients had received a diagnosis of malignancy prior to pleural fluid sampling, although malignant pleural involvement had never been documented for any. Twelve of the patients with previously documented malignancy had lung cancer, 9 patients had

Discussion

Malignant pleural effusion complicates the course of malignancy and is the initial presentation of malignancy in about 13% of patients.4 The documentation of malignant cells in pleural fluid has both diagnostic and prognostic value. We are unaware of any prospective study documenting the equivalence of small- and large-volume pleural fluid samples in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion; ours appears to be the first such study.

The issue of minimum adequate volume for cytologic diagnosis

References (11)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (91)

  • Malignant Pleural Effusion: Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management

    2022, American Journal of Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    The optimal amount of pleural fluid to send for cytology has been subject to debate. Studies have shown optimal volumes ranging from 50 to 150 mL.12,13 Cytology of pleural fluid has a mean sensitivity of approximately 60% in diagnosing metastatic malignancy, and is even lower for mesothelioma.2

  • How much is enough: investigation of pleural fluid cytology findings related to sample volume

    2022, Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology
    Citation Excerpt :

    They found no differences in the sensitivity or negative predictive values between any 2 quartiles, with small-volume samples diagnosing pleural malignancies with the same sensitivity and statistical accuracy as the larger volume samples.5 In 2009, Abouzgheib et al6 conducted a prospective study investigating whether 50 mL of pleural fluid was equivalent to a larger extracted volume for cytologic analysis by splitting the same samples into small- and large-volume specimens. They found complete concordance between the <50-mL and >50-mL groups in diagnosing malignant effusions, concluding that the collection of >50 mL of pleural fluid for cytologic analysis did not increase the diagnostic yield.6

  • Malignant Pleural Effusions

    2021, Clinics in Chest Medicine
View all citing articles on Scopus

The authors have reported to the ACCP that no significant conflicts of interest exist with any companies/organizations whose products or services may be discussed in this article.

Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (www.chestjournal.org/misc/reprints.shtml).

View full text