Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality of Life After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Early Results from a Prospective Cohort Study of 115 Patients

  • Peritoneal Surface Malignancy
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to describe short- and medium-term longitudinal quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC were recruited. The primary outcome was QoL, measured using the short-form 36 questionnaire and expressed as a physical component score (PCS) and a mental component score (MCS), with higher scores representing better QoL. Data were collected prospectively at baseline and before discharge, then 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Trajectories of the PCS and MCS were described for the study period and grouped according to a peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) (≤ 12 vs. ≥ 13) and a completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score (CC0 vs. CC1–CC3).

Results

Overall, 117 patients underwent CRS and HIPEC and 115 (98.3%) of the 117 patients participated in the study. The main primary pathology was colorectal in 52 (45%) of the 115 patients and appendiceal in 27 (23.5%) of the 115 patients. The median baseline PCS [48.16; interquartile range (IQR), 38.6–54.9] had decreased at pre-discharge (35.34; IQR, 28.7–41.8), then increased slightly at 3 months (42.54; IQR, 37.6–51.6), before returning to baseline within 6 months (48.35; IQR, 39.1–52.5) and remaining unchanged 12 months after surgery (48.55; IQR, 40.8–55.5). The MCS remained unchanged during the study period. The patients with a PCI of 13 or higher had worse PCS and MCS during the postoperative period than the patients with a PCI of 12 or lower.

Conclusions

The CRS and HIPEC procedures impaired PCS, with scores returning to baseline within 6 months after surgery, whereas MCS remained unchanged. The patients with a lower PCI had better postoperative QoL outcomes. For patients with peritoneal malignancy, CRS and HIPEC can be performed with acceptable short- to medium-term QoL outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Foster JM, Sleightholm R, Patel A, et al. Morbidity and mortality rates following cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy compared with other high-risk surgical oncology procedures. JAMA Network Open. 2019;2(1):e186847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sugarbaker PH. Update on the management of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018;7:599–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugarbaker PH. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: natural history and rational therapeutic interventions using intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Res. 1996;81:149–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith ME, Nathan H. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: safety is only half of the story. JAMA Network Open. 2019;2(1):e186839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hompes D, D’Hoore A, Van Cutsem E, et al. The treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer with complete cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) with oxaliplatin: a Belgian multicentre prospective phase II clinical study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2186–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baratti D, Kusamura S, Pietrantonio F, Guaglio M, Niger M, Deraco M. Progress in treatments for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases during the years 2010–2015: a systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;100:209–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Helm JH, Miura JT, Glenn JA, et al. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1686–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Spiliotis J, Halkia E, Lianos E, et al. Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective randomized phase III study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1570–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hotouras A, Desai D, Bhan C, Murphy J, Lampe B, Sugarbaker PH. Heated IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: a systematic literature review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26:661–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Verwaal VJ, van Ruth S, de Bree E, et al. Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3737–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. van Driel WJ, Koole SN, Sikorska K, et al. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(3):230–240. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1708618.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan WJ, Wong JF, Chia CS, Tan GH, Soo KC, Teo MC. Quality of life after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: an Asian perspective. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:4219–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Passot G, Bakrin N, Roux AS, et al. Quality of life after cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective study of 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40:529–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dodson RM, McQuellon RP, Mogal HD, et al. Quality-of-life evaluation after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(Suppl 5):772–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH. Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Res. 1996;82:359–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Burnett A, Lecompte M-EA, Trabulsi N, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis index predicts survival in colorectal patients undergoing HIPEC using oxaliplatin: a retrospective single-arm cohort study. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17:83.

  17. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ Clin Res Ed. 2007;335:806–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.

  19. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surgery. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ansari N, Brown KGM, McBride KE, et al. Accelerating the learning curve in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy using an external mentor model. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89:1097–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chia CS, Tan GH, Lim C, Soo KC, Teo MC. Prospective quality-of-life study for colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2905–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stearns AT, Malcomson L, Punnett G, et al. Long-term quality-of-life after cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei: a prospective longitudinal study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:965–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kopanakis N, Argyriou EO, Vassiliadou D, et al. Quality of life after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: a single-centre prospective study. J BUON. 2018;23:488–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Steffens D, Solomon MJ, Young JM, et al. Cohort study of long-term survival and quality of life following pelvic exenteration. BJS Open. 2018;2:328–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Young JM, Badgery-Parker T, Masya LM, et al. Quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes following exenteration for pelvic malignancy. Br J Surg. 2014;101:277–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe) research staff and the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital clinical staff for their contribution and support toward this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Steffens PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steffens, D., Koh, C., Ansari, N. et al. Quality of Life After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Early Results from a Prospective Cohort Study of 115 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 27, 3986–3994 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08443-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08443-4

Navigation