Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Defining the Safety Profile for Performing Pancreatoduodenectomy in the Setting of Hyperbilirubinemia

  • Pancreatic Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hyperbilirubinemia is commonly observed in patients requiring pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Thus far, literature regarding the danger of operating in the setting of hyperbilirubinemia is equivocal. What remains undefined is at what specific level of bilirubin there is an adverse safety profile for undergoing PD. The aim of this study is to identify the optimal safety profile of patients with hyperbilirubinemia undergoing PD.

Patients and Methods

The present work analyzed 803 PDs from 2004 to 2018. A generalized additive model was used to determine cutoff values of total serum bilirubin (TB) that were associated with increases in adverse outcomes, including 90-day mortality. Subgroup comparisons and biliary stent-specific analyses were performed for patients with TB below and above the cutoff.

Results

TB of 13 mg/dL was associated with an increase in 90-day mortality (P = 0.043) and was the dominant risk factor on multivariate logistic regression [odds ratio (OR) 8.193, P = 0.001]. Increased TB levels were also associated with reoperations, number of complications per patient, and length of stay. Patients with TB greater than or equal to 13 mg/dL (TB ≥ 13) who received successful biliary decompression through stenting had less combined death and serious morbidity (P = 0.048).

Conclusions

Preoperative TB ≥ 13 mg/dL was associated with increased 90-day mortality after PD. Reducing a TB ≥ 13 is generally recommended before proceeding to surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of vater. Ann Surg. 1935;102(4):763–79. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17856666. Accessed December 11, 2018.

  2. Wang L, Yu W-F. Obstructive jaundice and perioperative management. Acta Anaesth Taiwan. 2014;52(1):22–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aat.2014.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Martínez-Cecilia D, Reyes-Díaz M, Ruiz-Rabelo J, et al. Oxidative stress influence on renal dysfunction in patients with obstructive jaundice: a case and control prospective study. Redox Biol. 2016;8:160–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2015.12.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Padillo J, Puente J, Gómez M, et al. Improved cardiac function in patients with obstructive jaundice after internal biliary drainage: hemodynamic and hormonal assessment. Ann Surg. 2001;234(5):652–6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11685028. Accessed December 11, 2018.

  5. Plusa S, Webster N, Primrose J. Obstructive jaundice causes reduced expression of polymorphonuclear leucocyte adhesion molecules and a depressed response to bacterial wall products in vitro. Gut. 1996;38(5):784–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8707129. Accessed December 11, 2018.

  6. Dolejs S, Zarzaur BL, Zyromski NJ, et al. Does hyperbilirubinemia contribute to adverse patient outcomes following pancreatoduodenectomy? J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(4):647–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3381-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sauvanet A, Boher J-M, Paye F, et al. Severe jaundice increases early severe morbidity and decreases long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(2):380–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. El Nakeeb A, Salem A, Mahdy Y, et al. Value of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case–control study. Asian J Surg. 2018;41(2):155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.10.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoon KW, Heo JS, Choi DW, Choi SH. Factors affecting long-term survival after surgical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Korean Surg Soc. 2011;81(6):394. https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2011.81.6.394.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Berberat PO, Künzli BM, Gulbinas A, et al. An audit of outcomes of a series of periampullary carcinomas. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(2):187–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2008.01.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Topal B, Aerts R, Hendrickx T, Fieuws S, Penninckx F. Determinants of complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33(4):488–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2006.10.041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilsdorf RB, Spanos P. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1973;177(3):332–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4540286. Accessed December 11, 2018.

  13. van der Gaag NA, Rauws EAJ, van Eijck CHJ, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(2):129–37. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0903230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fang Y, Gurusamy KS, Wang Q, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on safety and efficacy of biliary drainage before surgery for obstructive jaundice. Br J Surg. 2013;100(12):1589–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scheufele F, Schorn S, Demir IE, et al. Preoperative biliary stenting versus operation first in jaundiced patients due to malignant lesions in the pancreatic head: a meta-analysis of current literature. Surgery. 2017;161(4):939–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007;142(5):761–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery. 2017;161(3):584–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):177–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181afde41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vollmer CM, Lewis RS, Hall BL, et al. Establishing a quantitative benchmark for morbidity in pancreatoduodenectomy using ACS-NSQIP, the accordion severity grading system, and the postoperative morbidity index. Ann Surg. 2015;261(3):527–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McMillan MT, Malleo G, Bassi C, et al. Drain management after pancreatoduodenectomy: reappraisal of a prospective randomized trial using risk stratification. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(4):798–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.07.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Generalized additive models for medical research. Stat Methods Med Res. 1995;4(3):187–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029500400302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ranstam J, Cook JA. Kaplan–Meier curve. Br J Surg. 2017;104(4):442. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De Pastena M, Marchegiani G, Paiella S, et al. Impact of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of 1500 consecutive cases. Dig Endosc. 2018;30(6):777–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pitt HA, Cameron JL, Postier RG, Gadacz TR. Factors affecting mortality in biliary tract surgery. Am J Surg. 1981;141(1):66–72. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6970004. Accessed January 16, 2019.

  25. Butler JR, Kays JK, House MG, et al. Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy in the cirrhotic patient: risk stratification and meta-analysis. HPB. September 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2018.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fisher L, Byrnes E, Fisher AA. Prevalence of vitamin K and vitamin D deficiency in patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders. Nutr Res. 2009;29(9):676–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2009.09.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gilliland T, Villafane-Ferriol N, Shah K, et al. Nutritional and metabolic derangements in pancreatic cancer and pancreatic resection. Nutrients. 2017;9(3):243. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9030243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pedrazzoli S. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(19):e6858. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000006858.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bonin EA, Baron TH. Preoperative biliary stents in pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18(5):621–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0403-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Crippa S, Cirocchi R, Partelli S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of metal versus plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable periampullary or pancreatic head tumors. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(9):1278–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.05.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jinkins LJ, Parmar AD, Han Y, et al. Current trends in preoperative biliary stenting in patients with pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2013;154(2):179–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.03.016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ngu W, Jones M, Neal CP, Dennison AR, Metcalfe MS, Garcea G. Preoperative biliary drainage for distal biliary obstruction and post-operative infectious complications. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83(4):280–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06296.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cameron JL, Crist DW, Sitzmann JV, et al. Factors influencing survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg. 1991;161(1):120–4; discussion 124–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1987845. Accessed January 18, 2019.

  35. Strasberg SM, Gao F, Sanford D, et al. Jaundice: an important, poorly recognized risk factor for diminished survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. HPB. 2014;16(2):150–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mansfield SD, Sen G, Oppong K, et al. Increase in serum bilirubin levels in obstructive jaundice secondary to pancreatic and periampullary malignancy - implications for timing of resectional surgery and use of biliary drainage. HPB. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651820600919860.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles M. Vollmer Jr. MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, B., Trudeau, M.T., Maggino, L. et al. Defining the Safety Profile for Performing Pancreatoduodenectomy in the Setting of Hyperbilirubinemia. Ann Surg Oncol 27, 1595–1605 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08044-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08044-w

Navigation