Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Significance of Sarcopenia in Patients with Esophagogastric Junction Cancer or Upper Gastric Cancer

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The association between sarcopenia and postoperative outcomes for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the impact of sarcopenia on short- and long-term outcomes after surgery for esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) or upper gastric cancer (UGC).

Methods

The study reviewed 148 patients with EGJC or UGC who underwent surgical resection. The patients were categorized into the sarcopenia group or the non-sarcopenia group according to their skeletal muscle index calculated using abdominal computed tomography images. The study compared clinicopathologic factors, postoperative complications, and prognosis between the two groups.

Results

Sarcopenia was present in 19 patients (32.2%) with EGJC and 23 patients (25.8%) with UGC. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were significantly poorer in the sarcopenia group than in the non-sarcopenia group (OS 85.5 vs 54.8%, P = 0.0010; RFS 78.7 vs 51.7%, P = 0.0054). The development of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. Both the uni- and multivariate analyses showed that N stage (P < 0.0001) and sarcopenia (P = 0.0024 and 0.0293, respectively) were independent poor prognostic factors for OS.

Conclusions

Sarcopenia was strongly associated with a poor long-term prognosis for patients with EGJC or UGC who underwent surgery. The results suggest that special attention might be needed during the development of treatment strategies for patients with sarcopenia who intend to undergo operations for EGJC and UGC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenberg IH. Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance. J Nutr. 1997;127:990S–91S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Von Haehling S, Morley JE, Anker SD. An overview of sarcopenia: facts and numbers on prevalence and clinical impact. J Cachex Sarcopenia Muscle. 2010;1:129–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Ageing. 2010;39:412–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Harimoto N, Shirabe K, Yamashita YI, et al. Sarcopenia as a predictor of prognosis in patients following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1523–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujiwara N, Nakagawa H, Kudo Y, et al. Sarcopenia, intramuscular fat deposition, and visceral adiposity independently predict the outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2015;63:131–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Go SI, Park MJ, Song HN, et al. Sarcopenia and inflammation are independent predictors of survival in male patients newly diagnosed with small cell lung cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24:2075–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miyamoto Y, Baba Y, Sakamoto Y, et al. Sarcopenia is a negative prognostic factor after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2663–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi Y, Oh DY, Kim TY, et al. Skeletal muscle depletion predicts the prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing palliative chemotherapy, independent of body mass index. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0139749.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dodson S, Baracos VE, Jatoi A, et al. Muscle wasting in cancer cachexia: clinical implications, diagnosis, and emerging treatment strategies. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:265–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tamandl D, Paireder M, Asari R, et al. Markers of sarcopenia quantified by computed tomography predict adverse long-term outcome in patients with resected oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:1359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tegels JJ, van Vugt JL, Reisinger KW, et al. Sarcopenia is highly prevalent in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer but not associated with worse outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:403–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu K, Zhang W, Chen X, et al. Comparison on clinicopathological features and prognosis between esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma (Siewert II/III types) and distal gastric adenocarcinoma: retrospective cohort study, a single-institution, high-volume experience in China. Medicine. 2015;94:e1386.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Carcinoma of the cardia: carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction—classification, pathology and extent of resection. Dis Esophagus. 1996;9:173–82.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshizumi T, Shirabe K, Nakagawara H, et al. Skeletal muscle area correlates with body surface area in healthy adults. Hepatol Res. 2014;44:313–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsubara Y, Matsumoto T, Aoyagi Y, et al. Sarcopenia is a prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:945–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin L, Birdsell L, Macdonald N, et al. Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1539–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mizuno A, Kanda M, Kobayashi D, et al. Adverse effects of intraoperative blood loss on long-term outcomes after curative gastrectomy of patients with stage II/III gastric cancer. Dig Surg. 2016;33:121–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liang YX, Guo HH, Deng JY, et al. Impact of intraoperative blood loss on survival after curative resection for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:5542–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakamura H, Saji H, Kurimoto N, et al. Impact of intraoperative blood loss on long-term survival after lung cancer resection. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;21:18–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang W, Fang YJ, Wu XJ, et al. Intraoperative blood loss independently predicts survival and recurrence after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e76125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Margonis GA, Kim Y, Samaha M, et al. Blood loss and outcomes after resection of colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Res. 2016;202:473–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Suetta C, Magnusson SP, Beyer N, et al. Effect of strength training on muscle function in elderly hospitalized patients. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007;17:464–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fukuda Y, Yamamoto K, Hirao M, et al. Sarcopenia is associated with severe postoperative complications in elderly gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:986–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Joglekar S, Asghar A, Mott SL, et al. Sarcopenia is an independent predictor of complications following pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111:771–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peng PD, van Vledder MG, Tsai S, et al. Sarcopenia negatively impacts short-term outcomes in patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis. HPB Oxford. 2011;13:439–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Reisinger KW, van Vugt JL, Tegels JJ, et al. Functional compromise reflected by sarcopenia, frailty, and nutritional depletion predicts adverse postoperative outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2015;261:345–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Braghetto MI, Cardemil HG, Mandiola BC, et al. Impact of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27:237–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoshida N, Baba Y, Watanabe M, et al. Original scoring system for predicting postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2015;45:346–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Saeki MD, PhD, FACS.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 24 kb)

10434_2017_5811_MOESM2_ESM.tif

SUPPLEMENTARY FIG. 1 Postoperative outcomes for patients with esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) or upper gastric cancer (UGC). A Recurrence-free survival (RFS) of all the study patients. B Overall survival (OS) of all the study patients (n = 142). The 5-year RFS and OS rates tended to be worse for the patients with EGJC (P = 0.1284) than for those with UGC (P = 0.0788). Supplementary material 2 (TIFF 88 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kudou, K., Saeki, H., Nakashima, Y. et al. Prognostic Significance of Sarcopenia in Patients with Esophagogastric Junction Cancer or Upper Gastric Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 1804–1810 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5811-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5811-9

Keywords

Navigation