Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Porous Excipients on the Manufacturability and Product Performance of Solid Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

FDA-approved self-emulsifying medicines rely on liquid-based formulations, which can exhibit limited stability and short shelf-lives. Solid self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) can improve such issues, but there is still a great need for identifying suitable porous carriers to convert liquid SEDDS into solids without impairing their mechanical properties, functionality, and industrial feasibility. The impact of SEDDS adsorption on tableting is also poorly understood. Therefore, solid SEDDS were prepared by adsorbing liquid SEDDS onto ten commercially available porous excipients. Products were assessed with respect to mechanical behavior, tabletability, and product performance. Adsorbing SEDDS onto porous excipients led to satisfactory stability, with the exception of Zeopharm® 600 due to its high alkalinity, and Neusilin® US2/UFL2, which caused quercetin to crystallize out of the liquid concentrate. SEDDS adsorption reduced the elastic recovery of most excipients, making tableting achievable using Aeroperl® 300 and Aerosil® 200/300. The impact of SEDDS on elastic recovery provides additional understanding on solid SEDDS manufacture process. Acceptable tablets were made via direct compression but with slow disintegration. Addition of a superdisintegrant (crospovidone 5% w/w) ensured tablet manufacturing without impairment of product performance. Solid SEDDS displayed several technical advantages over their liquid counterparts, but attention must be given to the properties of the porous excipient chosen. Drug-excipient interactions play a significant role in drug degradation and crystallization in solid SEDDS. Improved mechanical behavior upon adsorption led to well-composed tablets that performed satisfactorily in vitro upon addition of a superdisintegrant. This study provides an insight on excipient-oriented rational development of solid SEDDS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal U, Sharma R, Gupta M, Vyas SP. Is nanotechnology a boon for oral drug delivery? Drug Discov Today. 2014;19(10):1530–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fatouros DG, Müllertz A. Development of self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) for oral bioavailability enhancement of poorly soluble drugs. In: Drug delivery strategies for poorly water-soluble drugs. Oxford: Wiley; 2013. p. 225–45.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Tran TH, Guo Y, Song D, Bruno RS, Lu X. Quercetin-containing self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system for improving oral bioavailability. J Pharm Sci. 2014;103(3):840–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Elgart A, Cherniakov I, Aldouby Y, Domb AJ, Hoffman A. Improved oral bioavailability of BCS class 2 compounds by self nano-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS): the underlying mechanisms for Amiodarone and Talinolol. Pharm Res. 2013;30(12):3029–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang L, Dong J, Chen J, Eastoe J, Li X. Design and optimization of a new self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;330(2):443–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tang B, Cheng G, Gu J-C, Xu C-H. Development of solid self-emulsifying drug delivery systems: preparation techniques and dosage forms. Drug Discov Today. 2008;13(13–14):606–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Savla R, Browne J, Plassat V, Wasan KM, Wasan EK. Review and analysis of FDA approved drugs using lipid-based formulations. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2017;43(11):1743–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jing B, Wang Z, Yang R, Zheng X, Zhao J, Tang S, et al. Enhanced oral bioavailability of felodipine by novel solid self-microemulsifying tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2016;42(3):506–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ito Y, Kusawake T, Ishida M, Tawa R, Shibata N, Takada K. Oral solid gentamicin preparation using emulsifier and adsorbent. J Control Release. 2005;105(1–2):23–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nazzal S, Khan MA. Controlled release of a self-emulsifying formulation from a tablet dosage form: stability assessment and optimization of some processing parameters. Int J Pharm. 2006;315(1–2):110–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jannin V, Musakhanian J, Marchaud D. Approaches for the development of solid and semi-solid lipid-based formulations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:734–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weerapol Y, Limmatvapirat S, Jansakul C, Takeuchi H, Sriamornsak P. Enhanced dissolution and oral bioavailability of nifedipine by spontaneous emulsifying powders: effect of solid carriers and dietary state. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;91:25–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kutza C, Metz H, Kutza J, Syrowatka F, Mäder K. Toward a detailed characterization of oil adsorbates as “solid liquids”. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013;84(1):172–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gumaste SG, Dalrymple DM, Serajuddin ATM. Development of solid SEDDS, V: compaction and drug release properties of tablets prepared by adsorbing lipid-based formulations onto Neusilin® US2. Pharm Res. 2013;30(12):3186–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nasr A, Gardouh A, Ghorab M. Novel solid self-Nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (S-SNEDDS) for oral delivery of Olmesartan Medoxomil: design, formulation, pharmacokinetic and bioavailability evaluation. Pharmaceutics. 2016;8(4):20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shazly G, Mohsin K. Dissolution improvement of solid self-emulsifying drug delivery systems of fenofibrate using an inorganic high surface adsorption material. Acta Pharma. 2015;65(1):29–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang W, Zhang J, Wang S, Zhang H, Yang H, Yue G. Experimental study on the angle of repose of pulverized coal. Particuology. 2010;8:482–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scalia S, Trotta V, Traini D, Young PM, Sticozzi C, Cervellati F, et al. Incorporation of quercetin in respirable lipid microparticles: effect on stability and cellular uptake on A549 pulmonary alveolar epithelial cells. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2013;112:322–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. USP 39/NF 34 The United States Pharmacopeia. Rockville, MD: the United States Pharmacopoeial convention; 2016.

  20. Joshi AB, Patel S, Kaushal AM, Bansal AK. Compaction studies of alternate solid forms of celecoxib. Adv Powder Technol. 2010;21(4):452–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kudryavtsev YV, Gelinck E, Fischer HR. Theoretical investigation of van der Waals forces between solid surfaces at nanoscales. Surf Sci. 2009;603(16):2580–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Okada T, Kobari H, Haeiwa T. Effects of fluoride and urea on the crystal growth of a hectorite-like layered silicate on a silica surface. Appl Clay Sci. 2016;132:320–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pawar P, Joo H, Callegari G, Drazer G, Cuitino AM, Muzzio FJ. The effect of mechanical strain on properties of lubricated tablets compacted at different pressures. Powder Technol. 2016;301:657–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tye CK, Sun CC, Amidon GE. Evaluation of the effects of tableting speed on the relationships between compaction pressure, tablet tensile strength, and tablet solid fraction. J Pharm Sci. 2005;94(3):465–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dall’Acqua S, Miolo G, Innocenti G, Caffieri S. The photodegradation of quercetin: relation to oxidation. Molecules. 2012;17(12):8898–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Álvarez-Diduk R, Ramírez-Silva MT, Galano A, Merkoçi A. Deprotonation mechanism and acidity constants in aqueous solution of Flavonols: a combined experimental and theoretical study. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117(41):12347–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Catauro M, Papale F, Bollino F, Piccolella S, Marciano S, Nocera P, et al. Silica/quercetin sol-gel hybrids as antioxidant dental implant materials. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2015;16(3):35001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Berlier G, Gastaldi L, Ugazio E, Miletto I, Iliade P, Sapino S. Stabilization of quercetin flavonoid in MCM-41 mesoporous silica: positive effect of surface functionalization. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2013;393:109–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Krupa A, Jachowicz R, Kurek M, Figiel W, Kwiecień M. Preparation of solid self-emulsifying drug delivery systems using magnesium aluminometasilicates and fluid-bed coating process. Powder Technol. 2014;266:329–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu C-Y, Hancock BC, Mills A, Bentham AC, Best SM, Elliott JA. Numerical and experimental investigation of capping mechanisms during pharmaceutical tablet compaction. Powder Technol. 2008;181(2):121–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Picker KM. Time dependence of elastic recovery for characterization of tableting materials. Pharm Dev Technol. 2001;6(1):61–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nazzal S, Nutan M, Palamakula A, Shah R, Zaghloul A, Khan M. Optimization of a self-nanoemulsified tablet dosage form of ubiquinone using response surface methodology: effect of formulation ingredients. Int J Pharm. 2002;240(1):103–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cirri M, Roghi A, Valleri M, Mura P. Development and characterization of fast-dissolving tablet formulations of glyburide based on solid self-microemulsifying systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2016;104:19–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Dane O. Kildsig Center for Pharmaceutical Processing Research (CPPR). The authors express their appreciation to the industrial advisor Dr. Jonathan Booth (AstraZeneca) for his valuable input and knowledge, and Sterling Glass for his assistance proof-reading this article. The University of Connecticut and AbbVie jointly participated in study design, research, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing, reviewing, and approving the publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiuling Lu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

André O'Reilly Beringhs and Bruna Cristina Minatovicz are graduate students at the University of Connecticut; Bodhisattwa Chaudhuri and Xiuling Lu and professors at the University of Connecticut. They all have no additional conflicts of interest to report. Geoff G. Z. Zhang is an employee of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beringhs, A.O., Minatovicz, B.C., Zhang, G.G.Z. et al. Impact of Porous Excipients on the Manufacturability and Product Performance of Solid Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems. AAPS PharmSciTech 19, 3298–3310 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-018-1178-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-018-1178-x

KEY WORDS

Navigation