Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of satisfaction with territory design on the motivation, attitudes, and work outcomes of salespeople

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary emphasis of previous research concerning salespeople has been focused on their attitudes and behavior. The relationship between organizational variables and salesperson attitudes and behavior has received very limited attention. Sales territory design is largely uncontrollable by the salesperson, yet is acknowledged by managers and researchers as an important factor enabling salespeople to perform well. The objective is to examine satisfaction with territory design from the perspective of the salesperson. A conceptual model and hypotheses are developed linking the satisfaction with territory design with role ambiguity, intrinsic motivation, job satisfaction, and performance. Role conflict, met expectations, organizational commitment, and intention to leave are also included in the model. Survey results provide strong support for 19 of the 21 hypotheses examined. The findings offer significant insights concerning the role of territory design satisfaction in face-to-face selling and its consequences. Several managerial implications and avenues for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, E. and R. L. Oliver. 1987. “Perspectives on Behavior-Based Versus Outcome-Based Salesforce Control Systems.”Journal of Marketing 51 (October): 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C. and D. W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.”Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, James. 1997.Amos Users’ Guide Version 3.6. Chicago: Smallwaters Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babakus, E., D. W. Cravens, K. Grant, T. N. Ingram, and R. W. LaForge. 1996. “Investigating the Relationships Among Sales Management Control, Sales Territory Design, Salesperson Performance, and Sales Organization Effectiveness.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 13:345–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—, M. Johnston, and W. C. Moncrief 1996. “Examining the Role of Organizational Variables in the Salesperson Job Satisfaction Model.”Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 16(Summer): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,—,— and — 1999. “The Role of Emotional Exhaustion in Sales Force Attitude and Behavior Relationships.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27 (Winter): 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, E. L. 1989.Getting Closer to the Customer. Research Bulletin No. 229. New York: The Conference Board, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedian, A. G., and A. Achilles 1981. “A Path Analytic Study of the Consequences of Role Conflict and Ambiguity.”Academy of Management Journal 24 (June): 417–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, D. N. and William D. Perreault 1984. “A Role Stress Model of the Performance and Satisfaction of Industrial Salespersons.”Journal of Marketing 48 (Fall): 9–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. and D. G. Bonett 1980. “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures.”Psychological Bulleting 88:588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluedorn, A. C. 1982. “A Unified Model of Turnover From Organizations.”Human Relations 35 (February):135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. P., W. L. Cron, and T.W. Leigh. 1993. “Do Feelings of Success Mediate Sales Performance-Work Attitude Relationships?”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 21 (Spring):91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and R. A. Peterson. 1993. “Antecedents and Consequences of Salesperson Job Satisfaction: Meta-Analysis and Assessment of Causal Effects.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (February): 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. and R. Cudeck. 1993. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.” InTesting Structural Equation Models. Eds. K.A. Bollen and J. Scott Long. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 136–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calantone, R. J., J. Schmidt, and X. M. Song. 1996. “Controllable Factors of New Product Success: A Cross-National Comparison.”Marketing Science 15 (4): 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A., Jr., N. M. Ford, S. W. Hartley, and O. C. Walker, Jr. 1985. “The Determinants of Salesperson Performance: A Meta-Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (May): 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and O. C. Walker, Jr. 1974. “Measuring the Job Satisfaction of Industrial Salesmen.”Journal of Marketing Research 11 (August): 254–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and — 1997.Sales Force Management. 5th ed. Chicago: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comer, J. M., K. A. Machleit, and R. R. Lagace. 1989. “Psychometric Assessment of a Reduced Version of INDSALES.”Journal of Business Research 18: 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cravens, D. W., 1995. “The Changing Role of the Sales Force.”Marketing Management 4 (Fall): 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, T. N. Ingram, R. W. LaForge, and C. E. Young. 1992. “The Hallmarks of Effective Sales Organizations.”Marketing Management 1 (Winter): 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,—,—, and —. 1993. “Behavior-Based and Outcome-Based Salesforce Control Systems.”Journal of Marketing 57 (October): 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. 1970.Essentials of Psychological Testing. 3d ed. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. and R. M. Ryan. 1985.Intrinsic Motivation and Self Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J. and B. E. Mattson. 1979. “Consequences of Role Conflict and Ambiguity Experienced by Retail Salespeople.”Journal of Retailing 55 (Winter): 70–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, N. M., O. C. Walker, and G. A. Churchill Jr. 1975. “Expectation-Specific Measures of the Intersender Conflict and Role Ambiguity Experienced by Industrial Salesmen.”Journal of Business Research 3 (April): 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, D. W. and J. C. Anderson. 1992. “Monte Carlo Evaluation of Goodness Fit Indices of Structural Equation Models.”Sociological Methods and Research 21 (November): 132–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R., J. F. Hair, and M. W. Johnston. 1994. “Met Expectations.” Working paper, Louisiana State University.

  • Jackson, S. E. and R. S. Schuler. 1985. “A Meta Analysis and Conceptual Critique of Research on Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict in Work Settings.”Organizational & Human Decision Processes 36 (August): 16–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. W., A. Parasuraman, C. M. Futrell, and W. C. Black. 1990. “A Longitudinal Assessment of the Impact of Selected Organizational Influences on Salespeople’s Organizational Commitment During Early Employment.”Journal of Marketing Research 17 (August): 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keaveney, S. M. 1992. “An Empirical Investigation of Dysfunctional Organizational Turnover Among Chain and Non-Chain Retail Store Buyers.”Journal of Retailing 68 (Summer): 145–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and J. E. Nelson. 1993. “Coping With Organizational Role Stress: Intrinsic Motivational Orientation, Perceived Role Benefits, and Psychological Withdrawal.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 21 (Spring): 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaForge, R. W. and D. Cravens. 1985. “Empirical and Judgment-based Sales Force Decision Models: A Comparative Analysis.”Decision Sciences 16 (Spring): 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilien, G. L. and D. Weinstein. 1984. “An International Comparison of the Determinants of Industrial Marketing Expenditures.”Journal of Marketing 48 (Winter): 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodish, L. M. 1980. “A User-Oriented Model for Sales Force Size, Product, and Market Allocation Decisions.”Journal of Marketing 44 (Summer): 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, R. E., W. L. Cron, A. J. Dubinsky, and E. A. Joachimsthaler. 1988. “Influence of Formalization on the Organizational Commitment and Work Alienation of Salespeople and Industrial Buyers.”Journal of Marketing Research 15 (November): 376–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, R. L. Day, and E. A. Joachimsthaler. 1987. “Role Stress Among Industrial Buyers: An Integrative Model.”Journal of Marketing 51 (April): 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and A. L. Dixon. 1994. “Sellers and Buyers on the Boundary: Potential Moderators of Role Stress—Job Outcome Relationships.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22 (Winter): 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobley, W. H., S. O. Horner, and A. T. Hollingsworth. 1978. “An Evaluation of the Precursors of Hospital Employee Turnover.”Journal of Applied Psychology 63 (4): 408–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R., L. Porter, and R. Steers. 1982.Organizational Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netemeyer, R. G., M. W. Johnston, and S. Burton. 1990. “Analysis of Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Structured Equations Framework.”Journal of Applied Psychology 75 (April): 148–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. and E. Anderson. 1994. “An Empirical Test of the Consequences of Behavior- and Outcome-Based Sales Control Systems.”Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piercy, N. F., D. W. Cravens, and N. A. Morgan. 1999. “Relationships Between Sales Management Control, Territory Design, Salesforce Performance and Sales Organization Effectiveness.”British Journal of Management 10: 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W., R. M. Steers, R. T. Mowday, and P. V. Boulian. 1974. “Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Among Psychiatric Technicians.”Journal of Applied Psychology 59 (October): 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruden, H. O. and R. M. Reese. 1972. “Interorganizational Role Set Relations and the Performance and Satisfaction of Industrial Salesmen.”Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (December): 601–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, Gary, and Jagdip Singh. 1999. Paper presented at the American Marketing Association Sales and Sales Management Faculty Consortium, July.

  • Rizzo, J. R., R. J. House, and S. I. Lirtzman. 1970. “Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations.”Administrative Science Quarterly 15 (March): 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sager, J. K. 1994. “A Structural Model Depicting Salespeople’s Job Stress.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22 (January): 74–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. 1996.Applied Multivariate Techniques New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J., W. Verbeke, and G. K. Rhoads. 1996. “Do Organizational Practices Matter in Role Stress Processes? A Study of Direct and Moderating Effects for Marketing-Oriented Boundary Spanners.”Journal of Marketing 60 (July): 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teas, R. K. 1983. “Supervisory Behavior, Role Stress, and the Job Satisfaction of Industrial Salespeople.”Journal of Marketing Research 20 (February): 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, O. C., Jr., G. A. Churchill, Jr., and N. M. Ford. 1972. “Reactions to Role Conflict: The Case of the Industrial Salesperson.”Journal of Business Administration 3 (Spring): 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and —. 1979. “Where Do We Go From Here: Selected Conceptual and Empirical Issues Concerning the Motivation and Performance of the Industrial Salesforce.” InCritical Issues in Sales Management: State-of-the-Art and Future Research Needs. Eds. Gerald Albaum and Gilbert A. Churchill, Jr. Eugene: University of Oregon, 10–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

    Ken Grant

  2. Texas Christian University, Texas, USA

    David W. Cravens, George S. Low & William C. Moncrief

Authors
  1. Ken Grant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David W. Cravens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. George S. Low
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. William C. Moncrief
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Ken Grant is the deputy head in the Department of Marketing, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. He is a member of the editorial boards of theEuropean Journal of Marketing and theJournal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science. He has published in theInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, European Journal of Marketing, Industrial Marketing Management, and several other journals. He advises companies on marketing planning, new products, and sales management and conducts research and publishes in these areas.

David W. Cravens holds the Eunice and James L. West Chair of American Enterprise Studies at Texas Christian University. His research on sales management and marketing strategy has been published in theJournal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, and other leading journals in marketing and management. Before becoming an educator, he held various industry and government executive positions. He is internationally recognized for his research on marketing strategy and sales management. He has been a visiting scholar at universities in Austria, Australia, Chile, Czech Republic, England, Ireland, Germany, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore, and Wales. His textbook,Strategic Marketing (Irwin/McGraw-Hill 2000), is widely used in strategy and management courses.

George S. Low is an associate professor of marketing in the M. J. Neeley School of Business, Texas Christian University. He received a B.A. in advertising from Brigham Young University, an M.B.A. from the Richard Ivey School of Business at the University of Western Ontario, and a Ph.D. in marketing from the University of Colorado-Boulder. His research on the management of integrated marketing communications and brands has been published in theJournal of Marketing Research, Journal of Retailing, Journal of Advertising Research, Marketing Management, Marketing Science Institute’s Working Paper Series, and other journals.

William C. Moncrief is a senior associate dean and professor of marketing at Texas Christian University in Fort Worth, Texas. He received his B.Sc. in political science and his M.B.A. from the University of Mississippi. He completed his Ph.D. at Louisiana State University in 1983. His work has been published in leading marketing and sales journals, including theJournal of Marketing Research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, European Journal of Marketing, Journal of Business Research, Industrial Marketing Management, andJournal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, among others. His research interests are in the field of sales management and include topics such as sales deployment, sales contests, international sales, telemarketing, turnover, laptop computers, sales job activities, and quality control. He has taught in Germany, conducted research in Europe, and has most recently consulted in Mexico.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grant, K., Cravens, D.W., Low, G.S. et al. The role of satisfaction with territory design on the motivation, attitudes, and work outcomes of salespeople. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 29, 165–178 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/03079459994533

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03079459994533

Keywords

Search

Navigation