Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial test

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines the effect of an alliance competence on resource-based alliance success. The fundamental thesis guiding this research is that an alliance competence contributes to alliance success, both directly and through the acquisition and creation of resources. Using survey data gathered from 145 alliances, empirical tests of the hypotheses provide support for the posited explanation of alliance success. The findings indicate that an alliance competence is not only antecedent to the resources that are necessary for alliance success but also to alliance success itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja, Gautam. 2000. “The Duality of Collaboration: Inducements and Opportunities in the Formation of Interfirm Linkages.”Strategic Management Journal 21 (Special Issue): 317–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, Wroe. 1965.Dynamic Marketing Behavior. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, B. and T. Khanna. 2000. “Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances.”Strategic Management Journal 21 (Special Issue): 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Erin and Barton Weitz. 1992. “The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels.”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (February): 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James C. 1995. “Relationships in Business Markets: Exchange Episodes, Value Creation, and Their Empirical Assessment.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (4): 346–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and David W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.”Psychological Bulletin 103 (May): 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1991. “Predicting the Performance of Measures in a Confirmatory Factor Analysis With a Pretest Assessment of Their Substantive Validities.”Journal of Applied Psychology 76 (5): 732–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.”Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1992. “Integrating Organizational Behavior and Strategy Formulation Research: A Resource Based View.” Working Paper. Texas A&M University, College Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. 1990. “Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models.”Psychological Bulletin 107 (2): 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Lauranne. 1992. “Vertical Trade Relationship: The Role of Dependence and Symmetry in Attaining Organizational Goals.”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (February): 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin, Louis P. and Sanjit Sengupta. 1993. “Organizing Successful Co-Marketing Alliances.”Journal of Marketing 57 (April): 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, Joseph P. and William D. Perreault Jr. 1999. “Buyer-Seller Relationships in Business Markets.”Journal of Marketing Research 36 (November): 439–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandy, Rajesh and Gerard J. Tellis. 1998. “Organizing for Radical Product Innovation.”Journal of Marketing Research 35 (November): 474–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr. 1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs.”Journal of Marketing Research 16 (February): 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.”American Journal of Sociology 94 (Suppl.): S95-S112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1990.Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, Kathleen. 1991. “A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial-Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm?”Journal of Management 17 (March): 121–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, Suzanne M. and John A. Wagner III. 1994. “Percept-Percept Inflation in Microorganizational Research: An Investigation of Prevalence and Effect.”Journal of Applied Psychology 79 (1): 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K. and Bing-Sheng Teng. 2000. “A Reource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances.”Journal of Management 26 (1): 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, George S. 1995. “Advantageous Alliances.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (4): 297–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, Adamantios and Heidi M. Winklhofer. 2001. “Index Construction With Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development.”Journal of Marketing Research 38 (May): 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, Don A. 1978.Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Jeffrey H. and H. Singh. 1998. “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage.”Academy of Management Review 23 (4): 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “The Ever Evolving Alliance Manager.” 1993.The Alliance Analyst, October 30, p. 2.

  • “Financial Services—Why the Future Looks Like the Past.” 1995.The Alliance Analyst, October 2, p. 2.

  • Fornell, Claes and David F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (February): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesan, Shankar. 1994. “Determinant of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 58 (April): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes-Casseres, B. and Leonard-Barton, D. 1994. “Alliance Clusters in Multimedia: Safety Net or Entanglement?” Unpublished paper presented at Colliding Words Colloquium at the Harvard Business School, Boston, October 6.

  • Gummesson, Evert. 1994. “Is Relationship Marketing Operational?” Paper presented at the EMAC Conference, Maastricht, the Netherlands, May.

  • Gummesson, Evert. 1995. “Focus Shifts in Marketing: A New Agenda for the Third Millennium.” Presentation at the 20th Anniversary Program of the Marketing Technology Center MTC, Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Hamel, Gary and C. K. Prahalad. 1994.Competing for the Future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, John R. and Peter Pakar. 1997.Cross-Border Alliance in the Age of Collaboration. New York: Booz Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heide, Jan B. and George John. 1990. “Alliances in Industrial Purchasing: The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships.”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (February): 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, Roy D.. 1987. “Covariance Structure Modeling and Measurement Issues: A Note on Interrelations Among a Channel Entity's Power Sources.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (February): 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby D. 1997. “Competing Through Relationships: Grounding Relationship Marketing in Resource Advantage Theory.”Journal of Marketing Management 13: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2000.A General Theory of Competition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Robert M. Morgan. 1995. “The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition.”Journal of Marketing 59 (April): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1996. “The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions.”Journal of Marketing 60 (October): 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1997. “Resource-Advantage Theory: A Snake Swallowing Its Tail or a General Theory of Competition?”Journal of Marketing 61 (3): 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, Andrew C. 1996. “Creating Knowledge Through Collaboration.”California Management Review 39 (1): 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japn, Sandy D. 1995. “A Longitudinal Approach to the Effects of Partner Firm Characteristics, the Environment, and Mutual Trust on Synergy.” Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Florida.

  • — 1999. “Pie-Expansion Efforts: Collaboration Processes in Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing Research 36 (November): 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Shankar Ganesan. 2000. “Control Mechanisms and the Relationship Life-Cycle: Implications for Safeguarding Specific Investments and Developing Commitment.”Journal of Marketing Research 37 (May): 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl G. and Dag Sörbom. 1993.LISREL 8: A Guide to the Program and Applications. Chicago: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, Prashant, Harbir Singh, and Howard Perlmutter. 2000. “Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital.”Strategic Management Journal 21: 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmbach, Charles Jr. and Charles Roussel. 1999. Dispelling the Myths of Alliances.”Outlook Special Edition (October): 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Patrick J. and Rajiv P. Dant. 1992. “The Dimensions of Commerical Exchange.”Marketing Letters 3 (2): 135–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce. 2000. “The Network as Knowledge: Generative Rules and the Emergence of Structure.”Strategic Management Journal 21: 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, Ajay K., Tasadduq A. Shervani, and Goutam N. Challagalla. 1998. “Learning and Performance Orientation of Salespeople: The Role of Supervisors.”Journal of Marketing Research 35 (May): 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A. M. and F. Linnehan. 1995. “Formalized HRM Structures: Co-ordinating Equal Employment Opportunity or Concealing Organizational Practices?”Academy of Management Journal 38: 787–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lado, Augustine A., Nancy Boyd, and P. Wright. 1992. “A Competency-Based Model of Sustainable Competitive Advantage.”Journal of Management 18: 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambe, C. Jay and Robert E. Spekman. 1997. “Alliances, External Technology Acquisition, and Discontinuous Technological Change.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 14 (2): 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, and Shelby D. Hunt. 2000. “Interimistic Alliances: Conceptualization and Propositional Development.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences 28 (2): 212–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. A. and M. J. Gregory. 1996. “Developing and Applying a Process Approach to Competence Analysis.” InDynamics of Competence-Based Competition: Theory and Practice in the New Strategic Management. Eds. R. Sanchez, A. Heene, and H. Thomas. London: Elsevier, 141–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowendahl, B. and K. Haanes. 1997. “The Unit of Activity: A New Way to Understand Competence Building and Leveraging.” InStrategic Learning and Knowledge Management. Eds. R. Sanchez and A. Heene. New York: John Wiley, 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, Geeta, Barbara Bickart, Seymour Sudman, and Johnny Blair. 1995. “How Well Do You Know Your Partner? Strategies for Formulating Proxy-Reports and Their Effects on Convergence to Self-Reports.”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (1): 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Christine and Anne S. Miner. 1997. “The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity.”Journal of Marketing Research 34 (February): 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1994. “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noordewier, Thomas G., George John, and John R. Nevin. 1990. “Performance Outcomes of Purchasing Arrangements in Industrial Buyer-Vendor Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 54 (October): 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Lynn W. 1981. “Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (November): 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, Phillip M. and Dennis W. Organ. 1986. “Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects.”Journal of Management 12 (4): 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael. 1966.The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, Vas B. and Andrew Robson. 2000. “Impact of Leadership and Senior Management Commitment on Business Excellence: An Empirical Study in the North East of England.”Total Quality Management 11 (4,5,6): S399-S409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, Ron, Aime Heene, and Howard Thomas. 1996.Dynamics of Competence-Based Competition. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, M. B., S. Tamer Cavusgil, and Preet S. Aulakh. 1999. “International Expansion of Telecommunications Carriers: The Influence of Market Structure, Network characteristics, and Entry Imperfections.”Journal of International Business Studies 30 (2): 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Raj Echambadi, and Jeffery Harrison. 2001. “Alliance Entrepreneurship and Firm Market Performance.”Strategic Management Journal, 22 (6–7): 701–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———, S. Tamer Cavusgil, and Preet S. Aulakh. 2001. “The Influence of Complementarity, Compatibility, and Relationship Capital on Alliance Performance.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29 (4): 358–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G. and R. A. Bruce. 1994. “Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace.”Academy of Management Journal 37: 580–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, Rajesh. 2000. “New Product Quality and Product Development Teams.”Journal of Marketing 64 (April): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, Bernard L.. 1997. “The Importance of Collaborative Know-How: An Empirical Test of the Learning Organization.”Academy of Management Journal 40 (5): 1150–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Jagdip. 2000. “Performance Productivity and Quality of Frontline Employees in Service Organizations.”Journal of Marketing 64 (April): 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sividas, Eugene and F. Robert Dwyer. 2000. “An Examination of Organizational Factors Influenoing New Product Success in Internal and Alliance-Based Processes.”Journal of Marketing 64 (January): 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spekman, Robert E., Lynn A. Isabella, and Thomas C. MacAvoy. 1999.Alliance Competence: Maximizing the Value of Your Partnerships. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, and Theodore M. Forbes. 1996. “Creating Strategic Alliances Which Endure.”Long-Range Planning 29 (3): 346–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “The Trauma of Alliance Tracking”. 1995The Alliance Analyst, March 17.

  • “Two Grandmasters at the Extremes”. 1994The Alliance Analyst, November 25, p. 2.

  • Varadarajan, Rajan P. and Margaret H. Cunningham. 1995. “Strategic Alliances: A Synthesis of Conceptual Foundations.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (4): 297–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Daniel Rajaratnam. 1986. “Symbiotic Marketing Revisited.”Journal of Marketing 50 (January): 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, Birger. 1984. “A Resource-Based View of the Firm.”Strategic Management Journal 5 (2): 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. 1983. “Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchange.”American Economic Review 73 (September): 519–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1984. “Credible Commitments: Further Remarks.”American Economic Review 74 (June): 488–490.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Virginia Tech, Virginia, USA

    C. Jay Lambe

  2. University of Virginia, Virginia, USA

    Robert E. Spekman

  3. Texas Tech University, Texas, USA

    Shelby D. Hunt

Authors
  1. C. Jay Lambe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert E. Spekman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shelby D. Hunt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

C. Jay Lambe (Ph.D., The Darden School at University of Virginia) is an assistant professor of marketing in the Pamplin College of Business at Virginia Tech. For 10 years prior to entering academe, he was engaged in business-to-business marketing for both Xerox and AT&T. His research interests include business-to-business marketing, relationship marketing, marketing strategy, and sales management. He has publications in theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of Product Innovation Management, theEuropean Journal of Marketing, theJournal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, theInternational Journal of Management Reviews, theJournal of Business-to-Business Marketing, and theJournal of Relationship Marketing. He also serves as a reviewer for theJournal of Business-to-Business Marketing. Prior to joining the faculty at Virginia Tech, he was one of five Texas Tech University faculty members chosen in 1999 from the entire university for the annual Outstanding Faculty Member Award by the Mortar Board and Omicron Delta Kappa (Texas Tech University student organizations that recognize excellence in teaching).

Robert E. Spekman is the Tayloe Murphy Professor of Business Administration at the Darden School at the University of Virginia. He was formerly a professor of marketing and associate director of the Center for Telecommunications at the University of Southern California. He is an internationally recognized authority on business-to-business marketing and strategic alliances. His consulting experiences range from marketing research and competitive analysis, to strategic market planning, supply chain management, channels of distribution design and implementation, and strategic partnering. He has taught in a number of executive programs in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, and Europe. His executive program experience ranges from general marketing strategy, to sales force management, to channels strategy, to creating strategic alliances, to business-to-business marketing strategy, to a number of single-company and senior executive management programs. He has edited and/or written seven books and has authored (coauthored) more than 80 articles and papers. He also serves as a reviewer for a number of marketing and management journals, as well as for the National Science Foundation. Prior to joining the faculty at the University of Southern California, he taught in the College of Business at the University of Maryland, College Park. During his tenure at Maryland, he was granted the Most Distinguished Faculty Award by the MBA students on three separate occasions.

Shelby D. Hunt is the J. B. Hoskins and P. W. Horn Professor of Marketing at Texas Tech University, Lubbock. A past editor of theJournal of Marketing (1985–87), he is the author ofModern Marketing Theory: Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Science (South-Western, 1991) andA General Theory of Competition: Resources, Competences, Productivity, Economic Growth (Sage, 2000). He has written numerous articles on competitive theory, macromarketing, ethics, channels of distribution, philosophy of science, and marketing theory. Three of hisJournal of Marketing articles—“The Nature and Scope of Marketing” (1976), “General Theories and Fundamental Explananda of Marketing” (1983), and “The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition” (1995) (with Robert M. Morgan)—won the Harold H. Maynard Award for the best article on marketing theory. His 1985Journal of Business Research article with Lawrence B. Chonko, “Ethics and Marketing Management,” received the 2000 Elsevier Science Exceptional Quality and High Scholarly Impact award. His 1989 article, ”Reification and Realism in Marketing: in Defense of Reason,” won theJournal of Macromarketing Charles C. Slater Award. For his contributions to theory and science in marketing, he received the 1986 Paul D. Converse Award from the American Marketing Association, the 1987 Outstanding Marketing Educator Award from the Academy of Marketing Science, and the 1992 American Marketing Association/Richard D. Irwin Distinguished Marketing Educator Award.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lambe, C.J., Spekman, R.E. & Hunt, S.D. Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial test. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 30, 141–158 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/03079459994399

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03079459994399

Keywords

Search

Navigation