Skip to main content
Log in

Interactions between marketing and quality at the SBU level: Influences and outcomes

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The management of quality and development of effective cross-functional cooperation have assumed a new strategic importance over the past decade. However, many companies have reported that quality strategies have failed to deliver anticipated performance benefits and that ineffective interfunctional relationships may be to blame. This study explores marketing-quality interfunctional relationships as a potential source of quality strategy implementation failure at the strategic business unit (SBU) level. This study focuses on interdepartmental connectedness, communication and conflict between marketing and quality, and the antecedents and consequences of these dimensions of interfunctional interaction. Using data from a pooled response mail survey, the results suggest that marketing-quality interactions are associated with senior management quality leadership, strategic quality planning process, and control system characteristics. Interfunctional interactions between marketing and quality are found to be only weakly related to relative quality, market performance, and financial performance outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, David A. and Robert Jacobson. 1994. “The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality.”Journal of Marketing Research 31 (May): 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Irfan and A. Parasuraman. 1994. “Environmental and Positional Antecedents of Management Commitment to Service Quality: A Conceptual Framework.” InAdvances in Services Marketing and Management. Vol. 3. Eds. T. A. Swartz, D. E. Bowen, and S. W. Brown. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 69–93.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, John C., Manus Rungtusanatham, and Roger G. Schroeder. 1994. “A Theory of Quality Management Underlying the Deming Management Method.”Academy of Management Review 19 (3): 472–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S. 1982. “The Value of Formal Planning for Strategic Decisions.”Strategic Management Journal 3:197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and T. S. Overton. 1977. “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys.”Journal of Marketing Research 16 (August): 396–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, Donald W. 1991. “Interdepartmental Conflict in Organizational Buying: The Impact of Organizational Context.”Journal of Marketing Research 28 (May): 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belohlav, James A. 1993. “Quality, Strategy and Competitiveness.”California Management Review 35 (3): 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, William, Ajay Kalra, Richard Staelin, and Valarie A. Zeithaml. 1993. “A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (February): 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bounds, Greg, Lyle Yorks, Mel Adams, and Gipsie Ranney. 1994.Beyond Total Quality Management: Toward the Emerging Paradigm. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarthy, Balaji S. 1986. “Measuring Strategic Performance.”Strategic Management Journal 7:437–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, Jhinuk and Ajay Menon. 1993. “Dimensions of Quality: A Contingency Framework and Strategic Implications for Manufactured Goods.” InProceedings of AMA Winter Educators Conference. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Robert E. 1993. “Introduction to Special Issue on TQM.”California Management Review 35 (3): 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cravens, D. W., C. W. Holland, C. W. Lamb, and W. C. Moncrief. 1988. “Marketing’s Role in Product and Service Quality.”Industrial Marketing Management 17 (November): 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, Barrie and J. J. Plunkett. 1990. “The Process of Total Quality Management.” InManaging Quality. Eds. Barrie Dale and J. J. Plunkett. London: Philip Alan, 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, George. 1994. “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations.”Journal of Marketing 58 (4):37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Robin Wensley. 1988. “Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority.”Journal of Marketing 52 (2): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, James W. and David E. Bowen. 1994. “Management Theory and Total Quality: Improving Research and Practice Through Theory Development.”Academy of Management Review 19 (3): 392–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. Edwards. 1986.Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, George S. 1993. “The 1993 State of US Total Quality Management: A Baldrige Award Examiners Perspective.”California Management Review 35 (3): 32–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, A. V. 1983.Total Quality Control. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Robert J., Elliot Maltz, and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1997. “Enhancing Communication Between Marketing and Engineering: The Moderating Effect of Relative Functional Identification.”Journal of Marketing 61 (3): 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes, Michael D. Johnson, Eugene W. Anderson, Jaesung Cha, and Barbara Everitt Bryant. 1996. “The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings.”Journal of Marketing 60 (4): 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, Bradley T. 1994.Managing Customer Value. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, David A. 1988.Managing Quality. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991. “How the Baldrige Award Really Works.”Harvard Business Review 19 (6): 80–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghose, Sanjay and Samar K. Mukhopadhyay. 1993. “Quality as the Interface Between Manufacturing and Marketing: A Conceptual Model and an Empirical Study.”Management International Review 33 (1): 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greising, David. 1994. “Quality: How to Make It Pay.”Business Week, August 8, pp. 54–59.

  • Groocock, J. M. 1986.The Chain of Quality. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Anil K. and Vijay Govindarajan. 1991. “Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations.”Academy of Management Review 16 (4): 768–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. Richard and Ruth Wageman. 1995. “Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual and Practical Issues.”Administrative Science Quarterly 40:309–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Stuart and Catherine Banbury. 1994. “How Strategy-Making Processes Can Make a Difference.”Strategic Management Journal 15:251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartline, Michael D. and O. C. Ferrell. 1996. “The Management of Customer-Contact Service Employees: An Empirical Investigation.”Journal of marketing 60 (4): 52–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hise, Richard, Larry O’Neal, A. Parasuraman, and James McNeil. 1990. “Marketing/R&D Interaction in New Product Development: Implications for New Product Development Success Rates.”Journal of Product and Innovation Management 7 (June): 142–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrebiniak, Lawrence G. and William F. Joyce. 1984.Implementing Strategy. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Marie Adele and Dennis E. Garrett. 1990. “Intercoder Reliability Estimation Approaches in Marketing: A Generalizability Theory Framework for Quantitative Data.”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (May): 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, Michael D. 1995. “Cross Functional Working Relationships in Marketing.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (4): 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittner, Christopher D. and David F. Larker. 1996. “Measuring the Impact of Quality Initiatives on Firm Financial Performance.” InAdvances in the Management of Organizational Quality. Vol. 1. Eds. Soumeh Ghosh and Donald Fedor. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, Rahul. 1993. “TQM: More Than a Dying Fad?”Fortune, October 18, pp. 66–72.

  • Jacobson, Robert and David A. Aaker. 1987. “The Strategic Role of Product Quality.”Journal of Marketing 51 (October): 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, Bernard J. 1988. “Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing 52 (3): 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Ajay K. Kohli. 1993. “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing 57 (2): 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. C. and Richard C. Chvala. 1996.Total Quality Marketing. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran, Joseph M. 1986. “The Quality Trilogy.”Quality Progress 19 (August): 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Frank M. Gryna. 1980.Quality Planning and Analysis. 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Daniel and Robert L. Kahn. 1978.The Social Psychology of Organizations. 2d ed. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kordupleski, Raymond E., Roland T. Rust, and Anthony J. Zahorik. 1993. “Why Improving Quality Doesn’t Improve Quality (or Whatever Happened to Marketing)?”California Management Review 35 (3): 82–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, Philip and Laura Cousins. 1991. “Is Quality Market-Led?” InProceedings British Academy of Management Conference. Ed. Richard Wilson. Bath, UK: British Academy of Management, 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, Frank S. and Earl W. Sasser. 1982. “The Incline of Quality.”Harvard Business Review 60 (September–October): 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, Elliot and Ajay K. Kohli. 1996. “Market Intelligence Dissemination Across Functional Boundaries.”Journal of Marketing Research 33 (February): 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, Ajay, Bernard J. Jaworski, and Ajay K. Kohli. 1997. “Product Quality: Impact of Interdepartmental Interactions.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (3): 200–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, Anil, Sundar G. Bharadwaj, and Roy Howell. 1996. “The Quality and Effectiveness of marketing Strategy: Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict in Intraorganizational Relationships.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 24 (4): 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Danny. 1988. “Relating Porter’s Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and Performance Implications.”Academy of Management Journal 31 (2): 280–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moenaert, Rudy K. and William E. Souder. 1990. “An Analysis of the Use of Extrafunctional Information by R&D and Marketing Personnel: Review and Model.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 7:213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Christine. 1995. “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes.”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (August): 318–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, John C. and Stanley F. Slater. 1990. “The Effect of a Market orientation on Business Profitability.”Journal of Marketing 54 (4): 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, Jum C. and Ira H. Bernstein. 1994.Psychometric Theory. 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakland, John S. 1992.Total Quality Management. 2d ed. Oxford, UK: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neal, Charles R. and William C. Lafief. 1992. “Marketing’s Lead Role in Total Quality.”Industrial Marketing Management 21:133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Valarie A. Zeithaml, and Leonard L. Berry. 1985. “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research.”Journal of Marketing 49 (Fall): 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Lynn W., Dae R. Chang, and Robert D. Buzzell. 1983. “Product Quality, Cost Position and Business Performance: A Test of Some Key Hypotheses.”Journal of Marketing Research 47 (Spring): 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piercy, Nigel F. and Neil A. Morgan. 1994. “The Marketing Planning Process: Behavioral Problems Compared to Analytical Techniques in Predicting Plan Credibility.”Journal of Business Research 29 (3): 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Thomas C. 1995. “Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage: A Review and Empirical Study.”Strategic Management Journal 16:15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reger, Rhonda K., L. T. Gustafson, S. M. Demarie, and J. V. Mullane. 1994. “Reframing the Organization: Why Implementing Total Quality Is Easier Said Than Done.”Academy of Management Review 19(3):565–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicheld, Frederick F. and Earl W. Sasser. 1990. “Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services.”Harvard Business Review 68(September–October): 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruekert, Robert W. and Orville C. Walker. 1987a. “Interactions Between Marketing and R&D Departments in Implementing Different Business Strategies.”Strategic Management Journal 8:233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —and—. 1987b. “Marketing’s Interaction With Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence.”Journal of Marketing 51(1):1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, Roland T. and Anthony J. Zahorik. 1993. “Customer Satisfaction, Customer Retention and Market Share.”Journal of Retailing 69(Summer): 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and Timothy L. Keiningham. 1995. “Return on Quality (ROQ): Making Service Quality Financially Accountable.”Journal of Marketing 59(April):58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, Diane H. 1991. “Marketers Must Lead Quality Improvement or Risk Becoming Irrelevant.”Services Marketing Newsletter 7 (1):1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk, Alvin J. and Manohar U. Kalwani. 1982. “Measuring Influence in Organisational Purchase Decisions.”Journal of Marketing Research 19(May):165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Stanley F. and John C. Narver. 1994. “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship.”Journal of Marketing 58(1):46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, X. Michael and Mark E. Parry. 1993. “R&D-Marketing Integration in Japanese High Technology Firms: Hypotheses and Empirical Evidence.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 21(2):125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, Michael J. 1995.Management: Total Quality in a Global Environment. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasch, Stanley F. and Patricia Lanktree. 1980. “Can Your Marketing Planning Procedures Be Improved?”Journal of Marketing 44(2): 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. John, Caron H. and Leslie W. Rue. 1991. “Co-ordinating Mechanisms, Consensus Between Marketing and Manufacturing Groups and Marketplace Performance.”Strategic Management Journal 12:549–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Eugene F. and John R. Hollenbeck. 1989. “Clarifying Some Controversial Issues Surrounding Statistical Procedures for Detecting Moderator Variables: Empirical and Related Matters.”Journal of Applied Psychology 74(February):3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Kenneth W., Richard E. Walton, and John M. Dutton. 1972. “Determinants of Interdepartmental Conflict.” InIntra-Organizational Decision Making. Eds. M. Tuite, R. Chisolm, and M. Radnor. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, Andrew and Diane L. Ferry. 1980.Measuring and Assessing Organizations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. Rajan and Terry Clark. 1994. “Delineating the Scope of Corporate, Business and Marketing Strategy.”Journal of Business Research 31:93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, Stephen J. and Charles S. Zeynel. 1991. “The Senior Managers Role in Quality Improvement.”Quality Progress 24(January):66–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisendanger, Betsy. 1993. “Deming’s Light Dims at Florida Power & Light.”Journal of Business Strategy 14(September–October):60–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Workman, John P. 1993. “Marketing’s Limited Role in New Product Development in One Computer Systems Firm.”Journal of Marketing Research 30(November):405–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, Gerald, Karen LeMasters, and Michael Heffring. 1982.Theory Construction in Marketing. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, Valarie A. 1990. “Communicating With Customers About Service Quality.” InService Management Effectiveness. Eds. D. E. Bowen, R. B. Chase, and T. E. Cummings. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 369–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Leonard L. Berry, and A. Parasuraman. 1996. “The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality.”Journal of Marketing 60(2):31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Neil A. Morgan is a university lecturer in marketing and strategy at the Judge Institute of Management Studies, University of Cambridge, England. His research interests focus on strategic issues concerning marketing strategy formulation, marketing implementation processes, and business performance. His work has appeared in theJournal of Business Research, Industrial Marketing Management, British Journal of Management, and other journals.

Nigel F. Piercy is Sir Julian Hodge professor of marketing and strategy and chair of Marketing and Strategy at the Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, United Kingdom. His research interests focus on the organizational context of marketing management, market-led strategic change, and the role of process in marketing strategy implementation. His work has appeared in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of Advertising, and other journals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morgan, N.A., Piercy, N.F. Interactions between marketing and quality at the SBU level: Influences and outcomes. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 26, 190–208 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398263002

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398263002

Keywords

Navigation