Skip to main content
Log in

Success-producer and failure-preventer marketing skills: A social learning theory interpretation

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines organizations that emphasize differing types of marketing skills. It is based on a national survey of Health Maintenance Organizations. The organizations are first classified into groups based on their distinctive marketing skill configurations. Six groups were identified. Next, differences between these organization types are examined with respect to organization strategy, characteristics of the chief marketing executive, organizational environment, and performance. These results suggest that more successful organizations develop particular constellations of marketing skills. The results generally appear consistent with a social learning theory perspective on marketing skill development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, Derek F. and John S. Hammond. 1979.Strategic Market Planning: Problems and Analytical Approaches. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 1977.Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banting, Peter M. and Randolph E. Ross. 1973. “The Marketing Mix: A Canadian Perspective.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1 (Spring): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoma, Thomas V. 1984. “Making Your Marketing Strategy Work.”Harvard Business Review 62 (March–April): 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden, Neil H. 1964. “The Concept of the Marketing Mix.”Journal of Advertising Research 4 (June): 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, Andrew C. and Robert W. Zmud. 1984. “An Assessment of Critical Success Factors.”Sloan Management Review 25 (Summer): 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosse, Thomas J. and John E. Swan. 1983. “Strategic Marketing Planning by Product Managers—Room for Improvement?”Journal of Marketing 47 (Summer): 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, George S. and Robin Wensley. 1988. “Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority.”Journal of Marketing 52 (April): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, Gregory S. and P. S. Davis. 1984. “Porter’s Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership.”Academy of Management Journal 27 (September): 467–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, Gregory S. and Richard B. Robinson, Jr. 1984. “Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures.”Strategic Management Journal 5 (July–September): 265–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, Don A. 1978.Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enis, Ben M. and Michael P. Mokwa. 1979. “The Marketing Management Matrix: A Taxonomy of Strategy Comprehension.” InConceptual and Theoretical Developments in Marketing, pp. 485–500. Eds. O. C. Ferrell et al. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B. S. 1980.Cluster Analysis. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, C. and D. Schendel. 1983. “An Empirical Analysis of Strategy Types.”Strategic Management Journal 4 (April–June): 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginter, Peter M. and Donald D. White. 1982. “A Social Learning Approach to Strategic Management: Toward a Theoretical Foundation”.Academy of Management Review 7 (April): 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, Donald C. 1983. “High Profit Strategies in Mature Capital Goods Industries: A Contingency Approach.”Academy of Management Journal 26 (December): 687–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1984. “Taxonomic Approaches to Studying Strategy: Some Conceptual and Methodological Issues.”Journal of Management 10 (March): 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, Donald C. and S. M. Schecter. 1983. “Rurnaround Strategies for Mature Industrial Product Businesses.”Academy of Management Journal 26 (June): 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, Kathryn R. 1983. “Research Methodologies for Contingency Approaches to Business Strategy.”Academy of Management Review 8 (July): 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawes, Jon M. and William F. Crittenden. 1984. “A Taxonomy of Competitive Retailing Strategies.”Strategic Management Journal 5 (July–September): 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F., B. Mausner, and B. Snyderman. 1959.The Motivation to Work. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, Charles W. and Dan Schendel. 1978.Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. St. Paul, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, Bernard J. 1988. “Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types, and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing 52 (July): 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korey, George and Yvonne Bogorya. 1985. “The Managerial Action Learning Concept—Theory and Application.”Management Decision 23 (2): 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Philip. 1988.Marketing Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Philip, William Gregor, and William Rogers. 1977. “The Marketing Audit Comes of Age.”Sloan Management Review 18 (Winter): 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, Briance and David A. Aaker. 1989. “Mobility Barriers and Strategic Groups.”Strategic Management Journal 10 (September): 475–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, E. Jerome. 1981.Basic Marketing: A Managerial Approach. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, Stephen W. and James W. Kolari. 1987. “Marketing Strategy Implications of the Miles and Snow Typology.”Journal of Marketing 51 (October): 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Raymond E. and Charles C. Snow. 1978.Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normann, Richard. 1985. “Developing Capabilities for Organizational Learning.” InOrganizational Strategy and Change: New Viewpoints on Formulating and Implementing Strategic Decisions. Johannes M. Pennings and associates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Thomas J. 1984. “Strategy Follows Structure: Developing Distinctive Skills.”California Management Review 26 (Spring): 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punj, Girish and David W. Stewart. 1983. “Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestion for Applications.”Journal of Marketing Research 20 (May): 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Richard B. Jr. and John A. Pearce II. 1988. “Planned Patterns of Strategic Behavior and Their Relationship to Business-Unit Performance.”Strategic Management Journal 9 (January–February): 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samiee, Saeed. 1980. “Elements of Marketing Strategy: How Important Are They From the Executive Viewpoint?”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 8 (Winter): 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. 1982.SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, Charles B., Lew Taylor, and Dan R. Dalton. 1984. “Strategic Planning and Organizational Performance: A Critical Appraisal.”Journal of Management 10 (2): 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, Paul. 1983. “A Typology of Organizational Learning Systems.”Journal of Management Studies 20 (January): 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, Charles C. and Donald C. Hambrick. 1980. “Measuring Organizational Strategies: Some Theoretical and Methodological Problems.”Academy of Management Review 5 (October): 527–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, Charles C. and Lawrence G. Hrebiniak. 1980. “Strategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance.”Administrative Science Quarterly 25 (June): 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udell, Jon G. 1968. “The Perceived Importance of the Elements of Strategy.”Journal of Marketing 32 (January): 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. Rajan 1985. “A Two-Factor Classification of Competitive Strategy Variables.”Strategic Management Journal 6 (October/December): 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, N. and V. Ramanujam. 1986. “Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches.”Academy of Management Review 11 (October): 801–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Dennis A. 1988. “Beyond the Reach of the Invisible Hand: Impediments to Economic Activity, Market Failures, and Profitability.”Strategic Management Journal 9 (Special Issue, Summer): 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKee, D.O., Conant, J.S., Varadarajan, P.R. et al. Success-producer and failure-preventer marketing skills: A social learning theory interpretation. JAMS 20, 17–26 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723472

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723472

Keywords

Navigation