Skip to main content
Log in

The nature and measurement of marketing productivity in consumer durables industries: A firm level analysis

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improving productivity is a major concern in American industry. Efforts to enhance marketing productivity have been hampered by a lack of a clear conception of what constitutes productivity in the marketing area and an associated absence of standards or benchmarks with which to compare a firm’s performance and costs. In this paper a concept of marketing productivity is presented. The PIMS data base is then used to develop situation specific benchmarks for the consumer durables industries. Reliability and validity tests of the benchmarks are presented and the managerial implications of this approach are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. R. and Frank T. Paine. 1978. “PIMS: A Reexamination.”Academy of Management Review (July): 60211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, Johan and Thorolf Helgesen. 1980. “Marketing and Productivity: Conceptual and Measurement Issues.” Paper presented at the 1980 Macro Marketing Conference, University of Rhode Island.

  • Bucklin, Louis P. 1975. “A Synthetic Index of Marketing Productivity.”Proceedings of the 58th International Marketing Conference of the American Marketing Association. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 556–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1978a.Productivity in Marketing. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1978b. “Research in Productivity Measurement for Marketing Decisions.”Research in Marketing. Vol. 1, 122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzzell, R. D., B. T. Gale, and R. G. N. Sultan. 1975. “Market Share—A Key to Profitability.”Harvard Business Review 53 (January–February):97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Week. 1981. “Better Productivity Is the New Priority” (June 1): 98.

  • Byrne, Rusty Stieff. 1981. “Sources on Productivity.”Harvard Business Review (September–October):37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Darral G. 1977.Cumulative Advertising Effects: Sources and Implications. Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhalla, N. K. 1977. “Increase Your Marketing Productivity.”Canadian Business (March):68–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, Richard A. 1965. “How to Measure Marketing Performance.”Harvard Business Review (May–June):132–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortune. 1985. “Heinz Pushes to be the Low-Cost Producer.” (June 24): 44.

  • Greyser, Stephen A. 1980. “Marketing Issues.”Journal of Marketing 47 (Winter):89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Robert H. and Kim B. Clark. 1986. “Why Some Factories Are More Productive Than Others.”Harvard Business Review (September–August): 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedley, Barry. 1976. “A Fundamental Approach to Strategy Development.”Long-Range Planning 9 (December):2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1977. “Strategy and the Business Portfolio.”Long-Range Planning 10 (February):9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, Michael and Michael Pitts. 1983. “PIMS: Fact or Folklore.”Journal of Business Strategy 3 (Winter):38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magrath, A. J. and Kenneth G. Hardy. 1986. “Cost Containment in Marketing.”Journal of Business Strategy (Fall):14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrota, Sunil. 1984. “How to Measure Marketing Productivity.”Journal of Advertising Research 24 (June/July):9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiven, Malcolm A. 1980. “Plan for More Productive Advertising.”Harvard Business Review (March–April):130–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Lynn W., Dae R. Chang, and R. D. Buzzell. 1983. “Product Quality, Cost Position and Business Performance.”Journal of Marketing 47 (Spring):26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. 1980.Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeffler, Sidney, Robert D. Buzzell, and Donald F. Heany. 1974. “Impact of Strategic Planning on Profit Performance.”Harvard Business Review 52 (March–April):137–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevin, C. H. 1965.Marketing Productivity Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Wickham. 1986. “The Productivity Paradox.”Harvard Business Review (July–August):55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPI. 1980.The PIMS Program. Cambridge: The Strategic Planning Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, Robert L. 1978. “Marketing Productivity in Consumer Goods Industries.”Journal of Marketing 42 (January):60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Frederick E., Jr. 1981. “Top Management’s Concerns about Marketing Issues for the 1980’s.”Journal of Marketing 45 (Summer):9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Doyle L. and Pierce M. Windal. 1980. “Testing Cumulative Advertising Effects: A Comment on Methodology.”Journal of Marketing Research 17 (August):371–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

U S WEST, Inc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hawkins, D.I., Best, R.J. & Lillis, C.M. The nature and measurement of marketing productivity in consumer durables industries: A firm level analysis. JAMS 15, 1–8 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723284

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723284

Keywords

Navigation