Skip to main content
Log in

Retrospective and prospective views on the marketing/finance interface

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article introduces the special issue of theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science on the marketing/finance interface. In addition to previewing the nine subsequent articles in the special issue, it surveys early research on, suggests the scholarly foundations of, and recommends future directions for this boundary-spanning research domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Eugene W., Claes Fomell, and Sanal K. Mazvancheryl. 2004. “Customer Satisfaction and Shareholder Value.”Journal of Marketing 68 (October): 172–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Hans and Rik Pieters. 2003. “The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and Its Subareas Over Time.”Journal of Marketing 57 (April): 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, Lance A. and Mark B. Houston. 2001. “The Impact of Article Method Type and Subject Area on Article Citations and Reference Diversity inJM, JMR, and JCR.”Marketing Letters 12 (November): 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, John M., T. Bettina Comwell, and Stephen W. Pruitt. 2002. “Corporate Stadium Sponsorships, Signaling Theory, Agency Conflicts, and Shareholder Wealth.”Journal of Advertising Research 42 (November/December): 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franses, Philip Hans. 1998. “Large Data Sets in Finance and Marketing: Introduction by the Special Issue Editor.”Statistica Neerlandica 52 (November): 225–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, Kimberly C., Lynette L. Mathur, and Ike Mathur. 2000. “The Interrelationship Between Culture, Capital Structure, and Performance: Evidence From European Retailers.”Journal of Business Research 50 (November): 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guidry, Julie Anna, Brandi N. Guidry Hollier, Linda Johnson, John R. Tanner, and Chrisiane Veltos. 2004. “Surveying the Cites: A Ranking of Marketing Journals Using Citation Analysis.”Marketing Education Review 14 (Spring): 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Donna L. and Morris B. Holbrook. 1993. “The Intellectual Structure of Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Study of Author Cocitations in the First 15 Years of theJournal of Consumer Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (March): 505–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, Christian and Matthias Bucerius. 2005. “A Marketing Perspective on Mergers and Acquisitions: How Marketing Integration Affects Postmerger Performance.”Journal of Marketing 69 (January): 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, John A. and Jagdish N. Sheth. 1969.The Theory of Buyer Behaviour. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby D. 1976. “The Nature and Scope of Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 40 (July): 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, Michael R. 2004. “Revising the Structural Framework for Marketing Management.”Journal of Business Research 57 (September): 923–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Susan D. Steiner. 1997. “The Journal of Business and Entre-preneurship: The First Eight Years.”Journal of Business and Entre-preneurship 9 (March): 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Zhilin Yang. 2001. “International Marketing Serials: A Retrospective.”International Marketing Review 18 (6): 667–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Mark S. 2003. “Designating Opponents in Empirical Research Reports: The Rhetoric of ‘Interestingness’ in Consumer Research.”Marketing Theory 3 (December): 477–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak, Gene R. and Donald A. Michie. 1979. “The Social Disorder of the Broadened Concept of Marketing.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 7 (Summer): 214–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, Thomas W., Ellen Bolman Pulling, and Lucette B. Corner. 2001. “The Top Ten Sales Articles of the 20th Century.”Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 21 (Summer): 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, Dee, Ronald J. Dornoff, and Jerome B. Keman. 1975. “Marketing Strategies Based on Urban Areas Types.” InMarketing in Turbulent Times, Ed. Edward M. Mazze. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Subhash Jain. 1974. “Inequity in the Ghetto Distribution Structure and Opportunity Equalization for the Ghetto Dweller.” InMarketing’s Contribution to the Firm and Society. Ed. Ronald C. Curhan. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 280–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Rajendra Srivastava, and Subhash Jain. 1977. “Marketing Implications of the Proposed Balanced Growth and Economic Planning Act.” InContemporary Marketing Thought. Eds. Bamett A. Greenburg and Danny N. Bellenger. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 199–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1994. “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, Michael Jay, Gary Jones, and Megan J. Kearsley. 1999. “Accessibility: An Alternative Method of Ranking Marketing Journals.”Journal of Marketing Education 21 (December): 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprott, David E. and Anthony D. Miyazaki. 2002. “Two Decades of Contributions to Marketing and Public Policy: An Analysis of Research Published inJournal of Public Policy & Marketing.”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 21 (Spring): 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, Stephen W., T. Bettina Comwell, and John M. Clark. 2004. “The NASCAR Phenomenon: Auto Racing Sponsorships and Shareholder Wealth.”Journal of Advertising Research 44 (September/October): 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, Scott, W. Megginson, and L. Gitman. 2004.Corporate Finance. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theoharakis, Vasilis and Andrew Hirst. 2002. “Perceptual Differences of Marketing Journals: A Worldwide Perspective.”Marketing Letters 13 (November): 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, Gerard J., Rajesh K. Chandy, and David S. Ackerman. 1999. “In Search of Diversity: The Record of MajorMarketing Journals.”Journal of Marketing Research 36 (February): 120–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonta, Yasar and Yurdagiil Unal. 2005. “Scatter of Journals and Literature Obsolescence Reflected in Document Delivery Requests.”Informaton Science & Technology 56 (January): 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, Annette and Dianne Ross. 2000. “On Evaluation of Faculty Research Impact of Citation Analysis.”Journal of Applied Business Research 16 (Spring): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, George S. and Martin S. Roth. 1992. “Knowledge Development and Scientific Status in Consumer-Behavior Research: A Social Exchange Perspective.”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (September): 282–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and James A. Verbrugge. 2000. “Special Issue on the Marketing/Finance Interface.”Journal of Business Research 50 (November): 139–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Michael R. Hyman (mhyman@nmsu.edu) (B.S., University of Maryland; M.S.M. and Ph.D., Purdue University) is Wells Fargo Professor of Marketing at New Mexico State University (http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~mktgwww/hyman). He serves on seven editorial review boards, including theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science and theJournal of Advertising. His scholarly work has appeared in journals such as theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of Retailing, theJournal of Advertising, the Journal of Business Research, theJournal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, theInternational Journal of Advertising, theJournal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, theJournal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Business Horizons, theJournal of Business Ethics, andMarketing Education Review. His research interests include the effect of advertising on consumers, marketing ethics, marketing theory, and knowledge acquisition in academia.

Ike Mathur (imathur@cba.siu.edu) is a professor of finance at Southern Illinois University. He has served as interim dean for the College of Business, chair of the Department of Finance, and director of Doctoral Programs, all at Southern Illinois University. He is the author or coauthor of more than 100 articles and 14 books. He has published in theJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, theJournal of Banking and Finance, theJournal of International Money and Finance, theJournal of Futures Markets, Economic Letters, theJournal of International Business Studies, theJournal of Business Research, theJournal of Business, theJournal of Advertising, theJournal of Advertising Research, and theJournal of Macromarketing. Two of his recent books areEuropean Equity Markets and Corporate Financial Decisions andWealth Creation in Eastern Europe. He serves on the editorial board of a number of journals and is the editor of theJournal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money and theJournal of Multinational Financial Management.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hyman, M.R., Mathur, I. Retrospective and prospective views on the marketing/finance interface. JAMS 33, 390–400 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305279339

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305279339

Keywords

Navigation