Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Customer response capability in a sense-and-respond era: The role of customer knowledge process

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An organization’s customer response capability, its comptence in satisfying customer needs through effective and quick responses, is critical for sustained success. In this article, the authors examine how customer knowledge process influences customer response capability. They highlight two dimensions of customer response capability, customer response expertise and customer response speed. It is observed that apart from its direct positive association with customer response expertise and speed, the customer knowledge process also diminishes the positive association between risk propensity and these dimensions of customer response capability. The influence of customer response expertise and speed on performance is also examined. The hypotheses are tested using survey data collected from a sample of retailing firms and the findings triangulated using qualitative data collected through depth interviews with managers. The results highlight the importance of customer knowledge in enhancing customer response capability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, Leona S. and J. Hage. 1968. “Organizational Independence and Interorganizational Structure.”American Sociological Review 33 (December): 912–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. W., C. Fornell, and D. R. Lehmann. 1994. “Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings From Sweden.”Journal of Marketing 58 (3): 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, Jay B. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.”Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, Kenneth and J. Scott Long. 1993.Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, Stephen P. and Richard L. Nolan. 1998.Sense & Respond. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Ming-Jer and Ian C. MacMillan. 1992. “Nonresponse and Delayed Response to Competitive Moves: The Roles of Competitor Dependence and Action Irreversibility.”Academy of Management 35 (August): 539–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, George S. 1994. “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations.”Journal of Marketing 58 (4): 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman K. 1978.The Research Act. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, Rohit, John U. Farley and Frederick E. Webster Jr. 1993. “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 57 (January): 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. M. and M. A. Lyles. 1985. “Organizational Learning.”Academy of Management Review 10 (4): 803–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, David W. and James C. Anderson. 1988. “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (May): 186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1993. “Monte Carlo Estimations of Goodness-of-Fit Indices.” InTesting Structural Equations. Eds. Kenneth A. Bollen and J. Scott Long. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, George P. and Daniel J. Power. 1985. “Retrospective Reports of Strategic-Level Managers: Guidelines for Increasing Their Accurary.”Journal of Strategic Management 6 (2): 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., R. G. Demaree, and G. Wolf. 1993. “Estimating Within-Group Interrater Reliability With and Without Response Bias.”Journal of Applied Psychology 69 (1): 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay Kohli. 1993. “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing 57 (July): 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerin, Roger A., Rajan P. Varadarajan, and Robert Peterson. 1992. “A First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework.”Journal of Marketing 56 (4): 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce and U. Zander. 1992. “Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology.”Organization Science 3 (3): 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, Ajay K. and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1990. “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications.”Journal of Marketing 54 (2): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and Ajith Kumar. 1993. “MARKOR: A Measure of Market Orientation.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (November): 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krubasik, Edward G. 1988. “Customize Your Product Development.”Harvard Business Review 9 (November-December): 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Tiger and Roger J. Calantone. 1998. “The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination.”Journal of Marketing 62 (3): 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and J. P. Olson. 1975. “The Uncertainly of the Past: Organizational Learning Under Ambiguity.”European Journal of Political Research 2 (3): 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. 1994. “What Happens After Success: The Perils of Excellence.”Journal of Management Studies 31 (3): 325–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, George R., Easwar S. Iyer, and Sara Gooding Williams. 1996. “Environmental Organization Alliance Relationships Within and Across Nonprofit, Business, and Government Sectors.”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 15 (2): 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Christine. 1995. “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes.”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (3): 318–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1994. “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, John W. and Orville Walker. 1996. “Competency, Prior Performance, Opportunity Framing, and Competitive Response: Exploring Some Behavioral Decision Theory Perspectives.”Marketing Letters 7 (2): 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, John C. and Stanley F. Slater. 1990. “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability.”Journal of Marketing 54 (October): 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J. Paul. 1979. “Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing.”Journal of Marketing Research 16 (February): 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Lynn W. 1981. “Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (4): 395–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, Phil and Dennis W. Organ. 1986. “Self Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects.”Journal of Management 12 (4): 531–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. 1980.Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, Zur. 1995.Risk Taking: A Managerial Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Subhash. 1996.Applied Multivariate Techniques. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkula, James M. 1994. “Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning.”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Stanley F. and John C. Narver. 1995. “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization.”Journal of Marketing 59 (3): 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. 1990.Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. and N. R. Anderson. 1996. “Innovation in Top Management Teams.”Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (December): 680–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Carolina, South Carolina

    Satish Jayachandran & Kelly Hewett

  2. Illinois State University, Illinois, USA

    Peter Kaufman

Authors
  1. Satish Jayachandran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kelly Hewett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Kaufman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Satish Jayachandran is with the Department of Marketing at the University of South Carolina. His research interests are in the area of marketing strategy, specifically market responsiveness of firms and the impact of organizational performance on subsequent managerial and firm behavior. His research has been published in theJournal of Marketing and theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science. He was a recipient of the Harold H. Maynard award for 2001 from theJournal of Marketing.

Kelly Hewett is with the Department of Marketing at the University of South Carolina. Her research focuses on the management of relationships between buyers and sellers, as well as between headquarters and foreign subsidiaries in managing the marketing function globally. Her research has been published in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of International Business Studies, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, and theJournal of International Marketing, among others.

Peter Kaufman is with the Department of Marketing at Illinois State University. His research focuses on buyer-seller relationships, retailing, and distribution issues. He received an Honorable Mention in the Marketing Science Institute’s 2003 Alden G. Clayton Doctoral Dissertation Proposal Competition.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jayachandran, S., Hewett, K. & Kaufman, P. Customer response capability in a sense-and-respond era: The role of customer knowledge process. JAMS 32, 219–233 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304263334

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304263334

Keywords

Search

Navigation