Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors influencing the likelihood of customer defection: The role of consumer knowledge

  • Research Notes
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Customer satisfaction is the predominant metric firms use for detecting and managing customers' likelihood to defect. But while satisfaction and defection are related, satisfaction is only a weak predictor of whether a customer will defect. This article suggests that for repurchase decisions that involve an information-based evaluation of alternatives to the incumbent, likelihood of defection will be influenced by “how much” customers know about those alternatives. The relationship between level of knowledge about alternatives and defection is examined in the context of actual health insurance choices. Results suggest that the level of objective and subjective knowledge about alternatives has a direct effect on likelihood of defection—above and beyond satisfaction level. The view of defection forwarded in this article suggests that managers may be able to gain additional control over customer defection through actions aimed at influencing how much customers know (or come to know) about alternative vendors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, Leona S. and Steven G. West. 1991.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba, Joseph W. and Wesley Hutchinson. 1987. “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise.”Journal of Consumer Research 13(March): 411–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. W. and M. W. Sullivan. 1993. “The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms.”Marketing Science 12 (2): 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. Scott and Terry S. Overton. 1977. “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys.”Journal of Marketing Research 14(August): 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Reuben M. and David A. Kenney. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, James R. 1979.An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Mary Frances Luce, and John W. Payne. 1995. “Constructive Consumer Choice Processes.”Journal of Consumer Research 25 (December): 187–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, Peter H., Daniel L. Sherrell, and Nancy M. Ridgeway. 1986. “Consumer Search: An Extended Framework.”Journal of Consumer Research 13(June): 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Ruth N. 1998. “A Dynamic Model of the Duration of the Customer's Relationship With a Continuous Service Provider: The Role of Satisfaction.”Marketing Science 17(1): 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broniarczyk, Susan M. and Joseph W. Alba. 1994. “The Role of Consumers' Intuitions in Inference Making.”Journal of Consumer Research 21(December): 393–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brucks, Merrie. 1985. “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior.”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (June): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, Thomas Adams. 1998. “Measuring and Managing Consumer Switching Costs to Improve Customer Retention in Continuous Services”. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.

  • Cacioppo, John T. and Richard E. Petty. 1985. “Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion: The Role of Message Repetition.” InPsychological Processes and Advertising Effects: Theory, Research and Application. Eds. Linda F. Alwilt and Andrew A. Mitchell. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 91–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Margaret C. and Ronald C. Goodstein. 2001. “The Moderating Effect of Perceived Risk on Consumers' Evaluations of Product Incongruity: Preference for the Norm.”Journal of Consumer Research 28(December): 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, Kevin. 1989. “Beyond Service Fads—Meaningful Strategies for the Real World.”Sloan Management Review 30(summer): 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J. J. and S. A. Taylor. 1992. “Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension.”Journal of Marketing 56(July): 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Alan S. and Kunal Basu. 1994. “Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22(winter): 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, James F., David T. Kollat, and Roger D. Blackwell. 1973.Consumer Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, Russell H. 1990. “Multiple Processes by Which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The MODE Model as an Integrative Framework.” InAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 23. Ed. Mark P. Zanna. New York: Academic Press, 75–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, Martin and Icek Ajzen. 1975.Belief, Attitude Intention and Behavior: an Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes. 1992. “A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience.”Journal of Marketing 56(January): 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, David W. and James C. Anderson. 1988. “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment.”Journal of Marketing Research 25(May): 186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, Deborah A., Judith A. Sangl, and Judith A. Burrus. 1996. “Consumer Perspectives on Information Needs for Health Plan Choice.”Health Care Financing Review 18(1): 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L. A. 1987.Structural Equation Modeling With LISREL. Baltimore, MD: Johns-Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heide, Jan B. and Allen M. Weiss. 1995. “Vendor Consideration and Switching Behavior for Buyers in High-Technology Markets.”Journal of Marketing 59(July): 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten and Alexander Klee. 1997. “The Impact of Customer Satisfaction and Relationship Quality on Customer Retention: A Critical Reassessment and Model Development.”Psychology and Marketing 14(8): 737–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, Stephen J. and John Deighton. 1989. “Managing What Consumers Learn From Experience.”Journal of Marketing 53(2): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer, Wayne D. 1984. “An examination of Consumer Decision Making for a Common Repeat Purchase Product.”Journal of Consumer Research 11(December): 822–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, James and Gregory Wood. 1988. “The Effects of Incomplete Information on the Formation of Attitudes Toward Behavioral Alternatives.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(4): 580–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Eric J. and Edward J. Russo. 1984. “Product Familiarity and Learning New Information.”Journal of Consumer Research 11(1): 542–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Richard D. and Irwin P. Levin. 1985. “More Than Meets the Eye: The Effect of Missing Information on Purchase Evaluations.”Journal of Consumer Research 12(September): 169–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Michael A., David L. Mothersbaugh, and Sharon E. Beatty. 2000. “Switching Barriers and Repurchase Intentions in Services.”Journal of Retailing 76(2): 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Thomas O. and W. Earl Sasser Jr. 1995. “Why Satisfied Customers Defect.”Harvard Business Review 73(November–December): 88–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivetz, Ran and Itamar Simonson. 2000. “The Effects of Incomplete Information on Consumer Choice.”Journal of Marketing Research 37 (November): 427–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, Paul. 1987. “Markets With Consumer Switching Costs.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics 102(May): 375–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBarbera, Priscilla A. and David. Mazursky. 1983. “A Longitudinal Assessment of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction: The Dynamic Aspect of the Cognitive Process.”Journal of Marketing Research 20 (November): 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Robert J. 1981. “A Model of Multiatribute Judgments Under Attribute Uncertainty and Informational Constraint.”Journal of Marketing Research 18(November): 428–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, Vikas and Wagner A. Kamakura. 2001. “Satisfaction, Repurchase Intent, and Repurchase Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Customer Characteristics.”Journal of Marketing Research 38 (February): 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorthy, Dhar, Brian T. Ratchford, and Sabrata Talukdar. 1997. “Consumer Information Search Revisited: Theory and Empirical Analysis.”Journal of Consumer Research 23(March): 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerke, N. J. D. 1991. “A Note on a General Definition of the Coefficient of Determination.”Biometrika 78:691–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Committee for Quality Assurance. 2001. “Managed Care and the U.S. Health Care Industry”. Retrieved July 22, 2002, from http://www.ncqa.org/somc2001/intro/somc_2001_industry.htm

  • Newman, Joseph W. and Richard Staelin. 1972. “Prepurchase Information Seeking for New Cars and Major Household Appliances.”Journal of Marketing Research 9(August): 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Richard A. Werbel. 1973. “Multivariate Analysis of Brand Loyalty for Major Household Appliances.”Journal of Marketing Research 10(November): 404–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijssen, Edwin, Jagdip Singh, Deepak Sirdeshmukh, and Hartmut Holzmüller. 2003. “Investigating Industry Context Effects in Consumer-Firm Relationships: Preliminary Results From a Dispositional Approach.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 31(winter): 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, Jum. 1978.Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliva, Terrence, Richard L. Oliver, and Ian C. MacMillan. 1992. “A Catastrophe Model for Developing Service Satisfaction Strategies.”Journal of Marketing 56(July): 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Richard L. 1980. “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions.”Journal of Marketing Research 17(November): 460–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1997.Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. Boston: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1999. “Whence Consumer Loyalty.”Journal of Marketing 63 (Special Issue): 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Whan C., David L. Mothersbaugh, and Lawrence Feick. 1994. “Consumer Knowledge Assessment.”Journal of Consumer Research 21(June): 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punj, Girish N. and Richard Staelin. 1983. “A Model of Consumer Information Search for New Automobiles.”Journal of Consumer Research 9(March): 366–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, Frederick F. 1996.The Loyalty Effect: the Hidden Force Behind Growth, Profits, and Lasting Value. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and W. Earl Sasser. 1990. “Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services.”Harvard Business Review 68(September): 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, William T. and Elizabeth H. Creyer. 1992. “Making Inferences About Missing Information: The Effects of Existing Information.”Journal of Consumer Research 19(June): 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambandam, Rajan and Kenneth R. Lord. 1995. “Switching Behavior in Automobile Markets: A Consideration Sets Model.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23(winter): 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Stewart and Mark T. Spence. 2002. “Factors Affecting Encoding, Retrieval, and Alignment of Sensory Attributes in a Memory-Based Brand Choice Task.”Journal of Consumer Research 28(4): 603–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Carolyn J. and John G. Lynch. 1991. “Inference Effects Without Inference Making? Effects of Missing Information on Discounting and Use of Presented Information.”Journal of Consumer Research 17(March): 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George. 1961. “The Economics of Information.”Journal of Political Economy 69(June): 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujan, Harish, Barton A. Weitz, and Nirmalya Kumar. 1994. “Learning Orientation, Working Smart and Effective Selling.”Journal of Marketing 58(July): 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Steven D. 1999. “Strategies for Improving Health Plan Retention.”Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association Resource Guide: 1–5.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of North Carolina at Asheville, Asheville, USA

    Anthony J. Capraro

  2. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA

    Susan Broniarczyk & Rajendra K. Srivastava

Authors
  1. Anthony J. Capraro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan Broniarczyk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rajendra K. Srivastava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Anthony J. Capraro (tcapraro@unca.edu), an assistant professor at the University of North Carolina at Asheville, earned his Ph.D. in marketing in 1999 from the University of Texas after having spent 20 years in industry in marketing and marketing management positions. His current research interest focuses on developing and enhancing the value of a firm's customer base.

Susan Broniarczyk (Susan.Broniarczyk@bus.utexas.edu), an associate professor at the University of Texas at Austin, earned her Ph.D. in marketing from the University of Florida. She serves on the editorial boards of theJournal of Consumer Research and theJournal of Marketing Research and the advisory board for the Association for Consumer Research. Her research, which examines consumer decision making and how consumers' knowledge structures affect their reaction to missing or conflicting product information, appears in theJournal of Consumer Research, theJournal of Marketing Research, andOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

Rajendra K. Srivastava (Rajendra.Srivastava@bus.utexas.edu) is the Jack R. Crosby Regent's Chair in Business and a professor of marketing and management science and information systems (MSIS) in the McCombs School of Business at the University Texas at Austin. He is also the Daniel J. Jordan Research Scholar at Emory University. He earned his doctorate from the University of Pittsburgh. His research, which spans marketing and finance, has been published in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Marketing Research, Marketing Science, and theJournal of Banking and Finance. His current research interests focus on the impact of marketing strategy and market-based assets on corporate financial performance, particularly in the context of technology-intensive products and services.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Capraro, A.J., Broniarczyk, S. & Srivastava, R.K. Factors influencing the likelihood of customer defection: The role of consumer knowledge. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 31, 164–175 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070302250900

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070302250900

Key words

Search

Navigation