Hyaline Cartilage Thickness in Radiographically Normal Cadaveric Hips: Comparison of Spiral CT Arthrographic and Macroscopic Measurements

Published Online:Feb 1 2007https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2422051393

Abstract

Purpose: To assess spiral multidetector computed tomographic (CT) arthrography for the depiction of cartilage thickness in hips without cartilage loss, with evaluation of anatomic slices as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: Permission to perform imaging studies in cadaveric specimens of individuals who had willed their bodies to science was obtained from the institutional review board. Two independent observers measured the femoral and acetabular hyaline cartilage thickness of 12 radiographically normal cadaveric hips (from six women and five men; age range at death, 52–98 years; mean, 76.5 years) on spiral multidetector CT arthrographic reformations and on coronal anatomic slices. Regions of cartilage loss at gross or histologic examination were excluded. CT arthrographic and anatomic measurements in the coronal plane were compared by using Bland-Altman representation and a paired t test. Differences between mean cartilage thicknesses at the points of measurement were tested by means of analysis of variance. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibilities were determined.

Results: At CT arthrography, mean cartilage thickness ranged from 0.32 to 2.53 mm on the femoral head and from 0.95 to 3.13 mm on the acetabulum. Observers underestimated cartilage thickness in the coronal plane by 0.30 mm ± 0.52 (mean ± standard error) at CT arthrography (P < .001) compared with the anatomic reference standard. Ninety-five percent of the differences between CT arthrography and anatomic values ranged from −1.34 to 0.74 mm. The difference between mean cartilage thicknesses at the different measurement points was significant for coronal spiral multidetector CT arthrography and anatomic measurement of the femoral head and acetabulum and for sagittal and transverse CT arthrography of the femoral head (P < .001). Changes in cartilage thickness from the periphery to the center of the joint (“gradients”) were found by means of spiral multidetector CT arthrography and anatomic measurement.

Conclusion: Spiral multidetector CT arthrography depicts cartilage thickness gradients in radiographically normal cadaveric hips.

References

1 Santori N, Villar RN. Arthroscopic findings in the initial stages of hip osteoarthritis. Orthopedics 1999; 22: 405–409. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
2 Noguchi Y, Miura H, Takasugi S, Iwamoto Y. Cartilage and labrum degeneration in the dysplastic hip generally originates in the anterosuperior weight-bearing area: an arthroscopic observation. Arthroscopy 1999;15:496–506. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
3 Alvarez C, Chicheportiche V, Lequesne M, Vicaut E, Laredo JD. Contribution of helical computed tomography to the evaluation of early hip osteoarthritis: a study in 18 patients. Joint Bone Spine 2005;72:578–584. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
4 Vande Berg BC, Lecouvet FE, Poilvache P, et al. Assessment of knee cartilage in cadavers with dual-detector spiral CT arthrography and MR imaging. Radiology 2002;222:430–436. Link, Google Scholar
5 El-Khoury GY, Alliman KJ, Lundberg HJ, Rudert MJ, Brown TD, Saltzman CL. Cartilage thickness in cadaveric ankles: measurement with double-contrast multi–detector row CT arthrography versus MR imaging. Radiology 2004;233:768–773. Link, Google Scholar
6 Schmid MR, Notzli HP, Zanetti M, Wyss TF, Hodler J. Cartilage lesions in the hip: diagnostic effectiveness of MR arthrography. Radiology 2003;226:382–386. Link, Google Scholar
7 Waldt S, Bruegel M, Ganter K, et al. Comparison of multislice CT arthrography and MR arthrography for the detection of articular cartilage lesions of the elbow. Eur Radiol 2005;15:784–791. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
8 Daenen BR, Ferrara MA, Marcelis S, Dondelinger RF. Evaluation of patellar cartilage surface lesions: comparison of CT arthrography and fat-suppressed FLASH 3D MR imaging. Eur Radiol 1998;8:981–985. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
9 Kurrat HJ, Oberlander W. The thickness of the cartilage in the hip joint. J Anat 1978;126:145–155. Medline, Google Scholar
10 Shepherd DE, Seedhom BB. Thickness of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb. Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:27–34. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
11 Armstrong CG, Gardner DL. Thickness and distribution of human femoral head articular cartilage: changes with age. Ann Rheum Dis 1977;36:407–412. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
12 von Eisenhart R, Adam C, Steinlechner M, Muller-Gerbl M, Eckstein F. Quantitative determination of joint incongruity and pressure distribution during simulated gait and cartilage thickness in the human hip joint. J Orthop Res 1999;17:532–539. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
13 Eckstein F, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Landgraf J, et al. Quantitative analysis of incongruity, contact areas and cartilage thickness in the human hip joint. Acta Anat (Basel) 1997;158:192–204. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
14 Adam C, Eckstein F, Milz S, Putz R. The distribution of cartilage thickness within the joints of the lower limb of elderly individuals. J Anat 1998;193(pt 2):203–214. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
15 Nakanishi K, Tanaka H, Sugano N, et al. MR-based three-dimensional presentation of cartilage thickness in the femoral head. Eur Radiol 2001;11:2178–2183. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
16 Nishii T, Sugano N, Sato Y, Tanaka H, Miki H, Yoshikawa H. Three-dimensional distribution of acetabular cartilage thickness in patients with hip dysplasia: a fully automated computational analysis of MR imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004;12:650–657. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
17 Reis P, Nahal-Said R, Ravaud P, Dougados M, Amor B. Are radiological joint space widths of normal hips asymmetrical? Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:246–249. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
18 Lequesne M, Malghem J, Dion E. The normal hip joint space: variations in width, shape, and architecture on 223 pelvic radiographs. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:1145–1151. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
19 Meachim G, Fergie IA. Morphological patterns of articular cartilage fibrillation. J Pathol 1975;115:231–240. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
20 Noyes FR, Stabler CL. A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 1989;17:505–513. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
21 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–310. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
22 Fredensborg N, Nilsson BE. The joint space in normal hip radiographs. Radiology 1978;126:325–326. Link, Google Scholar
23 Armbuster TG, Guerra J Jr, Resnick D, et al. The adult hip: an anatomic study. I. The bony landmarks. Radiology 1978;128:1–10. Google Scholar
24 Carter DR, Beaupre GS, Wong M, Smith RL, Andriacchi TP, Schurman DJ. The mechanobiology of articular cartilage development and degeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;427(suppl):S69–S77. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
25 Adam C, Eckstein F, Milz S, Schulte E, Becker C, Putz R. The distribution of cartilage thickness in the knee-joints of old-aged individuals: measurement by A-mode ultrasound. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1998;13:1–10. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar

Article History

Published in print: 2007

Vol. 242, No. 2

Metrics

Altmetric Score

PDF download