Pierre Balthazard
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
This study investigates how a personality trait and expertise affect virtual teams interaction, and how that interaction leads to different levels of performance (e.g., solution quality, solution acceptance, cohesion). Teams have been shown to exhibit constructive, aggressive/defensive, or passive/defensive interaction styles that affect communication and thus team performance by facilitating or hindering the exchange of information among group members. These styles reflect an aggregation of the behaviors exhibited by individual team members, which are rooted in their individual personalities. The effects of interaction style on team performance have been well established in face-to-face and virtual teams. Generally, constructive interaction styles produce positive outcomes whereas passive/defensive styles beget negative ones. Aggressive/defensive teams produce solutions that are correlated with the expertise of those that have wrested control of the group but there is often little support for those solutions. The current work explores how different constellations of extraversion and expertise manifest themselves into group interaction styles and, ultimately, outcomes. The study involves 248 professional managers from executive MBA and professional development programs in 63 virtual teams that performed an intellective task. Results show that expertise and extraversion to be curvilinearly related to group interactions and performance, and high levels of extraversion and higher variations in extraversion between team members lead to less constructive and more passive/defensive interaction styles within teams. Results show that although expertise is the best predictor of task performance, it is primarily group interaction styles that predict contextual outcomes (e.g., solution acceptance, cohesion, effectiveness) in virtual teams.
- Balthazard, P. A. (1999). Virtual version of the Group Styles Inventory by R. A. Cooke and J. C. Lafferty. Arlington Heights IL: Human Synergistics/Center for Applied Research.Google Scholar
- Balthazard, P. A. (2000). Virtual version Ethical Decision Challenge by R. A. Cooke. Arlington Heights IL: Human Synergistics/Center for Applied Research.Google Scholar
- Barclay, D., Higgins, C., and Thompson, R. (1995). "The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach To Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use As An Illustration," Technology Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 285--309.Google Scholar
- Barrick, M. R. and M. K. Mount (1991). "The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis," Personnel Psychology, Vol. 44, pp. 1--26.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M., and Mount, M. K., (1998). "Relating Member Ability and Personality to Work-Team Processes and Team Effectiveness," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp. 377--391.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barry, B. and G. L. Stewart (1997). "Composition, Process and Performance in Self-Managed Groups: The Role of Personality," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 62--78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bottger, P. (1984). "Expertise and Air Time As Bases of Actual and Perceived Influence In Problem-Solving Groups," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 69, pp. 214--221.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brannick, J. T., and Prince, C. (1997). "An Overview of Team Performance Measurement," In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, and C. Price (eds.), Team Performance Assessment and Measurement, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Burleson, B. R., Levine, B. J., and Samter, W. (1984). "Decison-Making Procedure and Decision Quality," Human Communication Research, Vol. 10, pp. 557--574.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cook, J.D. (1981). The Experience of Work: A Compendium and Review of 249 Measures and Their Use, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Cooke, R. A. (1994). The Ethical Decision Challenge, Arlington Heights IL: Human Synergistics/Center for Applied Research.Google Scholar
- Cooke, R. A., and Kernaghan, J. A. (1987). "Estimating The Difference Between Group Versus Individual Performance On Problem-Solving Task," Group and organization Studies, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 319--342.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cooke, R. A., and Lafferty, J. C. (1988). Group Styles Inventory, Plymouth, MI: Human Synergistics.Google Scholar
- Cooke, R. A., and Rousseau, D. M. (1988). "Behavioral Norms and Expectations," Group and organization Studies, Vol. 13, pp. 245--273.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cooke, R. A., and Szumal, J. L. (1993). "Measuring Normative Beliefs and Shared Behavioral Expectations In organizations: The Reliability and Validity of The organizational Culture Inventory," Psychological Reports, Vol. 72, pp. 1299--1330.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cooke, R. A., and Szumal, J. L. (1994). "The Impact of Group Interaction Styles On Problem-Solving Effectiveness," Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, v. Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 415--437.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Digman, J. M., (1990). "Personality Structure: An Emergence of The Five-Factor Model," The Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 41, pp. 417--440.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fjermestad, J. and Hiltz, S. R. (1998-1999). "An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 7--149. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Feldman, D.C. (1984). "The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, pp. 47--53.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Festinger, L. (1950). Theory and Experiment in Social Communication, Ann Arbor: Research Center for Dynamics, Institute for social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Fiske, D. W. (1949). "Consistency of The Factorial Structures of Personality Ratings From Different Sources," Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 44, pp. 329--344.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, pp. 39--50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- George, J. M. (1990). "Personality, Affect, and Behavior In Groups," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 75, pp.107--116.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goffin, R. D. and Rothstein, M. G. (1996). "Personality Testing and The Assessment Center: Incremental Validity For Managerial Selection," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81, No. 6, pp. 746--756.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goldberg, L. R. (1990). "An Alternative Description of Personality: The Big-Five Factor Structure," Journal of Personality and Social Psycholog, Vol. 59, pp. 1216--1229.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Griffith, T., and Neale, M. A. (2000). "Information Processing In Traditional, Hybrid, and Virtual Teams: From Nascent Knowledge To Transactive Memory," In B. Staw and R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational Behavior, Vol. 22: Stanford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Hackman, J. R., and Morris, C. G. (1975). "Group Tasks, Group Interaction Process, and Group Performance Effectiveness: A Review and Proposed Integration," Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 8, pp. 45--99.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Haythorn, W. (1953). "The Influence of Individual Members On The Characteristics of Small Groups," Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 48, pp. 276--284.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hightower, R. T., and Sayeed, L. (1996). "Effects of Communication Mode and Prediscussion Information Distribution Characteristics On Information Exchange In Groups," Information Systems Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 451--465.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hill, G. W. (1982). "Group Versus Individual Performance: Are N + 1 Heads Better Than One?" Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 91, pp. 517--539.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hirokawa, R. (1985). "Discussion Procedures and Decision-Making Performance: A Test of A Functional Perspective," Human Communication Research, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 203--224.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hirokawa, R., and Gouran, D. S. (1989). "Facilitation of Group Communication: A Critique of Prior Research and An Agenda For Future Research," Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 71--92.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hoffman, L. R. (1979). "Applying Experiemental Research On Group Problem Solving To organizations," Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 15, pp. 375--391.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hogan, R. T. (1991). "Personality and Personality Measurement," Handbook of Industrial and organizational Psychology. M. D. D. L. M. Hough. Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists Press: 873--919.Google Scholar
- Hogan, R. (1996) "Personality Assessment," In Richard S. Barrett (ed.), Fair Employment Strategies in Human Resource Management. Westport, Connecticut: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
- Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., and Hogan, J. (1994). "What We Know About Leadership: Effectiveness and Personality," American Psychologist, Vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 493--504.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hogan, R., Hogan, J., and Roberts, B.W. (1996). "Personality Measurement and Employment Decisions: Questions and Answers," American Psychologist, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 469--477.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hollenbeck, J. R., Sego, D. J., Ilgen, D. R., Major, D. A., Hedlund, J., and Phillips, J. (1997). "Team Decision-Making Under Difficult Conditions: Construct Validation of Potential Manipulations Using The TIDE2 Simulation," In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, and C. Price (eds.), Team Performance Assessment and Measurement, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- House, R. J. and Howell, J. M. (1992). "Personality and Charismatic Leadership," Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 3, pp. 81--108.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hoyle, R. H. and Crawford, A. M. (1994). "Use of Individual-Level Data To Investigate Group Phenomena: Issues and Strategies," Small Group Research, Vol. 25, pp. 464--485.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Human Synergistics (1993). Group Styles Inventory, Plymouth, MI: Human Synergistics.Google Scholar
- Iacono, S. and Weisband, S. (1997). "Developing Trust In Virtual Teams," Proceedings of the 30th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Google ScholarDigital Library
- James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., and Wolf, G. (1984). "Estimating within-Group Interrater Reliability with and without Response Bias," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 69, pp. 85--98.Google ScholarCross Ref
- James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., and Wolf, G. (1993). "R(Wg) - An Assessment of within-Group Interrater Agreement," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 78, pp. 306--309.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., and Leidner, D. E. (1998). "Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust In Global Virtual Teams," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 29--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kozlowski, S. W. J., and Hattrup, K. (1992). "A Disagreement About within-Group Agreement: Disentangling Issues of Consistency Versus Consensus," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 77, pp. 161--167.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Libby, R., Trotman, K. T., and Zimmer, I. (1987). "Member Variation, Recognition of Expertise, and Group Performance," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 72, pp. 81--87.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lindell, M. K., and Brandt, D. J. (1999). "Assessing Interrater Agreement On The Job Relevance of A Test: A Comparison of The CVI, T, (rWG(J)), and r*(WG(J)) Indexes," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 84, pp. 640--647.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lindell, M. K., Brandt, D. J. and Whitney, D. J. (1999). "A Revised Index of Interrater Agreement For Multi-Item Ratings of A Single Target," Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 23, pp. 127--135.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maier, N. R. F. (1963). Problem-solving Discussions and Conferences: Leadership Methods and Skills. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Maier, N. R. F. (1967). "Assets and Liabilities In Group Problem-Solving: The Need For An Integrative Function," Psychological Review, Vol. 74, pp. 239--249.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mann, R. D. (1959). "A Review of The Relationships Between Personality and Performance In Small Groups," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 56, pp. 241--270.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
- Maznevski, M. L., and Chudoba, K. M. (2000). "Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness," Oganization Science. Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 473--492. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mazur, A. (1973). "Cross-Species Comparison of Status In Established Small Groups," American Sociological Review Vol. 38, pp. 513--529.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McCrae, R. R., and Costa, P. T. (1987). "Validation of The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Instruments and Observers," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 81--90.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McCrae, R. R. and Costa, P. T. (1989). "The Structure of Interpersonal Traits: Wiggin's Circumplex and The Five-Factor Model," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 56, pp. 586--595.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McCrae, R. R., and Costa, P. T. (1992). "Discriminant Validity of NEO-PIR Facet Scales," Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 229--237.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McCrae, R. R., and Costa, P. T. (1996). "Toward A New Generation of Personality Theories: Theorethical Contexts For The Five-Factor Model," In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of Personality -- Theoretical perspectives. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- McCrae, R. R. and John, O. P. (1992). "An Introduction To The Five-Factor Model and Its Applications," Journal of Personality Vol. 60, pp. 175--215.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McGrath, J.E. (1984) Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
- McIntyre, R. M., Salas, E., Morgan, B., and Glickman, A. S. (1989). Team research in the 80's: Lessons learned. (Tech Rep.). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.Google Scholar
- Mennecke, B. E., and Valacich, J. S. (1998). "Information Is What You Make It: The Influence of Group History and Computer Support On Information Sharing, Decision Quality, and Member Perceptions," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 173--197. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mittleman, D., and Briggs, R. O. (1999). "Communication Technology For Traditional and Virtual Teams," In E. Sundstrom (Ed.), Supporting work team effectiveness, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Morgan, B. B. Jr., Glickman, A. S., Woodard, E. A., Blaiwes, A. S., and Salas, E. (1986). Measurement of team behaviors in a Navy environment, (Technical Report). orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.Google Scholar
- Nowack, K. (1997). "Personality Inventories: The Next Generation," Performance in Practice, American Society of Training and Development, Winter 1996/97.Google Scholar
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory, (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Ocker, R., Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S. R., and Johnson, K. (1998). "Effects of Four Modes of Group Communication On The Outcomes of Software Requirements Determination," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 99--118. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O'Reilly, C., Caldwell, D., and Barnett, W. (1989). "Work Group Demography, Social Integration, and Turnover," Administrative Sciences Quarterly, Vol. 34, pp. 21--37.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Potter, R., Balthazard, P.A. and Cooke, R.A. (2000). "Virtual Team Interaction: Assessment, Consequences, and Management," Team Performance Management, Vol. 6, No. 7-8, pp. 131--137.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raymark, P.H., Schmit, M.J., and Guion, R.M. (1997). "Identifying Potentially Usefulpersonality Constructs For Employee Selection," Personnel Psychology, Vol. 50, pp. 723--736.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stasser, G., and Titus, W. (1985). "Pooling of Unshared Information In Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Groups Discussion," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 48, pp. 1467--1478.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Straus, S. G. (1996). "Getting A Clue: The Effects of Communication Media and Information Distribution On Participation and Performance In Computer-Mediated and Face-To-Face Groups," Small Group Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 115--142.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tan, B.C.Y., Wei, K.-K., Huang, W.W. and Ng, G.-N. (2000). "A Dialog Technique To Enhance Electronic Communication In Virtual Teams," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 153--165.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Townsend, A., DeMarie, S. and Hendrickson, A. (1998). "Virtual Teams: Technology and The Workplace of The Future," Academy of Management Executive, 12.Google Scholar
- Trapnell, P. D. and J. S. Wiggins (1990). "Extension of The Interpersonal Adjective Scalers To Include The Big Five Dimensions of Personality," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 59, pp. 781--790.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., and Hightower, R. (1997). "Virtual Teams Versus Face-To-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of A Web-Based Conference System," Decision Sciences, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 975--996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Watson, D. and Clark, L. A. (1997). "Extraversion and Its Positive Emotional Core," Handbook of Personality Psychology. R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson and S. R. Briggs. San Diego, CA, Academic Press: 767--793.Google Scholar
- Watson, W. E., and Michaelsen, L. K. (1988). "Group Interaction Behaviors That Affect Group Performance On An Intellective Task," Group and organization Studies, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 495--516.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weisband, S. (2000). Assessing divergent and convergent processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated groups, Working paper, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
- Yellen, R. E., M. Winniford, M., and Sanford, C. C. (1995). "Extraversion and Introversion In Electronically-Supported Meetings," Information and Management, Vol. 28, pp. 63--74. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yetton, P. W., and Bottger, P. C. (1982). "Individual Versus Group Problem Solving: An Empirical Test of A Best-Member Strategy," organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 29, pp. 307--321.Google Scholar
- Zalesny, M. D. (1990). "Rater Confidence and Social Influence In Performance Appraisals," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 75, pp. 274--289.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Expertise, extraversion and group interaction styles as performance indicators in virtual teams: how do perceptions of IT's performance get formed?
Recommendations
The Effects of Extraversion and Expertise on Virtual Team Interaction and Performance
HICSS '02: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'02)-Volume 8 - Volume 8This paper investigates the effects of extraversion, and team member expertise on virtual team interaction and performance. Sixty-three virtual teams of professional managers participated in an intellective decision making task using a web-based ...
Virtual team interaction styles
The virtual team is an increasingly common strategic work unit of many organizations. The virtual team, via various computer-based media (e.g. email, groupware) and noncomputer-based media (e.g. telephone), can interact and collaborate though separated ...
Group interaction styles in a virtual context: The effects on group outcomes
The influence of communication and information technologies (TICs) on group functioning and group outcomes is an important topic. Interdependent group work implies the need to communicate in order to share information and knowledge related to the task. ...
Comments