skip to main content
article

Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research

Published:03 February 2004Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Information technology is providing the infrastructure necessary to support the development of new organizational forms. Virtual teams represent one such organizational form, one that could revolutionize the workplace and provide organizations with unprecedented levels of flexibility and responsiveness. As the technological infrastructure necessary to support virtual teams is now readily available, further research on the range of issues surrounding virtual teams is required if we are to learn how to manage them effectively. While the findings of team research in the traditional environment may provide useful pointers, the idiosyncratic structural and contextual issues surrounding virtual teams call for specific research attention.This article provides a review of previously published work and reports on the findings from early virtual team research in an effort to take stock of the current state of the art. The review is organized around the input - process - output model and categorizes the literature into issues pertaining to inputs, socio-emotional processes, task processes, and outputs. Building on this review we critically evaluate virtual team research and develop research questions that can guide future inquiry in this fertile are of inquiry.

References

  1. Ahuja, M. and Carley, K. (1999). "Network Structure in Virtual Organizations," Organization Science, Vol. 10, No.6, pp. 741--757.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alavi, M. and Yoo, Y. (1997). "Is Learning in Virtual Teams Real?," Working Paper Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, S. (2000). "Virtual Teams Going Global," InfoWorld, Vol. 22, No.46, pp. 55--56.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, T.J. (1977). Managing the Flow of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ancona, D.G. and Caldwell, D.F. (1992). "Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance," Organization Science, Vol. 3, No.3, pp. 321--341.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Archer, N.P. (1990). "A Comparison of Computer Conferences with Face-to-face Meetings for Small Group Business Decisions," Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 9, No.4, pp. 307--317.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bednar, R. and Battersby, C. (1976). "The Effects of Specific Cognitive Structure on Early Group Development," The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 12, No.4, pp. 513--522.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Berdahl, J. and Craig, K. (1996). "Equality of Participation and Influences in Groups: The Effects of Communication Medium and Sex Composition," Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 4, No.2, pp. 179--201.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bordia, P. (1997). "Face-to-face versus Computer-mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature," The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 34, No.1, pp. 99--120.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Brown, S.L. and Eisenhardt, K.M. (1995). "Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No.2, pp. 343--379.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Burke, K. and Aytes, K. (1998). "A Longitudinal Analysis of the Effects of Media Richness on Cohesion Development and Process Satisfaction in Computer-supported Workgroups," Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Hawaii, pp. 135--144.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Burke, K. and Chidambaram, L. (1996). "Do Mediated Contexts Differ in Information Richness? A Comparison of Collocated and Dispersed Meetings," Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Hawai International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, pp. 92--101.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Carmel, E. and Agarwal, R. (2001). "Tactical Approaches for Alleviating Distance in Global Software Development," IEEE Software, pp. 22--29.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Chase, N. (1999). "Learning to Lead a Virtual Team," Quality, Vol. 38, No.9, p. 76.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ahuja, M. and Carley, K. (1999). "Network Structure in Virtual Organizations," Organization Science, Vol. 10, No.6, pp. 741--757.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Cheng, J. (1983). "Interdependence and Coordination in Organizations: A Role-system Analysis," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 156--162.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Chidambaram, L. (1996). "Relational Development in Computer-supported Groups," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, No.2, pp. 143--163.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Chidambaram, L. and Bostrom, R. (1993). "Evolution of Group Performance Over Time: A Repeated Measures Study of GDSS Effects," Journal of Organizational Computing, Vol. 3, No.4, pp. 443--469.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Chidambaram, L., Bostrom, R., and Wynne, B. (1990-1991). "A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Group Decision Support Systems on Group Development," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 7, No.3, pp. 7--25.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Cianni, M. and Wnuck, D. (1997). "Individual Growth and Team Enhancement: Moving Toward a New Model of Career Development," Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 11, No.1, pp. 105--115.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Cohen, S.G. and Bailey, D.E. (1997). "What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite," Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No.3, pp. 239--290.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Constant, D., Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. (1996). "The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice," Organization Science, Vol.7, No.2, pp.119--135.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Crampton, C. (2001). "The Mutual Knowledge Problem and its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration," Organization Science, Vol. 12, No.3, pp. 346--371.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Davidow, W.H. and Malone, M.S. (1992). The Virtual Corporation, New York: HarperCollins.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. DeMeyer, A. (1991). "Tech Talk: How Managers are Stimulating Global R&D Communication," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 32, pp. 49--59.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M.S. (1994). "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory," Organization Science, Vol. 5, No.2, pp. 121--147.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M.S. (1997). "Transitions in Teamwork in New Organizational Forms," Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 14, pp. 157-176.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Dune, P. (2000). "The Links that Boost Morale," Management Today, p. 74.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Eveland, J. and Bikson, T. (1988). "Work Group Structures and Computer Support: A Field Experiment," ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol. 6, No.4, pp. 354--379.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Fisher, S.G., Hunter, T.A. and Ketin Macrosson, W.D. (1997). "Team or Group? Managers' Perception of the Differences," Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 12, No.4, pp. 232--243.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Fjermested, J. and Hiltz, S.R. (1998-1999). "An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 15, No.3, pp. 7--149.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Furst, S., Blackburn, R. and Rosen, B. (1999). "Virtual Teams: A Proposed Agenda for Research," Information Systems Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 249--269.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Galvin, J. and Ahuja, M. (2001). "Am I Doing What's Expected? New Member Socialization in Virtual Groups," in Chidambaram, L., and Zigurs, I. (Eds.), Our Virtual World: The Transformation of Work, Play and Life via Technology, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, pp. 40--55.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Galegher, J. and Kraut, R.E. (1994). "Computer-mediated Communication for Intellectual Teamwork: An Experiment in Group Writing," Information Systems Research, Vol. 5, No.2, pp. 110--138.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Grenier, R., and Metes, G. (1995). Going Virtual: Moving Your Organization in the 21st Century, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Griffitt, W. (1974). "Attitude Similarity and Attraction," in Huston, T.L. (Ed.), Foundations of Interpersonal Attraction, New York: Academic Press.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Hackman, J.R. (1987). "The Design of Work Teams," in Lorsch, J.W. (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Hackman, J.R. (1989). Groups that Work (and Those that Don't), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Hackman, J.R. (1992). "Group Influences on Individuals in Organizations," in Dunnette, M.D., and Hough, L.M. (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Harrison, D. Price, K. and Bell, M. (1998). "Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface and Deep-level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41, No.1, pp. 96--107.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Hightower , R.T., Sayeed, L., Warkentin, M.E. and McHaney, R. (1997). "Information Exchange in Virtual Work Groups," in Igbaria, M. and Tan, M. (Eds.), The Virtual Workplace, Hershey, PA: Idea Group publishing.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Hollingshead, A., McGrath, J., and O'Connor, K. (1993). "Group Task Performance and Communication Technology: A Longitudinal Study of Computer-mediated versus Face-to-face Groups," Small Group Research, Vol. 24, No.3, pp. 307--333.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Hoogstraten, J. and Vorst, H. (1978). "Group Cohesion, Task Performance, and the Experimenter Expectancy Effect," Human Relations, Vol. 31, No.11, pp. 939--956.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Hulnick, G. (2000). "Doing Business Virtually," Communication World, Vol. 17, No.3, pp. 33--36.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Iacono, C.S. and Weisband, S.P. (1997). "Developing Trust in Virtual Teams," Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Jarvenpaa, S. and Ives, B. (1994). "The Global Network Organization of the Future: Information Management Opportunities and Challenges," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 10, No.4, pp. 25--57.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Jarvenpaa, S., Knoll, K. and Leidner, D. (1998). "Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, No.4, pp. 29--64.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Jarvenpaa, S. and Leidner, D. (1999). "Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams," Organization Science, Vol. 10, No.6, pp. 791--815.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Johansson, C, Dittrich, Y., and Juustila, A. (1999). "Software Engineering Across Boundaries: Student Project in Distributed Collaboration," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 42, No.4, pp. 286--296.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Kaiser, P., Tullar, W., and McKowen, D. (2000). "Student Team Projects by Internet," Business Communication Quarterly, Vol. 63, No.4, pp. 75--82.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Katzenbach, J.R and Smith, D.K. (1993). The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High Performance Organization, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Kayworth, T. and Leidner, D. (2000). "The Global Virtual Manager: A Prescription for Success," European Management Journal, Vol. 18, No.2, pp. 183--194.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Kayworth, T.R., Leidner, D.E.(2001-2002). "Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 18, No.3, pp. 7--41.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Kezsbom, D. (2000). "Creating Teamwork in Virtual Teams," Cost Engineering, Vol. 42, No.10, pp. 33--36.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Kirsch, L.J. (1997). "Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management," Information Systems Research, Vol. 8, No.3, pp. 215--239.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Koch, J. (1979). "Effects of Goal Specificity and Performance Feedback to Work Groups on Peer Leadership, Performance, and Attitudes," Human Relations, Vol. 32, No.10, pp. 819--840.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Krumpel, K. (2000). "Making the Right (Interactive) Moves for Knowledge-producing Tasks in Computer-mediated Groups," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 43, No.2, pp. 185--195.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Langfred, C.W. (1998). "Is Group Cohesiveness a Double-edged Sword? An Investigation of the Effects of Cohesiveness on Performance," Small Group Research, Vol. 29, pp. 124--143.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Lind, M. (1999). "The Gender Impact of Temporary Virtual Work Groups," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 42, No.4, pp. 276--285.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Lipnack, J. and Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Lipnack, J. and Stamps, J. (2000). Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries with Technology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Lurey, J. and Raisinhgani, M. (2001). "An Empirical Study of Best Practices in Virtual Teams," Information & Management, Vol. 38, No.8, pp. 523--544.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Majchrzak, A., Rice, R., King, N., Malhotra, A., and Ba, S. (2000a). "Computer-mediated Inter-organizational Knowledge-sharing: Insights from a Virtual Team Innovating Using a Collaborative Tool," Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 13, No.1, pp. 44--53.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Majchrzak, A., Rice, R., Malhotra, A., King, N., and Ba, S. (2000b). "Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-supported Inter-organizational Virtual Team," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No.4, pp. 569--600.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., Carman, R., and Lott, V. (2001). "Radical Innovation Without Collocation: A Case Study at Boeing-Rocketdyne," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No.2, pp. 229--249.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Mark, G. (2001). "Meeting Current Challenges for Virtually Collocated Teams: Participation, Culture, and Integration," in Chidambaram, L., and Zigures, I. (Eds.), Our Virtual World: The Transformation of Work, Play and Life via Technology, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, pp. 74--93.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Maznevski, M. and Chudoba, K. (2001). "Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness," Organization Science, Vol. 11, No.5, pp. 473--492.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. McDonough, E., Kahn, K., and Barczak, G. (2001). "An Investigation of the Use of Global, Virtual, and Collocated New Product Development Teams," The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 18, No.2, pp. 110--120.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. McGrath, J. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Prentice-Hall.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Meyerson, D., Weick, K.E. and Kramer, R.M. (1996). "Swift Trust and Temporary Groups," in Kramer, R.M. and Tyler, T.R. (Eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 166--195.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Miles, R.E. and Snow, C.C. (1986). "Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms," California Management Review, Vol. 28, No.3, pp. 62--73.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Miles, R.E. and Snow, C.C. (1992). "Causes of Failure in Network Organizations," California Management Review, Vol. 34, No.4, pp. 53--72.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Montoya-Weiss, M., Massey, A., and Song, M. (2001). "Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No.6, pp. 1251--1262.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Ouchi, W.G. (1979). "A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms," Management Science, Vol. 25, No.9, pp. 833--848.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Piccoli, G. and Ives, B. (2002). "Trust and the Unintended Effects of Behavior Control in Virtual Teams," Working Paper, Cornell Univ.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Pinto, M.B, Pinto, J.K. and Prescott, J.E. (1993). "Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-functional Cooperation," Management Science, Vol. 39, No.10, pp. 1281--1297.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Qureshi, S. and Vogel, D. (2001). "Adaptiveness in Virtual Teams: Organisational Challenges and Research Directions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 10, pp. 27--46.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Ramesh, V. and Dennis, A. (2002). "The Object-oriented Team: Lessons for Virtual Teams from Global Software Development," Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Robey, D., Khoo, H., and Powers, C. (2000). "Situated Learning in Cross-functional Virtual Teams," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications, Vol. 43, No.1, pp. 51--66.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Sarker, S., Lau, F., and Sahay, S. (2001). "Using an Adapted Grounded Theory Approach for Inductive Theory Building About Virtual Team Development," Database for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 32, No.1, pp. 38--56.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Sarker, S. and Sahay, S. (2002). "Information Systems Development by US-Norwegian Virtual Teams: Implications of Time and Space," Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Hawai International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, pp. 1--10.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Saunders, C.S. (2000). "Virtual teams: Piecing Together the Puzzle," in Zmud, R.W. (Ed.) Framing the Domain of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past, Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Savicki, V., Kelley, M., and Lingenfelter, D. (1996). "Gender, Group Composition, and Task Type in Small Task Groups using Computer-mediated Communication," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 12, No.4, pp. 549--565.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Sharda, R. Barr, S.H., and McDonnell, J.C. (1988). "Decision Support System Effectiveness: A Review and an Empirical Test," Management Science, Vol. 34, No.2, pp. 139--157.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Snow, C.C., Miles, R.E. and Coleman (1992). "Managing 21st Century Network Organizations," Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 20, No.3, pp. 5--20.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Solomon, C. (2001). "Managing Virtual Teams," Workforce, Vol. 80, No.6, pp. 60--65.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1986). "Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication," Management Science, Vol. 32, No.11, pp. 1492--1512.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Steiner, I. (1972). Group Process and Productivity, New York, NY: Academic Press.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Suchan, J. and Hayzak, G. (2001). "The Communication Characteristics of Virtual Teams: A Case Study," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 44, No.3, pp. 174--186.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Sundstrom, E., DeMuse, K.P. and Futrell, D. (1990). "Work Teams: Applications and Effectiveness," American Psychologist, Vol. 45, pp. 120--133.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Tan, B., Wei, K, Huang, W., Ng, G. (2000). "A Dialogue Technique to Enhance Electronic Communication in Virtual Teams," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 43, No.2, pp. 153--165.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Terborg, J., Castore, C., and DeNinno, J. (1976). "Group Composition, Group Performance, and Cohesion," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 34, pp. 782--790.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Townsend, A., DeMarie, S. and Hendrickson, A. (1998). "Virtual Teams: Technology and the Workplace of the Future," Academy of Management Executive,Vol. 2, No.3, pp.17--29.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Van Ryssen, S. and Hayes Godar, S. (2000). "Going International Without Going International: Multinational Virtual Teams," Journal of International Management, Vol. 6, pp. 49--60.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Victor, B. and Stephens, C. (1994). "The Dark Side of the New Organizational Forms: An Editorial Essay," Organization Science, Vol. 5, No.4, pp. 479--482.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Vogel, D., van Genuchten, M. Lou, D., Verveen, S., van Eekout, M., and Adams, A. (2001). "Exploratory Research on the Role of National and Professional Cultures in a Distributed Learning Project," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 44, No.2, pp. 114--125.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  98. Walther, J. (1995). "Relational Aspects of Computer-mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time," Organization Science, Vol. 6, No.2, pp. 186--203.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Walther, J.B. and Burgoon, J.K. (1992). "Relational Communication in Computer Mediated Interaction," Human Communication Research, Vol. 19, No.1.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Warkentin, M.E., and Beranek, P.M. (1999). "Training to Improve Virtual Team Communication," Information Systems Journal, Vol. 9, No.4.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Warkentin, M.E., Sayeed, L. and Hightower, R. (1997). "Virtual Teams versus Face-to-face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System," Decision Sciences, Vol. 28, No.4, pp. 975--996.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader