skip to main content
10.1145/945645.945658acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesk-capConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Sentiment analysis: capturing favorability using natural language processing

Published:23 October 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper illustrates a sentiment analysis approach to extract sentiments associated with polarities of positive or negative for specific subjects from a document, instead of classifying the whole document into positive or negative.The essential issues in sentiment analysis are to identify how sentiments are expressed in texts and whether the expressions indicate positive (favorable) or negative (unfavorable) opinions toward the subject. In order to improve the accuracy of the sentiment analysis, it is important to properly identify the semantic relationships between the sentiment expressions and the subject. By applying semantic analysis with a syntactic parser and sentiment lexicon, our prototype system achieved high precision (75-95%, depending on the data) in finding sentiments within Web pages and news articles.

References

  1. Chinatsu Aone, Mila Ramos-Santacruz, and William J. Niehaus. AssentorR: An NLP-Based Solution to E-mail Monitoring. In Proceedings of AAAI/IAAI 2000, pages 945--950. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bo Pang, Lillian Lee, and Shivakumar Vaithyanathan. Thumbs up? Sentiment Classification using Machine Learning Techniques. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 79--86. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ralph Grishman and Beth Sundheim. Message understanding conference - 6: A brief history. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 466--471. 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou and Kathleen R. McKeown. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL, pages 174--181. 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou and Janyce M. Wiebe. Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity. In Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 299-305. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chris Manning and Hinrich Schutze. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Satoshi Morinaga, Kenji Yamanishi, Kenji Tateishi, Toshikazu Fukushima. Mining Product Reputations on the Web. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pages 341--349. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mary S. Neff, Roy J. Byrd, and Branimir K. Boguraev. The Talent System: TEXTRACT Architecture and Data Model. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop on Software Engineering and Architecture of Language Technology systems (SEALTS), pages 1--8. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Penn Treebank Project. http://www.cis.upenn.edu/treebank/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. SAIC Information Extraction. http://www.itl.nist.gov/iaui/894.02/related_projects/muc/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellen Spertus. Smokey: Automatic recognition of hostile messages. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI), pages 1058--1065. 1997 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Richard M. Tong. An operational system for detecting and tracking opinions in on-line discussions. Working Notes of the ACM SIGIR 2001 Workshop on Operational Text Classification, pages 1--6. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Peter Turney. Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 417--424, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Janyce M. Wiebe, Theresa Wilson, and Matthew Bell. Identifying collocations for recognizing opinions. In Proceedings of the ACL/EACL Workshop on Collocation. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeonghee Yi and Tetsuya Nasukawa. Sentiment Analyzer: Extracting Sentiments towards a Given Topic using Natural Language Processing Techniques. In Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). (To appear). 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Sentiment analysis: capturing favorability using natural language processing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        K-CAP '03: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Knowledge capture
        October 2003
        198 pages
        ISBN:1581135831
        DOI:10.1145/945645

        Copyright © 2003 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 October 2003

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate55of198submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader