Lea Baumann
ABSTRACT
With professional social networking sites (PSNS) networking opportunities basically have no limits. Industry experts, influencers, and knowledgeable people from all sorts of fields and from all over the world can potentially become part of your business network, providing access to new perspectives and new information. Connecting with a diverse set of people with different expertise and knowledge can enhance personal work performance and career advancement. Yet, many people are online mainly connected with others they know from their direct work environment. Despite a lot of research concerning the influences on networking behavior, there is no research investigating if people who know that networking can be beneficial network more. More importantly, there is no research investigating if people who know that a diverse network is important network more diversely and whether or not affective and technical influences interfere with the relationship between knowing and doing. In an experimental study (n = 316), we examine the effects of knowledge and website functionalities on professional networking in order to draw implications on how to improve PSNS to encourage people to build diverse business networks. We find that people who generally know that networking is beneficial, in fact, network more. Moreover, people who know that diversity is important network more diversely. Besides, technical features of the website (e.g. who is recommended) can influence people's networking behavior. Finally, results are discussed and implications to improve PSNS are drawn.
- P. S. Adler and S.-W. Kwon. 2002. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17--40.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- V. Agarwal and K. K. Bharadwaj. 2013. A collaborative filtering framework for friends recommendation in social networks based on interaction intensity and adaptive user similarity. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(3), 359--379.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Ahuja, G. Soda, and A. Zaheer. 2012. The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science, 23(2), 434--448.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Baer. 2010. The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: a comprehensive examination and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 592--601.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Baumann, S. Utz, and A. Kirsch. 2018. Professional networking behavior: differences between offline and online networking. 51. Kongress Der Deutschen Gesellschaft Für Psychologie (DGPs). (Talk)Google Scholar
- P. M. Blau. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity: a primitive theory of social structure. Free Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- R. S. Burt. 1992. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- R. S. Burt. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349--399.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. C. Byham. 2009. Start networking right away (even if you hate it). Harvard Business Review, 22.Google Scholar
- T. Casciaro, F. Gino, and M. Kouchaki. 2014. The contaminating effect of building instrumental ties: how networking can make us feel dirty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(4), 705--735.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Chen, W. Geyer, C. Dugan, M. Muller, and I. Guy. 2009. "Make new friends, but keep the old one" - Recommending people on social networking sites. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI).Google Scholar
- R. Cross and J. N. Cummings. 2004. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 928--937.Google Scholar
- R. Cross and R. Thomas. 2011. A smarter way to network. Harvard Business Review, 89(7/8), 149--153.Google Scholar
- T. De Jong and M. G. M. Ferguson-Hessler. 1996. Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 105--113.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Fang, B. Landis, Z. Zhang, M. H. Anderson, J. D. Shaw, and M. Kilduff. 2015. Integrating personality and social networks: a meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organization Science, 26(4), 1243--1260.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. L. Forret and T. W. Dougherty. 2001. Correlates of networking behavior for managerial and professional employees. Group & Organization Management, 26(3), 283--311.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. S. Granovetter. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360--1380.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Guy, M. Jacovi, A. Perer, I. Ronen, and E. Uziel. 2010. Same places, same things, same people? Mining user similarity on social media. Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW).Google Scholar
- D. A. Harrison and K. J. Klein. 2007. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199--1228.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Ibarra. 1992. Homophily and differential returns: sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422--447.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Ingram and M. W. Morris. 2007. Do people mix at mixers? structure, homophily, and the "life of the party". Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(4), 558--585.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Kalish and G. Robins. 2006. Psychological predispositions and network structure: the relationship between individual predispositions, structural holes and network closure. Social Networks, 28(1), 56--84.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Kochan, K. Bezrukova, R. Ely, S. Jackson, A. Joshi, K. Jehn, J. Leonard, D. Levine, and D. Thomas. 2003. The effects of diversity on business performance: report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management, 42(1), 3--21.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Kuwabara, C. Hildebrand, and X. Zou. 2016. Lay theories of networking: how laypeople's beliefs about networks affect their attitudes and engagement toward instrumental networking. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 50--64.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. P. Mattick and J. C. Clarke. 1998. Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(4), 455--470.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Mehra, M. Kilduff, and D. J. Brass. 2001. The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 121--146.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415--444.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Oh and M. Kilduff. 2008. The ripple effect of personality on social structure: Self-monitoring origins of network brokerage. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1155--1164.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Z. Papacharissi. 2009. The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and A SmallWorld. New Media & Society, 11(1-2), 199--220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Parise, E. Whelan, and S. Todd. 2015. How twitter users can generate better ideas. MIT Sloan Management Review, 56(4), 20--25.Google Scholar
- J. Pfeffer and R. I. Sutton. 2000. The knowing-doing gap: how smart companies turn knowledge into action. Harvard Business Press, Brighton, MA.Google Scholar
- C. M. Porter and S. E. Woo. 2015. Untangling the networking phenomenon: a dynamic psychological perspective on how and why people network. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1477--1500.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Renkl. 2009. Wissenserwerb - Was wird da erworben? In E. Wild and J. Möller (Eds.) Pädagogische Psychologie. Springer Medizin Verlag: Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Z. Sasovova, A. Mehra, S. P. Borgatti, and M. C. Schippers. 2010. Network churn: the effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 639--670.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. T. Shea and G. M. Fitzsimons. 2016. Personal goal pursuit as an antecedent to social network structure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 45--57.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. T. Sparrowe, R. C. Liden, S. J. Wayne, and M. L. Kraimer. 2001. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316--325.Google Scholar
- S. Utz, N. Muscanell. 2014. Beruflicher Wissensaustausch auf sozialen Medien. 10. Stuttgarter WIMA Tage (Talk). Retrieved from: http://www.redeftie.eu/wp-uploads/2014/11/WiMaTage2014_SonjaUtz.pdfGoogle Scholar
- J. Walter, D. Z. Levin, and J. K. Munighan. 2015. Reconnection choices: selecting the most valuable (vs. most preferred) dormant ties. Organization Science, 26(5), 1447--1465.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. R. Wanberg, R. Kanfer, and J. T. Banas. 2000. Predictors and outcomes of networking intensity among unemployed job seekers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 491--503.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H.-G. Wolff and S. Kim. 2012. The relationship between networking behaviors and the big five personality dimensions. Career Development International, 17(1), 43--66.Google ScholarCross Ref
- How to encourage people to build diverse business networks?
Recommendations
Does social capital affect SNS usage? A look at the roles of subjective well-being and social identity
Examines the effects of social capital on SNS use (qualitative and quantitative use).Found that bridging capital significantly impacts qualitative SNS use.Verified the mediating role of subjective well-being between bonding capital and quantitative SNS ...
The contribution of mobile social media to social capital and psychological well-being
Using a two-wave panel in Hong Kong, this study examines how different uses of mobile social media contribute to individuals' social capital and psychological well-being. Findings showed that communicative use and self-disclosure on mobile social media ...
Online Bonding and Bridging Social Capital via Social Networking Sites
This research aimed to explore types of online social capital bridging and bonding that the Emiratis perceive in the context of social networking site SNS usage. A snow-ball sample of 230 Emiratis from two Emirates, Abu Dhabi and Dubai was used. The ...
Comments