ting yang
ABSTRACT
With the development of cloud computing and artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things (IoT) products are gradually entering every corner of our lives and changing the way we live. Yet traditional computer authentication protocol cannot be used directly in the Internet of things devices, because of its limitations (e.g., simple CPU structure, low storage capacity, weak computing power, etc.). Therefore, the authentication protocol for the Internet of Things is an essential ingredient for securing the internet of things.
In this paper, we introduce the background of authentication protocol for the Internet of Things, analyze the differences of authentication protocol between computer and Internet of Things, and then illustrates the developing trend of IoT authentication protocol. Based on the thorough survey, we discuss the new features of the authentication protocol for the Internet of Things from three aspects: description, solution. opportunities. At last, we specify some difficulties for the research of authentication protocol in the IoT.
- FM Amine, LA Maglaras, J Helge, et al (2017). Authentication Protocols for Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey[J]. Security and Communication Networks, 1--41.Google Scholar
- W Zhou, Y Jia, AN Peng, YQ Zhang, P Liu (2019). The Effect of IoT New Features on Security and Privacy: New Threats, Existing Solutions, and Challenges Yet to Be Solved[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(2): 1606--1616.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A Manos, A Tim, B Michael (2017). Understanding the Mirai Botnet[C]. 26th USENIX Security Symposium, 1093--1110.Google Scholar
- R Joshitta, L Arockiam. Authentication in IoT Environment: A Survey. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2016, 6(10): 140--145.Google Scholar
- D Alrababah, E Alshammari, A Alsuht. A Survey: Authentication Protocols for Wireless Sensor Network in the Internet of Things; Keys and Attacks[C]. The International Conference on new Trends in Computing Sciences (ICTCS'2017), 2017: 270--276.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E Mohammed, F Ahmad, C Maroun, et al. A Survey of Internet of Things (IoT) Authentication Schemes. Sensors, 2019, 15(16).Google Scholar
- A Afrah, A Amal, Badhib Arwa, et al. A Survey on Authentication Techniques for the Internet of Things. International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences, 2019: 271--275.Google Scholar
- A Lkram, H Alzubair, F Li. Authentication and privacy schemes for vehicular ad hoc networks: A survey. Vehicular Communications, 2019, 16: 45--61.Google Scholar
- B Vaidya, D Makrakis, H Mouftah. Two-Factor Mutual Authentication with Key Agreement in Wireless Sensor Networks[M]. Security and Communication Networks, 9(2):171--183.Google Scholar
- F Wu, L Xu, S Kumari, et al (2017). A Privacy-preserving and Provable User Authentication Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Internet of Things Security[J]. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 8(1):101--116.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Q Jiang, J Ma, F Wei, et al (2016). An untraceable temporal-credential-based two-factor authentication scheme using ECC for wireless sensor networks[J]. Journal of Network & Computer Applications, 76:37--48.Google ScholarDigital Library
- AG Mehdi, A Omar, et al (2018). Hardware based Two-Factor User Authentication for the Internet of Things[C]. 2018 14th International Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), 1081--1086.Google Scholar
- PK Dhillon, S Kalra (2017). A Lightweight Biometrics Based Remote User Authentication Scheme for IoT Services[J]. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 34(2):255--270.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L Kou, YQ Shi, et al (2019). A Lightweight Three-Factor User Authentication Protocol for the Information Perception of IoT[J]. Computers Materials & Continua, 58(2):545--565.Google ScholarCross Ref
- AK Das (2015). A Secure and Efficient User Anonymity-Preserving Three-Factor Authentication Protocol for Large-Scale Distributed Wireless Sensor Networks[M]. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 82(3):1377--1404.Google Scholar
- MN Babu, ASN Chakravarthy, C Ravindranath (2017). The Design of a Secure Three Factor Authentication Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks[C]. International Conference on Nextgen Electronic Technologies: Silicon to Software (ICNETS2), 184--190.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A Tewari, B Gupta (2017). Cryptanalysis of a Novel Ultra-Lightweight Mutual Authentication Protocol for IoT Devices using RFID Tags, 73(3):1085--1102.Google Scholar
- KE Psannis, S Xinogalos, A Sifaleras (2014). Convergence of Internet of Things and Mobile Cloud Computing[J]. Systems Science & Control Engineering an Open Access Journal, 2(1):476--483.Google Scholar
- L Peris, CJ C Hernandez, et al (2016). LMAP: a Real Lightweight Mutual Authentication Protocol for Low-cost RFID tags[C]. Proceedings of the Printed Handout of Workshop on RFID Security.Google Scholar
- P Perislopez, JC Hern, JM Esteveztapiador, et al (2006). M2AP: A Minimalist Mutual-Authentication Protocol for Low-cost RFID Tags[M]. Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing. 4159:912--923.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A Tewari, BB Gupta (2017). Cryptanalysis of a Novel Ultra-lightweight Mutual Authentication Protocol for IoT Devices Using RFID tags[J]. The Journal of Supercomputing, 73(3):1085--1102.Google ScholarDigital Library
- K Wang, C Chen, W Fang, et al (2018). On the Security of a New Ultra-Lightweight Authentication Protocol in IoT Environment for RFID Tags[J]. The Journal of Supercomputing, 74(1):65--70.Google ScholarDigital Library
- K Fan, Q Lou, et al (2017). Cloud-based Lightweight RFID Mutual Authentication Protocol. 2017 IEEE Second International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace (DSC), 333--338.Google Scholar
- V Odelu, S Saha, et al (2019). Efficient Privacy Preserving Device Authentication in WBANs for Industrial e-health Applications[J]. Computers & Security, 83:300--312.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F Wu, X Li, et al (2018). A Lightweight and Robust Two-factor Authentication Scheme for Personalized Healthcare Systems Using Wireless Medical Sensor Networks[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems-The International Journal of Escience, 82:727--737.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L Wu, Y Zhang, L Li, et al (2016). Efficient and Anonymous Authentication Scheme for Wireless Body Area Networks[J]. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(6):134.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J Srinivas, S Mukhopadhyay, D Mishra (2017). Secure and Efficient User Authentication Scheme for Multi-Gateway Wireless Sensor Networks[J]. Ad Hoc Networks, 54:147--169.Google ScholarDigital Library
- R Amin, SH Islam, GP Biswas, et al (2016). Design of an Anonymity-Preserving Three-Factor Authenticated Key Exchange Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks[J]. Computer Networks the International Journal of Computer & Telecommunications Networking, 101:42--62.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Q Jiang, S Zeadally, J Ma, et al (2017). Lightweight Three-Factor Authentication and Key Agreement Protocol for Internet-Integrated Wireless Sensor Networks[J]. IEEE Access, 5:3376--3392.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G Prosanta, S Biplab (2019). Lightweight and Privacy-Preserving Two-Factor Authentication Scheme for IoT Devices[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(1):580--589.Google ScholarCross Ref
- DX Li, W Peng, et al (2018). A Blockchain-Based Authentication and Security Mechanism for IoT[C]. 27th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN).Google ScholarCross Ref
- J M Cui, Z W Zhang, et al (2018). An Improved User Authentication Protocol for IoT[C]. 2018 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery (CyberC).Google ScholarCross Ref
- S Kalra, S Sood (2015). Secure Authentication Scheme for IoT and Cloud Servers[J]. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 24.Google Scholar
- S Kumari, M Karuppiah, A K Das, et al (2017). A Secure Authentication Scheme Based on Elliptic Curve Cryptography for IoT and Cloud Servers[J]. The Journal of Supercomputing.Google Scholar
- W Zhang, D Lin, H Zhang, et al (2017). A Lightweight Anonymous Mutual Authentication with Key Agreement Protocol on ECC[C]. The 14th IEEE International Conference on Embedded Software and Systems.Google ScholarCross Ref
- YW Chen, J Martinez, et al (2018). A Lightweight Anonymous Client--Server Authentication Scheme for the Internet of Things Scenario: LAuth[J]. Sensors, 18(11).Google Scholar
- V Rao, KV Prema (2019). Light-weight Hashing Method for User Authentication in Internet-of-Things[J]. Ad Hoc Networks, 89:97--106Google ScholarCross Ref
- L Wu, Y Zhang, L Li, et al (2016). Efficient and Anonymous Authentication Scheme for Wireless Body Area Networks[J]. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(6):134.Google ScholarDigital Library
- P Vijayakumar, M Azees, V Chang, et al (2017). Computationally efficient privacy preserving authentication and key distribution techniques for vehicular ad hoc networks[J], Cluster Computing, 20(3):2439--2450.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J Liu, Y Yu, J Jia, S Wang, et al (2019). Lattice-Based Double-Authentication-Preventing Ring Signature for Security and Privacy in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks[J]. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 24(5):575--584.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P Vijayakumara, V Changb, LJ Deboraha, et al (2018). Computationally efficient privacy Preserving Anonymous Mutual and Batch Authentication Schemes for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78(3):943--955.Google ScholarDigital Library
- H Shen, J Shen, MK Khan, et al (2016). Efficient RFID Authentication Using Elliptic Curve Cryptography for the Internet of Things[J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 96(4):1--14.Google Scholar
- Y Chen, J Chou (2015). ECC-based Untraceable Authentication for Large-Scale active-tag RFID systems[J]. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(1), 97--120.Google ScholarDigital Library
- P Gope, R Amin, ISK Hafizul, et al (2017). Lightweight and Privacy-preserving RFID Authentication Scheme for Distributed IoT Infrastructure with Secure Localization Services for Smart City Environment[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 83:629--637.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M Miettinen, TD Nguyen, A Sadeghi, et al (2018). Revisiting Context-Based Authentication in IoT[C], 2018 55th ACM/ESDA/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), 1--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- AI Radu, FD Garcia (2016). LeiA: A Lightweight Authentication Protocol for CAN[M]. 21st European Symposium on Research in Computer Security (ESORICS), 9879:283--300.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W Liu, H Liu, et al (2016). The Yoking-proof-based Authentication Protocol for Cloud-assisted Wearable Devices[J]. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing[J], 20(3):469--479.Google ScholarDigital Library
- KK Thinn (2009). Three Way Challenge-Response Authentication in Smart Card Using Elliptic Curve Cryptosystem[C]. Proc. of International Conference on Advanced Computer Control, 2009. IEEE Computer Society.Google ScholarDigital Library
- P Prasithsangaree, P Krishnamurthy (2004). A Three-Way Authentication Protocol for Public Access Wireless Networks[J]. International Conference on Wireless Networks/International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, 195--201.Google Scholar
- N Bouchemal, S Kallel, N Bouchemal (2019). A Survey: WSN Heterogeneous Architecture Platform for IoT[C]. Machine Learning for Networking. First International Conference, 321--328.Google ScholarDigital Library
- MBM Noor, WH Hassan (2019). Current research on Internet of Things (IoT) security: A survey[J]. Computer Networks, 148:283--294.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P Punithavathi, S Geetha, et al (2019). A Lightweight Machine Learning-based Authentication Framework for Smart IoT Devices[J]. Information Sciences, 484:255--268.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L Mainetti, L Patrono, A Vilei (2011). Evolution of Wireless Sensor Networks towards the Internet of Things: A Survey[C]. International Conference on Software.Google Scholar
- R Liu, JF Wang (2016). Internet of Things: Application and Prospect[C]. 13th Global Congress on Manufacturing and Management (GCMM 2016), 100.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- New Features of Authentication Scheme for the IoT: A Survey
Recommendations
Authentication Protocol for Securing Internet of Things
ICEMIS '18: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Engineering & MIS 2018The Internet of things (IoT) is become an important research topic because it integrates various sensors and objects to communicate directly with one another object without human intervention. Today, Internet of Things has so many applications in our ...
Verifying a secure authentication protocol for IoT medical devices
AbstractThe advancement of Internet of Things (IoT) technology has made medical equipment smaller and smarter, while computing environment has shifted from server-client wire/wireless communication networks toward diverse portable laptops, smartphones, ...
Security of the Internet of Things: An Overview
ICCIS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Communication and Information SystemsOver the last several decades, the pace of progress of Internet technology has undergone rapid developments, especially in the Internet of Things (IoT). The recent advancements that have changed the way people live are called Smart devices, which are ...
Comments