skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376231acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

In Search of Forms for Evocative and Generative Reflection: Exploratory Studies and a Design Proposal

Published:23 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today an increasing number of personal informatics tools and platforms support intended behavior change and goal achievement through data-based self-reflection. The scope of self-reflection expands with emerging sources, goals, and challenges of human well-being, demanding for reframing recent computer-mediated reflective practice. This study investigates a broader range of contexts and forms of self-reflection that support navigating one's mind and goals beyond achieving preset goals. This paper describes contemporary issues on human well-being and two exploratory studies-one conducted in a traveling artists' residency and the other in a design studio class-which surveyed various triggers, contexts, and forms of self-reflection. By connecting the insights from the two studies, I propose evocative and generative reflection as an alternative perspective to tracking-based, goal-oriented reflection and discuss implications for the design for reflection with a focus on the creative dimension of human well-being.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper104pv.mp4

mp4

40.2 MB

a104-jung.mp4

mp4

73.8 MB

References

  1. Alberto Monge Roffarello and Luigi De Russis. (2019). The Race Towards Digital Wellbeing: Issues and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Paper 386, 14 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300616Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alliance of Artists Communities. Residences | Alliance of Artists Communities. Retrieved from http://www.artistcommunities.org/residenciesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. American Art Therapy Association. About Art Therapy | American Art Therapy Association. Retrieved from https://arttherapy.org/about-art-therapy/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Amid Ayobi, Tobias Sonne, Paul Marshall, and Anna L. Cox. 2018. Flexible and Mindful Self-Tracking: Design Implications from Paper Bullet Journals. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Paper 28, 14 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173602Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Andrea Grimes Parker. 2014. Reflection-throughperformance: personal implications of documenting health behaviors for the collective. Pers Ubituit Comput 18, 7 (October 2014), 1737 -- 1752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0780--5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Andrew Quitmeyer. 2018. Hiking Hacks: Workshop Model for Exploring Wilderness Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 945--956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196748.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Anna Ståhl, Jakob Tholander, Jarmo Laaksolahti, and Elsa Kosmack-Vaara. 2017. Being, Bringing and Bridging: Three Aspects of Sketching with Nature. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1309--1320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064764.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. automato.farm. 2019. BIY: Believe It Yourself. Retrieved from http://automato.farm/portfolio/believe_it_yourself/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Barrie Tullett. 2014. Tyepwriter Art: A Modern Anthology. Laurence King Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: cultural probes. interactions. ACM 6, 1 (Jan./Feb. 1999), 21--29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bin Zhu, Anders Hedman, and Haibo Li. 2017. Designing Digital Mindfulness: Presence-In and Presence With versus Presence-Through. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2685 -- 2695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Brian Eno. Oblique Strategies. Retrieved from https://www.enoshop.co.uk/product/obliquestrategies.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Center for Human Technology. Center for Human Technology: Realigning Technology with Humanity. Retrieved from http://humanetech.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chris Elsden, Abigail C. Durrant, David Chatting, David S. Kirk. 2017. Designing Documentary Informatics. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 649--661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064714.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Claudia Núñez-Pacheco. 2018. Reflection through Inner Presence: A Sensitizing Concept for Design. Multimodal Technologies and Interact 2 (1), 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2010005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. D. Jean Clandinin and F. Michael Connelly. 2004. Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. David Howes. 2013. The Expanding Field of Sensory Studies. (August 2013). Retrieved from http://www.sensorystudies.org/sensorialinvestigations/the-expanding-field-of-sensory-studies/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Danya Glabau. 2017. Fancy Feast: The aspirational fantasies in photogenic food. (September 21, 2017). Retrieved from http://reallifemag.com/fancy-feast/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Donald A. Schön. 1984. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1st ed.). Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dorian Peters, Rafael A. Calvo, and Richard M. Ryan. 2018. Designing for Motivation, Engagement and Wellbeing in Digital Experience. Frontiers in Psychology. 9, 797 (28 May 2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ellen J. Langer. 2006. On Becoming an Artist: Reinventing Yourself Through Mindful Creativity. Ballantine Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Eric P. S. Baumer, Vera Khovanskaya, Mark Matthews, Lindsay Reynolds, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, and Geri Gay. 2014. Reviewing Reflection: On the Use of Reflection. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing Interactive Systems. (DIS '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Pages 93 -- 102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598598Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Eric P. S. Baumer. 2015. Reflective Informatics: Conceptual Dimensions for Designing Technologies for Reflection. In Proceedings of the 2015 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Pages 585 -- 594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702234Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Haining Zhu, Nathalie Henry Riche, and Dominikus Baur. 2017. Understanding Self-Reflection: How People Reflect on Personal Data Through Visual Data Exploration. In Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth'17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 173- 182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3154862.3154881Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Francesca Gino. 2019. Need More Self-Control? Try a Simple Ritual (August 21, 2019). Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/need-moreself-control-try-a-simple-ritual/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Gille Bolton and Russell Delderfield, R. (2018). Reflective Practice: Writing and Professional Development (5th Ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Glenn Parsons. 2008. Aesthetics and Nature (1st ed.). Continuum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Giorgia Lupi and Stefanie Posavec. (2016). Dear Data. Princeton Architectural Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Halbert L. Dunn. 1959. High-Level Wellness for Man and Society. American Journal of Public Health 49, 6 (June), 786--792. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2105%2Fajph.49.6.786Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A stagebased model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the 2010 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Pages 557 -- 566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753409Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Jan Steward and Corita Kent. 2008. Learning by heart: Teachings to free the creative spirit (2nd Ed.). Allworth.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jay David Bolter and Diane Gromala. 2003. Windows and Mirrors: Interaction Design, Digital Art, and the Myth of Transparency. The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Jayne Wallace, Jon Rogers, Michael Shorter, Pete Thomas, Martin Skelly, and Richard Cook. 2018. The SelfReflector: Design, IoT and the High Street. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Paper 423, 12 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173997Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. John W. Travis and Regina Sara Ryan. 2004. The Wellness Workbook: How to Achieve Enduring Health and Vitality (3rd ed.). Celestial Arts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jonathan Harris and Sep Kemvar. We Feel Fine. Retrieved from http://wefeelfine.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Julia Cameron. 2016. The artist's way (Anniversary Ed.). TarcherPerigee.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Kimiko Ryokai, Elena Durán López, Noura Howell, Jon Gillick, and David Bamman. 2018. Capturing, Representing, and Interacting with Laughter. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Paper 358, 12 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173932Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Kristina Höök et al. 2017. Soma-Based Design Theory. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Pages 550 -- 557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3027082Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Kristina Höök, Martin P. Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, and Johanna Mercurio. 2016. Somaesthetic Appreciation Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Pages 3131 -- 3142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858583Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Kirsten Boehner, Janet Vertesi, Phoebe Sengers, and Paul Dourish. 2007. How HCI interprets the probes. In Proceedings of the 2007 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Pages 1077 -- 1086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240789Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Lars Hallnäs and Johan Redström. 2001. Slow Technology: Designing for Reflection. Pers Ubiquit Comput. 5, 3 (August 2001), 201 -- 212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00000019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Lian Loke, George Poonkhin Khut, and A. Baki Kocaballi. 2012. Bodily experience and imagination: designing ritual interactions for participatory live-art contexts. In Proceedings of the 2012 conference on Designing Interactive Systems. (DIS '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Pages 779 -- 788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318073Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Marc Wittmann. 2017. Felt Time: The Science of How We Experience Time. The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Maliheh Ghajargar and Mikael Wiberg. 2018. Thinking with Interactive Artifacts: Reflection as a Concept in Design Outcomes. Design Issues 34, 2 (Spring 2018), 48 -- 63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00485Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Florian 'Floyd' Mueller and Damon Young. 2017. Five Lenses for Designing Exertion Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Pages 2473 -- 2483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025746Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Nada Terzimehić, Renate Häuslschmid, Heinrich Hussmann, m.c. schraefel. 2019. A Review & Analysis of Mindfulness Research in HCI: Framing Current Lines of Research and Future Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Paper 457, 13 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300687Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Nam Wook Kim, Hyejin Im, Nathalie Henry Riche, Alicia Wang, Krzysztof Gajos, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2019. DataSelfie: Empowering People to Design Personalized Visuals to Represent There Data. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Paper 79, 12 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300309Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Natasha Myers. 2014. Sensing Botanical Sensoria: A Kriya for Cultivating Your Inner Plant. Retrieved from http://imaginativeethnography.org/imaginings/affect/se nsing-botanical-sensoria/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Nicholas Feltron. Feltron. Retrieved from http://feltron.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Parham, J. 2017. What Does 'Self-Care' Mean Amid a Barrage of News and Social Media? (Nov 20, 2017). Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/self-caredigital-detox/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Petr Slovák, Christopher Frauenberger, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2017. Reflective Practicum: A Framework of Sensitizing Concepts to Design for Transformative Reflection. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Pages 2696 -- 2707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025516Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2005. Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility (CC '05), Olav W. Bertelsen, Niels Olof Bouvin, Peter G. Krogh, and Morten Kyng (Eds.). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 49--58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094569Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Pierre D. Lévy. 2018. The beauty of making hot chocolate - an inquiry on designing for everyday rituals. In Proceedings of Design Research Society 2018 (DRS '12). 514--523. DIO: https://doi.org/10.21606/dma.2017.514Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Rebecca Solnit. 2001. Wanderlust: A History of Walking. Penguin Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Richard Shusterman. 2008. Body Consciousness: A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Runyuan (Jason) Chen, Mania Orand, Shin Young (Lucia) Choi, and Leena Choi. 2018. An Empirical Exploration of Mindfulness Design Using Solo Travel Domain. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Paper 97, 12 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173671Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Sabrina Barr. 2019. Pinterest introduces wellness activities to support mental health (July 23, 2019). Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/lifestyle/health-and-families/pinterest-wellness-activitiesmental-health-anxiety-breathing-exercisesa9016571.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Self-Authoring -- What is Self-Authoring? Retrieved from https://selfauthoring.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Sherry Turkle. 2011. Evocative Objects: Things We Think With. The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Shinrin-Yoku. Retrieved from http://www.shinrinyoku.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Strohecker, J. 2005. A Brief History of Wellness. HealthWorld Online. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/UGoFr4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Susie Ellis. 2017. Wellness, Well-Being... And What About Spa? (April 9, 2017). Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/susieellis/wellness-wellbeingand-wha_b_9641722.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Szu-Yu (Cyn) Liu, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2018. Photography as A Design Research Tool into Natureculture. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing Interactive Systems. (DIS '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Pages 777 -- 789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196819Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Tim Hwang. 2019. Announcing the Program on Advanced Divination (Jun 3, 2019). Retrieved from https://medium.com/@timhwang/announcing-theprogram-on-advanced-divination-b99e9b2c689aGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. TRYBE. Welcome to Trybe. Retrieved from http://www.trybe.usGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Jack Mezirow. (1995). Transformation theory of adult learning. In M. Welton (Ed.), In defense of the lifeworld (39--70). New York: SUNY Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Yoko Akama, Ann Light, and Simon Bowen. 2017. Mindfulness and Technology: Traces of A Middle Way. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 345--355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064752Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Eugene T. Gendlin. 1982. Focusing (2nd Ed.). Bantam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. CDC. 2018. Well-Being Concepts | HRQOL | CDC. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/wellbeing.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. In Search of Forms for Evocative and Generative Reflection: Exploratory Studies and a Design Proposal

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2020
      10688 pages
      ISBN:9781450367080
      DOI:10.1145/3313831

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 April 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format