skip to main content
10.1145/3287098.3287104acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Participatory data collection and management in low-resource contexts: a field trial with urban refugees

Published:04 January 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

As access to and control of data becomes increasingly democratized, understanding the potential and constraints for low resource contexts has important implications for system design as well as practice. Our research pushes the bounds of current system deployment by proposing and testing an ICT-based participatory data management system to transform participants from data providers to data consumers. This tool begins with participatory design, which engages participants in deciding which types of data to collect. Then, it involves training them in data collection, analysis and management. This enables participants to gain basic data science skills to make informed decisions. Our study uses mixed methods to explore the feasibility and effects of this system with urban refugees living in Rwanda. The quantitative results indicate refugees' perceived effectiveness in using the system to build communities is directly influenced by system usability assessments, which in turn are influenced by education levels but not ICT self-efficacy. Qualitative results highlight the community-based interactions experienced by all participants and highlight important differences in pursuing projects with urban versus camp-based refugees.

References

  1. Rema A Afifi, Jihad Makhoul, Taghreed El Hajj, and Rima T Nakkash. 2011. Developing a Logic Model for Youth Mental Health: Participatory Research with a Refugee Community in Beirut. Health Policy and Planning 26, 6, 508--517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Khorshed Alam and Sophia Imran. 2015. The digital Divide and Social Inclusion among Refugee Migrants. Information Technology & People 28, 2, 344--365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Asam Almohamed and Dhaval Vyas. 2016. Designing for the Marginalized: A Step Towards Understanding the Lives of Refugees and Asylum Seekers. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16 Companion), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 165--168. http://doi.org/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Savita Bailur. 2007. The Complexities of Community Participation in ICT for Development Projects: The Case of "Our Voices." Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Burcu Balcik, Benita M. Beamon, Caroline C. Krejci, Kyle M. Muramatsu, and Magaly Ramirez. 2010. Coordination in Humanitarian Relief Chains: Practices, Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Production Economics 126, 1, 22--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Aaron Bangor, Philip T. Kortum, and James T. Miller. 2008. An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24, 6, 574--594.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Jennifer Baranoff, R Israel Gonzales, Jay Liu, Heidi Yang, and Jimin Zheng. 2015. Lantern: Empowering Refugees Through Community-Generated Guidance Using Near Field Communication. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 7--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kamaldeep Bhui, Tom Craig, Salaad Mohamud, et al. 2006. Mental Disorders among Somali Refugees: Developing Culturally Appropriate Measures and Assessing Socio-Cultural Risk Factors. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 41, 5, 400--408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. John Brooke. 1996. SUS-A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale. In Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor & Francis, 189--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Daniele Codato, Diego Malacarne, Guglielmo Pristeri, Salvatore Pappalardo, and Massimo De Marchi. 2018. Towards a more Liveable and Accessible Cycle Path Network in Padova: a Participatory Mapping Process. Real Corp, 471--477.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Deborah R Compeau and Christopher A Higgins. 1995. Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly 19, 2, 189--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Clare Daley. 2009. Exploring community connections: Community cohesion and refugee integration at a local level. Community Development Journal 44, 2, 158--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. James Darcy and Charles-Antoine Hofmann. 2003. According to need? Needs Assessment and Decision-Making in the Humanitarian Sector.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Tim Davies and Fernando Perini. 2016. Researching the emerging impacts of open data: revisiting the ODDC conceptual framework. The Journal of Community Informatics 12, 148--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gretchen J. Domek, Maureen Cunningham, Andrea Jimenez-Zembrano, et al. 2017. Designing and Implementing an Early Childhood Health and Development Program in Rural, Southwest Guatemala (Lessons Learned and Future Directions). Advances in Pediatrics 64, 1, 381--401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Matthew S. Eastin and Robert LaRose. 2000. Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 6, 1, JCMC611. http://doi.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Melissa Fleming. 2014. Let's Help Refugees Thrive, Not Just Survive. TED. Retrieved December 19, 2016 from http://www.ted.com/talks/melissa_fleming_let_s_help_refugees_thrive_not_just_survive?nolanguage=en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jane Foot and Trevor Hopkins. 2010. A Glass Half-Full: How an Asset Approach Can Improve Community Health and Well-Being.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kimberly M. Fornace, Henry Surendra, T0ommy Rowel Abidin, et al. 2018. Use of mobile technology-based participatory mapping approaches to geolocate health facility attendees for disease surveillance in low resrouce settings. International Journal of Health Geographics 17, 1, 17--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Aakar Gupta, William Thies, Edward Cutrell, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2012. mClerk: Enabling Mobile Crowdsourcing in Developing Regions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1843--1852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Carl Hartung, Yaw Anokwa, Waylon Brunette, Adam Lerer, Clint Tseng, and Gaetano Borriello. 2010. Open Data Kit: Tools to Build Information Services for Developing Regions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD '10.), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Karen Jacobsen and Loren B Landau. 2003. The Dual Imperative in Refugee Research: Some Methodological and Ethical Considerations in Social Science Research on Forced Migration. Disasters 27, 3, 185--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Crista E. Johnson, Sagal A. Ali, and Michele P-L Shipp. 2009. Building Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships with a Somali Refugee Community. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 37, 230--236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Gereon Koch Kapuire, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, and Edwin Blake. 2015. An insider perspective on community gains: A subjective account of a Namibian rural communities perception of a long-term participatory design project. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 74, 124--143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Sonia Livingstone and Ellen Helsper. 2010. Balancing Opportunities and Risks in Teenagers' Use of the Internet: the Role of Online Skills and Internet Self-Efficacy. New Media & Society 12, 2, 309--329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Kenneth I. Maton. 2008. Empowering Community Settings: Agents of Individual Development, Community Bettterment, and Positive Social Change. American Journal of Community Psychology 41, 4--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Wallerstein N. Minkler M. 2003. Introduction to community based participatory research. In Community-Based Participatory Research for Health, Minkler M and Wallerstein N (eds.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. C. A. Murphy, D. Coover, and S. V. Owen. 1989. Development and Validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement 49, 893--899.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Louis Ngamassi, Carleen Maitland, and Andrea H. Tapia. 2014. Humanitarian Interorganizational Information Exchange Network: How Do Clique Structures Impact Network Effectiveness? Voluntas 25, 6, 1483--1508.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Elisa Pascucci. 2017. The Humanitarian Infrastructure and the Question of Over-Research: Reflections on Fieldwork in the Refugee Crises in the Middle East and North Africa. Area 49, 2, 249--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Johanne Pelletier, Ned Horning, Nadine Laporte, Raymond Achu Samndong, and Scott Goetz. 2018. Anticipating social equity impacts in REDD+ policy design: An example from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Land Use Policy 75, June, 102--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Tatiana Iversson Piazza. 2017. Towards the co-production of fisheries knowledge for co-management using mobile technologies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Alfred P Rovai. 2002. Building Sense of Community at a Dstance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 3, 1, 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. and Dana Chisnell Rubin, Jeffrey. 2008. Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. RURA. 2016. Statistics and Tariff Information in Telecommunication, Media and Postal Service as of the Third Quarter 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Laura Simich, Morton Beiser, and Farah N. Mawani. 2003. Social Support and the Significance of Shared Experience in Refugee Migration and Resettlement. Western Journal of Nursing Research 25, 7, 872--891.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Alistair Sutcliffe. 2009. Designing for User Engagement: Aesthetic and Attractive User Interfaces. In Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, John M. Carroll and Edward M. Freymoyer (eds.). Morgan & Claypool, 55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Andrea H. Tapia, Louis-marie Ngamassi Tchouakeu, Edgar Maldonado, and Carleen F. Maitland. 2013. Crossing Borders, Organizations, Levels, and Technologies: Is Collaboration in Humanitarian Action. Information Technologies & International Development 9, 1, 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Kerry Taylor-Leech and Danielle Boon. 2016. Navigating the multilingual field. In Doing Research within Communities: Stories and lessons from language and education field research, Kerry Taylor-Leech and Donna Starks (eds.). Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. UNHCR. 2012. Livelihood Programming in UNHCR: Operational Guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.un.am/up/library/Livelihood_programming_in_UNHCR_eng.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. UNHCR. 2016. Mapping of Urban Refugees' Access to Essential Services in Rwanda.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. UNHCR. 2016. Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. UNHCR. 2018. UNHCR Global Report 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Olivia Vélez. 2011. Design and Usability Testing of an mHealth Application for Midwives in Rural Ghana.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Michalis Vitos, Julia Altenbuchner, Matthias Stevens, Gillian Conquest, Jerome Lewis, and Muki Haklay. 2017. Supporting Collaboration with Non-Literate Forest Communities in the Congo-Basin. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1576--1590. http://doi.org/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Lucy Williams. 2006. Social Networks of Refugees in the United Kingdom: Tradition, Tactics and New Community Spaces. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 32, 5, 865--879.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Peter Wright and John McCarthy. 2010. Experience-Centered Design: Designers, Users, and Communities in Dialogue. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Ying Xu and Carleen Maitland. 2017. Mobilizing Assets: Data-Driven Community Development with Refugees. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD '17), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Karen E. Fisher and Eiad Yafi. 2018. Syrian Youth in Za'atari Refugee Camp as ICT Wayfarers: An Exploratory Study Using LEGO and Storytelling. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS '18), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 12. http://doi.org/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Mun Y. Yi and Yujong Hwang. 2003. Predicting the Use of Web-based Information Systems: Self-Efficacy, Enjoyment, Learning Goal Orientation, and the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 59, 4, 431--449. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Participatory data collection and management in low-resource contexts: a field trial with urban refugees

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICTD '19: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development
      January 2019
      422 pages
      ISBN:9781450361224
      DOI:10.1145/3287098

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 January 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate22of116submissions,19%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader