skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173745acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Supporting Meaningful Personal Fitness: the Tracker Goal Evolution Model

Published:19 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

While the number of users sporting fitness trackers is constantly increasing, little is understood about how tracking goals can evolve over time. As recent studies have shown that the long-term health effects of trackers are limited, we need to readdress how trackers engage users. We conducted semi-structured interviews and an online survey to explore how users change their tracking goals. Based on our results, we created the Tracker Goal Evolution Model. The model describes how tracker goals can evolve from internal user needs through qualitative goals to quantitative goals that can be used with trackers. It also includes trust and reflection as key contextual factors contributing to meaningful transitions between goals. We postulate showing how tracker goals relate to other personal fitness goals as key for long-term engagement with trackers. Our model is useful for designers of future trackers as a tool to create evolving and meaningful tracking goals.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn2131-file5.mp4

mp4

11.5 MB

pn2131.mp4

mp4

198.3 MB

References

  1. Elena Agapie, Daniel Avrahami, and Jennifer Marlow. 2016. Staying the Course: System-Driven Lapse Management for Supporting Behavior Change. ACM Press, 1072--1083. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Eric P.S. Baumer. 2015. Reflective Informatics: Conceptual Dimensions for Designing Technologies of Reflection. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 585--594. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dena M. Bravata, Crystal Smith-Spangler, Vandana Sundaram, Allison L. Gienger, Nancy Lin, Robyn Lewis, Christopher D. Stave, Ingram Olkin, and John R. Sirard. 2007. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. Jama 298, 19 (2007), 2296--2304. http: //jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/209526Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Christiano Castelfranchi and Rino Falcone. 2010. Trust theory: A socio-cognitive and computational model. Vol. 18. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Matthew Chalmers and Areti Galani. 2004. Seamful Interweaving: Heterogeneity in the Theory and Design of Interactive Systems. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 243--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Catherine B. Chan, Daniel A.J. Ryan, and Catrine Tudor-Locke. 2004. Health benefits of a pedometer-based physical activity intervention in sedentary workers. Preventive Medicine 39, 6 (Dec. 2004), 1215--1222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. James Clawson, Jessica A. Pater, Andrew D. Miller, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, and Lena Mamykina. 2015. No longer wearing: investigating the abandonment of personal health-tracking technologies on craigslist. ACM Press, 647--658. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sunny Consolvo, Katherine Everitt, Ian Smith, and James A. Landay. 2006. Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. ACM, 457--466. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1124840 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan. 2008. Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of happiness studies 9, 1 (2008), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Antonella Delle Fave, Ingrid Brdar, Teresa Freire, Dianne Vella-Brodrick, and Marié P Wissing. 2011. The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research 100, 2 (2011), 185--207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Daniel A. Epstein, Monica Caraway, Chuck Johnston, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2016a. Beyond Abandonment to Next Steps: Understanding and Designing for Life after Personal Informatics Tool Use. ACM Press, 1109--1113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Daniel A. Epstein, Jennifer H. Kang, Laura R. Pina, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2016b. Reconsidering the Device in the Drawer: Lapses As a Design Opportunity in Personal Informatics. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 829--840. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Daniel A. Epstein, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. A lived informatics model of personal informatics. ACM Press, 731--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Blaine J. Fowers, Christine O. Mollica, and Erin N. Procacci. 2010. Constitutive and instrumental goal orientations and their relations with eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology 5, 2 (2010), 139--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Nanna Gorm and Irina Shklovski. 2016a. Sharing Steps in the Workplace: Changing Privacy Concerns Over Time. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4315--4319. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Nanna Gorm and Irina Shklovski. 2016b. Steps, Choices and Moral Accounting: Observations from a Step-Counting Campaign in the Workplace. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 148--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mariam Hassib, Daniel Buschek, Paweı W. Wo´ zniak, and Florian Alt. 2017. HeartChat: Heart Rate Augmented Mobile Chat to Support Empathy and Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2239--2251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Luke Wayne Henderson and Tess Knight. 2012. Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing 2, 3 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Veronika Huta. 2015. The complementary roles of eudaimonia and hedonia and how they can be pursued in practice. Positive Psychology in Practice: Promoting Human Flourishing in Work, Health, Education, and Everyday Life, (2015), 216--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Veronika Huta. 2016. An overview of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being concepts. Handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (2016), 14--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Veronika Huta and Alan S Waterman. 2014. Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies 15, 6 (2014), 1425--1456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. John M Jakicic, Kelliann K Davis, Renee J Rogers, Wendy C King, Marsha D Marcus, Diane Helsel, Amy D Rickman, Abdus S Wahed, and Steven H Belle. 2016. Effect of wearable technology combined with a lifestyle intervention on long-term weight loss: the IDEA randomized clinical trial. Jama 316, 11 (2016), 1161--1171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Kristina Knaving and Paweı Wo´ zniak. 2016. TickTockRun: Towards Enhancing Communication in Runner Families. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (CSCW '16 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 309--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kristina Knaving, Paweı Wo´ zniak, Morten Fjeld, and Staffan Björk. 2015. Flow is Not Enough: Understanding the Needs of Advanced Amateur Runners to Design Motivation Technology. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2013--2022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Moon-Hwan Lee, Seijin Cha, and Tek-Jin Nam. 2015. Patina Engraver: Visualizing Activity Logs As Patina in Fashionable Trackers. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1173--1182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A Stage-based Model of Personal Informatics Systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 557--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Elisa D. Mekler and Kasper Hornbæk. 2016. Momentary Pleasure or Lasting Meaning?: Distinguishing Eudaimonic and Hedonic User Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4509--4520. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jasmin Niess and Sarah Diefenbach. 2016. Communication Styles of Interactive Tools for Self-Improvement. Psychology of Well-Being 6, 1 (06 Jun 2016), 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers Chalmers. 2014. Personal Tracking As Lived Informatics. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1163--1172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2001. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology 52, 1 (2001), 141--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin EP Seligman and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2014. Positive psychology: An introduction. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Springer, 279--298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Lie Ming Tang and Judy Kay. 2017. Harnessing Long Term Physical Activity Data&Mdash;How Long-term Trackers Use Data and How an Adherence-based Interface Supports New Insights. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 2, Article 26 (June 2017), 28 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Elizabeth Telfer. 1980. Happiness: An Examination of a Hedonistic and a Eudaemonistic Concept of Happiness and of the Relations Between Them, with a Consideration of how Far and in what Sense Either Kind of Happiness May be Said to be the Goal of Human Life. Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Alan S Waterman. 1993. Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of personality and social psychology 64, 4 (1993), 678.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Paweı W. Wozniak, Anton Fedosov, Eleonora Mencarini, and Kristina Knaving. 2017. Soil, Rock, and Snow: On Designing for Information Sharing in Outdoor Sports. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 611--623. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Supporting Meaningful Personal Fitness: the Tracker Goal Evolution Model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader