skip to main content
research-article

New technologies, patient experience, theoretical approaches and heuristics in RHM: guest editorial

Published:04 August 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In the August 2015 Communication Design Quarterly (CDQ) special issue on Rhetoric of Health and Medicine (RHM), Lisa Meloncon and Erin Frost introduced readers to this "emerging field." Since a Poiroi commentary in 2013 written by Scott, Segal, and Keränen, numerous scholars that earlier identified our sub-discipline with the terms medical rhetoric, have embraced this what might be seen as a more inclusive term, although I would argue that for some of us, the term rhetoric already included at least every possible manifestation of health, medicine and language. However, RHM does indeed cast a wider net, as pointed out in the 2015 issue, including essays on architecture, social work, and psychology. While rhetoric per se is certainly found within all fields, if writing about such fields and especially from such fields is included in RHM, then such a transdisciplinary impulse takes us very much further indeed. While this particular issue can easily find itself under the RHM umbrella, these particular scholars writing here were invited because they had participated in 2016 as a very successful panel at SIGDOC annual conference. These five scholars have much to share and teach us, as well as move us forward in our thinking, research, writing and participation in health and medical settings.

References

  1. Burke, K. (1969). A Rhetoric of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Davis, D. (2010) Inessential Rhetorics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ferenbok, J., Mann, S., & Michael, K. (2016). The Changing ethics of mediated looking: Wearables, surveillances, and power. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 5(2), 94--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline & Punish. New York: Vintage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. New York: Vintage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Geertz, C. (1983.) Local Knowledge. New York: Basic.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall, E. T. and Hall, M. R. (1987). Hidden differences: Doing business with the Japanese. New York:Doubleday.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hawisher, G. E. & Selfe, C. L. (1999). Introduction. In Global literacies and the worldwide web. New York: Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Heifferon, B. A. (2011). Immigration reform: {Re}forming theories of cyber-design. Computer-mediated communication across cultures: Interactions in online environments. Kirk St.Amant and Filipp Sapienti. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. London: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hofstede, G. (1991). Culture and organization: The Software of the mind. (1991). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hofstede, G. (1994.). Uncommon sense about organizations: Cases, studies and field observations. London: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lovitt, C. and Goswami, D., Eds. (1999). Exploring the Rhetoric of International Professional Communication: An agenda for teachers and researchers. In C. Sides, Ed. Technical communication series, Amityville, NY: Baywood.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lupton, D. (2012). M-health and health promotion: The digital cyborg and surveillance society. Social Theory & Health, 10(3), 229--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lupton, D. (2015). Quantified sex: a critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps.Culture, health & sexuality, 17(4), 440--453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Marcuse, H. (1964) One-Dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of industrial society. Boston, Beacon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. McComiskey, B. (2015). Dialectical rhetoric. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Meloncon, L. & Frost, E., Eds. (2015). Introduction. Design Quarterly, 3 (4), 7--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Meloncon, L. (2016). Patient experience design: Technical communication's role in patient health information and education. Intercom. Retrieved, from https://www.stc.org/intercom/2016/02/patient-experience- design-technical-communications-role-in-patient-health- information-and-education/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. National Patient Safety Foundation's Lucian Leape Institute (2014). Safety is personal: Partnering with patients & families for the safest care. Retrieved from www.npsf.org/default.asp?page=safetyispersonal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Perkins, J. M. (1999). Communicating in a global, multicultural corporation: Other metaphors and strategies. In C. Lovitt, & D. Goswami, Eds. Exploring the rhetoric of international professional communication: An agenda for teachers and researchers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Amityville, NY: Baywood, 14--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Pinker, S. (1994). The Language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: William Morrow.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Scott, J. B., Segal, J. Z., & Keränen, L. (2013). The Rhetorics of health and medicine: Inventional possibilities for scholarship and engaged practice. Poiroi, 9(1), Article 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. St.Amant, K. (2017). Mapping the context of care: An approach to patient-centered design in international contexts. ConneXions: International Professional Communication Journal, 5(1): 109--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. St.Amant, K. (2015). Cultural considerations for communication design: Integrating ideas of culture,communication, and context into user experience design. Communication Design Quarterly, 4(1): 6--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. St.Amant, K. (2015). Aspects of access: Considerations for creating health and medical content for international audiences. Communication Design Quarterly, 3(3): 7--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Swan, M. (2012). Health 2050: The realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen. Journal of personalized medicine, 2(3), 93--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Trompenaars, A. & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Weiss, S. and Stripp, W. (1998). "Negotiating with foreign business persons: An introduction for Americans with propositions for six cultures." The Cultural context in business communication. S. Niemeier, C. P. Campbell, and R. Dirven, Eds. Oxford: John Benjamins Press, 51--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Yi-Jokipii, H. (2001). The Local and the global: An Exploration into the Finnish and English websites of a Finnish company. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 44(2), 104--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image Communication Design Quarterly
    Communication Design Quarterly  Volume 5, Issue 2
    July 2017
    67 pages
    EISSN:2166-1642
    DOI:10.1145/3131201
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2017 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 August 2017

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader