skip to main content
10.1145/2909609.2909665acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Competing institutional logics in ICT4D education projects: A South American study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We take an institutional logics perspective to explain why design-reality gaps persist in ICT4D projects. From case study interviews at development agencies at work on two national education projects, one in Argentina and one in Uruguay, we show how two main institutional logics strongly shaped thought and action among development staff. The presence of an education sector professionalism logic aimed at creating real changes in education was not surprising because both projects were directed towards the education domain. Yet, this logic in many ways was secondary to a technology sector professionalism logic that focused on superior performance in product development, solving problems with technology, and evaluating technology uptake. We show how these two logics competed over time and within projects. We conclude by noting that an institutional logics perspective helps explain the persistence of design-reality gaps by making clear, for example, why solutions such as participatory design may fall short because they fail to come to terms with competing logics.

References

  1. Ames, M. 2014. Translating magic: The charisma of One Laptop Per Child's XO Laptop in Paraguay. Beyond imported magic: Essays on science, technology, and society in Latin America. E. Medina et al., eds. MIT Press. 207--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Avgerou, C. and Walsham, G. eds. 2001. Information technology in context: Studies from the perspective of developing countries. Aldershot. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bada, A. 2002. Local adaptations to global trends: A study of an IT-based organizational change program in a Nigerian bank. The Information Society. 18, 2 (2002), 77--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Berente, N. and Yoo, Y. 2012. Institutional contradictions and loose coupling: Postimplementation of NASA's enterprise information system. Information Systems Research. 23, 2 (2012), 376--396. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Boxenbaum, E. and Jonsson, S. 2008. Isomorphism, diffusion, and decoupling. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. R. Greenwood et al., eds. Sage. 78--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Braa, J. et al. 2007. Scaling up local learning: Experiences from south-south-north networks of shared software development. Ninth International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries (Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cervantes, R. et al. 2011. Infrastructures for low-cost laptop use in Mexican schools. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, 2011), 945--954. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chambers, R. 1983. Rural development: Putting the last first. Longman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Cotten, S.R. et al. 2011. Using Affordable Technology To Decrease Digital Inequality. Information, Communication & Society. 14, 4 (2011), 424--444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Cristia, J. et al. 2012. Technology and child development: Evidence from the One Laptop Per Child program.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Diniz, E.H. et al. 2014. Achieving ICT4D Project Success by Altering Context, Not Technology. Information Technologies & International Development. 10, 4 (2014), 15--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodson, L. et al. 2013. Considering Failure: Eight Years of ITID Research 1. 9, 2 (2013), 19--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dybå, T. and Dingsøyr, T. 2008. Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology. 50, 9 (2008), 833--859. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Educ.ar 2007. Educ.ar S.E.: Informe de gestión 2003--2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Giangola, N. 2001. What works: Educ.ar's strategy for a nation connected and learning. World Resources Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hatakka, M. et al. 2012. Students' use of one to one laptops: A capability approach analysis. Information Technology & People. 26, 1 (2012), 94--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Hawari, A. and Heeks, R. 2010. Explaining ERP failure in a developing country: A Jordanian case study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 23, 2 (2010), 135--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Hayes, N. and Rajão, R. 2011. Competing institutional logics and sustainable development: the case of geographic information systems in Brazil's Amazon region. Information Technology for Development. 17, 1 (Jan. 2011), 4--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hayes, N. and Westrup, C. 2014. Consultants as intermediaries and mediators in the construction of information and communication technologies for development. Information Technologies & International Development. 10, 2 (2014), 19--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Heeks, R. 2006. Health information systems: Failure, success and improvisatoin. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 75, 2 (2006), 125--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Heeks, R. 2002. Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. The Information Society. 18, 2 (2002), 37--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Heeks, R. and Mathisen, H. 2012. Understanding success and failure of anti-corruption initiatives. Crime, Law and Social Change. 58, 5 (2012), 533--549. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Hoffman, A. 2011. Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization & Environment. 24, 1 (2011), 3--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Islam, M.S. and Grönlund, Å. 2011. Bangladesh calling: farmers' technology use practices as a driver for development. Information Technology for Development. 17, 2 (Apr. 2011), 95--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kitchener, M. 2002. Mobilizing the logic of managerialism in professional fields: The case of academic health centre mergers. Organization Studies. 23, 3 (2002), 391--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Krishna, S. and Walsham, G. 2005. Implementing public information systems in developing countries: Learning from a success story. Information Technology for Development. 11, 2 (Apr. 2005), 123--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. La Presidenta entregó la netbook 5 millones de Conectar Igualdad: 2015. http://www.anses.gob.ar/noticia/la-presidenta-entrego-la-netbook-millones-de-conectar-igualdad-286. Accessed: 2016-03-25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. López Gallego, L. and Da Silva Ramos, M. 2014. Pensando el Plan Ceibal desde la perspectiva de la Acción Pública y la Teoría del Actor-Red. Athenea Digital: revista de pensamiento e investigación social. 14, 1 (2014), 49--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lounsbury, M. 2007. A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal. 50, 2 (2007), 289--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Marquis, C. and Lounsbury, M. 2007. Vive la résistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of US community banking. Academy of Management Journal. 50, 4 (2007), 499--820. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Meso, P. et al. 2005. Towards a model of consumer use of mobile information and communication technology in LDCs: the case of sub-Saharan Africa. Information Systems Journal. 15, 2 (2005), 119--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Miles, M. and Huberman, A. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ministerio de Educación {Argentina} 2011. Informes ejecutivos: Encuentro de presentación de informes de investigación.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Ministerio de Educación {Argentina} 2011. Nuevas voces, nuevos escenarios: estudios evaluativos sobre Programa Conectar Igualdad.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Orton, J. and Weick, K. 1990. Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review. 15, 2 (1990), 203--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Parikh, T. et al. 2003. Design studies for a financial management system for micro-credit groups in rural india. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Universal Usability (New York, New York, USA, 2003), 15--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Pittaluga, L. and Rivoir, A. 2012. One Laptop per Child and Bridging the Digital Divide: The Case of Plan CEIBAL in Uruguay. Information Technologies & International Development. 8, 4 (2012), 145--159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Plan CEIBAL 2009. Primer informe nacional de monitoreo y evaluación de impacto social del Plan Ceibal, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Plan CEIBAL 2014. Programa Ceibal en Inglés: Evaluación de aprendizajes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Pouezevara, S. et al. 2014. Planning and Evaluating ICT in Education Programs Using the Four Dimensions of Sustainability: A Program Evaluation from Egypt. International Journal Of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology. 10, 2 (2014), 120--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Pozzebon, M. and van Heck, E. 2006. Local adaptations of generic application systems: The case of Veiling Holambra in Brazil. Journal of Information Technology. 21, 2 (2006), 73--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Primeras acciones en esta nueva etapa de educ.ar: 2003. http://coleccion.educ.ar/CDInstitucional/contenido/notas_institucionales/2003/10_09_10_2003.html. Accessed: 2016-03-25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Rangaswamy, N. 2006. Social entrepreneurship as Critical Agency: A study of rural Internet kiosks. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies and Development (2006), 143--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Reay, T. and Hinings, C. 2005. The recomposition of an organization field: Health care in Alberta. Organization Studies. 26, 3 (2005), 351--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Rosner, D. and Ames, G. 2014. Designing for repair? Infrastructures and materialities of breakdown. 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (New York, NY, 2014), 319--331. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Royce, W. 1987. Managing the development of large software systems: Concepts and techniques. Ninth International Conference on Software Engineering (Los Alamitos, CA, 1987), 328--338. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Sanner, T. and Saebo, J. 2014. Paying per diems for ICT4D project participation: A sustainability challenge. Information Technologies & International Development. 10, 2 (2014), 33--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Say Chan, A. 2014. Balancing design: OLPC engineers and ICT translations at the periphery. Beyond imported magic: Essays on science, technology, and society in Latin America. E. Medina et al., eds. MIT Press. 181--205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. 1993. Participatory design: Principles and practices. Lawrence Earlbaum Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Scott, W. 2007. Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Silva, L. and Hirschheim, R. 2007. Fighting against windmills: Strategic information systems and organizational deep structures. MIS Quarterly. 31, 2 (2007), 327--354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Sjostedt, M. 2013. Aid effectiveness and the Paris Declaration: A mismatch between ownership and results-based management? Public Administration and Development. 33, (2013), 143--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Spradley, J. 1979. The Ethnographic Interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Thornton, P. and Ocasio, W. 1999. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958--1990. American Journal of Sociology. 105, 3 (1999), 801--843. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Villanueva-Mansilla, E. and Olivera, P. 2012. Institutional Barriers to Development Innovation: Assessing the Implementation of XO-1 Computers in Two Peri-Urban Schools in Peru. Information Technologies & International Development. 8, 4 (2012), 177--189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Walsham, G. and Sahay, S. 1999. GIS for district-level administration in India: problems and opportunities. Mis Quarterly. 23, 1 (1999), 39--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Walton, R. 2013. Stakeholder flux: Participation in technology-based international development projects. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 27, 4 (2013), 409--435. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Warschauer, M. and Ames, M. 2010. Can one laptop per child save the world's poor? Journal of International Affairs. 64, 1 (2010), 33--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Weiss, R. 1994. Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Winocur, R. and Aguerre, C. 2011. A Paradigmatic Case: The "Plan CEIBAL." Infoamérica. 5, (2011), 59--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. World Bank 2012. ICT for Greater Development Impact: World Bank Group Strategy for Information and Communication Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Yin, R. 2012. Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICTD '16: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development
    June 2016
    427 pages
    ISBN:9781450343060
    DOI:10.1145/2909609

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 3 June 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate22of116submissions,19%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader