skip to main content
10.1145/2398776.2398793acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evolution of a location-based online social network: analysis and models

Published:14 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Connections established by users of online social networks are influenced by mechanisms such as preferential attachment and triadic closure. Yet, recent research has found that geographic factors also constrain users: spatial proximity fosters the creation of online social ties. While the effect of space might need to be incorporated to these social mechanisms, it is not clear to which extent this is true and in which way this is best achieved.

To address these questions, we present a measurement study of the temporal evolution of an online location-based social network. We have collected longitudinal traces over 4 months, including information about when social links are created and which places are visited by users, as revealed by their mobile check-ins. Thanks to this fine-grained temporal information, we test and compare whether different probabilistic models can explain the observed data adopting an approach based on likelihood estimation, quantitatively comparing their statistical power to reproduce real events. We demonstrate that geographic distance plays an important role in the creation of new social connections: node degree and spatial distance can be combined in a gravitational attachment process that reproduces real traces. Instead, we find that links arising because of triadic closure, where users form new ties with friends of existing friends, and because of common focus, where connections arise among users visiting the same place, appear to be mainly driven by social factors.

We exploit our findings to describe a new model of network growth that combines spatial and social factors. We extensively evaluate our model and its variations, demonstrating that it is able to reproduce the social and spatial properties observed in our traces. Our results offer useful insights for systems that take advantage of the spatial properties of online social services.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. L. Backstrom, E. Sun, and C. Marlow. Find me if you can: improving geographical prediction with social and spatial proximity. In Proceedings of WWW'10, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science, 286(5439), 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Barrat, M. Barthélemy, and A. Vespignani. The effects of spatial constraints on the evolution of weighted complex networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, (05), 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. Barthélemy. Crossover from scale-free to spatial networks. Europhysics Letters, 63, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Barthélemy. Spatial Networks. Physics Reports, 499, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. V. Carrothers. A Historical Review of the Gravity and Potential Concepts of Human Interaction. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 22, 1956.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D. J. Crandall, L. Backstrom, D. Cosley, S. Suri, D. Huttenlocher, and J. M. Kleinberg. Inferring social ties from geographic coincidences. PNAS, 107(52):22436--22441, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Cranshaw, E. Toch, J. Hong, A. Kittur, and N. Sadeh. Bridging the gap between physical location and online social networks. In Proceedings of UbiComp'10, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Expert, T. S. Evans, V. D. Blondel, and R. Lambiotte. Uncovering space-independent communities in spatial networks. PNAS, 108(19):7663--7668, May 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. L. Feld. The Focused Organization of Social Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5):1015--1035, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. D. Fetterly, M. Manasse, M. Najork, and J. Wiener. A large-scale study of the evolution of web pages. In Proceedings of WWW'03, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Kaiser and C. C. Hilgetag. Spatial growth of real-world networks. PRE, 69:036103, Mar 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. T. Karagiannis, C. Gkantsidis, D. Narayanan, and A. Rowstron. Hermes: clustering users in large-scale e-mail services. In Proceedings of SoCC'10, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Krackhardt and M. S. Handcock. Heider vs Simmel: emergent features in dynamic structures. In Proceedings of ICML'06, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. Kumar, J. Novak, and A. Tomkins. Structure and Evolution of Online Social Networks. In Proceedings of KDD'06, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. Lambiotte, V. Blondel, C. Dekerchove, E. Huens, C. Prieur, Z. Smoreda, and P. Vandooren. Geographical dispersal of mobile communication networks. Physica A, 387(21), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Leskovec, L. Backstrom, R. Kumar, and A. Tomkins. Microscopic evolution of social networks. In Proceedings of KDD'08, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Leskovec, J. Kleinberg, and C. Faloutsos. Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations. In Proceedings of KDD'05, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg. The link prediction problem for social networks. In Proceedings of CIKM'03, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. D. Liben-Nowell, J. Novak, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkins. Geographic routing in social networks. PNAS, 102(33):11623--11628, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. R. N. Lichtenwalter, J. T. Lussier, and N. V. Chawla. New perspectives and methods in link prediction. In Proceedings of KDD'10, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. A. Mislove, M. Marcon, K. P. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. Measurement and Analysis of Online Social Networks. In Proceedings of IMC '07, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J.-P. Onnela, S. Arbesman, M. C. González, A.-L. Barabási, and N. A. Christakis. Geographic constraints on social network groups. PLoS ONE, 6(4):e16939, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. J. M. Pujol, V. Erramilli, G. Siganos, X. Yang, N. Laoutaris, P. Chhabra, and P. Rodriguez. The little engine(s) that could: scaling online social networks. In Proceedings of SIGCOMM'10, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. D. M. Romero and J. Kleinberg. The Directed Closure Process in Hybrid Social-Information Networks, with an Analysis of Link Formation on Twitter. In Proceedings of ICWSM'11, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. S. Scellato, A. Noulas, R. Lambiotte, and C. Mascolo. Socio-spatial Properties of Online Location-based Social Networks. In Proceedings of ICWSM'11, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. S. Scellato, A. Noulas, and C. Mascolo. Exploiting place features in link prediction on location-based social networks. In Proceedings of KDD'11, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. G. Simmel. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. The Free Press, 1908.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. S. Traverso, K. Huguenin, V. Trestian, I. Erramilli, N. Laoutaris, and K. Papagiannaki. TailGate: Handling Long-Tail Content with a Little Help from Friends. In Proceedings of WWW'12, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. B. M. Waxman. Routing of multipoint connections. Selected Areas in Communications, 6(9):1617--1622, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. M. P. Wittie, V. Pejovic, L. Deek, K. C. Almeroth, and B. Y. Zhao. Exploiting locality of interest in online social networks. In Proceedings of CONEXT'10, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. C. Wiuf, M. Brameier, O. Hagberg, and M. P. H. Stumpf. A likelihood approach to analysis of network data. PNAS, 103(20):7566--7570, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Evolution of a location-based online social network: analysis and models

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IMC '12: Proceedings of the 2012 Internet Measurement Conference
      November 2012
      572 pages
      ISBN:9781450317054
      DOI:10.1145/2398776

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 November 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate277of1,083submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      IMC '24
      ACM Internet Measurement Conference
      November 4 - 6, 2024
      Madrid , AA , Spain

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader